-
Medicine Jun 2023The preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio is a novel inflammation-based prognostic marker in various cancers. However, its prognostic role in biliary tract... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio is a novel inflammation-based prognostic marker in various cancers. However, its prognostic role in biliary tract cancer is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in biliary tract cancer.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature for studies evaluating the prognostic value of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in patients undergoing surgery for biliary tract cancer was conducted, and a random effects meta-analysis of overall survival and recurrence-free survival was performed.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 1292 participants were included. The preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio negatively correlated with overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.44 [95% confidence interval: 1.98-2.90]; P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.73 [95% confidence interval: 2.01-3.70]; P < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that an elevated preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio predicted poor overall survival, regardless of the cutoff value, sample size, histological type, and treatment.
CONCLUSION
An elevated preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for biliary tract cancer. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio may be an independent prognostic biomarker for overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing surgery for biliary tract cancer.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; C-Reactive Protein; Serum Albumin; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37266653
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033656 -
Journal of Interferon & Cytokine... Aug 2023Osteosarcoma is the most prevalent type of primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents. The effect of cytokines on osteosarcoma prognosis has been studied and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Osteosarcoma is the most prevalent type of primary bone malignancy in children and adolescents. The effect of cytokines on osteosarcoma prognosis has been studied and reported. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic value of cytokines as osteosarcoma biomarkers. Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the prognostic value of cytokines in osteosarcoma. From the eligible studies, data on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were extracted. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 11 studies involving 755 patients were included in this analysis. High macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression in tumors was significantly associated with shortened OS (HR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.18-3.42, = 0.010) and MFS (HR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.47-4.01, = 0.001). Elevated T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3 (Tim-3) levels in serum correlated with increased risk of disease progression in patients with osteosarcoma (HR = 3.14, 95% CI: 2.88-3.03, 0.001). However, interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor were not substantially associated with osteosarcoma prognosis. Owing to a paucity of research, other relevant cytokines [interferon-α/β receptor, tissue factor, macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1), and IL-23] could not be combined. In conclusion, MIF levels in tumors and Tim-3 levels in serum can be potential biomarkers of poor prognosis in osteosarcoma. To confirm this finding and implement these biomarkers into clinical applications, additional large-scale, high-quality studies are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Cytokines; Prognosis; Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2; Biomarkers, Tumor; Osteosarcoma; Bone Neoplasms
PubMed: 37566475
DOI: 10.1089/jir.2023.0083 -
Systematic Reviews Dec 2014Prognostic factors are associated with the risk of future health outcomes in individuals with a particular health condition. The prognostic ability of such factors is... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Prognostic factors are associated with the risk of future health outcomes in individuals with a particular health condition. The prognostic ability of such factors is increasingly being assessed in both primary research and systematic reviews. Systematic review methodology in this area is continuing to evolve, reflected in variable approaches to key methodological aspects. The aim of this article was to (i) explore and compare the methodology of systematic reviews of prognostic factors undertaken for the same clinical question, (ii) to discuss implications for review findings, and (iii) to present recommendations on what might be considered to be 'good practice' approaches.
METHODS
The sample was comprised of eight systematic reviews addressing the same clinical question, namely whether 'aspirin resistance' (a potential prognostic factor) has prognostic utility relative to future vascular events in patients on aspirin therapy for secondary prevention. A detailed comparison of methods around study identification, study selection, quality assessment, approaches to analysis, and reporting of findings was undertaken and the implications discussed. These were summarised into key considerations that may be transferable to future systematic reviews of prognostic factors.
RESULTS
Across systematic reviews addressing the same clinical question, there were considerable differences in the numbers of studies identified and overlap between included studies, which could only partially be explained by different study eligibility criteria. Incomplete reporting and differences in terminology within primary studies hampered study identification and selection process across reviews. Quality assessment was highly variable and only one systematic review considered a checklist for studies of prognostic questions. There was inconsistency between reviews in approaches towards analysis, synthesis, addressing heterogeneity and reporting of results.
CONCLUSIONS
Different methodological approaches may ultimately affect the findings and interpretation of systematic reviews of prognostic research, with implications for clinical decision-making.
Topics: Aspirin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Resistance; Humans; Prognosis; Review Literature as Topic
PubMed: 25466903
DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-140 -
Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark... Jul 2021: Several studies suggest that there is an association between the metastatic nodal tumor volume and the clinical outcome in patients with solid cancers. However,...
