-
European Archives of... Dec 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated coblation versus laser (carbon dioxide and diode) tonsillectomy, with regard to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated coblation versus laser (carbon dioxide and diode) tonsillectomy, with regard to various surgical and clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant from inception until March 2021. We evaluated risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. We summarized the outcomes as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted subgroup analysis based on the day of postoperative pain (day 1, day 7, and day 14) and type of postoperative hemorrhage (reactionary and secondary). In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis according to the type of laser.
RESULTS
Five RCTs were analyzed. Three and two RCTs were evaluated as having "some concerns" and "low risk of bias", respectively. Coblation tonsillectomy correlated with lower intraoperative blood loss (MD = -5.08 ml, 95% CI [- 7.33 to - 2.84], P < 0.0001) and lower operative time (MD = - 4.50 min, 95% CI [- 6.10 to - 2.90], P < 0.0001) compared with the laser tonsillectomy. However, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the postoperative pain score (SMD = - 0.27, 95% CI [- 0.72 to 0.17], P = 0.27) and rate of postoperative hemorrhage (RR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.27-3.40], P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis reported similar insignificant difference between both groups according to the day of postoperative pain and type of postoperative hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS
Coblation tonsillectomy correlated with a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss and operative time compared with the laser technique. Nevertheless, these effects do not seem clinically meaningful in surgical practice.
Topics: Humans; Tonsillectomy; Blood Loss, Surgical; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pain, Postoperative; Lasers
PubMed: 35810212
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07534-0 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Apr 2015The aims of this study are to review the advantages and drawbacks of the ambulatory management of patients scheduled for haemorrhoidal surgery and to highlight the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aims of this study are to review the advantages and drawbacks of the ambulatory management of patients scheduled for haemorrhoidal surgery and to highlight the reasons for unplanned hospital admission and suggest preventive strategies.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to January 2013 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Manuscripts were specifically analysed for failure and side effects of haemorrhoidal surgery in ambulatory settings.
RESULTS
Fifty relevant studies (6082 patients) were retrieved from the literature review. The rate of ambulatory management failure ranged between 0 and 61%. The main reasons for failure were urinary retention, postoperative haemorrhage and unsatisfactory pain control. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with the highest rates of urinary retention. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation has less frequent side effects susceptible to impair ambulatory management than haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy. However, the fact that haemorrhoidopexy is less painful than haemorrhoidectomy may allow ambulatory management.
CONCLUSION
Day-case haemorrhoidal surgery can be performed whatever the surgical procedure. Postoperative pain deserves special prevention measures after haemorrhoidectomy, especially by using perineal block or infiltrations. Urinary retention is a common issue that can be responsible for failure; it requires a preventive strategy including short duration spinal anaesthesia. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation is easy to perform in outpatients but deserves more complete evaluation in this setting.
Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Hemorrhoidectomy; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Ligation; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Surgical Stapling; Urinary Retention
PubMed: 25427629
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2073-x -
Asian Journal of Surgery Aug 2023This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether administration tranexamic acid (TXA) could reduce blood loss and vascular events in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether administration tranexamic acid (TXA) could reduce blood loss and vascular events in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case control trials (CCT) that compared outcomes of patients who did and did not receive TXA during UKA. We searched Cochrane Central Register of including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wan Fang data, CBM and CNKI for relevant studies. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and calculated pooled risk estimates. The primary outcome was operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative HCT, postoperative HB, transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, total blood loss, postoperative ROM,postoperative VAS score, postoperative complications. Data were using fixed-effects or random-effects models with standard mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Finally, 9 clinical studies with 744 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, TXA group could reduced transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, and total blood loss, and increased postoperative HB with statistically significance. The main findings of this meta-analysis are that the transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, total blood loss and postoperative HB in the tranexamic acid group were superior to those in the routine group. Additional high-quality RCTs should be conducted in the future.
