-
European Urology Jun 2023Minimally invasive surgical therapies for male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction were developed to be safer and more tolerable than... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Minimally invasive surgical therapies for male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction were developed to be safer and more tolerable than standard ablative techniques. These treatments have not been compared with each other in a randomised fashion, and for some treatments, there are no trials against a reference technique.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and grey literature for randomised controlled trials was performed. Trials meeting the selection criteria were assessed for the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Treatments were compared, using a network meta-analysis, in terms of outcomes including symptom score, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual urine, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), and scales from the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The search identified 63 trials. Symptoms and quality of life for PAE, PUL, and WVTT appeared similar to those for TURP, whereas TURP was found to have the most clinically significant improvement in flow rate. TUMT was less efficacious than TURP but provided similar results on quality of life. Comparisons of ejaculatory function favoured WVTT and PUL compared with TURP. The relative efficacy of iTIND was less clear because of the risk of bias in the respective trial.
CONCLUSIONS
PAE, PUL, and WVTT appear favourable from a risk-benefit perspective despite probably having less efficacy than TURP for objective outcomes. These findings warrant confirmation through long-term randomised controlled trials.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This paper has summarised the evidence from 63 clinical trials on minimally invasive surgical therapies for men with symptoms of an enlarged prostate, including water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), temporary implantable nitinol device, and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). Improvement in symptoms for each of PAE, PUL, TUMT, and WVTT in short-term follow-up was similar to that for the standard surgical treatment, although standard surgery appeared to provide the greatest increase in urine flow. Men who had WVTT or PUL were less likely to have problems with sexual function than those who had standard surgery.
Topics: Humans; Male; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Quality of Life; Network Meta-Analysis; Steam; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36964042
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.028 -
European Urology Jun 2015A number of transurethral ablative techniques based on the use of innovative medical devices have been introduced in the recent past for the surgical treatment of benign... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update.
CONTEXT
A number of transurethral ablative techniques based on the use of innovative medical devices have been introduced in the recent past for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transurethral ablative procedures for BPO.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic literature search was performed for all RCTs comparing any transurethral surgical technique for BPO to another between 1992 and 2013. Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 1 yr based on International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. Efficacy at midterm follow-up, prostate volume, perioperative data, and short-term and long-term complications were also assessed. Data were analyzed using RevMan software.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 69 RCTs (8517 enrolled patients) were included. No significant difference was found in terms of short-term efficacy between bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP). However, B-TURP was associated with a lower rate of perioperative complications. Better short-term efficacy outcomes, fewer immediate complications, and a shorter hospital stay were found after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) compared with M-TURP. Compared with M-TURP, GreenLight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) was associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications but no different short-term efficacy outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis shows that HoLEP is associated with more favorable outcomes than M-TURP in published RCTs. B-TURP and PVP have resulted in better perioperative outcomes without significant differences regarding efficacy parameters after short-term follow-up compared with M-TURP. Further studies are needed to provide long-term comparative data and head-to head comparisons of emerging techniques.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate, photovaporization of the prostate, and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate have shown efficacy outcomes comparable with conventional techniques yet reduce the complication rate. The respective role of these new options in the surgical armamentarium needs to be refined to propose tailored surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction relief.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Solid-State; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prostate; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction; Volatilization
PubMed: 24972732
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017 -
BMC Medicine Dec 2021Obesity is a worldwide epidemic that has been associated with a plurality of diseases in observational studies. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Obesity is a worldwide epidemic that has been associated with a plurality of diseases in observational studies. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies of the association between body mass index (BMI) and chronic diseases.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase were searched for MR studies on adult BMI in relation to major chronic diseases, including diabetes mellitus; diseases of the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems; and neoplasms. A meta-analysis was performed for each disease by using results from published MR studies and corresponding de novo analyses based on summary-level genetic data from the FinnGen consortium (n = 218,792 individuals).
RESULTS
In a meta-analysis of results from published MR studies and de novo analyses of the FinnGen consortium, genetically predicted higher BMI was associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 14 circulatory disease outcomes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, five digestive system diseases, three musculoskeletal system diseases, and multiple sclerosis as well as cancers of the digestive system (six cancer sites), uterus, kidney, and bladder. In contrast, genetically predicted higher adult BMI was associated with a decreased risk of Dupuytren's disease, osteoporosis, and breast, prostate, and non-melanoma cancer, and not associated with Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease.
