-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2011Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem. In the National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines it is stressed that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide public health problem. In the National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines it is stressed that lifestyle issues such as physical activity should be seen as cornerstones of the therapy. The physical fitness in adults with CKD is so reduced that it impinges on ability and capacity to perform activities in everyday life and occupational tasks. An increasing number of studies have been published regarding health effects of various regular exercise programmes in adults with CKD and in renal transplant patients.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to: 1) assess the effects of regular exercise in adults with CKD and kidney transplant patients; and 2) determine how the exercise programme should be designed (e.g. type, duration, intensity, frequency of exercise) to be able to affect physical fitness and functioning, level of physical activity, cardiovascular dimensions, nutrition, lipids, glucose metabolism, systemic inflammation, muscle morphology and morphometrics, dropout rates, compliance, adverse events and mortality.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Biosis, Pedro, Amed, AgeLine, PsycINFO and KoreaMed. We also handsearched reference lists of review articles and included studies, conference proceeding's abstracts. There were no language restrictions.Date of last search: May 2010.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included any randomised controlled trial (RCT) enrolling adults with CKD or kidney transplant recipients undergoing any type of physical exercise intervention undertaken for eight weeks or more. Studies using less than eight weeks exercise, those only recommending an increase in physical activity, and studies in which co-interventions are not applied or given to both groups were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data extraction and assessment of study and data quality were performed independently by the two authors. Continuous outcome data are presented as standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
Forty-five studies, randomising 1863 participants were included in this review. Thirty two studies presented data that could be meta-analysed. Types of exercise training included cardiovascular training, mixed cardiovascular and resistance training, resistance-only training and yoga. Some studies used supervised exercise interventions and others used unsupervised interventions. Exercise intensity was classed as 'high' or 'low', duration of individual exercise sessions ranged from 20 minutes/session to 110 minutes/session, and study duration was from two to 18 months. Seventeen per cent of studies were classed as having an overall low risk of bias, 33% as moderate, and 49% as having a high risk of bias.The results shows that regular exercise significantly improved: 1) physical fitness (aerobic capacity, 24 studies, 847 participants: SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.42; walking capacity, 7 studies, 191 participants: SMD -0.36, 95% CI-0.65 to -0.06); 2) cardiovascular dimensions (resting diastolic blood pressure, 11 studies, 419 participants: MD 2.32 mm Hg, 95% CI 0.59 to 4.05; resting systolic blood pressure, 9 studies, 347 participants: MD 6.08 mm Hg, 95% CI 2.15 to 10.12; heart rate, 11 studies, 229 participants: MD 6 bpm, 95% CI 10 to 2); 3) some nutritional parameters (albumin, 3 studies, 111 participants: MD -2.28 g/L, 95% CI -4.25 to -0.32; pre-albumin, 3 studies, 111 participants: MD - 44.02 mg/L, 95% CI -71.52 to -16.53; energy intake, 4 studies, 97 participants: SMD -0.47, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.05); and 4) health-related quality of life. Results also showed how exercise should be designed in order to optimise the effect. Other outcomes had insufficient evidence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence for significant beneficial effects of regular exercise on physical fitness, walking capacity, cardiovascular dimensions (e.g. blood pressure and heart rate), health-related quality of life and some nutritional parameters in adults with CKD. Other outcomes had insufficient evidence due to the lack of data from RCTs. The design of the exercise intervention causes difference in effect size and should be considered when prescribing exercise with the aim of affecting a certain outcome. Future RCTs should focus more on the effects of resistance training interventions or mixed cardiovascular- and resistance training as these exercise types have not been studied as much as cardiovascular exercise.
Topics: Adult; Chronic Disease; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Transplantation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 21975737
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003236.pub2 -
Revue D'epidemiologie Et de Sante... Dec 2008To evaluate the impact of spiruline on nutritional rehabilitation. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the impact of spiruline on nutritional rehabilitation.
DATA SOURCES
Systematic search in medical and scientific databases (Medline, Cochrane, Embase) and other specific databases (PhD theses, reports...).
METHODS
We selected studies in which spiruline was used as supplementation in malnourished patients, irrespective of the form and dose of spiruline and in controlled trials or not. Two persons made the selection separately. Nutritional status was estimated by anthropometric and biological measures.
RESULTS
Thirty-one references were identified and seven studies were retained for this review; three randomized controlled and four non-controlled trials. Spiruline had a positive impact on weight in all studies. In non-controlled trials, the other parameters: arm circumference, height, albumin, prealbumin, protein and hemoglobin improved after spiruline supplementation. For these studies, methodology was the main drawback. None of the studies retained for analysis were double-blinded clinical trials and all involved small samples. Four of them did not have a control group for comparison.
