-
Pediatric Dermatology 2013To systematically review the literature evaluating efficacy and adverse events of propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas, we searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane... (Review)
Review
To systematically review the literature evaluating efficacy and adverse events of propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas, we searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for all studies examining the response of infantile hemangiomas (IHs) to propranolol published between June 12, 2008, and June 15, 2012. Forty-one studies with 1,264 patients were included; 74% of patients were female and approximately 30% had received other treatments before propranolol. Propranolol was initiated at a mean age of 6.6 months at a mean dose of 2.1 mg/kg/day and for a mean treatment duration of 6.4 months. The response rate for patients with IHs treated with propranolol was 98% (range 82%-100%), with response rate defined as any improvement with propranolol. Treatment response rates were comparable for studies evaluating IHs at specific sites, such as periorbital IHs. Studies that followed patients after treatment completion reported IH rebound growth in 17% of patients. There were 371 adverse events reported in 1,189 patients. The most common adverse events were changes in sleep (n = 136) and acrocyanosis (n = 61). Serious adverse events were rare, with reports of symptomatic hypotension in five patients, hypoglycemia in four, and symptomatic bradycardia in one. This systematic review of 1,264 patients treated with propranolol for IHs showed a high rate of efficacy and a low rate of serious adverse events.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Female; Hemangioma; Humans; Infant; Male; Propranolol; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23405852
DOI: 10.1111/pde.12089 -
The British Journal of Ophthalmology May 2022To assess the comparative efficacy of latanoprostene bunod (LBN), a novel prostaglandin analogue (PGA), to other medications for open-angle glaucoma and ocular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS
To assess the comparative efficacy of latanoprostene bunod (LBN), a novel prostaglandin analogue (PGA), to other medications for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS
A systematic literature review adapted from the Li (Ophthalmology, 2016) study was conducted. Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched for randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 2014 and 19 March 2020. Studies had to report IOP reduction after 3 months for at least two different treatments among placebo, PGAs (bimatoprost 0.01%, bimatoprost 0.03%, latanoprost, LBN, tafluprost, unoprostone) or apraclonidine, betaxolol, brimonidine, brinzolamide, carteolol, dorzolamide, levobunolol, timolol, travoprost. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to provide the relative effect in terms of mean difference (95% credible interval) of IOP reduction and ranking probabilities. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated.
RESULTS
A total of 106 trials were included with data for 18 523 participants. LBN was significantly more effective than unoprostone (-3.45 (-4.77 to -2.12)). Although relative effect was not significative, compared with other PGAs, LBN numerically outperformed latanoprost (-0.70 (-1.83 to 0.43)) and tafluoprost (-0.41 (-1.87 to 1.07)), was similar to bimatoprost 0.01% (-0.02(-1.59 to 1.55)) and was slightly disadvantaged by bimatoprost 0.03% (-0.17 (-1.42 to 1.07)). LBN was significantly more efficient than the beta-blockers apraclonidine, betaxolol, brimonidine, brinzolamide, carteolol, dorzolamide and timolol. According to SUCRA, LBN was ranked second after bimatoprost 0.03%, followed by bimatoprost 0.01%.
CONCLUSION
LBN was significantly more effective than the PGA unoprostone and most of the beta-blockers. Compared with the most widely used PGAs, LBN numerically outperformed latanoprost and travoprost and was similar to bimatoprost 0.01%.
Topics: Amides; Antihypertensive Agents; Bayes Theorem; Betaxolol; Bimatoprost; Brimonidine Tartrate; Carteolol; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Latanoprost; Network Meta-Analysis; Ocular Hypertension; Prostaglandins A; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic; Timolol; Travoprost
PubMed: 33397657
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317262 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2013Stroke affects 15 million people per year worldwide. Despite recent developments in acute stroke treatment, prevention remains very important. Stroke has a high rate of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stroke affects 15 million people per year worldwide. Despite recent developments in acute stroke treatment, prevention remains very important. Stroke has a high rate of recurrence; therefore secondary prevention is also important. Many clinical approaches to control risk factors have been proposed. One of these approaches is the prescription of beta-blockers that have effects beyond the reduction of blood pressure, which can reduce the recurrence of stroke.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy of beta-blockers for preventing stroke recurrence and for reducing death and major vascular events in people with a previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and to determine their safety, particularly with regard to the development of diabetes mellitus.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (December 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (December 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2011), EMBASE (1980 to December 2011), and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to December 2011). We also searched ongoing trials registers and reference lists.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included participants with previous stroke or TIA due to arterial thrombosis or embolism.The intervention was any beta-blocker versus control, or beta-blocker plus other treatment versus other treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the trials identified, appraised quality, and extracted data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two RCTs involving 2193 participants in the review. Both studies randomised participants to either beta-blocker (atenolol 5 mg) or placebo. No statistical differences were noted among the groups in risks of fatal and non-fatal stroke (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 1.17). For all other outcomes analysed (death from all causes, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, major vascular events), we observed no significant differences between the groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
To date, no available evidence supports the routine use of beta-blockers for secondary prevention after stroke or TIA. More studies with larger samples are needed.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists; Atenolol; Cause of Death; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Secondary Prevention; Stroke
PubMed: 23728669
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007890.pub2 -
The International Journal of... 2022To describe the possible adverse effects of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solutions, high-concentration alcohol solutions, and povidone-iodine products, which are...
