-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2013Beta (β) blockers are indicated for use in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, optimal therapy for people with CAD accompanied by intermittent claudication has been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Beta (β) blockers are indicated for use in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, optimal therapy for people with CAD accompanied by intermittent claudication has been controversial because of the presumed peripheral haemodynamic consequences of beta blockers, leading to worsening symptoms of intermittent claudication. This is an update of a review first published in 2008.
OBJECTIVES
To quantify the potential harmful effects of beta blockers on maximum walking distance, claudication distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature when used in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
SEARCH METHODS
For this update, the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched March 2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 2).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of both selective (β1) and non-selective (β1 and β2) beta blockers compared with placebo. We excluded trials that compared different types of beta blockers.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Primary outcome measures were claudication distance in metres, time to claudication in minutes and maximum walking distance in metres and minutes (as assessed by treadmill).Secondary outcome measures included calf blood flow (mL/100 mL/min), calf vascular resistance and skin temperature (ºC).
MAIN RESULTS
We included six RCTs that fulfilled the above criteria, with a total of 119 participants. The beta blockers studied were atenolol, propranolol, pindolol and metoprolol. All trials were of poor quality with the drugs administered over a short time (10 days to two months). None of the primary outcomes were reported by more than one study. Similarly, secondary outcome measures, with the exception of vascular resistance (as reported by three studies), were reported, each by only one study. Pooling of such results was deemed inappropriate. None of the trials showed a statistically significant worsening effect of beta blockers on time to claudication, claudication distance and maximal walking distance as measured on a treadmill, nor on calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature, when compared with placebo. No reports described adverse events associated with the beta blockers studied.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Currently, no evidence suggests that beta blockers adversely affect walking distance, calf blood flow, calf vascular resistance and skin temperature in people with intermittent claudication. However, because of the lack of large published trials, beta blockers should be used with caution, if clinically indicated.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Atenolol; Humans; Intermittent Claudication; Metoprolol; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Pindolol; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regional Blood Flow; Walking
PubMed: 24027118
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005508.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Myasthenia is a condition in which neuromuscular transmission is affected by antibodies against neuromuscular junction components (autoimmune myasthenia gravis, MG; and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Myasthenia is a condition in which neuromuscular transmission is affected by antibodies against neuromuscular junction components (autoimmune myasthenia gravis, MG; and neonatal myasthenia gravis, NMG) or by defects in genes for neuromuscular junction proteins (congenital myasthenic syndromes, CMSs). Clinically, some individuals seem to benefit from treatment with ephedrine, but its effects and adverse effects have not been systematically evaluated.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects and adverse effects of ephedrine in people with autoimmune MG, transient neonatal MG, and the congenital myasthenic syndromes.
SEARCH METHODS
On 17 November 2014, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched reference lists of articles, conference proceedings of relevant conferences, and prospective trial registers. In addition, we contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing ephedrine as a single or add-on treatment with any other active treatment, placebo, or no treatment in adults or children with autoimmune MG, NMG, or CMSs.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed study design and quality, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information on adverse effects from included articles, and contacted authors.
MAIN RESULTS
We found no RCTs or quasi-RCTs, and therefore could not establish the effect of ephedrine on MG, NMG and CMSs. We describe the results of 53 non-randomised studies narratively in the Discussion section, including observations of endurance, muscle strength and quality of life. Effects may differ depending on the type of myasthenia. Thirty-seven studies were in participants with CMS, five in participants with MG, and in 11 the precise form of myasthenia was unknown. We found no studies for NMG. Reported adverse effects included tachycardia, sleep disturbances, nervousness, and withdrawal symptoms.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was no evidence available from RCTs or quasi-RCTs, but some observations from non-randomised studies are available. There is a need for more evidence from suitable forms of prospective RCTs, such as series of n-of-one RCTs, that use appropriate and validated outcome measures.
Topics: Adrenergic Agents; Adult; Child; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Ephedrine; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Myasthenia Gravis; Myasthenia Gravis, Neonatal; Myasthenic Syndromes, Congenital
PubMed: 25515947
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010028.pub2 -
Acta Ophthalmologica May 2022Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review...
Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of beta-blockers, or combination using beta-blockers, with and without preservatives. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline to final follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ocular and systemic side effects, and other clinical and quality of life outcomes. Of 242 records identified, seven RCTs (1125 patients) were included. The follow-up period ranged from one to 12 months. Timolol was used in five studies, and two studies used a combination (timolol with bimatoprost or dorzolamide). The difference in mean change (MD) in IOP between the preservative-free and the preserved drugs was statistically significant but not clinically relevant: (MD 0.29 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.51 mmHg, p = 0.010; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events: Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcome was low or very low and reported in few studies. No significant difference was observed on ocular surface symptoms. Tear break-up time (TBUT) was better with preservative-free drops (p < 0.001). Schirmer's test was better in the preservative-free group (p < 0.001). Level of evidence for all ocular surface outcomes was low or very low. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. We found no clinically relevant difference in mean change in IOP between the preserved and the preservative-free treatments. Data on adverse events used different methods and were incompletely reported. Although some measures of ocular surface health favoured preservative-free medications, more evidence is needed. The increasing use of preservative-free drops may be associated with better ocular surface and tolerability, but strong evidence from RCTs would be welcome.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Ocular Hypertension; Ophthalmic Solutions; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Timolol
PubMed: 34128326
DOI: 10.1111/aos.14926 -
BMJ Open May 2016To assess the clinical and haemodynamic effects of carvedilol for patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the clinical and haemodynamic effects of carvedilol for patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
We searched PubMed, Cochrane library databases, EMBASE and the Science Citation Index Expanded through December 2015. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included.
OUTCOME MEASURE
We calculated clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, bleeding-related mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeding) as well as haemodynamic outcomes (hepatic venous pressure (HVPG) reduction, haemodynamic response rate, post-treatment arterial blood pressure (mean arterial pressure; MAP) and adverse events).
RESULTS
12 RCTs were included. In 7 trials that looked at haemodynamic outcomes compared carvedilol versus propranolol, showing that carvedilol was associated with a greater reduction (%) of HVPG within 6 months (mean difference -8.49, 95% CI -12.36 to -4.63) without a greater reduction in MAP than propranolol. In 3 trials investigating differences in clinical outcomes between carvedilol versus endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL), no significant differences in mortality or variceal bleeding were demonstrated. 1 trial compared clinical outcomes between carvedilol versus nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN), and showed that no significant difference in mortality or bleeding had been found. 1 trial comparing carvedilol versus nebivolol showed a greater reduction in HVPG after 14 days follow-up in the carvedilol group.
CONCLUSIONS
Carvedilol may be more effective in decreasing HVPG than propranolol or nebivolol and it may be as effective as EVL or nadolol plus ISMN in preventing variceal bleeding. However, the overall quality of evidence is low. Further large-scale randomised studies are required before we can make firm conclusions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42015020542.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Carbazoles; Carvedilol; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Liver Cirrhosis; Propanolamines; Propranolol; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27147389
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010902 -
European Urology Focus Mar 2021Nocturia is a prevalent symptom with varied aetiology and no consensus on treatment options. (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Nocturia is a prevalent symptom with varied aetiology and no consensus on treatment options.
OBJECTIVE
We systematically reviewed evidence comparing the benefits and harms of various treatment options for nocturia or nocturnal incontinence in women.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Literature search was performed using Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases (from 1 January 1946 to 26 September 2017), following the methods detailed in the Cochrane Handbook. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. Certainty of evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The literature search identified 3573 citations, of which 11 full-text articles were included. Three studies on desmopressin and four on antimuscarinics provided evidence of improving nocturia symptoms. Four studies on behavioural treatment provided limited evidence and controversial results. One study on oestrogen did not prove the benefit of any mode of administration, and one small study on functional magnetic stimulation provided some evidence of effectiveness in nocturia. One randomised controlled trial (RCT; 141 participants) reported a statistically significant difference between the desmopressin and placebo groups (desmopressin patients experienced 0.75 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.47-1.03] nocturia episodes less than those experience by the placebo group; certainty of evidence = low). The only RCT on antimuscarinics in women with nocturia reported that oxybutynin reduced the number of nocturia episodes by 0.3 (95% CI -0.02 to 0.62) versus placebo. In one RCT comparing tolterodine with the combination of tolterodine with behavioural therapy, there was significant change from baseline nocturnal incontinence episodes in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
There is some evidence that desmopressin and antimuscarinics are effective treatment options for nocturia; however, there is very limited evidence for other treatment options. The findings should be interpreted with caution as there were some methodological flaws in the included studies, particularly outcome heterogeneity.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This review identified several medical treatments for nocturia in women, such as desmopressin and antimuscarinics, which appear to improve the severity of the condition.