CONCLUSIONS
The totality of the evidence from MR studies supports a causal role of excess adiposity in a plurality of chronic diseases. Hence, continued efforts to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity are a major public health goal.
Topics: Adiposity; Adult; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Male; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Multiple Chronic Conditions; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
PubMed: 34906131
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02188-x -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Dec 2023Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is recommended for first line surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by moderate and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) is recommended for first line surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) caused by moderate and large prostatic adenoma. However, its role in the retreatment setting after failed previous surgical treatment for BPO remains uncaptured. In this scope, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the safety and efficacy of AEEP in the retreatment setting.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases from inception to March 2022 for prospective or retrospective studies involving patients undergoing prostatic enucleation for recurrent or residual BPO after previous standard or minimally invasive surgical treatments for BPO. Based on data availability, we performed a meta-analysis comparing AEEP in patients with recurrent or residual BPO versus AEEP for primary BPO.
PROSPERO
CRD42022308941).
RESULTS
We included 15 studies in the systematic review and 10 in the meta-analysis (6553 patients, 841 with recurrent or residual BPO and 5712 with primary BPO). All included studies involved patients undergoing HoLEP or ThuLEP. In terms of Qmax, post-void residual, International Prostate Symptom Score, removed adenoma, operative time, duration of catheterization and hospital stay, as well as complications, HoLEP for recurrent or residual BPO was equally effective compared to HoLEP for primary BPO up to 1 year postoperatively. Importantly, the beneficial effect of HoLEP on the retreatment setting was observed after previous standard or minimally invasive surgical treatments for BPO. The overall strength of evidence for all outcomes was deemed very low.
CONCLUSIONS
HoLEP may be safely and effectively used in experienced hands for the surgical treatment of recurrent or residual BPO in patients with large or moderate prostates following previous open, endoscopic or minimally invasive surgical treatment for BPO.
Topics: Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Endoscopy
PubMed: 37193777
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00677-z -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2022Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and bladder tumors may co-exist, especially among elderly patients. Transurethral... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and bladder tumors may co-exist, especially among elderly patients. Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) and endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction in the same setting are avoided by many surgeons due to concerns for tumor cell seeding and recurrences in the prostatic urethra.
AIM
The aim of this study was assess the effect of concomitant TURBT and endoscopic BPO surgery on oncological safety and patient quality of life via systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases and sources of grey literature published before June 2021 for relevant studies. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMD) to compare concomitant TURBT and BPO surgery versus TURBT alone in terms of recurrence and progression rates. Accordingly, we undertook multiple subgroups and sensitivity analyses (PROSPERO: CRD42020173363).
RESULTS
Three randomized and twelve retrospective observational studies with 2421 participants were included. Across studies with good methodological quality, no statistically significant differences were demonstrated regarding overall bladder tumors recurrence rates between concomitant endoscopic BPO surgery and TURBT versus TURBT alone (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.60-1.09, I = 42%). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in recurrences located at the bladder neck and/or prostatic urethra (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.76-1.47, I = 0%), time to first recurrence (WMD: -0.2 months, 95% Cl: -2.2-1.8, I = 48%), and progression rate (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.67-1.64, I = 0%). Subgroup analyses based on tumor grade, number of tumors, and utilization of single-instillation chemotherapy post-TURBT did not detect any significant differences in overall bladder tumor recurrence. The level of evidence was estimated as low for all outcomes. Concomitant surgery improved lower urinary tract symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Concomitant endoscopic BPO surgery and TURBT are oncologically safe and improve LUTS-related quality of life.
PubMed: 36294528
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206208 -
BMJ Open Apr 2022To systematically review the literature regarding the reliability and validity of assessment methods available in primary care for bladder outlet obstruction or benign...
Reliability and validity of assessment methods available in primary care for bladder outlet obstruction and benign prostatic obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the literature regarding the reliability and validity of assessment methods available in primary care for bladder outlet obstruction or benign prostatic obstruction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
DESIGN
Systematic review with best evidence synthesis.