Topics: Humans; Tranexamic Acid; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Blood Loss, Surgical; Postoperative Hemorrhage
PubMed: 36396576
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.10.078 -
European Archives of... Aug 2015The purpose of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to compare the efficacy (and other postoperative outcomes) of... (Review)
Review
The purpose of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to compare the efficacy (and other postoperative outcomes) of nonabsorbable versus absorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Studies were considered for inclusion if they were published in English language, were randomized clinical trials, and reported on outcomes following postoperative synechia. The primary outcome for meta-analysis was the incidence of postoperative synechia; pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Five studies, involving 241 nasal cavities in each treatment group, were included in the systematic review. The prevalence of synechia ranged from 4.6 to 8.0 % in the absorbable groups and from 8.0 to 35.7 % in the nonabsorbable groups. Postoperative bleeding was lower in the absorbable groups, whereas there was no clear finding regarding postoperative pain. Postoperative edema was generally similar between groups. There were no consistent findings regarding bleeding and pain on packing removal. Two studies using the same type of packing material were included in the meta-analysis. The combined OR (0.33, 95 % CI 0.04-2.78) for postoperative synechia did not significantly favor (P = 0.308) absorbable packing over nonabsorbable packing. Although there is some evidence in the available literature that absorbable nasal packing may provide superior outcomes to nonabsorbable packing after FESS, the lack of homogeneity between studies makes definitive conclusions impossible. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to compare the efficacy of different types of absorbable nasal packing for preventing synechia after FESS.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Hemostasis, Surgical; Humans; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Transanal Endoscopic Surgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24927828
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3107-2 -
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced... Feb 2019Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy is the standard procedure for body and tail pancreatic tumors. Technical difficulties arising from the strict... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy is the standard procedure for body and tail pancreatic tumors. Technical difficulties arising from the strict anatomical relationship between pancreas and splenic vessels generally impose a concomitant splenectomy. Previous retrospective studies have shown a reduced risk of postoperative complications and infections in spleen preserved patients, but this is still a debated issue. Aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a more robust evidence on the effect of spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were consulted. Pooled effect measures were calculated using an inverse-variance weighted or Mantel-Haenszel in random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I-index and Cochran Q-test.
RESULTS
Ten observational studies were eligible, and 632 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Overall, 296 (46.8%) patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (Group S), and 336 (53.2%) patients underwent spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Group SP). In-hospital mortality was 0%. In the group S, the estimated pooled odds ratio of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) and overall complications was 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.28; P = .048) and 2.30 (95% CI: 1.11-4.76; P = .024). The estimated pooled odds ratio of pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding, and reoperation was 1.64 (P = .094), 1.01 (P = .987), and 1.24 (P = .776), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy may reduce postoperative SSI and overall complications. These results should be interpreted with caution but seem meaningful to establish a better evidence-based treatment for distal pancreatic tumors. Further studies are warranted to analyze the role of spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on long-term outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Organ Sparing Treatments; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Reoperation; Spleen; Splenectomy; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 30592691
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0738 -
Medicine Dec 2019Hemocoagulase is isolated and purified from snake venoms. Hemocoagulase agents have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of surgical bleeding. A systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hemocoagulase is isolated and purified from snake venoms. Hemocoagulase agents have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of surgical bleeding. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effects of hemocoagulase on postoperative bleeding and transfusion in patients who underwent cardiac surgery.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched to identify all clinical trials comparing hemocoagulase with placebo/blank on postoperative bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Two authors independently extracted perioperative data and outcome data. For continuous variables, treatment effects were calculated as weighted mean difference and 95% confidential interval (CI). For dichotomous data, treatment effects were calculated as odds ratio and 95% CI. Each outcome was tested for heterogeneity, and randomized-effects or fixed-effects model was used in the presence or absence of significant heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were done by examining the influence of statistical model and individual trial on estimated treatment effects. Publication bias was explored through visual inspection of funnel plots of the outcomes. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 12 studies including 900 patients, and 510 patients were allocated into hemocoagulase group and 390 into control group. Meta-analysis suggested that, hemocoagulase-treated patients had less bleeding volume, reduced red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma transfusion, and higher hemoglobin level than those of controlled patients postoperatively. Meta-analysis also showed that, hemocoagulase did not influence intraoperative heparin or protamine dosages and postoperative platelet counts. Meta-analysis demonstrated that, hemocoagulase-treated patients had significantly shorter postoperative prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and thrombin time, higher fibrinogen level and similar D-dimer level when compared to control patients.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis has found some evidence showing that hemocoagulase reduces postoperative bleeding, and blood transfusion requirement in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, these findings should be interpreted rigorously. Further well-conducted trials are required to assess the blood-saving effects and mechanisms of Hemocoagulase.
