-
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Nov 2023To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gushukang (GSK) capsules in the treatment of primary osteoporosis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Gushukang (GSK) capsules in the treatment of primary osteoporosis.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials related to the treatment of primary osteoporosis were collected through online retrieval of the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (Sino-Med), VIP, US National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Web of Science and Cochrane library. The literature was searched from January 1, 2000, to March 17, 2022. The risk bias and quality of the trials included in the meta-analysis were evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration's risk assessment tool. The effect size was expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 24 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were incorporated into this systematic review. The 2363 patients were all primary osteoporosis patients, of whom 1197 were in the observation group and 1166 were in the control group. GSK capsule group was superior to conventional medication group in improving beta type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide (β-CTX) (MD - 0.28, 95% CI [- 0.31, - 0.25]), while in improving prepeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), conventional medications group was superior to GSK capsule group (MD - 1.37, 95% CI [- 1.92, - 0.82]), and there were no significant differences between the two groups in overall efficacy (OE) (OR 1.62, 95% CI [0.89, 2.98]), increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (lumbar spine: MD - 0.02, 95% CI [- 0.08, 0.04]; femoral neck: MD - 0.01, 95% CI [- 0.07, 0.05]; hip: MD 0.01, 95% CI [- 0.02, 0.02]), enhancement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (MD - 1.37, 95% CI [- 13.29, 10.55]), serum calcium (S-Ca) (MD 0.02, 95% CI [- 0.13, 0.17]), bone glutamyl protein (BGP) (MD 3.75, 95% CI [- 12.26, 19.76]), safety (OR 0.37, 95% CI [0.07, 2.02]) and pain relief (MD 0.32, 95% CI [- 0.59, 1.22]). GSK capsule combined with conventional medications group was superior to conventional medications group in improvement of OE (OR 3.19, 95% CI [2.20, 4.63]), BMD (lumbar spine (MD 0.06, 95% CI [0.02, 0.10]), femoral neck (MD 0.08, 95% CI [0.03, 0.13]), hip (MD 0.14, 95% CI [0.08, 0.21]) and other parts (MD 0.04, 95% CI [0.03, 0.05]), ALP (MD - 5.56, 95% CI [- 10.08, - 1.04]), β-CTX (MD - 0.15, 95% CI [- 0.18, - 0.12]) and pain relief (MD - 1.25, 95% CI [- 1.83, - 0.68]), but there was no difference in S-Ca (MD 0.02, 95% CI [- 0.13, 0.17]), BGP (MD 1.30, 95% CI [- 0.29, 2.89]), PINP (MD 1.30, 95% CI [- 0.29, 2.89]), serum phosphorus (S-P) (MD 0.01, 95% CI [- 0.09, 0.12]) and safety (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.38, 1.35]).
CONCLUSION
GSK capsules can effectively treat primary osteoporosis, and when combined with conventional medications, the drug significantly increased bone mineral density, relieved pain and improved bone metabolism-related indicators in primary osteoporosis patients with better efficacy. However, due to the inclusion of Chinese literature and possible publication bias, the reliability of conclusions still requires more high-quality RCTs to enhance.
Topics: United States; Humans; Osteoporosis; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Pain
PubMed: 37940992
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04264-9 -
Medicine Nov 2022Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) liver fibrosis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) liver fibrosis.
METHODS
Databases, including PubMed, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), China Biomedical Database (CBM), Wan Fang, VIP database, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. The time was searched up to May 2022. The participant intervention comparator outcomes of this study were as follows: P, patients with CHB liver fibrosis; I, Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets; C, pharmacological placebo; O, the efficacy rate, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin (ALB), procollagen III protein (PIIIP), hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), collagen C type IV (IV-C), portal vein diameter, spleen thickness and HBV-DNA negative conversion rate. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, Begg's test and Egger's test were used to evaluate the methodological quality of eligible studies. A randomized controlled trial of Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets was used to treat CHB liver fibrosis. Three reviewers independently selected trials, extracted data, cross-checked, and performed methodological quality assessments. Data analysis was completed by Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies with 2717 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets was effective by increasing the efficacy. Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets was more efficient in improving ALT, AST, TBIL, ALB, PIIIP, HA, LN, IV-C, portal vein diameter, spleen thickness, and HBV-DNA negative conversion rate with no serious adverse reactions.
