-
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions Feb 2015The aim of this review is to describe the incidence, features, predisposing factors, and outcomes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) after transcatheter valve... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this review is to describe the incidence, features, predisposing factors, and outcomes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) after transcatheter valve replacement (TVR).
BACKGROUND
Very few data exist on PVE after TVR.
METHODS
Studies published between 2000 and 2013 regarding PVE in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) were identified through a systematic electronic search.
RESULTS
A total of 28 publications describing 60 patients (32 TAVRs, 28 TPVRs) were identified. Most TAVR patients (66% male, 80 ± 7 years of age) had a very high-risk profile (mean logistic EuroSCORE: 30.4 ± 14.0%). In TPVR patients (90% male, 19 ± 6 years of age), PVE was more frequent in the stenotic conduit/valve (61%). The median time between TVR and infective endocarditis was 5 months (interquartile range: 2 to 9 months). Typical microorganisms were mostly found with a higher incidence of enterococci after TAVR (34.4%), and Staphylococcus aureus after TPVR (29.4%). As many as 60% of the TAVR-PVE patients were managed medically despite related complications such as local extension, embolism, and heart failure in more than 50% of patients. The valve explantation rate was 57% and 23% in balloon- and self-expandable valves, respectively. In-hospital mortality for TAVR-PVE was 34.4%. Most TPVR-PVE patients (75%) were managed surgically, and in-hospital mortality was 7.1%.
CONCLUSIONS
Most cases of PVE post-TVR involved male patients, with a very high-risk profile (TAVR) or underlying stenotic conduit/valve (TPVR). Typical, but different, microorganisms of PVE were involved in one-half of the TAVR and TPVR cases. Most TPVR-PVE patients were managed surgically as opposed to TAVR patients, and the mortality rate was high, especially in the TAVR cohort.
Topics: Endocarditis; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Incidence; Pulmonary Valve; Risk Factors; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
PubMed: 25700757
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.013 -
European Heart Journal Jun 2013Left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) occurs frequently in developing countries and causes major morbidity and mortality. Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is most... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Urgent surgery compared with fibrinolytic therapy for the treatment of left-sided prosthetic heart valve thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
AIMS
Left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) occurs frequently in developing countries and causes major morbidity and mortality. Fibrinolytic therapy (FT) is most commonly used as treatment, but increases the risk of stroke and bleeding. Urgent surgery may be more efficacious and cause fewer complications. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of urgent surgery and FT for the treatment of left-sided PVT.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for articles which included at least five patients each treated with surgery and FT. The primary outcome was complete restoration of valve function. Other outcomes were in-hospital death, thrombo-embolism (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, or non-CNS systemic embolism), major bleeding, and recurrence of PVT on follow-up. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for each outcome and pooled them using a random effects model. We included seven eligible studies with 690 episodes of PVT, 446 treated with surgery, and 244 with FT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of the primary outcome (86.5 vs. 69.7%, OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.94-6.78, P = 0.066, I(2) = 74%) or death (13.5 vs. 9%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.63-5.98, P = 0.244, I(2) = 59%) between the two treatments. However, compared with FT, urgent surgery was associated with significant reductions in thrombo-embolism (1.6 vs. 16%, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.24, P < 0.001, I(2) = 0%), major bleeding (1.4 vs. 5%; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, P = 0.046, I(2) = 0%), and recurrent PVT (7.1 vs. 25.4%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74, P = 0.013, I(2) = 59%).
CONCLUSION
Urgent surgery was not superior to FT at restoring valve function, but substantially reduced the occurrence of thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding, and recurrent PVT. In experienced centres, urgent surgery should probably be preferred over FT for treating left-sided PVT, pending the results of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Emergency Treatment; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Hemorrhage; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Failure; Recurrence; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23329151
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs486 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Sep 2023Patients with isolated tricuspid valve (TV) disease have poor prognosis with no consensus on their management. Transcatheter TV intervention is emerging as a valid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Patients with isolated tricuspid valve (TV) disease have poor prognosis with no consensus on their management. Transcatheter TV intervention is emerging as a valid option in patients with prohibitive surgical risk. We analyzed studies of patients who underwent isolated TV surgery to identify the features associated with successful clinical outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting clinical outcomes of isolated surgical TV intervention, namely TV repair, TV replacement with a bioprosthetic valve (TVR-B), or TV replacement with a mechanical valve (TVR-M). Twenty-seven studies involving 10,478 patients (4,931 TV repair, 3,821 TVR-B, and 1,713 TVR-M) were included. Early mortality occurred in 9% and did not differ between TV surgical approaches. Late mortality was 27% at a median follow-up of 4 (3 to 6) years and was significantly higher for all-TVR (30% vs 25%, rate ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.31, p = 0.004) and TVR-B (28% vs 24%, rate ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.30, p = 0.02) compared with TV repair. Late mortality did not differ between TVR-B and TVR-M. Across all studies, early complications included bleeding (7.4%), acute kidney injury (18.7%), permanent pacemaker (13.7%), cerebrovascular accidents (1.2%), and infection (8.9%). Late clinical outcomes included reintervention (3.7%), structural valve deterioration (2.4%), valve thrombosis (2.6%), and TV regurgitation recurrence after 1 year (15.0%). In conclusion, in isolated TV surgeries, TV repair has favorable long-term mortality compared with TV replacement. This supports the development and refinement of transcatheter TV repair approaches. Future research is recommended to provide comparative data for various transcatheter TV interventions.
