-
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2023The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used tool for assessing the risk of falls in older adults. However, to increase the test's predictive value, the instrumented... (Review)
Review
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a widely used tool for assessing the risk of falls in older adults. However, to increase the test's predictive value, the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test has been developed, incorporating different technological approaches. This systematic review aims to explore the evidence of the technological proposal for the segmentation and analysis of iTUG in elderlies with or without pathologies. A search was conducted in five major databases, following PRISMA guidelines. The review included 40 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The most used technology was inertial sensors (75% of the studies), with healthy elderlies (35%) and elderlies with Parkinson's disease (32.5%) being the most analyzed participants. In total, 97.5% of the studies applied automatic segmentation using rule-based algorithms. The iTUG test offers an economical and accessible alternative to increase the predictive value of TUG, identifying different variables, and can be used in clinical, community, and home settings.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Accidental Falls; Postural Balance; Time and Motion Studies; Parkinson Disease; Physical Therapy Modalities
PubMed: 37050485
DOI: 10.3390/s23073426 -
Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) May 2022The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a major role in knee proprioception and is thus responsible for maintaining knee joint stability and functionality. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a major role in knee proprioception and is thus responsible for maintaining knee joint stability and functionality. The available evidence suggests that ACL reconstruction diminishes somatosensory feedback and proprioceptive functioning, which are vital for adequate joint positioning and movement control.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of an ACL rupture on knee proprioception after arthroscopic ACL repair surgery or conservative treatment.
METHODS
A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to 10th October 2020: PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library and Scopus. Randomized and non-randomized studies that evaluated proprioception using the joint position sense (JPS) and threshold to detection of passive motion (TTDPM) techniques at 15°-30° knee flexion with an external healthy control group in a time period between 6 and 24 months post injury or operation were included in the analysis.
RESULTS
In total, 4857 studies were identified, from which 11 were included in the final quantitative analysis. The results demonstrated that proprioception after arthroscopic ACL repair surgery was significantly lower than in the healthy control group (JPS: standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.87, p < 0.01, n = 6 studies; TTDPM: SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.20-1.34, p < 0.01, n = 4 studies). There were no significant differences in proprioception between the conservative treatment group and the healthy control group (JPS: SMD 0.57, 95% CI - 0.69 to 1.84, p = 0.37, n = 4 studies; TTDPM: SMD 0.82, 95% CI - 0.02 to 1.65, p = 0.05, n = 2 studies), although measures for TTDPM were close to statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
The findings of the present systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that knee proprioception is persistently compromised 6-24 months following surgical treatment of ACL tears compared with healthy controls. The reduced kinesthetic awareness after ACL surgery is of high relevance for optimizing individual treatment plans in these patients. As the current literature is still scarce about the exact underlying mechanisms, further research is needed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021198617).
Topics: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Humans; Knee Joint; Proprioception
PubMed: 34854058
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01600-z -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jul 2014Clinicians commonly examine posture and movement in people with the belief that correcting dysfunctional movement may reduce pain. If dysfunctional movement is to be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Clinicians commonly examine posture and movement in people with the belief that correcting dysfunctional movement may reduce pain. If dysfunctional movement is to be accurately identified, clinicians should know what constitutes normal movement and how this differs in people with low back pain (LBP). This systematic review examined studies that compared biomechanical aspects of lumbo-pelvic movement in people with and without LBP.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, AMI, CINAHL, Scopus, AMED, ISI Web of Science were searched from inception until January 2014 for relevant studies. Studies had to compare adults with and without LBP using skin surface measurement techniques to measure lumbo-pelvic posture or movement. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and identified and extracted data. Standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for group differences between people with and without LBP, and where possible, meta-analyses were performed. Within-group variability in all measurements was also compared.
RESULTS
The search identified 43 eligible studies. Compared to people without LBP, on average, people with LBP display: (i) no difference in lordosis angle (8 studies), (ii) reduced lumbar ROM (19 studies), (iii) no difference in lumbar relative to hip contribution to end-range flexion (4 studies), (iv) no difference in standing pelvic tilt angle (3 studies), (v) slower movement (8 studies), and (vi) reduced proprioception (17 studies). Movement variability appeared greater for people with LBP for flexion, lateral flexion and rotation ROM, and movement speed, but not for other movement characteristics. Considerable heterogeneity exists between studies, including a lack of detail or standardization between studies on the criteria used to define participants as people with LBP (cases) or without LBP (controls).
CONCLUSIONS
On average, people with LBP have reduced lumbar ROM and proprioception, and move more slowly compared to people without LBP. Whether these deficits exist prior to LBP onset is unknown.