CONCLUSION
It was shown that Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets can effectively improve liver function and relieve liver fibrosis, but future research should focus on rigorously designed, multicenter, and large randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Humans; Hepatitis B, Chronic; DNA, Viral; Liver Cirrhosis; Alanine Transaminase; Tablets; Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36401442
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031664 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Apr 2023To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Fuzheng Huayu preparation (/, FZHY) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on hepatitis B. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of Fuzheng Huayu preparation (/, FZHY) plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on hepatitis B.
METHODS
Numerous databases - PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, WanFang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biological Medicine Database - were searched to identify the randomized controlled trials published from the inception of the database to November 2021. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment. RevMan 5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight studies involving 990 patients met the inclusion criteria in the current Meta-analysis. Levels of alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, hyaluronic acid, type III procollagen, laminin, and type IV collagen after combination therapy were significantly lower than those after TDF therapy alone. However, albumin levels did not differ significantly between the two regimens. Subgroup analysis based on disease progression suggested that the combination therapy improved albumin levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B but not in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. Moreover, subgroup analysis based on treatment duration suggested that the albumin levels were increased and the type III procollagen levels were decreased with the > 24-week combination therapy but not with the ≤ 24-week combination therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
A combination regimen of TDF and FZHY is more effective in treating hepatitis B than TDF alone. The combination therapy can effectively alleviate hepatic fibrosis and improve liver function. However, more standardized, high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate the study results.
Topics: Humans; Tenofovir; Collagen Type III; Hepatitis B; Liver Cirrhosis; Albumins; Antiviral Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36994510
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20221108.005 -
Calcified Tissue International Feb 2023There exists a marked circadian variation for several bone markers (BM), which is influenced by endogenous as well as exogenous factors including hormones, physical... (Review)
Review
There exists a marked circadian variation for several bone markers (BM), which is influenced by endogenous as well as exogenous factors including hormones, physical activity, and fasting. Consequently, was the aim of this review to provide an overview of the knowledge of the circadian variation of BM and which factors influence this rhythmicity. A systematic search of PubMed was performed for studies evaluating the circadian variation of BM and which factors influence this rhythmicity. The studies were screened for eligibility by a set of predetermined criteria including a list of relevant BM and a minimum study duration of 24 h with at least 3 blood samples of which two should be at least 6 h apart. In total were 29 papers included. There exists a marked circadian variation for most BM including Carboxy-terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) and osteocalcin (OC) with nighttime or early morning peak. Pro-collagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (PINP) and PTH also showed circadian rhythm but with less amplitude. The inter-osteoblast-osteoclast regulatory markers such as OPG, RANKL, FGF23, and sclerostin showed no circadian rhythm. The markers were differently affected by exogenous factors like fasting, which greatly reduced the circadian variation of CTX but did not affect PINP or OC. The marked circadian variation and the factors which influence the rhythmicity, e.g., fasting are of great consequence when measuring BM. To reduce variation and heighten validity should circadian variation and fasting be kept in mind when measuring BM.
Topics: Circadian Rhythm; Bone and Bones; Collagen Type I; Biomarkers; Osteocalcin
PubMed: 35305134
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-00965-1 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Apr 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to reveal the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with alendronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to reveal the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with alendronate in patients with primary osteoporosis. The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from the establishment of each database to April 2022 for comparative studies on the topic, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, and 2 authors individually extracted information and data concerning study design, baseline characteristics, bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and adverse events (AEs). We identified 8 eligible trials, including 1863 participants. Pooled estimates demonstrated that, compared with alendronate, zoledronic acid showed no significant difference in increasing the BMD of the lumbar spine after 1 year (SMD = -0.03, 95%CI -0.15 to 0.09, I = 0.41%) or after 2 years (SMD = 0.16, 95%CI -0.12 to 0.43, I = 63%), and the BMD of the total hip after 1 year (SMD = -0.08, 95%CI -0.31 to 0.14, I = 64%) or after 2 years (SMD = 0.05, 95%CI -0.21 to 0.32, I = 61%). No significant difference in improving bone turnover markers, including serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type-1 collagen, urine N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type-1 collagen, and serum procollagen type-1 N-terminal propeptide, were found, whereas significantly higher total AE rates (RR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.60 to 3.21, I = 75%) were recorded within 3 days of infusion, but some lower AE rates, particularly of gastrointestinal AEs (RR = 0.6, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.83, I = 37%), were noted after 3 days of infusion. Compared with alendronate, zoledronic acid has achieved comparable therapeutic results in the treatment of primary osteoporosis in increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover marker levels. Zoledronic acid showed a better safety profile than alendronate with long-term use, especially with regards to gastrointestinal-related AEs.