: Several studies suggest that there is an association between the metastatic nodal tumor volume and the clinical outcome in patients with solid cancers. However, despite the prognostic potential of nodal volume, a standardized method for estimating the nodal volumetric parameters is lacking. Herein, we conducted a systematic review of the published scientific literature towards investigating the prognostic value of nodal volume in the carcinomas of head and neck, taking into consideration the primary tumor site and the human papillomavirus (HPV) status. : For this purpose, the biomedical literature database PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for studies relevant to the relationship of nodal volume to the treatment outcome and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Collectively, based on stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, 23 eligible studies were included in the present systematic review. : On the basis of our findings, nodal volume is suggested to be strongly associated with clinical outcomes in HNSCC patients. Of particular note, there is an indication that nodal volume is an independent factor for further risk stratification for recurrence-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx (oropharynx and hypopharynx). Extranodal extension (ENE) and HPV status should be also taken into consideration in further studies.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 34340270
DOI: 10.52586/4937 -
Journal of Cardiac Failure Oct 2021Elevated blood lactate levels are strongly associated with mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Recent evidence suggests that the degree and rate at which blood... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Elevated blood lactate levels are strongly associated with mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. Recent evidence suggests that the degree and rate at which blood lactate levels decrease after the initiation of treatment may be equally important in patient prognosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the usefulness of lactate clearance as a prognostic factor in cardiogenic shock.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Elsevier EMBASE, EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science to identify studies comparing lactate clearance between survivors and nonsurvivors at one or more timepoints. Both prospective and retrospective studies were eligible for inclusion. Two study investigators independently screened, extracted data, and assessed the quality of all included studies. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. The median lactate clearance at 6-8 hours was 21.9% (interquartile range [IQR] 14.6%-42.1%) in survivors and 0.6% (IQR -3.7% to 14.6%) in nonsurvivors. At 24 hours, the median lactate clearance was 60.7% (IQR 58.1%-76.3%) and 40.3% (IQR 30.2%-55.8%) in survivors and nonsurvivors, respectively. Accordingly, the pooled mean difference in lactate clearance between survivors and nonsurvivors at 6-8 hours was 17.3% (95% CI 11.6%-23.1%, P < .001) at 6-8 hours and 27.9% (95% CI 14.1%-41.7%, P < .001) at 24 hours.
CONCLUSIONS
Survivors had significantly greater lactate clearance at 6-8 hours and at 24 hours compared with nonsurvivors, suggesting that lactate clearance is an important prognostic marker in cardiogenic shock.
Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Lactic Acid; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Shock, Cardiogenic
PubMed: 34625128
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.012 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Feb 2024Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (IMA) is a unique and rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with poorly defined prognostic factors and highly controversial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (IMA) is a unique and rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with poorly defined prognostic factors and highly controversial studies. Hence, this study aimed to comprehensively identify and summarize the prognostic factors associated with IMA.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from their inception until June 2023. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were obtained to evaluate potential prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 1062 patients from 11 studies were included. In univariate analysis, we found that gender, age, TNM stage, smoking history, lymph node metastasis, pleural metastasis, spread through air spaces (STAS), tumor size, pathological grade, computed tomography (CT) findings of consolidative-type morphology, pneumonia type, and well-defined heterogeneous ground-glass opacity (GGO) were risk factors for IMA, and spiculated margin sign was a protective factor. In multivariate analysis, smoking history, lymph node metastasis, pathological grade, STAS, tumor size, and pneumonia type sign were found to be risk factors. There was not enough evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, CT signs of lobulated margin, and air bronchogram were related to the prognosis for IMA.
CONCLUSION
In this study, we comprehensively analyzed prognostic factors for invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung in univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and/or DFS. Finally, 12 risk factors and 1 protective factor were identified. These findings may help guide the clinical management of patients with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.
Topics: Humans; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Pneumonia; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female
PubMed: 38303008
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03326-4 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2022Blocking the Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated great efficacy in cancer immunotherapy treatment and remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Blocking the Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated great efficacy in cancer immunotherapy treatment and remains the central modality of immune targeting. To support the rational and tailored use of these drugs, it is important to identify reliable biomarkers related to survival. The role of the soluble form of the PD-L1 (sPD-L1) as a prognostic biomarker related to survival in solid cancer patients treated with immunotherapy has not yet been consistently evaluated. A systematic literature search of original articles in PubMed, MEDLINE and Scopus was conducted. Studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or Kaplan−Meier curves or individual patient data for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) associated with baseline levels of sPD-L1 in cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy treatment were considered eligible. Twelve studies involving 1076 patients and different tumor types treated with immunotherapy were included in the analysis. High blood levels of sPD-L1 correlated with poorer OS and PFS in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.15, 1.93, p < 0.01, I2 = 77% for OS; HR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.20, 2.12, p < 0.01, I2 = 82% for PFS). A subgroup analysis highlighted that high levels of sPD-L1 were associated with worse survival in patients affected by NSCLC (HR = 1.81 95%CI: 1.09−3.00, p = 0.02, I2 = 83% for OS; HR = 2.18, 95%CI: 1.27−3.76, p < 0.01, I2 = 88% for PFS). An HR > 1 indicated that patients with low levels of sPD-L1 have the highest rates of OS/PFS. In this meta-analysis, we clarified the role of sPD-L1 in different solid cancers treated exclusively with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). sPD-L1 could represent a non-invasive biomarker that is easily dosable in the blood of patients. The pooled data from the selected studies showed that a high circulating concentration of sPD-L1 in cancer patients correlates with worse survival, suggesting that it may be a helpful prognostic biomarker for the selection of cancer patients before immunotherapy, thus improving the efficacy of ICIs and avoiding unnecessary treatment.