Topics: Biomechanical Phenomena; Chi-Square Distribution; Humans; Lordosis; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Pelvis; Posture; Proprioception; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 25012528
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-229 -
Gait & Posture Oct 2022Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural deviation. An increasing number of studies have reported that people with FHP present with impaired postural control and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Forward head posture (FHP) is a common postural deviation. An increasing number of studies have reported that people with FHP present with impaired postural control and gait; however, there is conflicting evidence. A systematic review focusing on these relationships has been unavailable to date.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Is there a relationship between FHP, postural control and gait?
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021231908). Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus (via EBSCO) were systematically searched, and a manual search was performed using the reference lists of included studies. Eligible studies included observational studies addressing the relationship between FHP, postural control and/or gait. Quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cross-Sectional Studies.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were selected for this review. Consistent evidence supported that people with FHP had significant alterations in limits of stability (n = 3), performance-based balance (n = 3), and cervical proprioception (n = 4). Controversial evidence existed for a relationship of FHP with static balance (n = 4) and postural stability control (n = 4). Limited evidence existed to support an alteration in gait and vestibular function. Three studies on induced FHP consistently identified no reduced postural control.
SIGNIFICANCE
Current evidence supports an association between FHP and a detrimental alteration in limits of stability, performance-based balance, and cervical proprioception. Instead of simply indicating impaired overall balance, the findings of this review indicate that a reduction in specific aspects of the postural control requires to be clarified in clinical evaluation for individuals with FHP, which would facilitate the planning and application of appropriate interventions to prevent dysfunctions and disability.
Topics: Humans; Posture; Cross-Sectional Studies; Postural Balance; Gait; Neck
PubMed: 36274469
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.10.008 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Jun 2021To summarize the available literature related to reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go in typical adults and children, and individuals diagnosed with the...
PURPOSE
To summarize the available literature related to reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go in typical adults and children, and individuals diagnosed with the following pathologies: Huntington's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, Down syndrome, or cerebral palsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A search was conducted using MeSH terms and keywords through a variety of databases. Data regarding reliability and validity were synthesized.
RESULTS
This review included 77 articles. Results were variable depending on the studied population. The Timed Up and Go showed excellent reliability in typical adults, in individuals with cerebral palsy, in individuals with multiple sclerosis, in individuals with Huntington's disease, individuals with a stroke, and individuals with a spinal cord injury. The TUG demonstrated strong concurrent validity for individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury. Predictive validity data was limited.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the literature assessed, the Timed Up and Go is clinically applicable and reliable across multiple populations. The Timed Up and Go has a wide variety of clinical use making it a diverse measure that should be considered when choosing an outcome an activity based outcome measure. However, there are some limitations in the validity of the utilization of the Timed Up and Go to some populations due to a lack of data and/or poor choice of comparison outcome measures when assessing validity. Additional research is needed for young to middle aged adults.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONOutcome measures are a vital component of clinical practice across all populations.The Timed Up and Go is a highly studied outcome measure in the geriatric population, but lacks research of its applicability to other populations.This study was able to highlight the clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go in populations that under utilize this outcome measure.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Child; Disabled Persons; Humans; Longevity; Middle Aged; Physical Therapy Modalities; Postural Balance; Reproducibility of Results; Stroke
PubMed: 31656104
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1682066 -
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2017The use of dual-task training paradigm to enhance postural stability in patients with balance impairments is an emerging area of interest. The differential effects of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The use of dual-task training paradigm to enhance postural stability in patients with balance impairments is an emerging area of interest. The differential effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability still remain unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to analyze the effects of dual task and training application on static and dynamic postural stability among various population groups. Systematic identification of published literature was performed adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, from inception until June 2016, on the online databases Scopus, PEDro, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SportDiscus. Experimental studies analyzing the effects of dual task and dual-task training on postural stability were extracted, critically appraised using PEDro scale, and then summarized according to modified PEDro level of evidence. Of 1,284 records, 42 studies involving 1,480 participants met the review's inclusion criteria. Of the studies evaluating the effects of dual-task training on postural stability, 87.5% of the studies reported significant enhancements, whereas 30% of the studies evaluating acute effects of dual tasks on posture reported significant enhancements, 50% reported significant decrements, and 20% reported no effects. Meta-analysis of the pooled studies revealed moderate but significant enhancements of dual-task training in elderly participants (95% CI: 1.16-2.10) and in patients suffering from chronic stroke (-0.22 to 0.86). The adverse effects of complexity of dual tasks on postural stability were also revealed among patients with multiple sclerosis (-0.74 to 0.05). The review also discusses the significance of verbalization in a dual-task setting for increasing cognitive-motor interference. Clinical implications are discussed with respect to practical applications in rehabilitation settings.
