-
Neurourology and Urodynamics Mar 2016Validated questionnaires are increasingly the preferred method used to obtain historical information. Specialized questionnaires exist validated for patients with... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Validated questionnaires are increasingly the preferred method used to obtain historical information. Specialized questionnaires exist validated for patients with neurogenic disease including neurogenic bladder. Those currently available are systematically reviewed and their potential for clinical and research use are described.
METHODS
A systematic search via Medline and PubMed using the key terms questionnaire(s) crossed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) for the years 1946 to January 22, 2014 inclusive. Additional articles were selected from review of references in the publications identified. Only peer reviewed articles published in English were included.
RESULTS
18 questionnaires exist validated for patients with neurogenic bladder; 14 related to MS, 3 for SCI, and 1 for neurogenic bladder in general; with 4 cross-validated in both MS and SCI. All 18 are validated for both male and female patients; 59% are available only in English. The domains of psychological impact and physical function are represented in 71% and 76% of questionnaires, respectively. None for the female population included elements to measure symptoms of prolapse.
CONCLUSION
The last decade has seen an expansion of validated questionnaires to document bladder symptoms in neurogenic disease. Disease specific instruments are available for incorporation into the clinical setting for MS and SCI patients with neurogenic bladder. The availability of caregiver and interview options enhances suitability in clinical practice as they can be adapted to various extents of disability. Future developments should include expanded language validation to the top 10 global languages reported by the World Health Organization.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cost of Illness; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reproducibility of Results; Spinal Cord Injuries; Surveys and Questionnaires; Urinary Bladder; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Urodynamics; Young Adult
PubMed: 25620137
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22720 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2017Prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) at term is managed expectantly or by planned early birth. It is not clear if waiting for birth to occur spontaneously is better... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) at term is managed expectantly or by planned early birth. It is not clear if waiting for birth to occur spontaneously is better than intervening, e.g. by inducing labour.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review is to assess the effects of planned early birth (immediate intervention or intervention within 24 hours) when compared with expectant management (no planned intervention within 24 hours) for women with term PROM on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (9 September 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of planned early birth compared with expectant management (either in hospital or at home) in women with PROM at 37 weeks' gestation or later.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias of the included studies. Data were checked for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-three trials involving 8615 women and their babies were included in the update of this review. Ten trials assessed intravenous oxytocin; 12 trials assessed prostaglandins (six trials in the form of vaginal prostaglandin E2 and six as oral, sublingual or vaginal misoprostol); and one trial each assessed Caulophyllum and acupuncture. Overall, three trials were judged to be at low risk of bias, while the other 20 were at unclear or high risk of bias.Primary outcomes: women who had planned early birth were at a reduced risk of maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis and/or endometritis) than women who had expectant management following term prelabour rupture of membranes (average risk ratio (RR) 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.72; eight trials, 6864 women; Tau² = 0.19; I² = 72%; low-quality evidence), and their neonates were less likely to have definite or probable early-onset neonatal sepsis (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.92; 16 trials, 7314 infants;low-quality evidence). No clear differences between the planned early birth and expectant management groups were seen for the risk of caesarean section (average RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.04; 23 trials, 8576 women; Tau² = 0.10; I² = 55%; low-quality evidence); serious maternal morbidity or mortality (no events; three trials; 425 women; very low-quality evidence); definite early-onset neonatal sepsis (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.33; six trials, 1303 infants; very low-quality evidence); or perinatal mortality (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.66; eight trials, 6392 infants; moderate-quality evidence).
