-
Pancreas Oct 2015We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the benefit and risk of continuous regional... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the benefit and risk of continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitors (CRAIpis) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) or acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP).
METHODS
The search was performed using the key words "pancreatitis" and "regional arterial infusion." All language studies involving adult cases of SAP or ANP, which assessed the impact of the CRAIpis, were included.
RESULTS
Our analysis included 8 observational studies and 2 RCTs from 376 potentially relevant articles. With regard to the observational studies, the CRAIpi was significantly associated with decreased both mortality (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidential interval [CI], 0.25-0.64; P = 0.0001) and the need for urgent surgical intervention (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.3; P < 0.0001). In the RCTs, the application of CRAIpi tends to decrease the mortality but does not reach the significance (risk reduction, -0.12; 95% CI, -0.36-0.12; P = 0.33).
CONCLUSIONS
The CRAIpi has the potential to reduce the mortality or the need for urgent surgical intervention in cases of SAP or ANP. Further, large multicenter trials are needed to refute or confirm our findings.
Topics: Acute Disease; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Observational Studies as Topic; Pancreatitis; Protease Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26355545
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000375 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Apr 2023We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Severe Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
PURPOSE
We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS
A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting severe bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated.
RESULTS
Twenty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 87,616 patients were enrolled. The bleeding safety of DOACs for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA,80.2), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,68.3), apixaban (SUCRA,48.5), dabigatran (SUCRA,40.0), VKAs (SUCRA,12.9); major bleeding: dabigatran (SUCRA,74.0), apixaban (SUCRA,71.5), edoxaban (SUCRA,66.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,22.7), VKAs (SUCRA,15.4); gastrointestinal bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA,55.9), VKAs (SUCRA,53.7), edoxaban (SUCRA,50.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,50.4), dabigatran (SUCRA,39.5); intracranial hemorrhage: dabigatran (SUCRA,84.6), edoxaban (SUCRA,74.1), apixaban (SUCRA,65.8), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,24.4), VKAs (SUCRA,1.1).
CONCLUSION
Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF, the most safe DOAC is edoxaban in terms of fatal bleeding; dabigatran in terms of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage and apixaban in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, given the nature of indirect comparisons, more high-quality evidence from head-to-head comparisons is still needed to confirm them.
Topics: Humans; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Network Meta-Analysis; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Vitamin K; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 34436708
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07232-9 -
Cancer Causes & Control : CCC Sep 2015We aim to investigate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy and colorectal cancer (CRC)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We aim to investigate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy and colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis.
METHODS
Literature was searched on PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant studies evaluating ACEIs/ARBs therapy and risk of CRC incidence or survival of CRC patients. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for the association between ACEIs/ARBs and CRC risk and mortality.
RESULTS
Eleven observational studies were included in the systematic review. A meta-analysis of six studies totaling 113,048 individuals indicated a 6% decreased risk of CRC in ACEIs/ARBs users compared to non-users (95% CI 0.89-0.98). In the four case-control studies, individuals using ACEIs/ARBs were associated with a 6% decreased risk of CRC (95% CI 0.90-0.99). The meta-analysis of three studies investigating the relationship between ACEIs/ARBs and survival of CRC did not show a significantly decreased mortality in ACEIs/ARBs users (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60-1.09). Seven studies evaluated the dose-response relationship between ACEIs/ARBs therapy and CRC, and two of them showed that the association was related to longer duration and higher dose.
CONCLUSIONS
CEIs/ARBs therapy might be associated with a reduce risk of CRC development, but whether use of these medications improves the outcomes of CRC remains unknown. Large-scale and more robust studies are needed to further explore this association.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Hypertension; Incidence; Risk
PubMed: 26081426
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0617-1 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Sep 2010To compare lipid profiles in HIV-infected adults receiving atazanavir-based regimens. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To compare lipid profiles in HIV-infected adults receiving atazanavir-based regimens.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir with a comparator and evaluated lipids at 48 weeks. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Current Controlled Trials, National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, trials at AIDSinfo and HIV conference proceedings to May 2009. Standardized mean difference (SMD) between study arms in change from baseline to week 48 in lipid parameters was determined weighted by study size and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
RESULTS
Nine eligible RCTs were identified (n = 3346). SMDs (mmol/L) in four RCTs comparing atazanavir/ritonavir with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor were: total cholesterol, -0.62 (95% CI -0.72, -0.51); low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, -0.31 (95% CI -0.44, -0.17); high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, -0.16 (95% CI -0.27, -0.06); non-HDL cholesterol, -0.58 (95% CI -0.69, -0.48); and triglycerides, -0.46 (95% CI -0.58, -0.34). Atazanavir compared with non-atazanavir (three RCTs) found lower total, LDL and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides [SMD -0.87 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.67, -0.45); -0.88 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); and -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.75, -0.36), respectively], but HDL cholesterol did not differ [-0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.49, 0.16)]. In the atazanavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir comparison (two RCTs), total [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] and non-HDL cholesterol [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] were higher, but HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were not different.
CONCLUSIONS
At 48 weeks, plasma lipid concentrations were lower with atazanavir/ritonavir than with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens. Total and non-HDL cholesterol were higher with atazanavir/ritonavir than atazanavir alone.
Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Atazanavir Sulfate; HIV Infections; Humans; Lipids; Oligopeptides; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ritonavir
PubMed: 20554568
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkq231 -
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B Nov 2015Cysteine proteases continue to provide validated targets for treatment of human diseases. In neurodegenerative disorders, multiple cysteine proteases provide targets for... (Review)
Review
Cysteine proteases continue to provide validated targets for treatment of human diseases. In neurodegenerative disorders, multiple cysteine proteases provide targets for enzyme inhibitors, notably caspases, calpains, and cathepsins. The reactive, active-site cysteine provides specificity for many inhibitor designs over other families of proteases, such as aspartate and serine; however, a) inhibitor strategies often use covalent enzyme modification, and b) obtaining selectivity within families of cysteine proteases and their isozymes is problematic. This review provides a general update on strategies for cysteine protease inhibitor design and a focus on cathepsin B and calpain 1 as drug targets for neurodegenerative disorders; the latter focus providing an interesting query for the contemporary assumptions that irreversible, covalent protein modification and low selectivity are anathema to therapeutic safety and efficacy.
PubMed: 26713267
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.08.001 -
Lipids in Health and Disease Jul 2022The incidence rate of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is increasing annually; however, there are still no effective methods for establishing an early... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The incidence rate of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is increasing annually; however, there are still no effective methods for establishing an early diagnosis and conducting real-time tracing. Vaspin can affect the metabolic processes in the body, and it is closely associated with many metabolic diseases. Many previous studies have speculated on the association between vaspin and MAFLD, but the results of these studies have not been conclusive. This meta-analysis examined the differences in circulating vaspin levels between patients with MAFLD and healthy individuals.
METHODS
Six databases and other sources were searched with free terms and Medical Subject Headings terms, and a total of 13 articles were included (900 cases and 669 controls). RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16 were used for analysis. The standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the overall outcomes. Cohen's kappa coefficient was applied to examine the differences between the two authors in the selection of studies and in the evaluation of the quality of evidence for the studies.
RESULTS
The results demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the circulating vaspin levels between the MAFLD group and healthy group (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: [- 0.12, 1.04]). The subgroup analysis suggested that area and body mass index (BMI) may be the sources of heterogeneity, and the results of univariate meta-regression analysis were consistent with those of the subgroup analysis (P = 0.005 and P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, BMI may better explain the source of heterogeneity (P = 0.032) in the multivariate meta-regression analysis.
CONCLUSION
In summary, no significant correlation was observed between the circulating vaspin levels and MAFLD. BMI may be an important factor affecting this correlation, which may provide a reference for further studies on mechanism and diagnosis of MAFLD.
Topics: Body Mass Index; Humans; Liver Diseases; Serpins
PubMed: 35780150
DOI: 10.1186/s12944-022-01658-2 -
PloS One 2013Optimal regimen choice of antiretroviral therapy is essential to achieve long-term clinical success. Integrase inhibitors have swiftly been adopted as part of current... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Optimal regimen choice of antiretroviral therapy is essential to achieve long-term clinical success. Integrase inhibitors have swiftly been adopted as part of current antiretroviral regimens. The purpose of this study was to review the evidence for integrase inhibitor use in clinical settings.
METHODS
MEDLINE and Web-of-Science were screened from April 2006 until November 2012, as were hand-searched scientific meeting proceedings. Multiple reviewers independently screened 1323 citations in duplicate to identify randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials and cohort studies on integrase inhibitor use in clinical practice. Independent, duplicate data extraction and quality assessment were conducted.
RESULTS
48 unique studies were included on the use of integrase inhibitors in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients and treatment-experienced patients with either virological failure or switching to integrase inhibitors while virologically suppressed. On the selected studies with comparable outcome measures and indication (n = 16), a meta-analysis was performed based on modified intention-to-treat (mITT), on-treatment (OT) and as-treated (AT) virological outcome data. In therapy-naive patients, favorable odds ratios (OR) for integrase inhibitor-based regimens were observed, (mITT OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86). However, integrase inhibitors combined with protease inhibitors only did not result in a significant better virological outcome. Evidence further supported integrase inhibitor use following virological failure (mITT OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11-0.66), but switching to integrase inhibitors from a high genetic barrier drug during successful treatment was not supported (mITT OR 1.43; 95% CI 0.89-2.31). Integrase inhibitor-based regimens result in similar immunological responses compared to other regimens. A low genetic barrier to drug-resistance development was observed for raltegravir and elvitegravir, but not for dolutegravir.
CONCLUSION
In first-line therapy, integrase inhibitors are superior to other regimens. Integrase inhibitor use after virological failure is supported as well by the meta-analysis. Careful use is however warranted when replacing a high genetic barrier drug in treatment-experienced patients switching successful treatment.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Protease Inhibitors; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load
PubMed: 23341902
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052562 -
International Journal of Environmental... Dec 2022In the United States, a significant amount of the population is affected by hyperlipidemia, which is associated with increased levels of serum low-density lipoprotein... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In the United States, a significant amount of the population is affected by hyperlipidemia, which is associated with increased levels of serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and risk of cardiovascular disease. As of 2019, the guidelines set by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association advocate for the use of statins as the major contributor to lowering serum LDL-C. While proven to be effective, side effects, including muscle-related symptoms and new-onset diabetes mellitus, can make patients unable to tolerate statin therapy. Additionally, there is a subset of the population which does not approach a recommended LDL-C goal on statin treatment. Due to these findings, it was deemed necessary to review the literature of current statin-alternative lipid-lowering therapies.