PURPOSE
To describe the possible adverse effects of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solutions, high-concentration alcohol solutions, and povidone-iodine products, which are indicated for disinfection of inanimate surfaces against human coronavirus of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV), on prosthesis materials, including zirconia, lithium disilicate, and acrylic resin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature research for articles published between January 2010 and February 2020 was conducted in Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct using a combination of the following MeSH/Emtree terms and keywords: sodium hypochlorite, alcohol, ethanol, povidone-iodine, dental ceramic, zirconia, lithium disilicate, and acrylic resin.
RESULTS
A total of 538 studies were identified in the search during initial screening, of which 44 were subject to full-text evaluation, and 24 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Seven articles on zirconia and lithium disilicate investigated the effect of NaOCl (0.5% and 1%), 96% isopropanol, and 80% ethanol on bond strength after saliva contamination. The remaining articles evaluated color alteration, surface roughness modifications, decrease in flexural strength, and bonding strength of all cleaning agents on acrylic resin.
CONCLUSION
NaOCl (1%) solution for 1 minute is recommended to reduce SARS-CoV infectivity and to minimize the risk of cross-contamination through prosthetic materials. The increase in surface roughness and color alteration were recorded using 1% NaOCl on acrylic resin, but this increase was not clinically significant. A decrease in bonding strength was determined after using 1% NaOCl, 96% isopropanol, and 80% ethanol solutions on lithium disilicate. Silanization before the try-in procedure and the application of the second layer of silane after cleaning methods are recommended to improve the bonding strength.
Topics: 2-Propanol; Acrylic Resins; COVID-19; Ceramics; Dental Bonding; Dental Porcelain; Dental Stress Analysis; Disinfection; Ethanol; Humans; Materials Testing; Pandemics; Povidone-Iodine; Resin Cements; Sodium Hypochlorite; Surface Properties; Zirconium
PubMed: 33662052
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.7151 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2016Beta-blockers are an essential part of standard therapy in adult congestive heart failure and therefore, are expected to be beneficial in children. However, congestive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Beta-blockers are an essential part of standard therapy in adult congestive heart failure and therefore, are expected to be beneficial in children. However, congestive heart failure in children differs from that in adults in terms of characteristics, aetiology, and drug clearance. Therefore, paediatric needs must be specifically investigated. This is an update of a Cochrane review previously published in 2009.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of beta-adrenoceptor-blockers (beta-blockers) in children with congestive heart failure.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS up to November 2015. Bibliographies of identified studies were checked. No language restrictions were applied.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised, controlled, clinical trials investigating the effect of beta-blocker therapy on paediatric congestive heart failure.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently extracted and assessed data from the included trials.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified four new studies for the review update; the review now includes seven studies with 420 participants. Four small studies with 20 to 30 children each, and two larger studies of 80 children each, showed an improvement of congestive heart failure with beta-blocker therapy. A larger study with 161 participants showed no evidence of benefit over placebo in a composite measure of heart failure outcomes. The included studies showed no significant difference in mortality or heart transplantation rates between the beta-blocker and control groups. No significant adverse events were reported with beta-blockers, apart from one episode of complete heart block. A meta-analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (LVFS) data showed a very small improvement with beta-blockers.However, there were vast differences in the age, age range, and health of the participants (aetiology and severity of heart failure; heterogeneity of diagnoses and co-morbidities); there was a range of treatments across studies (choice of beta-blocker, dosing, duration of treatment); and a lack of standardised methods and outcome measures. Therefore, the primary outcomes could not be pooled in meta-analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is not enough evidence to support or discourage the use of beta-blockers in children with congestive heart failure, or to propose a paediatric dosing scheme. However, the sparse data available suggested that children with congestive heart failure might benefit from beta-blocker treatment. Further investigations in clearly defined populations with standardised methodology are required to establish guidelines for therapy. Pharmacokinetic investigations of beta-blockers in children are also required to provide effective dosing in future trials.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Carbazoles; Carvedilol; Child; Child, Preschool; Heart Failure; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Metoprolol; Propanolamines; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 26820557