Topics: Humans; B7-H1 Antigen; Prognosis; Immunotherapy; Immunologic Factors; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 36430974
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214496 -
Anticancer Research Sep 2019Sarcopenia describes the loss of skeletal muscle mass. While this condition is associated with a high mortality in cancer patients, its influence on survival is still... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIM
Sarcopenia describes the loss of skeletal muscle mass. While this condition is associated with a high mortality in cancer patients, its influence on survival is still underestimated.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A systematic review for articles was performed using the PubMed database, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, Science Direct and by manual search. We used data of overall survival in sarcopenic patients for assessing the death risk. We extracted hazard ratio estimates from univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 15 studies were eligible for meta-analysis including a total of 2,521 lung cancer patients. Univariate meta-analysis revealed a two-fold increased death risk in sarcopenic patients; multivariate meta-analysis yielded a significant, three-fold elevated risk of death. This higher mortality is independent of tumour stage.
CONCLUSION
Muscle loss is an independent risk factor for increased death risk in lung cancer patients independent of cancer stage. This argues for implementing screening for sarcopenia into cancer care.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Muscle, Skeletal; Neoplasm Staging; Organ Size; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Sarcopenia
PubMed: 31519557
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13640 -
Digestive Surgery 2020Various inflammatory markers have been investigated for a prognostic role in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, the value of preoperative platelet to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Various inflammatory markers have been investigated for a prognostic role in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, the value of preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of PLR as a preoperative prognostic factor for resectable pancreatic cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Systematic literature search was conducted for studies assessing PLR influence as a preoperative prognostic factor in resectable pancreatic cancer patients. Random-effects model was applied for pooling hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
RESULTS
Fourteen articles with 2,743 patients were included in the study. According to the analysis, high PLR had no correlation with decreased OS. Due to high heterogeneity among studies, subgroup analysis was performed. Better OS was associated with low PLR in Asian patients, patients with mixed type of operation performed, and patients with preoperative PLR ≤150. Low PLR was associated with significantly better DFS.
CONCLUSIONS
PLR is a predictive factor of better DFS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, available evidence does not support PLR as a reliable prognostic factor for OS.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lymphocyte Count; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Platelet Count; Preoperative Period; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 32690855
DOI: 10.1159/000508444 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Sep 2023Serum ferritin levels serves as biomarkers in many inflammatory and infectious diseases. This current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether serum... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Serum ferritin levels serves as biomarkers in many inflammatory and infectious diseases. This current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether serum ferritin levels are associated with severe dengue and its utility as a biomarker of disease severity. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. A total of 18 studies examining the serum ferritin levels in dengue cases in the context of disease severity (nine studies having dengue classification as non-severe vs. severe dengue cases, and nine studies having dengue classification as dengue without warning signs (DwoWS), dengue with warning signs (DwWS), and severe dengue cases) were included and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA software to calculate the effect size as a standardized mean difference (SMD) or Hedges 'g' for the continuous outcome. Higher serum ferritin levels were found in severe dengue cases compared to non-severe cases [SMD (Hedges 'g') 4.05 (95% C.I. 2.09-6.00), (I = 98.8%)]. In the second group, DwWS cases showed high serum ferritin levels compared to DwoWS [SMD 2.01 (95% C.I. 0.92-3.10), (I = 97.89%)], and severe dengue cases showed higher levels of serum ferritin compared to DwWS [SMD 2.66 (95% C.I. 1.72-4.48), (I = 98.78%)] and DwoWS cases [SMD 6.65 (95% C.I. 1.72-11.59), (I = 99.78%]. Subgroup analysis for the country of study (India vs. others), ferritin testing methods, and ferritin measurement day revealed testing method as a significant contributor to heterogeneity. To conclude, the present study suggests serum ferritin as a prognostic marker for dengue disease severity. Multi-centric studies involving a large number of dengue patients with a uniform case definition accounting for all the confounding variables might help in determining a universal cut-off value to discriminate between non-severe and severe dengue.
Topics: Humans; Severe Dengue; Prognosis; Biomarkers; Patient Acuity; Ferritins; Dengue
PubMed: 37347209
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2468