Topics: Exercise; Humans; Postural Balance
PubMed: 28356727
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S125201 -
Journal of Athletic Training Nov 2017Reference: Schiftan GS, Ross LA, Hahne AJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Reference: Schiftan GS, Ross LA, Hahne AJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):238-244.
CLINICAL QUESTION
Does the use of proprioceptive training as a sole intervention decrease the incidence of initial or recurrent ankle sprains in the athletic population?
DATA SOURCES
The authors completed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) from inception to October 2013. The reference lists of all identified articles were manually screened to obtain additional studies. The following key words were used. Phase 1 population terms were sport*, athlet*, and a combination of the two. Phase 2 intervention terms were propriocept*, balance, neuromusc* adj5 train*, and combinations thereof. Phase 3 condition terms were ankle adj5 sprain*, sprain* adj5 ankle, and combinations thereof.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies were included according to the following criteria: (1) the design was a moderate- to high-level randomized controlled trial (>4/10 on the PEDro scale), (2) the participants were physically active (regardless of previous ankle injury), (3) the intervention group received proprioceptive training only, compared with a control group that received no proprioceptive training, and (4) the rate of ankle sprains was reported as a main outcome. Search results were limited to the English language. No restrictions were placed on publication dates.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two authors independently reviewed the studies for eligibility. The quality of the pertinent articles was assessed using the PEDro scale, and data were extracted to calculate the relative risk. Data extracted were number of participants, intervention, frequency, duration, follow-up period, and injury rate.
MAIN RESULTS
Of the initial 345 studies screened, 7 were included in this review for a total of 3726 participants. Three analyses were conducted for proprioceptive training used (1) to prevent ankle sprains regardless of history (n = 3654), (2) to prevent recurrent ankle sprains (n = 1542), or (3) as the primary preventive measure for those without a history of ankle sprain (n = 946). Regardless of a history of ankle sprain, participants had a reduction in ankle-sprain rates (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55, 0.77; numbers needed to treat [NNT] = 17, 95% CI = 11, 33). For individuals with a history of ankle sprains, proprioceptive training demonstrated a reduction in repeat ankle sprains (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.51, 0.81; NNT = 13, 95% CI = 7, 100). Proprioceptive training as a primary preventive measure demonstrated significant results (RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.97; NNT = 33, 95% CI = 16, 1000).
CONCLUSIONS
Proprioceptive training programs were effective in reducing the incidence rates of ankle sprains in the athletic population, including those with and those without a history of ankle sprains.
Topics: Ankle Injuries; Ankle Joint; Humans; Physical Therapy Modalities; Proprioception; Sports; Sprains and Strains
PubMed: 29140127
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.11.16 -
Journal of Neuroengineering and... Nov 2021Physical training (PT, e.g., Tai Chi and strength training) has been demonstrated to improve balance control and prevent falls. Recently, exergame intervention (EI) has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison between the effects of exergame intervention and traditional physical training on improving balance and fall prevention in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Physical training (PT, e.g., Tai Chi and strength training) has been demonstrated to improve balance control and prevent falls. Recently, exergame intervention (EI) has emerged to prevent falls by enhancing both physical and cognitive functions in older adults. Therefore, we aim to quantitatively assess and compare the effects of PT and EI on the performance of balance control and fall prevention in healthy older adults via meta-analysis.
METHODS
A search strategy based on the PICOS principle was used to find the publication in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE. The quality and risk of bias in the studies were independently assessed by two researchers.
RESULTS
Twenty studies consisting of 845 participants were included. Results suggested that as compared to PT, EI induced greater improvement in postural control (sway path length, SMD = - 0.66, 95% CI - 0.91 to - 0.41, P < 0.001, I = 0%; sway speed, SMD = - 0.49, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.27, P < 0.001, I = 42%) and dynamic balance (SMD = - 0.19, 95% CI - 0.35 to - 0.03, P = 0.02, I = 0%) in healthy older adults. The EI with 90-119 min/week for more than 8-week significantly reduced falls. Subgroup analyses revealed that exergames, which were designed by the two principles of repeatedly performing diversified tasks and gradually increase the difficulty of the task, induced significant effects in improving balance control and falls prevention respectively (P = 0.03, P = 0.009). In addition, intervention that combines EI and PT induced significant improvement in postural control (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION
The exergame intervention, especially the combination of EI and PT, is a promising strategy to improve balance control and reduce falls in healthy older adults. Future studies with rigorous design, larger sample size, and follow-up assessments are needed to further assess the effectiveness of diverse exergame interventions in fall prevention and to quantify the "dose-effect" relationship, as well as the carry-over effect of such intervention, which will ultimately help optimize the rehabilitative strategies to improve balance control and prevent falls.