Topics: Humans; Tricuspid Valve; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Treatment Outcome; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Heart Valve Diseases; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37531685
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.006 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Apr 2023New technologies for the treatment of Aortic Stenosis are evolving to minimize risk and treat an increasingly comorbid population. The Sutureless Perceval Valve is one... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
New technologies for the treatment of Aortic Stenosis are evolving to minimize risk and treat an increasingly comorbid population. The Sutureless Perceval Valve is one such alternative. Whilst short-term data is promising, limited mid-term outcomes exist, until now. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate mid-term outcomes in the Perceval Valve in isolation.
METHODS
A systematic literature review of 5 databases was performed. Articles included evaluated echocardiographic and mortality outcomes beyond 5 years in patients who had undergone Perceval Valve AVR. Two reviewers extracted and reviewed the articles. Weighted estimates were performed for all post-operative and mid-term data. Aggregated Kaplan Meier curves were reconstructed from digitised images to evaluate long-term survival.
RESULTS
Seven observational studies were identified, with a total number of 3196 patients analysed. 30-day mortality was 2.5%. Aggregated survival at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years was 93.4%, 89.4%, 84.9%, 82% and 79.5% respectively. Permanent pacemaker implantation (7.9%), severe paravalvular leak (1.6%), structural valve deterioration (1.5%), stroke (4.4%), endocarditis (1.6%) and valve explant (2.3%) were acceptable at up to mid-term follow up. Haemodynamics were also acceptable at up mid-term with mean-valve gradient (range 9-13.6 mmHg), peak-valve gradient (17.8-22.3 mmHg) and effective orifice area (1.5-1.8 cm) across all valve sizes. Cardiopulmonary bypass (78 min) and Aortic cross clamp times (52 min) were also favourable.
CONCLUSION
To our knowledge, this represents the first meta-analysis to date evaluating mid-term outcomes in the Perceval Valve in isolation and demonstrates good 5-year mortality, haemodynamic and morbidity outcomes.
KEY QUESTION
What are the mid-term outcomes at up to 5 years follow up in Perceval Valve Aortic Valve Replacement?
KEY FINDINGS
Perceval Valve AVR achieves 80% freedom from mortality at 5 years with low valve gradients and minimal morbidity.
KEY OUTCOMES
Perceval Valve Aortic Valve Replacement has acceptable mid-term mortality, durability and haemodynamic outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis
PubMed: 37041628
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02273-7 -
The European Journal of Health... Mar 2018To review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of heart valve implantations generated by decision analytic models and to assess their methodological quality. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of heart valve implantations generated by decision analytic models and to assess their methodological quality.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed including model-based cost-effectiveness analyses of heart valve implantations. Study and model characteristics and cost-effectiveness results were extracted and the methodological quality was assessed using the Philips checklist.
RESULTS
Fourteen decision-analytic models regarding the cost-effectiveness of heart valve implantations were identified. In most studies transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was cost-effective compared to standard treatment (ST) in inoperable or high-risk operable patients (ICER range 18,421-120,779 €) and in all studies surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was cost-effective compared to ST in operable patients (ICER range 14,108-40,944 €), but the results were not consistent on the cost-effectiveness of TAVI versus SAVR in high-risk operable patients (ICER range: dominant to dominated by SAVR). Mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR) had the lowest costs per success compared to mitral valve repair and biological MVR. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate to good.
CONCLUSION
This review showed that improvements can be made in the description and justification of methods and data sources, sensitivity analysis on extrapolation of results, subgroup analyses, consideration of methodological and structural uncertainty, and consistency (i.e. validity) of the models. There are several opportunities for future decision-analytic models of the cost-effectiveness of heart valve implantations: considering heart valve implantations in other valve positions besides the aortic valve, using a societal perspective, and developing patient-simulation models to investigate the impact of patient characteristics on outcomes.