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
women who had a planned early birth were at a reduced risk of chorioamnionitis (average RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82; eight trials, 6874 women; Tau² = 0.19; I² = 73%), and postpartum septicaemia (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.96; three trials, 263 women), and their neonates were less likely to receive antibiotics (average RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.84; 10 trials, 6427 infants; Tau² = 0.06; I² = 32%). Women in the planned early birth group were more likely to have their labour induced (average RR 3.41; 95% CI 2.87 to 4.06; 12 trials, 6945 women; Tau² = 0.05; I² = 71%), had a shorter time from rupture of membranes to birth (mean difference (MD) -10.10 hours; 95% CI -12.15 to -8.06; nine trials, 1484 women; Tau² = 5.81; I² = 60%), and their neonates had lower birthweights (MD -79.25 g; 95% CI -124.96 to -33.55; five trials, 1043 infants). Women who had a planned early birth had a shorter length of hospitalisation (MD -0.79 days; 95% CI -1.20 to -0.38; two trials, 748 women; Tau² = 0.05; I² = 59%), and their neonates were less likely to be admitted to the neonatal special or intensive care unit (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85; eight trials, 6179 infants), and had a shorter duration of hospital (-11.00 hours; 95% CI -21.96 to -0.04; one trial, 182 infants) or special or intensive care unit stay (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; four trials, 5691 infants). Women in the planned early birth group had more positive experiences compared with women in the expectant management group.No clear differences between groups were observed for endometritis; postpartum pyrexia; postpartum antibiotic usage; caesarean for fetal distress; operative vaginal birth; uterine rupture; epidural analgesia; postpartum haemorrhage; adverse effects; cord prolapse; stillbirth; neonatal mortality; pneumonia; Apgar score less than seven at five minutes; use of mechanical ventilation; or abnormality on cerebral ultrasound (no events).None of the trials reported on breastfeeding; postnatal depression; gestational age at birth; meningitis; respiratory distress syndrome; necrotising enterocolitis; neonatal encephalopathy; or disability at childhood follow-up.In subgroup analyses, there were no clear patterns of differential effects for method of induction, parity, use of maternal antibiotic prophylaxis, or digital vaginal examination. Results of the sensitivity analyses based on trial quality were consistent with those of the main analysis, except for definite or probable early-onset neonatal sepsis where no clear difference was observed.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is low quality evidence to suggest that planned early birth (with induction methods such as oxytocin or prostaglandins) reduces the risk of maternal infectious morbidity compared with expectant management for PROM at 37 weeks' gestation or later, without an apparent increased risk of caesarean section. Evidence was mainly downgraded due to the majority of studies contributing data having some serious design limitations, and for most outcomes estimates were imprecise.Although the 23 included trials in this review involved a large number of women and babies, the quality of the trials and evidence was not high overall, and there was limited reporting for a number of important outcomes. Thus further evidence assessing the benefits or harms of planned early birth compared with expectant management, considering maternal, fetal, neonatal and longer-term childhood outcomes, and the use of health services, would be valuable. Any future trials should be adequately designed and powered to evaluate the effects on short- and long-term outcomes. Standardisation of outcomes and their definitions, including for the assessment of maternal and neonatal infection, would be beneficial.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Obstetric Labor Complications; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Prostaglandins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Term Birth; Time Factors; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 28050900
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3 -
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology Mar 2006The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes of both external cephalic version (ECV) and persisting breech presentation at... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes of both external cephalic version (ECV) and persisting breech presentation at term. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Medline, Embase and All Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Reviews databases. Data were extracted from studies that compared women who had an ECV from 36 weeks' gestation with a similar control group of women enrolled at the same gestational age, eligible for, but who did not have an ECV. Eleven studies with a total of 2503 women were included. Adverse outcomes related to ECV were rarely reported and in most studies there was no evidence that relevant outcomes were ascertained among similar women who did not have an ECV. There was no increased risk of antepartum fetal death associated with ECV, but numbers were small. There were no reported cases of uterine rupture, placental abruption, prelabour rupture of membranes or cord prolapse, but these outcomes were not examined among controls. Onset of labour within 24 h and nuchal cord was non-significantly higher among women who had an ECV compared with those with a persisting breech. Despite limited reporting and small numbers, the results of our review suggest that adverse maternal and fetal outcomes of both ECV and persisting breech presentation are rare. Only with improved reporting and collection of safety data on ECV and persisting breech presentation can we provide high-quality information to assist informed decision making by pregnant women with a breech presentation at term.