Topics: Adult; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Muscarinic Antagonists; Nocturia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tolterodine Tartrate
PubMed: 32061540
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.012 -
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Jan 2024The current gold standard treatment for port-wine stains (PWS) is pulsed dye laser (PDL). However, multiple treatment sessions may be necessary and complete resolution...
OBJECTIVES
The current gold standard treatment for port-wine stains (PWS) is pulsed dye laser (PDL). However, multiple treatment sessions may be necessary and complete resolution is often not achieved. Neoangiogenesis can occur soon after treatment and is thought to be a major factor contributing to treatment failure. Adjuvant antiangiogenic topical therapies may therefore improve the efficacy of pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov using "port-wine stain," "nevus flammeus," "capillary malformation," "sturge weber," and "pulsed dye laser" as keywords and medical subject heading (MeSH) terms. Articles were included if they (1) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT); (2) studied patients with PWS; and (3) investigated topical adjuvant therapies with PDL. Bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomized Controlled Trial Standard Checklist.
RESULTS
1835 studies were identified, with six studies meeting inclusion criteria. The total number of patients studied was 103 (range: 9-23), with 8-36 week follow-up. The average age ranged from 11 to 33.5 years old. Three studies examined adjuvant topical sirolimus (n = 52), two examined timolol (n = 29), and one studied imiquimod (n = 22). Two of three RCTs reported no improvement through colorimetric analysis with topical sirolimus; however, one of these studies did show a significant improvement through Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score. The last sirolimus study showed significant improvement through digital photographic image scoring (DPIA). Studies examining topical timolol reported no change in PWS appearance compared to placebo. The addition of 5% adjuvant imiquimod cream did lead to significant improvement. A variety of outcome measures were used. Imiquimod and sirolimus led to mild cutaneous adverse events, while timolol caused no side effects. None of the adverse events led to treatment discontinuation. Study quality was moderate in three, high in two, and low in one.
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of adjuvant topical therapy was unclear. Limitations included variation in concentration and duration of adjuvant therapies, differences in follow-up time, and inconsistent outcome measure reporting. Given their potential clinical promise, larger prospective studies examining topical adjuvant therapies should be considered.
Topics: Humans; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Port-Wine Stain; Imiquimod; Timolol; Lasers, Dye; Sirolimus; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37431532
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23706 -
Propranolol versus corticosteroids: what should be the treatment of choice in infantile hemangiomas?Annals of Plastic Surgery Feb 2015Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are common and benign vascular tumors and usually involute spontaneously. Nevertheless, in some cases, treatment with systemic... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are common and benign vascular tumors and usually involute spontaneously. Nevertheless, in some cases, treatment with systemic corticosteroids or propranolol is required. No randomized controlled studies, in which both treatment options were compared, have been performed.
METHODS
A systematic literature review and a retrospective cohort study in the Academic Medical Centre of 56 patients (mean age, 5.5 months; range, 0-40 months; SD, 7.6) with IHs were carried out. These patients were treated with either systemic corticosteroids or propranolol. The outcomes of both treatment options were evaluated and compared.