Topics: Batroxobin; Blood Transfusion; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Hemostatics; Humans; Postoperative Hemorrhage
PubMed: 31876750
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018534 -
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Jan 2021Ibuprofen is a drug widely used in children who underwent elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy because compared to the other Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Ibuprofen is a drug widely used in children who underwent elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy because compared to the other Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) it is considered a safe drug with a low risk of postoperative bleeding.
AREAS COVERED
We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ibuprofen vs. placebo or not-NSAIDs drugs in children aged up to 17 years of age, who underwent elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane from 1990 through 30 April 2019. We searched www.clinicaltrials.gov for relevant ongoing studies. Our primary outcome was postoperative bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were postoperative bleeding not requiring further surgical intervention, the need for blood transfusion, nausea, vomiting, prolonged hospital stay, postoperative pain, and adverse events related to ibuprofen administration. The database search yielded 1227 patients from 7 studies.
EXPERT OPINION
Given the imprecision of our estimates, the quality of evidence very low/moderate and the few RCTs identified, the results of this analysis were consistent with either a benefit or a detrimental effect of the administration of ibuprofen and do not provide a definitive answer to the review question. Further studies are needed on this important topic.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Child; Humans; Ibuprofen; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 33306914
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1863787 -
Safety of outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European Journal of Medical Research Aug 2016Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most prevalent spine surgeries and neurosurgical procedures performed to treat a variety of disorders in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most prevalent spine surgeries and neurosurgical procedures performed to treat a variety of disorders in the cervical spine. Over the last several years, ACDF has been done in the outpatient setting for less invasive approaches and exposures, as well as modified anesthetic and pain management techniques. Despite the fact that it may be innocuous in other parts of the body, complications in the spine can literally be fatal. The objective of this article is to evaluate the safety of outpatient surgery compared with inpatient surgery in the cervical spine for adult patients.
METHODS
The multiple databases including Pubmed, Springer, EMBASE, EBSCO and China Journal Full-text Database were adopted to search for the relevant studies in English or Chinese. Full-text articles involving to the safety of outpatient cervical spine surgery were selected. Review Manager 5.0 was adopted to estimate the effects of the results among selected articles. Forest plots, sensitivity analysis and bias analysis for the articles included were also conducted. Chi-square tests were conducted with SPSS 20.0 software.
RESULTS
Finally, 12 articles were included. The results of meta-analysis suggested that in the articles included, no death occurred, and compared with inpatient surgery, outpatient surgery has a similar risk (RR = 0.99, 95 % CI [0.98, 1.00], P = 0.02; P for heterogeneity = 0.47, I (2) = 0 %). An I (2) value of 0 % indicates no heterogeneity observed. All complications were occurred in both outpatients and inpatients. Among the studies selected, after the outpatient spine surgery, the highest incidences of complication were dysphagia (18/29) and hematoma (4/29). Compared with the overall complication rate in inpatient group, no significant difference was observed (x (2) = 1.820, P = 0.177).
CONCLUSION
In this study, outpatient surgery has a similar risk with inpatient surgery, and no difference of morbidity between outpatient and inpatient was found. Because of short operative time and moderate postoperative pain, we believe that outpatient cervical spine surgery is a safe and convenient alternative procedure, which also decrease the cost of care. Besides, postoperative complications including dysphagia and hematoma should be noticed.