Topics: Breech Presentation; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Fetal Mortality; Gestational Age; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Version, Fetal
PubMed: 16466434
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Manual rotation is commonly performed to increase the chances of normal vaginal delivery and is perceived to be safe. Manual rotation has the potential to prevent... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Manual rotation is commonly performed to increase the chances of normal vaginal delivery and is perceived to be safe. Manual rotation has the potential to prevent operative delivery and caesarean section, and reduce obstetric and neonatal complications.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of prophylactic manual rotation for women with malposition in labour on mode of delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 October 2014), the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (all searched 23 February 2014), previous reviews and, references of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised clinical trials comparing prophylactic manual rotation in labour for fetal malposition versus expectant management, augmentation of labour or operative delivery. We defined prophylactic manual rotation as rotation performed without immediate assisted delivery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included only one small pilot study (involving 30 women). The study, which we considered to be at low risk of bias, was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital in Australia, and involved women with cephalic, singleton pregnancies. The primary outcome was operative delivery (instrumental delivery or caesarean section).In the manual rotation group, 13/15 women went on to have an instrumental delivery or caesarean section, whereas in the control group, 12/15 women had an operative delivery. The estimated risk ratio was 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.49). There were no maternal or fetal mortalities in either groupThere were no clear differences for any of the secondary maternal or neonatal outcomes reported (e.g. perineal trauma, analgesia use duration of labour).In terms of adverse events, there were no reported cases of umbilical cord prolapse or cervical laceration and a single case of a non-reassuring or pathological cardiotocograph during the procedure.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy of prophylactic manual rotation early in the second stage of labour for prevention of operative delivery. One additional study is ongoing. Further appropriately designed trials are required to determine the efficacy of manual rotation.
Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Cesarean Section; Extraction, Obstetrical; Female; Humans; Labor Presentation; Obstetric Labor Complications; Perineum; Pilot Projects; Pregnancy; Version, Fetal
PubMed: 25532081
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009298.pub2 -
Spine May 2009Systematic review. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically assess benefits and harms of nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back and radicular pain.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Although use of certain interventional therapies is common or increasing, there is also uncertainty or controversy about their efficacy.
METHODS
Electronic database searches on Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases were conducted through July 2008 to identify randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of local injections, botulinum toxin injection, prolotherapy, epidural steroid injection, facet joint injection, therapeutic medial branch block, sacroiliac joint injection, intradiscal steroid injection, chemonucleolysis, radiofrequency denervation, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation, Coblation nucleoplasty, and spinal cord stimulation. All relevant studies were methodologically assessed by 2 independent reviewers using criteria developed by the Cochrane Back Review Group (for trials) and by Oxman (for systematic reviews). A qualitative synthesis of results was performed using methods adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force.
RESULTS
For sciatica or prolapsed lumbar disc with radiculopathy, we found good evidence that chemonucleolysis is moderately superior to placebo injection but inferior to surgery, and fair evidence that epidural steroid injection is moderately effective for short-term (but not long-term) symptom relief. We found fair evidence that spinal cord stimulation is moderately effective for failed back surgery syndrome with persistent radiculopathy, though device-related complications are common. We found good or fair evidence that prolotherapy, facet joint injection, intradiscal steroid injection, and percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation are not effective. Insufficient evidence exists to reliably evaluate other interventional therapies.
CONCLUSION
Few nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain have been shown to be effective in randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Topics: Catheter Ablation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Injections, Epidural; Intervertebral Disc Chemolysis; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Low Back Pain; Nerve Block; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiculopathy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 19363456
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a103b1 -
Heliyon Oct 2021To this date, there are 4 systematic reviews and meta-analyses studies about the burden and associated factors of birth asphyxia in Ethiopia. However, findings of these...
BACKGROUND
To this date, there are 4 systematic reviews and meta-analyses studies about the burden and associated factors of birth asphyxia in Ethiopia. However, findings of these studies are inconsistent which is difficult to make use of the findings for preventing birth asphyxia in the country. Therefore, umbrella review of these studies is required to pool the inconsistent findings into a single summary estimate that can be easily referred by the information users in Ethiopia.
METHODS
PubMed, Science direct, web of science, data bases specific to systematic reviews such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRM) studies on the magnitude and risk factors of perinatal asphyxia in Ethiopia. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. The estimates of the included SRM studies on the prevalence and predictors of perinatal asphyxia were pooled and summarized with random-effects meta-analysis models. From checking PROSPERO, this umbrella review wasn't registered.