METHODS
A systematic review of preclinical and clinical papers, and a current meta-analysis, was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Following the literature review, a meta-analysis was conducted using ProMeta 3.
RESULTS
Through systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature, it is suggested that newer lipid-lowering therapies such as proprotein convertase subtilsin-kixen type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a safe and effective statin alternative for the population with statin intolerance. PCSK9 inhibitors were shown to have no significant effect in causing myalgia in patients and showed no increase in adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to a control of a current antilipemic medication regimen.
DISCUSSION
There are many statin-alternative therapies that should be investigated further as a potential replacement for patients with statin intolerance or as an addition for patients with statin resistance.
Topics: Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Proprotein Convertase 9; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Cholesterol, LDL; Cardiovascular Diseases; Anticholesteremic Agents
PubMed: 36554779
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416899 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Jul 2016The size of the placebo response in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treatment and its relation to the route of drug administration have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The size of the placebo response in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) treatment and its relation to the route of drug administration have not been systematically reviewed. We aimed to determine weight loss, change in HbA1c and incidence of adverse events after treatment with injectable placebo GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1ra), compared with oral placebo DPP-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and placebo SGLT-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i).
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and Central were searched up to September 2014 for randomized placebo controlled trials investigating GLP-1ra, DPP-4i or SGLT2-i. Data on placebo groups were extracted and pooled using a generic inverse variance random effects model.
RESULTS
Sixty-seven trials were included, involving 2522, 5290 and 2028 patients randomized to placebo GLP-1ra, placebo DPP-4i and placebo SGLT-2i, respectively. Body weight decreased by -0.67 kg (95% CI -1.03, -0.31) after treatment with placebo GLP-1ra (-0.76 kg [95% CI -1.10, -0.43] with placebo short acting GLP-1ra and -0.32 kg [95% CI -1.75, 1.10] with placebo long acting GLP-1ra) and by -0.31 kg (95% CI -0.64, 0.01) with placebo DPP-4i (P = 0.06 for difference with placebo short acting GLP-1ra). Placebo SGLT-2i resulted in an intermediate -0.48 kg (95% CI -0.81, -0.15) weight loss. Weight loss with placebo showed a strong correlation with the active comparator drug (r(2) = 0.40-0.78). HbA1c changed little with placebo treatment (-0.23%, 0.10% and -0.13% for placebo GLP-1ra, DPP-4i and SGLT-2i). Adverse events occurred frequently with placebo, were often similar to the active comparator drug and led to drop-out in 2.0-2.7% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS
The response to placebo treatment was related to its active comparator, with injectable placebo GLP-1ra showing a relevant response on weight, whereas oral placebo DPP4i showed no significant response. These findings may suggest that subjective expectations influence T2DM treatment efficacy, which can possibly be employed therapeutically.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Placebo Effect; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Weight Loss
PubMed: 26935973
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12925 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2021Population growth and water scarcity necessitate alternative agriculture practices, such as reusing wastewater for irrigation. Domestic wastewater has been used for... (Review)
Review
Population growth and water scarcity necessitate alternative agriculture practices, such as reusing wastewater for irrigation. Domestic wastewater has been used for irrigation for centuries in many historically low-income and arid countries and is becoming more widely used by high-income countries to augment water resources in an increasingly dry climate. Wastewater treatment processes are not fully effective in removing all contaminants, such as antimicrobial resistant bacteria (ARB) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). Literature reviews on the impact of wastewater irrigation on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the environment have been inconclusive and mostly focused on treated wastewater. We conducted the first systematic review to assess the impact of irrigation with both treated or untreated domestic wastewater on ARB and ARGs in soil and adjacent water bodies. We screened titles/abstracts of 3002 articles, out of which 41 were screened in full text and 26 were included in this review. Of these, thirteen investigated irrigation with untreated wastewater, and nine found a positive association with ARB/ARGs in soil. Out of thirteen studies focused on treated wastewater, six found a positive association with ARB/ARGs while six found mixed/negative associations. Our findings demonstrate that irrigation with untreated wastewater increases AMR in soil and call for precautionary action by field workers, their families, and consumers when untreated wastewater is used to irrigate crops. The effect of irrigation with treated wastewater was more variable among the studies included in our review, highlighting the need to better understand to what extent AMR is disseminated through this practice. Future research should assess factors that modify the effect of wastewater irrigation on AMR in soil, such as the degree and type of wastewater treatment, and the duration and intensity of irrigation, to inform guidelines on the reuse of wastewater for irrigation.
Topics: Agricultural Irrigation; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Genes, Bacterial; Humans; Soil; Wastewater; Water
PubMed: 34769568
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111046