Topics: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heart Valves; Humans; Models, Economic; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 28265822
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0880-z -
European Radiology Jul 2015Multimodal non-invasive imaging plays a key role in establishing a diagnosis of PHV endocarditis. The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Multimodal non-invasive imaging plays a key role in establishing a diagnosis of PHV endocarditis. The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of TTE, TEE, and MDCT in patients with (suspected) PHV endocarditis.
METHODS
Studies published between 1985 and 2013 were identified via search and cross-reference of PubMed/Embase databases. Studies were included if (1) they reported on the non-invasive index tests TTE, TEE, or MDCT; (2) data was provided on PHV endocarditis as the condition of interest; and (3) imaging results were verified against either surgical inspection/autopsy or clinical follow-up reference standards, thereby enabling the extraction of 2-by-2 tables.
RESULTS
Twenty articles (including 496 patients) met the inclusion criteria for PHV endocarditis. TTE, TEE, and MDCT + TEE had a pooled sensitivity/specificity for vegetations of 29/100%; 82/95%, and 88/94%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity/specificity of TTE, TEE, and MDCT + TEE for periannular complications was 36/93%, 86/98%, and 100/94%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
TEE showed good sensitivity and specificity for establishing a diagnosis of PHV endocarditis. Although MDCT data are limited, this review showed that MDCT in addition to TEE may improve sensitivity in detecting life-threatening periannular complications.
KEY POINTS
• Multimodal imaging is an important ingredient of diagnostic workup for PHV endocarditis. • Transthoracic and transesophageal echography may miss life-threatening periannular complications. • MDCT can improve sensitivity for the detection of life-threatening periannular complications.
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Echocardiography; Echocardiography, Transesophageal; Endocarditis; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Multimodal Imaging; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 25680715
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3605-7 -
Tricuspid valve repair concomitant with mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2023Uncertainties persist about whether to aggressively and effectively treat tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during mitral valve (MV) surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Uncertainties persist about whether to aggressively and effectively treat tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during mitral valve (MV) surgery.
REVIEW METHODS
Systematic literature searches were performed in five databases to collect all relevant studies published before May 2022 on whether the tricuspid valve was treated during MV surgery. Separate meta-analyses were performed on data from unmatched studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT)/adjusted studies.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 44 publications were included, of which eight were RCT studies and the rest were retrospective studies. There was no difference in 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.00, 95% CI: 0.71-1.42, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.30-1.41)] or overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.19, HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.52-1.14] in unmatched studies and RCT/adjusted studies. Late mortality (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.21-0.64) and cardiac-related mortality (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21-0.62) were lower in the tricuspid valve repair (TVR) group in the RCT/adjusted studies. In the unmatched studies, overall cardiac mortality (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.88) was lower in the TVR group. In the late TR progression analysis, the late TR progression was lower among patients in the concomitantly intervened tricuspid group, and patients in the untreated tricuspid group were prone to TR progression in both studies (HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22-0.41, HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.58).
CONCLUSIONS
TVR concomitant with MV surgery is most effective in patients with significant TR and dilated tricuspid annulus, especially those with a significantly reduced risk of distant TR progression.
Topics: Humans; Tricuspid Valve; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37300887
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000396 -
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic... Sep 2023To support clinical decision-making in children with aortic valve disease, by compiling the available evidence on outcome after paediatric aortic valve repair (AVr). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To support clinical decision-making in children with aortic valve disease, by compiling the available evidence on outcome after paediatric aortic valve repair (AVr).
METHODS
A systematic review of literature reporting clinical outcome after paediatric AVr (mean age at surgery <18 years) published between 1 January 1990 and 23 December 2021 was conducted. Early event risks, late event rates and time-to-event data were pooled. A microsimulation model was employed to simulate the lives of individual children, infants and neonates following AVr.