Topics: Aged; Exercise; Exergaming; Humans; Postural Balance; Resistance Training
PubMed: 34819097
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00917-0 -
British Journal of Sports Medicine May 2015To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published... (Review)
Review
Injury risk factors, screening tests and preventative strategies: a systematic review of the evidence that underpins the perceptions and practices of 44 football (soccer) teams from various premier leagues.
PURPOSE
To systematically review the scientific level of evidence for the 'Top 3' risk factors, screening tests and preventative exercises identified by a previously published survey of 44 premier league football (soccer) teams. Also, to provide an overall scientific level of evidence and graded recommendation based on the current research literature.
METHODS
A systematic literature search (Pubmed [MEDLINE], SportDiscus, PEDRO and Cochrane databases). The quality of the articles was assessed and a level of evidence (1++ to 4) was assigned. Level 1++ corresponded to the highest level of evidence available and 4, the lowest. A graded recommendation (A: strong, B: moderate, C: weak, D: insufficient evidence to assign a specific recommendation) for use in the practical setting was given.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were analysed. The overall level of evidence for the risk factors previous injury, fatigue and muscle imbalance were 2++, 4 and 'inconclusive', respectively. The graded recommendation for functional movement screen, psychological questionnaire and isokinetic muscle testing were all 'D'. Hamstring eccentric had a weak graded 'C' recommendation, and eccentric exercise for other body parts was 'D'. Balance/proprioception exercise to reduce ankle and knee sprain injury was assigned a graded recommendation 'D'.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of perceptions and practices of premier league teams have a low level of evidence and low graded recommendation. This does not imply that these perceptions and practices are not important or not valid, as it may simply be that they are yet to be sufficiently validated or refuted by research.
Topics: Athletic Injuries; Early Diagnosis; Evidence-Based Medicine; Exercise Therapy; Fatigue; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Muscle Strength; Muscle, Skeletal; Postural Balance; Proprioception; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Soccer; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 25576530
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094104 -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics May 2023In recent years, sports games based on virtual reality (VR) have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of diseases related to the elderly. However, there... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In recent years, sports games based on virtual reality (VR) have been widely used in the prevention and treatment of diseases related to the elderly. However, there seems to be no consensus on the improvement and comparison of physical function, balance and falls in elderly people with balance impairment.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to explore the effects of VR intervention on physical function, balance and falls in elderly people with balance impairment.
METHODS
Systematic literature searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were performed for VR games-related randomized controlled trials or comparison studies among elderly participants with impaired balance, published in English or Chinese until March 20, 2022. The Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean deviation or mean difference of the sample and its 95% confidence interval (CI) in VR games.
RESULTS
The systematic review included 23 studies. The results showed that VR intervention had significant effects on hand grip strength (MD:1.30, P = 0.040), knee extension strength (MD:-6.27, P<0.001), five times sit-to-stand test scores (MD:1.13, P = 0.030), timed up-and-go test scores (MD:-1.01, P = 0.001), berg balance scale scores (MD:2.37, P<0.001), and falls efficacy scale scores (SMD:-0.28, P = 0.020). Subgroup analysis results showed that VR intervention was more effective on improving TUG and BBS scores than the conventional exercise group (MD=-0.54, P = 0.004; MD=3.24, P<0.001) and the non-intervention group (MD=-0.98, P = 0.001; MD=3.30, P < 0.001). The balance training-based VR had a significant effect on improving TUG (MD=-1.03, P = 0.004) and BBS (MD=2.93, P<0.001), and 20-45 min intervention, ≥3 times/wk, 5-8 wk cycles were significant in improving TUG (MD=-0.89, P<0.001; MD=-0.75, P = 0.0003; MD=-1.54, P<0.0001). VR intervention significantly improved TUG (MD=-2.27, P<0.0001) and BBS (MD=3.41, P<0.0001) in older adults in the hospital or nursing home compared with those residing in communities.
CONCLUSION
VR interventions can help the elderly with impaired balance to overcome traditional sports obstacles and improve physical function, balance and minimize falls. Balance training-based VR intervention is more effective in balance recovery and fall prevention compared with game program. An intervention plan comprising 20-45 min, 5-8 wk cycles, and ≥3 times/wk frequency has significantly higher effects for high-risk elderly populations living in hospitals or nursing homes.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Accidental Falls; Hand Strength; Nursing Homes; Virtual Reality; Postural Balance
PubMed: 36680968
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.104924