Topics: Adult; Cervical Vertebrae; Deglutition Disorders; Diskectomy; Humans; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 27582129
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-016-0229-6 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Jun 2016EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative procedure after failed ERCP. However, limited data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD are available.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative procedure after failed ERCP. However, limited data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD are available. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD and to evaluate transduodenal (TD) and transgastric (TG) approaches.
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies published in the English language for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Data from eligible studies were combined to calculate the cumulative technical success rate (TSR), functional success rate (FSR), and adverse-event rate of EUS-BD and the pooled odds ratio of TSR, FSR, and adverse-event rate of the TD approach when compared with the TG approach.
RESULTS
Forty-two studies with 1192 patients were included in this study, and the cumulative TSR, FSR, and adverse-event rate were 94.71%, 91.66%, and 23.32%, respectively. The common adverse events associated with EUS-BD were bleeding (4.03%), bile leakage (4.03%), pneumoperitoneum (3.02%), stent migration (2.68%), cholangitis (2.43%), abdominal pain (1.51%), and peritonitis (1.26%). Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis for comparative evaluation of TD and TG approaches for EUS-BD. Compared with the TG approach, the pooled odds ratio of the TSR, FSR, and adverse-event rate of the TD approach were 1.36 (95% CI, .66-2.81; P > .05), .84 (95% CI, .50-1.42; P > .05), and .61 (95% CI, .36-1.03; P > .05), respectively, which indicated no significant difference in the TSR, FSR, and adverse-event rate between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Although it is associated with significant morbidity, EUS-BD is an effective alternative procedure for relieving biliary obstruction. There was no significant difference between the TD and TG approaches for EUS-BD.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures; Cholangitis; Choledochostomy; Cholestasis; Drainage; Endosonography; Humans; Odds Ratio; Peritonitis; Pneumoperitoneum; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Prosthesis Failure; Surgery, Computer-Assisted; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26542374
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.033 -
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2019Pancreatic cancer is a disease of the elderly. Surgical resection is usually offered to patients in early stage disease; however, pancreatic resection in the elderly is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic cancer is a disease of the elderly. Surgical resection is usually offered to patients in early stage disease; however, pancreatic resection in the elderly is controversial.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, were searched for studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of elderly (above the age of 70) with non-elderly patients (below the age of 70) following pancreatic resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma over the period from the inception of electronic database to 2017. Twelve articles documenting 4860 patients were included. A meta-analysis of data on patient characteristics, operative techniques, and perioperative outcomes were analysed. Our primary endpoint was postoperative mortality, defined as 30-day mortality or in-hospitalisation mortality.
RESULTS
There were 919 patients in the elderly group and 3941 patients in the non-elderly group. Elderly patients had worse ASA scores (p < 0.001) and more cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.002). Tumour size, T-stage, N-stage and tumour grade were similar between the elderly and non-elderly group (p > 0.05). Fewer elderly patients received a concomitant venous resection with their pancreatectomy (RR0.80, p = 0.003, I2 = 0%), achieved a negative margin status (RR0.76, p = 0.02, I2 = 28%) and underwent adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (RR0.69, p < 0.001, I2 = 42%). Overall complication (RR1.15, p < 0.001, I2 = 47%), in particular, respiratory complications (RR2.33, p = 0.004, I2 = 39%), was higher in the elderly group. There was no difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula formation, postoperative haemorrhage, intraabdominal abscess and length of hospital stay between both groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative mortality was similar between both groups (p = 0.17). Subgroup analysis according to the time of enrolment (<2000, ≥2000) showed a significant subgroup effect (Chi2 = 3.44, p = 0.06, I2 = 70.9%) and revealed that postoperative mortality in the elderly group improved over time (Before 2000: n = 1654, subtotal RR2.27, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%; From 2000 onwards: n = 3206, subtotal RR1.00, p = 0.99, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Fewer elderly patients received chemotherapy and portal vein resection to achieve a clear margin. Pancreatic resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can be performed safely on elderly patients with acceptable risks in experienced centres by specialist hepatobiliary surgeons. Age alone should not be the only determinant for the selection of patients for surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Comorbidity; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage
PubMed: 31580919
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.030