RESULTS
Forty-one publications were included, encompassing 2 623 patients with 17 217 patient-years of follow-up (median follow-up: 7.3 years; range: 1.0-14.4 years). Pooled mean age during repair for aortic stenosis in children (<18 years), infants (<1 year) or neonates (<30 days) was 5.2 ± 3.9 years, 35 ± 137 days and 11 ± 6 days, respectively. Pooled early mortality after stenosis repair in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 3.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.5%), 7.4% (4.2-13.0%) and 10.7% (6.8-16.9%). Pooled late reintervention rate after stenosis repair in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 3.31%/year (1.66-6.63%/year), 6.84%/year (3.95-11.83%/year) and 6.32%/year (3.04-13.15%/year); endocarditis 0.07%/year (0.03-0.21%/year), 0.23%/year (0.07-0.71%/year) and 0.49%/year (0.18-1.29%/year); and valve thrombosis 0.05%/year (0.01-0.26%/year), 0.15%/year (0.04-0.53%/year) and 0.19%/year (0.05-0.77%/year). Microsimulation-based mean life expectancy in the first 20 years for children, infants and neonates with aortic stenosis, respectively, was 18.4 years (95% credible interval: 18.1-18.7 years; relative survival compared to the matched general population: 92.2%), 16.8 years (16.5-17.0 years; relative survival: 84.2%) and 15.9 years (14.8-17.0 years; relative survival: 80.1%). Microsimulation-based 20-year risk of reintervention in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 75.2% (72.9-77.2%), 53.8% (51.9-55.7%) and 50.8% (47.0-57.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
Long-term outcomes after paediatric AVr for stenosis are satisfactory and dependent on age at surgery. Despite a high hazard of reintervention for valve dysfunction and slightly impaired survival relative to the general population, AVr is associated with low valve-related event occurrences and should be considered in children with aortic valve disease.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Child; Infant; Adolescent; Aortic Valve; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Constriction, Pathologic; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Reoperation
PubMed: 37584683
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad284 -
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Apr 2023Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and COVID-19 infection has been well established. Increased... (Review)
Review
Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and COVID-19 infection has been well established. Increased inflammatory response in the setting of COVID-19 infection is associated with VTE and hypercoagulability. Venous and arterial thrombotic events in COVID-19 infection have been well documented; however, few cases have been reported involving cardiac valve prostheses. In this review, we present a total of eight cases involving COVID-19-related prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT), as identified in a systematic review. These eight cases describe valve position (mitral versus aortic) and prosthesis type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical), and all cases demonstrate incidents of PVT associated with simultaneous or recent COVID-19 infection. None of these eight cases display obvious non-adherence to anticoagulation; five of the cases occurred greater than three years after the most recent valve replacement. Our review offers insights into PVT in COVID-19 infected patients including an indication for increased monitoring in the peri-infectious period. We explore valve thrombosis as a mechanism for prosthetic valve failure. We describe potential differences in antithrombotic strategies that may offer added antithrombotic protection during COVID-19 infection. With the growing population of valve replacement patients and recurring COVID-19 infection surges, it is imperative to explore relationships between COVID-19 and PVT.
Topics: Humans; Fibrinolytic Agents; Venous Thromboembolism; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Thrombosis; Aortic Valve
PubMed: 36528721
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-022-02746-x -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Jan 2016Despite an increasing interest in pediatric aortic valve repair, aortic valve replacement in children may be unavoidable. The evidence on outcome after pediatric aortic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Despite an increasing interest in pediatric aortic valve repair, aortic valve replacement in children may be unavoidable. The evidence on outcome after pediatric aortic valve replacement is limited and usually reported in small case series. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an overview of reported outcome of pediatric patients after aortic valve replacement.
METHODS
A systematic literature search for publications reporting outcome after pediatric aortic valve replacement published between January 1990 and May 2015 was conducted. Studies written in English with a study size of more than 30 patients were included.
RESULTS
Thirty-four publications reporting on 42 cohorts were included in this review: 26 concerning the Ross procedure (n = 2409), 13 concerning mechanical prosthesis aortic valve replacement (n = 696), and 3 concerning homograft aortic valve replacement (n = 224). There were no studies on bioprostheses that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled mean patient age was 9.4 years, 12.8 years, and 8.9 years for Ross, mechanical prosthesis, and homograft recipients, respectively. Pooled mean follow-up was 6.6 years. The Ross procedure was associated with lower early (4.20%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.37-5.22 vs 7.34%; 95% CI, 5.21-10.34 vs 12.82%; 95% CI, 8.91-18.46) and late mortality (0.64%/y; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84 vs 1.23%/y; 95% CI, 0.85-1.79 vs 1.59%/y; 95% CI, 1.03-2.46) compared with mechanical prosthesis aortic valve replacement and homograft aortic valve replacement, respectively. No significantly different aortic valve reoperation rates were observed between the Ross procedure and mechanical prosthesis aortic valve replacement (1.60%/y; 95% CI, 1.27-2.02 vs 1.07%/y; 95% CI, 0.68-1.68, respectively), whereas homograft aortic valve replacement was associated with significantly higher aortic valve reoperation rates (5.44%/y; 95% CI, 4.24-6.98). The Ross procedure-associated right ventricular outflow tract reoperation rate was 1.91% per year (95% CI, 1.50-2.44).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review illustrates that all currently available aortic valve substitutes are associated with suboptimal results in children, reflecting the urgent need for reliable and durable repair techniques and innovative replacement solutions for this challenging group of patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Allografts; Aortic Valve; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Child, Preschool; Heart Valve Diseases; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemodynamics; Humans; Infant; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26541831
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.083