CONCLUSION
The impact of spiruline was positive for most of the considered variables. However, the studies taken into account in this review are of poor-methodological quality. A randomized, a large-sized double-blind controlled clinical trial with a longer follow-up should be conducted to improve current knowledge on the potential impact of spiruline on nutritional rehabilitation.
Topics: Adolescent; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Malnutrition; Nutritional Status; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spirulina; Time Factors
PubMed: 19010626
DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.08.004 -
Bioscience Reports Jun 2020The improvement of malnutrition with levocarnitine in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The improvement of malnutrition with levocarnitine in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of levocarnitine in improving malnutrition in MHD patients. We performed a literature search for relevant articles related to the treatment of malnutrition by L-carnitine in MHD patients in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. We set the publication dates from 1950 to July 2019. The levels of albumin, prealbumin, total protein, and transferrin before and after treatment were used for assessing malnutrition. Twenty-seven studies were included in the present analysis. The results of the random effects model indicated that L-carnitine treatment improved the albumin level in patients on MHD patients. The pooled standardized mean difference of albumin level was 2.51 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13-2.90, P<0.001). The pooled total protein level was 3.83 (95% CI: 2.41-5.24, P = 0.000) and the pooled transferrin level was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.18-0.52, P = 0.000). Significant differences were observed with the total protein and transferrin levels. The results indicated that levocarnitine significantly improved the prealbumin level in patients on MHD. The pooled prealbumin level was 70.86 (95% CI: 42.99-98.73, P = 0.000). No publication bias was detected (P>0.05). The present meta-analysis indicated that L-carnitine can have a favorable effect on malnutrition biomarkers in patients on MHD, including the increase in albumin, total protein, transferrin, and prealbumin levels. The L-carnitine could be an option for treatment of MHD patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Carnitine; Dietary Supplements; Female; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Malnutrition; Middle Aged; Nutritional Status; Prealbumin; Renal Dialysis; Serum Albumin, Human; Transferrin; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32490516
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20201639 -
Medicine Jan 2020Whether combined parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) is superior to EN alone remains controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Whether combined parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) is superior to EN alone remains controversial.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined PN and EN versus EN alone for critically ill patients based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES
Studies designed as RCTs evaluating the treatment effectiveness of combined PN and EN versus EN alone for critically ill patients were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2019.
METHODS
The pooled relative risks and weighted mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model. Twelve RCTs recruiting a total of 5609 adults and 1440 children were selected for the final meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The summary relative risks indicated that combined PN and EN was not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality, respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, and nutrition-related complications. Moreover, combined PN and EN was associated with longer hospital stay and higher albumin and prealbumin levels compared with EN alone. No significant differences were, however, found between combined PN and EN and EN alone in terms of ventilatory support, intensive care unit stay, and transferrin and C-reactive protein levels.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that combined PN and EN significantly increased hospital stay duration and albumin and prealbumin levels compared with EN alone for critically ill patients. Large-scale RCTs should be conducted to compare the treatment effectiveness of combined PN and EN versus EN alone for critically ill patients due to a specific cause.
Topics: Critical Illness; Enteral Nutrition; Humans; Parenteral Nutrition; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32011471
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018778 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Mar 2021
Topics: Albumins; Alpha-Globulins; Ascites; Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts; Female; Heart Atria; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Meningeal Neoplasms; Meningioma; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Paracentesis; Postoperative Complications; Prealbumin; Reoperation; Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
PubMed: 33540175
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106519 -
Frontiers in Nutrition 2022This meta-analysis assessed the clinical significance of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) after...
UNLABELLED
This meta-analysis assessed the clinical significance of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) after radical resection. We comprehensively searched electronic databases, such as EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Database (CBM), Wanfang Electronic Database, and VIP Medical Information System (VIP) from inception to 10 April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of omega-3 PUFAs and conventional nutrition or blank treatments were selected. The following were evaluated in the pooled analysis: immune function-related indices (IgA, IgG, IgM, CD3, CD4, CD8, and ratio of CD4/CD8), nutritional status-related indices [total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), and prealbumin (PA)], and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Next, we conducted heterogeneity detection, sensitivity analysis, contour-enhanced funnel plot to detect possible publication bias, and meta-regression analysis. In all, 20 studies, including 1,613 patients (809 in the omega-3 PUFAs group and 804 in the control group), were selected in the final analysis. The results of the pooled analysis showed that omega-3 PUFAs significantly increased the humoral immune function indices, including IgA [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.54, 95% CI 0.10-0.99], IgM (SMD = 0.52, 95% CI 0.05-0.99), IgG (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.84); T cell immune function indices, including CD3 (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.92), CD4 (SMD = 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-0.98), and ratio of CD4/CD8 (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.39-0.92). However, CD8 was markedly reduced after intervention of omega-3 PUFAs (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI -0.66-0.09). In addition, pooled analysis indicated that omega-3 PUFAs markedly improved the nutritional status indicators, including TP (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI 0.17-0.88), ALB (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI 0.15-0.70), and PA (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI 0.01-0.90). The meta-regression analysis revealed that the covariates of the small sample affected the robustness and credibility of the CD4 results. Conclusively, this study suggested that omega-3 PUFAs have the potential to be used as a valid immunonutritional therapy/support for treating patients with CRC postoperatively. This meta-analysis protocol was registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42021288487).