RESULTS
The literature review showed that propranolol resulted in an involution in 100% of the patients, whereas corticosteroids only reached involution in 89%. The mean first response of the IH to propranolol was 3.2 days and of corticosteroids was 8.5 days. In our study sample, the patients treated with propranolol showed a faster and better response than the patients treated with corticosteroids. This is in line with literature findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Systemic propranolol treatment is more effective for IHs than systemic corticosteroid treatment. Secondly, propranolol elicits a faster response than corticosteroids.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Antineoplastic Agents; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Female; Hemangioma, Capillary; Humans; Infant; Male; Propranolol; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24051459
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318299cd4e -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2004Propranolol is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for migraine prophylaxis. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Propranolol is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for migraine prophylaxis.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to determine whether there is evidence that propranolol is more effective than placebo and as effective as other drugs for the interval (prophylactic) treatment of patients with migraine.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Potentially eligible studies were identified by searching MEDLINE/PubMed (1966 to May 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2003), and by screening bibliographies of reviews and identified articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials of at least 4 weeks duration comparing clinical effects of propranolol with placebo or another drug in adult migraine sufferers.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers extracted information on patients, methods, interventions, outcomes measured, and results using a pre-tested form. Study quality was assessed using two checklists (Jadad scale and Delphi list). Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures and insufficient reporting of the data, only selective quantitative meta-analyses were performed. As far as possible, effect size estimates were calculated for single trials. In addition, results were summarised descriptively and by a vote count among the reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 58 trials with 5072 participants met the inclusion criteria. The 58 selected trials included 26 comparisons with placebo and 47 comparisons with other drugs. The methodological quality of the majority of trials was unsatisfactory. The principal shortcomings were high dropout rates and insufficient reporting and handling of this problem in the analysis. Overall, the 26 placebo-controlled trials showed clear short-term effects of propranolol over placebo. Due to the lack of studies with long-term follow up, it is unclear whether these effects are stable after stopping propranolol. The 47 comparisons with calcium antagonists, other beta-blockers, and a variety of other drugs did not yield any clear-cut differences. Sample size was, however, insufficient in most trials to establish equivalence.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS
Although many trials have relevant methodological shortcomings, there is clear evidence that propranolol is more effective than placebo in the short-term interval treatment of migraine. Evidence on long-term effects is lacking. Propranolol seems to be as effective and safe as a variety of other drugs used for migraine prophylaxis.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Calcium Channel Blockers; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Refusal
PubMed: 15106196
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003225.pub2 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Oct 2020Flushing and erythema are frequent skin symptoms in rosacea. Because their adequate treatment remains a clinical challenge, new treatment options are explored, such as...
BACKGROUND
Flushing and erythema are frequent skin symptoms in rosacea. Because their adequate treatment remains a clinical challenge, new treatment options are explored, such as oral β-blockers.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy of oral β-blockers for rosacea-associated facial flushing and erythema.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched, including studies providing original data on the efficacy of oral β-blockers in rosacea patients with facial flushing and/or persistent erythema. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.
RESULTS
Nine studies evaluating the use of carvedilol, propranolol, nadolol, and β-blockers in general were included. Articles studying carvedilol and propranolol showed a large reduction of erythema and flushing during treatment with a rapid onset of symptom control. Bradycardia and hypotension were the most commonly described adverse events.
LIMITATIONS
Most studies had a retrospective design with a small sample size, and outcome measurement was often subjective.
CONCLUSIONS
Oral β-blockers could be an effective treatment option for patients with rosacea with facial erythema and flushing that does not respond to conventional therapy. Larger prospective trials with objective outcome assessment are needed to validate the promising results of these studies.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Bradycardia; Carvedilol; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Evaluation; Erythema; Facial Dermatoses; Flushing; Humans; Hypotension; Nadolol; Propranolol; Retrospective Studies; Rosacea; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32360760
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.129 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Oct 2021β-blockers are commonly prescribed to treat multiple cardiovascular (CV) diseases, but, frequently, adverse drug reactions and intolerance limit their use in clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
β-blockers are commonly prescribed to treat multiple cardiovascular (CV) diseases, but, frequently, adverse drug reactions and intolerance limit their use in clinical practice. Interindividual variability in response to β-blockers may be explained by genetic differences. In fact, pharmacogenetic interactions for some of these drugs have been widely studied, such as metoprolol. But studies that explore genetic variants affecting bisoprolol response are inconclusive, limited or confusing because of mixed results with other β-Blockers, different genetic polymorphisms observed, endpoint studied etc. Because of this, we performed a systematic review in order to find relevant genetic variants affecting bisoprolol response. We have found genetic polymorphism in several genes, but most of the studies focused in ADRB variants. The ADRB1 Arg389Gly (rs1801253) was the most studied genetic polymorphism and it seems to influence the response to bisoprolol, although studies are inconclusive. Even, we performed a meta-analysis about its influence on systolic/diastolic blood pressure in patients treated with bisoprolol, but this did not show statistically significant results. In conclusion, many genetic polymorphisms have been assessed about their influence on patients´ response to bisoprolol and the ADRB1 Arg389Gly (rs1801253) seems the most relevant genetic polymorphism in this regard but results have not been confirmed with a meta-analysis. Our results support the need of further studies about the impact of genetic variants on bisoprolol response, considering different genetic polymorphisms and conducting single and multiple SNPs analysis, including other clinical parameters related to bisoprolol response in a multivariate study.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Bisoprolol; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Pharmacogenetics; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34470728
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112069