RESULTS
We included four SRM studies with a total of 49,417 neonates. The summary estimate for prevalence of birth asphyxia was 22.52% (95% CI = 17.01%-28.02%; I = 0.00). From the umbrella review, the reported factors of statistical significance include: maternal illiteracy [AOR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.44-2.67], primiparity [AOR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.03-1.62], antepartum hemorrhage [AOR = 3.43; 95% CI: 1.74-6.77], pregnancy induced hypertension [AOR = 4.35; 95% CI: 2.98-6.36], premature rupture of membrane [AOR = 12.27; 95% CI: 2.41, 62.38], prolonged labor [AOR = 3.18; 95% CI: 2.75, 3.60], meconium-stained amniotic fluid [AOR = 5.94; 95% CI: 4.86, 7.03], instrumental delivery [AOR = 3.39; 95% CI: 2.46, 4.32], non-cephalic presentation [AOR = 3.39; 95% CI: 1.53, 5.26], cord prolapse [AOR = 2.95; 95% CI: 1.64, 5.30], labor induction [AOR = 3.69; 95% CI: 2.26-6.01], cesarean section delivery [AOR = 3.62; 95% CI: 3.36, 3.88], low birth weight [AOR = 6.06; 95% CI: 5.13, 6.98] and prematurity [AOR = 3.94; 95% CI: 3.67, 4.21] at 95% CI.
CONCLUSION
This umbrella review revealed high burden of birth asphyxia in Ethiopia. The study also indicated significant risk of birth asphyxia among mothers who were unable to read and write, primiparous mothers, those mothers having antepartum hemorrhage, pregnancy induced hypertension, premature rupture of membrane, prolonged labor, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, instrumental delivery, cesarean section delivery, non-cephalic presentation, cord prolapse and labor induction. Moreover, low birth weight and premature neonates were more vulnerable to birth asphyxia compared to their normal birth weight and term counterparts. Therefore, burden of birth asphyxia should be mitigated through special consideration of these risk mothers and neonates during antenatal care, labor and delivery. Mitigation of the problem demands the collaborative efforts of national, regional and local stakeholders of maternal and neonatal health.
PubMed: 34746456
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08128 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Sep 2017External cephalic version (ECV) increases the likelihood of a vaginal delivery in patients with breech presentation. Our objective was to determine the rate of cephalic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
External cephalic version (ECV) increases the likelihood of a vaginal delivery in patients with breech presentation. Our objective was to determine the rate of cephalic vaginal delivery in women undergoing ECV after PROM.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of all case reports, case series and clinical trials of patients undergoing an ECV after PROM ≥ 24 weeks. Maternal demographics and outcome data were obtained. The primary outcome was rate of cephalic vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis was performed for continuous outcomes by calculating mean and standard deviations for appropriate variables.
RESULTS
The systematic review yielded six papers with 13 case reports and no clinical trials of ECV after PROM. The rate of success to cephalic presentation was 46.1% (six of 13 cases), with a subsequent vaginal delivery rate of 23.1% (three of 13 cases). The rate of umbilical cord prolapse was 33.3% (two of six cases).
CONCLUSIONS
ECV after PROM has been reported in 13 cases in the literature. For the cases reported, 46.1% of ECV were successful in turning to cephalic position, but only 23.1% resulted in a vaginal delivery. There was a 33.3% incidence of umbilical cord prolapse. Given the high rate of umbilical cord prolapse, it would be imperative to offer an ECV in the setting of PROM only at an institution that has the ability to perform the indicated emergent cesarean delivery and only after appropriate counseling.
Topics: Breech Presentation; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Version, Fetal
PubMed: 27718774
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1245284 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Mar 2020Hybrid simulation is defined as the use of a patient actor combined with a task trainer within the same session. We sought to investigate the level of evidence about the...