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021288487], identifier [CRD42021288487].
PubMed: 36479293
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.945590 -
Spine Deformity Sep 2019Structured Literature Review.
STUDY DESIGN
Structured Literature Review.
OBJECTIVES
We sought to evaluate the peer-reviewed literature for potentially modifiable patient and surgical factors that could be incorporated into a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Lean Methodology uses Standard Work to improve efficiency and decrease waste and error. ASD is known to have a high surgical complication rate. Several patient and surgical potentially modifiable factors have been suggested to affect complications, including preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index (BMI), age-appropriate realignment, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status. We sought to evaluate the literature for evidence supporting these factors to include in a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications.
METHODS
Each of these six factors was developed into an appropriate clinical question that included the patient population, surgical intervention, a comparison group, and outcomes measure (PICO question). A comprehensive literature search was then performed. The authors reviewed abstracts and analyzed data from included studies. From 456 initial citations with abstract, 173 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for clinical questions regarding the influence of these factors was provided by 93 included studies.
RESULTS
We found fair evidence supporting a low preoperative hemoglobin level associated with increased transfusion rates and decreased BMD and increased BMI associated with increased complication rates. Fair evidence supported low albumin/prealbumin associated with increased complications. There was fair evidence associating smoking exposure to increased reoperations, but conflicting evidence associating it with increased complications. There was no evidence in the literature evaluating age-appropriate realignment and complications.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status all are potentially modifiable risk factors that are associated with increased complications in the adult spine surgery population. Developing a Standard Work Protocol for patient evaluation and optimization should include these factors.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level II.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Orthopedic Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Spinal Curvatures
PubMed: 31495466
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2019.04.003 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2020Malnutrition is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. Oral protein-based nutritional supplements are often provided to patients whose oral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Malnutrition is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis. Oral protein-based nutritional supplements are often provided to patients whose oral intake is otherwise insufficient to meet their energy and protein needs. Evidence for the effectiveness of oral protein-based nutritional supplements in this population is limited.
OBJECTIVES
The aims of this review were to determine the benefits and harms of using oral protein-based nutritional supplements to improve the nutritional state of patients with CKD requiring dialysis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 December 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with CKD requiring dialysis that compared oral protein-based nutritional supplements to no oral protein-based nutritional supplements or placebo.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data from individual studies. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-two studies (1278 participants) were included in this review. All participants were adults on maintenance dialysis of whom 79% were on haemodialysis (HD) and 21% peritoneal dialysis. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. The majority of studies were at unclear risk of selection, performance, and reporting bias. The detection bias was high for self-reported outcomes. Oral protein-based nutritional supplements probably lead to a higher mean change in serum albumin compared to the control group (16 studies, 790 participants: MD 0.19 g/dL, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33; moderate certainty evidence), although there was considerable heterogeneity in the combined analysis (I = 84%). The increase was more evident in HD participants (10 studies, 526 participants: MD 0.28 g/dL, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.46; P = 0.001 for overall effect) and malnourished participants (8 studies, 405 participants: MD 0.31 g/dL, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.52, P = 0.003 for overall effect). Oral protein-based nutritional supplements also probably leads to a higher mean serum albumin at the end of the intervention (14 studies, 715 participants: MD 0.14 g/dL, 95% CI 0 to 0.27; moderate certainty evidence), however heterogeneity was again high (I = 80%). Again the increase was more evident in HD participants (9 studies, 498 participants: MD 0.21 g/dL, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.38; P = 0.02 for overall effect) and malnourished participants (7 studies, 377 participants: MD 0.25 g/dL, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.47; P = 0.03 for overall effect). Compared to placebo or no supplement, low certainty evidence showed oral protein-based nutritional supplements may result in a higher serum prealbumin (4 studies, 225 participants: MD 2.81 mg/dL, 95% CI 2.19 to 3.43), and mid-arm muscle circumference (4 studies, 216 participants: MD 1.33 cm, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.43) at the end of the intervention. Compared to placebo or no supplement, oral protein-based nutritional supplements may make little or no difference to weight (8 studies, 365 participants: MD 2.83 kg, 95% CI -0.43 to 6.09; low certainty evidence), body mass index (9 studies, 368 participants: MD -0.04 kg/m, 95% CI -0.74 to 0.66; moderate certainty evidence) and lean mass (5 studies, 189 participants: MD 1.27 kg, 95% CI -1.61 to 4.51; low certainty evidence). Due to very low quality of evidence, it is uncertain whether oral protein-based nutritional supplements affect triceps skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference, C-reactive protein, Interleukin 6, serum potassium, or serum phosphate. There may be little or no difference in the risk of developing gastrointestinal intolerance between participants who received oral protein-based nutritional supplements compared with placebo or no supplement (6 studies, 426 participants: RR 2.