Topics: Humans; Female; Alendronate; Zoledronic Acid; Diphosphonates; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Density; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
PubMed: 36433675
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.2181 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Dec 2019To assess the time from fracture until bone turnover markers (BTM), which are biochemical markers reflecting in vivo bone formation and resorptive activity, have...
To assess the time from fracture until bone turnover markers (BTM), which are biochemical markers reflecting in vivo bone formation and resorptive activity, have returned to a stable level since BTM have been shown to be at least as good as bone mineral density in monitoring the effect of anti-resorptive treatment in osteoporosis. This study searched for articles in PUBMED, CINAHL, Medline, EM-BASE, and Cochrane, and identified 3486 unique articles. These articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven articles addressing time to normalization of either CTX, PINP, osteocalcin, or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase after a recent fracture were identified and these were analyzed qualitatively. CTX appeared to return to baseline within 6 months. PINP appeared to return to baseline within 6 months and interestingly dip below baseline after a year. Osteocalcin was elevated throughout the first year after a fracture, with most changes in the first 6 months. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was increased for up to a year, however with a discrepancy between used assays. Seven studies were identified, showing CTX and PINP to return to baseline within 6 months. OC was elevated for 12 months. BAP was increased for up to a year. However, none of these studies had fasting patients and a long follow-up period with regular measurements. The studies could indicate that the BTM CTX and PINP have returned to baseline within 6 months; however, further studies are needed assessing pre-analytical factors while having a long follow-up. Bone turnover markers appear as good as or better than bone mineral density in monitoring the effect of anti-resorptive medication in osteoporosis. This study tries to identify the time from fracture until BTM are back at baseline. Most studies did not however take pre-analytical variation into consideration. Further research is therefore needed.
Topics: Alkaline Phosphatase; Biomarkers; Bone Remodeling; Collagen Type I; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Osteocalcin; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Procollagen
PubMed: 31446441
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05132-1 -
PloS One 2015Lifespan and the proportion of older people in the population are increasing, with far reaching consequences for the social, political and economic landscape. Unless... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Lifespan and the proportion of older people in the population are increasing, with far reaching consequences for the social, political and economic landscape. Unless accompanied by an increase in health span, increases in age-related diseases will increase the burden on health care resources. Intervention studies to enhance healthy ageing need appropriate outcome measures, such as blood-borne biomarkers, which are easily obtainable, cost-effective, and widely accepted. To date there have been no systematic reviews of blood-borne biomarkers of mortality.
AIM
To conduct a systematic review to identify available blood-borne biomarkers of mortality that can be used to predict healthy ageing post-retirement.
METHODS
Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. We included prospective cohort studies with a minimum of two years follow up and data available for participants with a mean age of 50 to 75 years at baseline.
RESULTS
From a total of 11,555 studies identified in initial searches, 23 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Fifty-one blood borne biomarkers potentially predictive of mortality risk were identified. In total, 20 biomarkers were associated with mortality risk. Meta-analyses of mortality risk showed significant associations with C-reactive protein (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.42, p<0.001; Cancer-mortality 1.62, p<0.009; CVD-mortality 1.31, p = 0.033), N Terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.43, p<0.001; CHD-mortality 1.58, p<0.001; CVD-mortality 1.67, p<0.001) and white blood cell count (Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality 1.36, p = 0.001). There was also evidence that brain natriuretic peptide, cholesterol fractions, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen, granulocytes, homocysteine, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, neutrophils, osteoprotegerin, procollagen type III aminoterminal peptide, serum uric acid, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 and tumour necrosis factor receptor II may predict mortality risk. There was equivocal evidence for the utility of 14 biomarkers and no association with mortality risk for CD40 ligand, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, ferritin, haemoglobin, interleukin-12, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, matrix metalloproteinase 9, myelopereoxidase, P-selectin, receptor activator of nuclear factor KappaB ligand, sex hormone binding globulin, testosterone, transferrin, and thyroid stimulating hormone and thyroxine.
CONCLUSIONS
Twenty biomarkers should be prioritised as potential predictors of mortality in future studies. More studies using standardised protocols and reporting methods, and which focus on mortality rather than risk of disease or health status as an outcome, are needed.
Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Longevity; MEDLINE; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms
PubMed: 26039142
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127550 -
The British Journal of Nutrition May 2024Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation/fortification on bone turnover markers in women. All human randomised clinical trials reported changes in bone resorption markers (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX)) or bone formation factors (osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) following vitamin D administration in women (aged ≥ 18 years) were considered. Mean differences (MD) and their respective 95 % CI were calculated based on fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity status. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression models, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, publication bias and the quality of the included studies were also evaluated. We found that vitamin D supplementation had considerable effect on sCTX (MD: -0·038, 22) and OC (MD: -0·610, 24) with high heterogeneity and uNTX (MD: -8·188, 6) without heterogeneity. Our results showed that age, sample size, dose, duration, baseline vitamin D level, study region and quality of studies might be sources of heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis also revealed significant reductions in P1NP level in dose less than 600 μg/d and larger study sample size (>100 participants). Moreover, no significant change was found in BALP level. Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women. However, results were inconsistent for bone formation markers.
Topics: Humans; Vitamin D; Female; Dietary Supplements; Biomarkers; Bone Remodeling; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Bone Resorption; Collagen Type I; Bone and Bones; Osteocalcin; Alkaline Phosphatase; Peptides; Food, Fortified
PubMed: 38221822
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524000060 -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Jul 2021The rising incidence of chronic liver disease (CLD) has increased the need for early recognition. This systematic review assesses the diagnostic accuracy of the enhanced...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The rising incidence of chronic liver disease (CLD) has increased the need for early recognition. This systematic review assesses the diagnostic accuracy of the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test in cases of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis due to multiple etiologies in at-risk populations.
METHODS
Studies evaluating the ELF accuracy in identifying advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, defined as METAVIR stage F ≥ 3 and F = 4 or equivalent, in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol liver disease (ALD), or viral hepatitis were included. Liver biopsy was used as the reference standard. Medline and Embase databases were searched. The QUADAS-2 tool was used as a framework to assess risk of bias and applicability. The area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) was extracted as a summary measure of diagnostic accuracy.
RESULTS
Thirty-six studies were included: 11 hepatitis C, 4 hepatitis B, 9 NAFLD, 2 ALD, and 10 mixed. The ELF test showed good diagnostic performance in detecting advanced fibrosis in patients with viral hepatitis (AUROC 0.69 to 0.98) and excellent performance in NAFLD (AUROC 0.78 to 0.97) and ALD (AUROC from 0.92 to 0.94). There is also evidence of good diagnostic performance for detecting cirrhosis in patients with viral hepatitis (AUROC 0.63 to 0.99), good performance in NAFLD (AUROC 0.85 to 0.92), and excellent performance in patients with ALD (AUROC 0.93 to 0.94).
CONCLUSION
This systematic review supports the use of the ELF test across a range of CLD as a possible alternative to liver biopsy in selected cases.
Topics: Algorithms; Biomarkers; Biopsy; Hepatitis, Viral, Human; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Diseases, Alcoholic; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Peptide Fragments; Procollagen; Prognosis; Severity of Illness Index; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1
PubMed: 33668077
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15482 -
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies Aug 2021The results from clinical trials have revealed that the effects of resveratrol supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers are inconsistent. Our... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The results from clinical trials have revealed that the effects of resveratrol supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers are inconsistent. Our objective was to determine the effects of resveratrol supplementation on BMD and serum bone biomarkers.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Web of science and Scopus were searched up to August 24, 2020. Two reviewers independently performed the articles search and screen according to defined selection criteria. The study quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated with the Cochrane scoring system. Heterogeneity among studies was examined by Cochrane Q test. Retrieved data were pooled after mean differences (MD) were computed between two groups for BMD and serum biomarkers. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate a potential difference in terms of dose of resveratrol and intervention duration. Sensitivity analysis was executed by omitting studies with imputed values in order to evaluate the influence of these studies on the overall results.
RESULTS
Ten eligible studies involving 698 subjects were included in this meta-analysis with 401 participants receiving resveratrol and 297 receiving placebo. Supplementation of resveratrol had no statistically significant effects on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at lumbar spine (MD: -0.02, 95% CI: - 0.05, 0.01, p = 0.26, I = 6%), total hip BMD (MD: -0.01, 95% CI: - 0.04, 0.02, p = 0.65, I = 0%), and whole body BMD (MD: 0.00, 95% CI: - 0.02, 0.02, p = 0.74, I = 0%). Supplementation of resveratrol also did not result in significant change in bone serum markers, including serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (OCN), procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and parathyroid hormone (PTH). Subgroup analysis showed the effect of resveratrol supplementation on BMD and serum bone markers were similar in trails of different doses, intervention duration, and pathological conditions of the participants.
CONCLUSION
Resveratrol supplementation did not show any significant effect on BMD or serum bone markers with the current evidence. Further investigation with more well-organized multicentre randomized trial is warranted.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antioxidants; Bone Density; Dietary Supplements; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resveratrol; Young Adult
PubMed: 34420523
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03381-4