Hybrid simulation is defined as the use of a patient actor combined with a task trainer within the same session. We sought to investigate the level of evidence about the clinical benefits of hybrid simulation training in obstetrics. We searched MEDLINE using the keywords: Obstetrics AND Medical Education AND (Standardized patient OR Hybrid simulation). A total of 155 studies were screened, from which we selected 11 articles were selected from the title and the abstract in PubMed. For each study, data about the type of simulation, the level of evidence according KirkPatrick's hierarchy was collected. There is evidence that clinical benefit for patients exists for Shoulder Dystocia, and Cord prolapse. For Non-technical skills, such as communication or team training, hybrid simulation was also effective. Whether hybrid simulation offers better training for communication and better immersion than high-fidelity simulation for learners remains to be investigated.
Topics: Clinical Competence; Communication; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; High Fidelity Simulation Training; Humans; Obstetric Labor Complications; Obstetrics; Patient Simulation; Physician-Patient Relations; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Prolapse; Shoulder Dystocia; Simulation Training; Umbilical Cord
PubMed: 31927239
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.024 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Nov 2019The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early amniotomy performed during induction of labor. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early amniotomy performed during induction of labor.
DATA SOURCES
The Medline, Embase, and Web-of-Science databases (from conception to end-of-search date, Dec. 31, 2018) were systematically searched.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials that compared the performance of early amniotomy (performed before active phase of labor) to spontaneous or late amniotomy were eligible for inclusion. Eligible studies were limited to studies published as full articles available in the English language and included patients with a singleton viable fetus at term undergoing induction of labor for any indication.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Data were pooled using the random-effects and fixed-effects models after assessing for the presence of heterogeneity. Risk of bias for each included study was assessed based on the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Primary outcomes were cesarean delivery and time to delivery. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum infectious morbidity, operative delivery, indication for cesarean, cord prolapse, uterine hyperstimulation, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. A subanalysis that included only nulliparous patients was performed for the primary outcomes.
RESULTS
There were a total of 7 studies identified that met the inclusion criteria and these studies reported on 1775 patients. The early and late/spontaneous amniotomy groups included 884 and 891 patients, respectively. Patients who had an early amniotomy had a shorter time to delivery (mean difference, -3.62 hours; 95% confidence interval, -.09 to -1.16). When limiting the analysis to the 866 nulliparous women, early amniotomy was associated with a 5 hour shorter time to delivery compared with late amniotomy (mean difference, -5.12 hours; 95% confidence interval, -8.47 to -1.76; I, 89%). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.49) or intrapartum infectious morbidity (relative risk, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-2.61) between the 2 groups. There were no differences in any of the other secondary outcomes evaluated.
CONCLUSION
Early amniotomy during induction of labor is associated with faster time to delivery without any evidence of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Topics: Amniotomy; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor Onset; Labor, Induced; Pregnancy
PubMed: 33345842
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100052 -
Zeitschrift Fur Geburtshilfe Und... Oct 2016In many countries pregnant women in term singleton pregnancies are advised by obstetricians and midwives to lie down immediately after rupture of membranes until... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In many countries pregnant women in term singleton pregnancies are advised by obstetricians and midwives to lie down immediately after rupture of membranes until engagement of the foetal head is confirmed. The horizontal positioning aims to prevent the prolapse of the umbilical cord. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effects of the maternal lying down measure in term singleton pregnancies. We searched the databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE/Ovid and CENTRAL (Issue 10, 2015) from their inception until September 30, 2015. Additionally, we searched selected trial registers, the reference lists of potentially relevant studies and national and international obstetrical clinical guidelines. All types of studies without language restriction were selected. One retrospective study was found. Only one woman with a term singleton pregnancy had the event of an umbilical cord prolapse following premature rupture of membranes (0.008%). The study did not report on the presence of an engaged foetal head in this woman. Recommendations cannot be made in favour or against the lying down positioning based solely on the single identified study. For that reason, the widespread recommendation given by obstetricians and midwives should be critically reassessed. Also, induction of maternal anxiety and increased costs to the healthcare system following transportation to the delivery unit have to be considered in the light of the given minimal risk of umbilical cord prolapse in conjuncture with lacking evidence for the utility of the common recommendation.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Obstetrics; Patient Positioning; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pregnancy; Prolapse; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome; Umbilical Cord; Young Adult
PubMed: 27723919
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107361