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007037.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2014Preterm birth is a major contributor to perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Tocolytic agents are drugs used to inhibit uterine contractions. Betamimetics are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Preterm birth is a major contributor to perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Tocolytic agents are drugs used to inhibit uterine contractions. Betamimetics are tocolytic agents that have been widely used, especially in resource-poor countries.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of betamimetics given to women with preterm labour.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 December 2013) and reference lists of retrieved studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials of betamimetics, administered by any route or any dose, in the treatment of women in preterm labour where betamimetics were compared with other betamimetics, placebo or no treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors assessed risk of bias and extracted the data independently.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-eight trials were assessed as eligible for inclusion in the review, but eight did not report any outcome data relevant to the review. Results are based on the 20 trials that contributed data.Twelve trials, involving 1367 women, compared betamimetics with placebo. Betamimetics decreased the number of women in preterm labour giving birth within 48 hours (average risk ratio (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.88, 10 trials, 1209 women). There was a decrease in the number of births within seven days (average RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98, five trials, 911 women) but there was no evidence of a reduction in preterm birth (before 37 weeks' gestation) (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.03, 10 trials, 1212 women). No benefit was demonstrated for betamimetics for perinatal death (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.55, 11 trials, 1332 infants), or neonatal death (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.27 to 3.00, six trials, 1174 infants). No significant effect was demonstrated for respiratory distress syndrome (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.08, eight trials, 1239 infants). A few trials reported on cerebral palsy, infant death and necrotising enterocolitis; no significant differences between groups were identified for any of these outcomes. Betamimetics were significantly associated with the following outcomes: withdrawal from treatment due to adverse effects; maternal chest pain; dyspnoea; palpitation; tremor; headaches; hypokalaemia; hyperglycaemia; nausea or vomiting; nasal stuffiness; and fetal tachycardia.Nine trials compared different types of betamimetics. Other betamimetics were compared with ritodrine in five trials (n = 948). Other comparisons were examined in single trials: hexoprenaline compared with salbutamol (n = 140), slow versus moderate release salbutamol (n = 52) and salbutamol compared with terbutaline (n = 200). Trials were small, varied, and of insufficient quality to delineate any consistent patterns of effect.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Betamimetics help to delay birth, which may give time to allow women to be transferred to tertiary care or to complete a course of antenatal corticosteroids. However, multiple adverse effects must be considered. The data are too few to support the use of any particular betamimetic.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Female; Fenoterol; Hexoprenaline; Humans; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Pregnancy; Premature Birth; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritodrine; Terbutaline; Tocolytic Agents
PubMed: 24500892
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004352.pub3 -
Journal of Neurology Mar 2013Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common movement disorders of adults, characterized by postural and kinetic tremor. It often causes embarrassment and more rarely... (Review)
Review
Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common movement disorders of adults, characterized by postural and kinetic tremor. It often causes embarrassment and more rarely serious disability, requiring treatment. To assess the current state of knowledge on ET therapy and produce recommendations based on the analysis of evidence the authors reviewed the literature regarding pharmacologic and surgical therapies, providing a quality assessment of the studies and the strength of recommendations for each treatment. A committee of experts selected clinical-based questions to guide the search. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all the studies conducted on patients with ET published until September 2010. Articles were classified according to GRADE evidence profile, a system for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation based on the quality of the studies. The quality of evidence was often rated as "low" or "very low" for the studies analyzed. Propranolol, long-acting propranolol, primidone, and topiramate are recommended as first-line therapy, with restrictions for their side effects. Arotinolol, sotalol, ICI 118.551 and LI 32.468 (experimental drugs), zonisamide, gabapentin, alprazolam, clozapine, and olanzapine are recommended as a second-line treatment. Botulinum toxin type A and thalamic deep-brain stimulation are recommended for refractory ET. The results highlight the need of well-designed direct comparison trials aimed at evaluating relative effectiveness and safety of the drugs currently used in clinical practice. Furthermore, additional controlled clinical trials are required to define other possible treatment strategies for ameliorating the management of ET.
Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clozapine; Deep Brain Stimulation; Essential Tremor; Humans; Italy; Movement Disorders; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Propranolol; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22886006
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6628-x -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Nov 2021Parkinson's disease (PD) ranks the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Aside from genetic predisposition, many external factors such as traumatic brain injury... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Parkinson's disease (PD) ranks the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Aside from genetic predisposition, many external factors such as traumatic brain injury and exposure of substances including pesticides also contribute to PD's pathogenesis. Many previous studies observed the association between the use of β-adrenoceptor acting agents and risk of PD.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize whether the use of β-agonist and β-antagonist agents were associated with risk of PD.
METHOD
We independently searched for published studies from EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception to February 2021. This meta-analysis includes 9 case-control studies and 1 cohort study meeting the eligibility criteria, with a total of 380,105 participants.
RESULTS
Overall β-antagonists use appeared to associate with increase PD risk with an odd ratio (OR) of 1.2 (95% CI 1.07-1.34). Propranolol and metoprolol had a statistically significant association with higher risk of PD: pooled OR was 1.67 (95% CI 1.22-2.29) and 1.07 (95% CI 1.03-1.1), respectively. On the other hand, β-agonists significantly inverse association with PD risk with OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.92). Salbutamol unexpectedly showed no statistical significance in reduced risk of PD with a pooled risk ratio of 1.0 (95% CI 0.87-1.16).
CONCLUSION
Overall β-antagonists, including propranolol and metoprolol, were associated with an increased risk of PD, in contrast to β-agonists, which were associated with decreased the risk.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Cohort Studies; Humans; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Parkinson Disease; Propranolol; Receptors, Adrenergic
PubMed: 34598055
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.120009 -
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics &... Dec 2022Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined as urinary urgency, usually with urinary frequency and nocturia. . The current treatment for OAB includes conservative management,...
BACKGROUND
Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined as urinary urgency, usually with urinary frequency and nocturia. . The current treatment for OAB includes conservative management, surgery, and pharmacotherapy. Mirabegron is a new drug acting by the ß3-adrenoceptor agonism. This study aimed to review the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron in the treatment of OAB.
AREAS COVERED
We searched published articles in electronic search databases. Ten studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Various antimuscarinics, including oxybutynin, fesoterodine, tolterodine, darifenacin, and trospium were compared with mirabegron. The results were evaluated and compared according to the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), cost/year, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Of the ten studies in only three, mirabegron was not a cost-effective strategy. In seven cases, mirabegron was cost-effective.
EXPERT OPINION
The cost-effectiveness of mirabegron was variable in different regions; however, most of the studies show the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron. Our study illustrates that mirabegron's ICER in comparison with its comparators is below the willingness to pay threshold even in the countries with low GDP/Capita. Our proposal for future economic studies for OAB pharmacotherapy is to compare different doses, formulations, and administration forms in a real-world context.
Topics: Humans; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Acetanilides; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; Tolterodine Tartrate; Muscarinic Antagonists; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36172806
DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2130761 -
Human Psychopharmacology May 2015This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the use of pindolol augmentation in depressed patients resistant to selective serotonin reuptake... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the use of pindolol augmentation in depressed patients resistant to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and PsychINFO databases from 1970 through December 2013 was conducted. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studied on unipolar SSRI-resistant depressed adults were included. The primary outcome was mean change scores of depressive symptom on the depression rating scales, assessed with standardized mean differences.
RESULTS
Five RCTs consisting of 154 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The overall pooled effect size in the primary and secondary efficacy analysis showed no significant effects of pindolol plus SSRI therapy (standardized mean difference = -0.43, p = 0.24; OR = 1.92, p = 0.39, respectively). In terms of acceptability, there was no statistical difference in either tolerability or safety between the two groups (OR = 0.46, p = 0.40; OR = 0.90, p = 0.94, respectively). These estimates remained robust through several sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except 7.5 mg-qd pindolol augmentation did show a significant benefit over 2.5-mg tid pindolol augmentation.
CONCLUSIONS
Pindolol augmentation may not be suitable for treatment-resistant depression patients with SSRI-resistant depression. However, once-daily high-dose pindolol (7.5 mg qd) appears to show a promising benefit in these patients.
Topics: Adult; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pindolol; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25689398
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2465