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 13.65, low certainty evidence). It was not possible to draw conclusions about cost or quality of life, and deaths were not reported as a study outcome in any of the included studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Overall, it is likely that oral protein-based nutritional supplements increase both mean change in serum albumin and serum albumin at end of intervention and may improve serum prealbumin and mid-arm muscle circumference. The improvement in serum albumin was more evident in haemodialysis and malnourished participants. However, it remains uncertain whether these results translate to improvement in nutritional status and clinically relevant outcomes such as death. Large well-designed RCTs in this population are required.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Arm; Bias; Biomarkers; Dietary Proteins; Humans; Malnutrition; Peritoneal Dialysis; Placebos; Prealbumin; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Serum Albumin; Skinfold Thickness
PubMed: 32390133
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012616.pub2 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jun 2018Chronic inflammation is related with cancer and leads to worsening prognosis in cancer patients. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) supplementation has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Chronic inflammation is related with cancer and leads to worsening prognosis in cancer patients. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) supplementation has been proposed as adjuvant treatment in cancer due anti-inflammatory properties. In the present meta-analysis, we pooled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of n-3 PUFAs (from fish oil isolated or added in an immunonutrition formula) on inflammatory markers in gastric cancer.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed in Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, Science Direct and Web of Science, besides GOOGLE Scholar and a hand searching of reference lists, through July 2016. We pooled the effect size from individual studies using a random-effect model and carried out heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
Nine trials (698 patients) fulfilled the entry criteria and were included in the synthesis of the systematic review. Eight were carried out in surgical patients and one in patients that received chemotherapy. Four used only fish oil as intervention and five used an immunonutrition formula. Global meta-analysis demonstrated higher albumin (7 studies, SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.07, 0.48) and prealbumin (4 studies, SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.12, 1.00) concentrations, and lower IL-6 (2 studies, SMD -0.71; 95% CI -1.15, -0.27) and TNF-α (2 studies, SMD -0.92; 95% CI -1.58, -0.26) concentrations in patients of the intervention group as compared to control group. However, total protein, transferrin and CRP concentrations were not improved by n-3 PUFAs supplementation.
CONCLUSION
This study provides evidence that n-3 PUFAs supplementation from fish oil or added an immunonutrition formula has favorable effects on inflammatory markers in gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Topics: Acute-Phase Proteins; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cytokines; Dietary Supplements; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Fish Oils; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; MEDLINE; Male; Prealbumin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serum Albumin; Stomach Neoplasms; Transferrin; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 28666598
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.05.008 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper...
INTRODUCTION
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
METHODS
A systematic literature search up to December 2021 was done and 23 studies included 3,010 subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection at the start of the study; 1,556 of them were given home enteral nutritional support and 1,454 were normal oral diet. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the influence of home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection by the dichotomous or continuous methods with a random or fixed-influence model.
RESULTS
Home enteral nutritional support had significantly higher quality of life (MD, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.50-2.67, < 0.001), better body weight change (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31-2.43, < 0.001), higher albumin (MD, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.72-1.82, < 0.001), and higher pre-albumin (MD, 30.79; 95% CI, 7.29-54.29, = 0.01) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. However, home enteral nutritional support had no significant impact on the hemoglobin (MD, 4.64; 95% CI, -4.17 to 13.46, = 0.30), and complications (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.76-1.40, = 0.83) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
CONCLUSIONS
Home enteral nutritional support had a significantly higher quality of life, better body weight change, higher albumin, and higher pre-albumin, and had no significant impact on the hemoglobin and complications compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. Further studies are required.
PubMed: 35252342
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.844475