SETTING
Primary care.
PARTICIPANTS
Men with LUTS due to bladder outlet obstruction or benign prostatic obstruction.
REVIEW METHODS
PubMed, Ebsco/CINAHL and Embase databases were searched for studies on the validity and reliability of assessment methods for bladder outlet obstruction and benign prostatic obstruction in primary care. Methodological quality was assessed with the COSMIN checklist. Studies with poor methodology were excluded from the best evidence synthesis.
RESULTS
Of the 5644 studies identified, 61 were scored with the COSMIN checklist, 37 studies were included in the best evidence synthesis, 18 evaluated bladder outlet obstruction and 17 benign prostatic obstruction, 2 evaluated both. Overall, reliability was poorly evaluated. Transrectal and transabdominal ultrasound showed moderate to good validity to evaluate bladder outlet obstruction. Measured prostate volume with these ultrasound methods, to identify benign prostatic obstruction, showed moderate to good accuracy, supported by a moderate to high level of evidence. Uroflowmetry for bladder outlet obstruction showed poor to moderate diagnostic accuracy, depending on used cut-off values. Questionnaires were supported by high-quality evidence, although correlations and diagnostic accuracy were poor to moderate compared with criterion tests. Other methods were supported by low level evidence.
CONCLUSION
Clinicians in primary care can incorporate transabdominal and transrectal ultrasound or uroflowmetry in the evaluation of men with LUTS but should not solely rely on these methods as the diagnostic accuracy is insufficient and reliability remains insufficiently researched. Low-to-moderate levels of evidence for most assessment methods were due to methodological shortcomings and inconsistency in the studies. This highlights the need for better study designs in this domain.
Topics: Female; Humans; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Primary Health Care; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Reproducibility of Results; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
PubMed: 35487713
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056234 -
European Urology Aug 2021Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is associated with sexual dysfunction. Furthermore, numerous BPO interventions may themselves impact sexual function. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is associated with sexual dysfunction. Furthermore, numerous BPO interventions may themselves impact sexual function.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review with network meta-analysis to evaluate how BPO interventions affect erectile function.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Three databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical interventions for BPO. The primary outcome was postoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score at ten time points up to 72 mo. A random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed. In comparison to monopolar transurethral resection (mTURP), the mean difference (MD) with 95% credible interval (CrI) and rank probability (rank p) were calculated for interventions. The mean baseline score was studied in meta-regression. τ values were used to quantify heterogeneity.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A total of 48 papers (33 RCTs, 5159 patients, 16 interventions) were included. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) ranked highest at 1 mo (MD 3.88, 95% CrI -0.47 to 8.25; rank p = 0.742), 6 mo (MD 2.43, 95% CrI -0.72 to 5.62; rank p = 0.581), 12 mo (MD 2.94, 95% CrI -0.26 to 6.12, rank p = 0.782), and 24 mo (MD 3.63, 95% CrI 0.14 to 7.11; rank p = 0.948), at which point statistical significance was reached. At time points up to 60 mo, there were no statistically significant comparisons for other interventions. Analyses were not possible at 18, 48, or 72 mo. β did not reach statistical significance in meta-regression. τ was highest at 1 mo (0.56) and 60 mo (0.55).
CONCLUSIONS
PUL ranked highly and resulted in erectile function improvement at 24 mo compared to mTURP, but direct evidence is lacking. We did not observe significant differences in erectile function following other interventions up to 60 mo. Owing to heterogeneity, our conclusions are weakest at 1 and 60 mo. Further RCTs comparing sexual function outcomes are recommended, such as PUL versus holmium laser or bipolar enucleation.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Different surgical treatments can be used to treat benign enlargement of the prostate causing urinary problems. We compared the effects of various treatments on erectile function at time points up to 5 years after surgery. Compared to surgical removal of some of the prostate gland (transurethral resection of the prostate, TURP), a technique called prostatic urethral lift resulted in better erectile function scores at 24 months. However, other treatments did not differ in their effect on erectile function.
Topics: Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Transurethral Resection of Prostate
PubMed: 34127315
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.012 -
European Urology Focus Sep 2023Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) aims at ablating prostate adenoma by resection, enucleation, or vaporisation. Apart from established ablation modes according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, various technologies have emerged as safe/effective alternatives but remain under investigation.
OBJECTIVE
To explore short-term benefits/harms of emerging technologies for surgical management of LUTS/BPO.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL via Ovid up to June 18, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), Rezum, prostatic urethral lift (PUL), and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) versus sham/transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
We included ten RCTs (1108 men). Aquablation versus TURP: insignificant change in International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS; mean difference [MD] 0.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.44 to 2.44), quality of life (QoL; MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.21), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; MD -0.30, 95% CI -3.71 to 3.11), retreatment (risk ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-1.66), and urinary incontinence (UI; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.26-1.95). PAE versus monopolar TURP (M-TURP): insignificant change in IPSS (MD 3.33, 95% CI -28.39 to 35.05), QoL (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.54), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5; MD 3.07, 95% CI -1.78 to 7.92), and UI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.01-2.86), and significant change in Qmax (MD -9.52, 95% CI -14.04 to -5.0), favouring M-TURP. PAE versus bipolar TURP: insignificant change in IPSS (MD -2.80, 95% CI -6.61 to 1.01), QoL (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.46 to 0.08), Qmax (MD -3.51, 95% CI -8.08 to 1.06), UI (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01-2.51), and retreatment (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.19-19.63). PUL versus TURP: insignificant change in QoL (MD 0.40, 95% CI -0.29 to 1.09), UI (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-1.05), and retreatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.12-1.86), and significant change in IPSS (MD 3.40, 95% CI 0.22-6.58), and IIEF-5 (MD 3.00, 95% CI 0.41-5.59) and Qmax (MD -9.60, 95% CI -13.44 to -5.76), favouring PUL and TURP, respectively. Rezum and iTIND have not been evaluated in RCTs against TURP to date.
CONCLUSIONS
Supporting evidence for clinical use of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits/harms should be investigated further in high-quality RCTs.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This review summarises the evidence for the clinical use of aquablation, prostatic arterial embolisation (PAE), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), Rezum, and temporary implantable nitinol device (iTIND) to manage lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. The supporting evidence for the clinical usage of aquablation, PAE, PUL, Rezum, and iTIND is very limited. Benefits and harms should be investigated further in high-quality randomised controlled trials.
PubMed: 37741783
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.09.003 -
European Urology Jun 2016The urodynamic outcomes for α1-blockers (ABs) treatment in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS/BPE) is a matter of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
The urodynamic outcomes for α1-blockers (ABs) treatment in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS/BPE) is a matter of debate.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the ABs urodynamic outcomes in patients with LUTS/BPE. The primary endpoint was variation in bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI). Secondary endpoints were the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and detrusor pressure at Qmax (PdetQmax). A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to compare ABs with placebo.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases was performed in May 2015. Seventeen studies were selected for inclusion.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
The overall pooled data showed a mean BOOI change of -14.19 (p<0.0001), a mean PdetQmax change of -11. 39cm H2O (p<0.0001), and a mean Qmax improvement of 2.27ml/s (p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed a mean BOOI change of -14.88 (p=0.01) for alfuzosin, -19.41 (p=0.01) for doxazosin, -16.47 (p<0.0001) for naftopidil, -30.45 (p<0.0001) for silodosin, -14.27 (p=0.002) for tamsulosin, and -6.69 (p=0.005) for terazosin. Subanalysis of RCTs containing a placebo arm showed a significant improvement in BOOI in patients undergoing ABs treatment. Meta-regression revealed a significant positive association between the percentage of patients with obstruction at baseline and the improvement in BOOI after treatment with ABs.
CONCLUSION
ABs improve BOOI in patients with LUTS/BPE mainly by reducing PdetQmax, and this effect is higher in patients presenting with urodynamic obstruction at baseline. The free Qmax variation underestimates the real effect of ABs on benign prostatic obstruction.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Results of this meta-analysis suggest that α1-blockers objectively improve urinary voiding function in patients with benign prostatic obstruction.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Clinical Trials as Topic; Doxazosin; Humans; Indoles; Male; Naphthalenes; Piperazines; Prazosin; Prostatism; Quinazolines; Severity of Illness Index; Sulfonamides; Tamsulosin; Urodynamics
PubMed: 26831507
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.034