-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) drugs, such as evogliptin, as the second-line drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment have been reported to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) drugs, such as evogliptin, as the second-line drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment have been reported to facilitate insulin secretion by reducing glucagon and inhibiting glucagon like peptides. With a vague consensus, the advantageous and non-inferior effects of evogliptin relative to other DPP-4i drugs were recently demonstrated on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and overall adverse events in T2DM patients. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the overall influence of evogliptin on HbA1c levels and the adverse events in T2DM patients compared to sitagliptin and linagliptin.
METHODS
Complying with PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search in databases and a meta-analysis. Data about HbA1c levels and the adverse events of T2DM patients were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
From 1,397 studies, we found five matched studies involving 845 subjects (mean age: 54.7 ± 3 years). The meta-analysis revealed that evogliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin/linagliptin with a mean difference of 0.062 (95% CI: -0.092 to 0.215. I: 0%. = 0.431) regarding the HbA1c level reduction, and the risk ratio was -0.006 (95% CI: -0.272 to 0.260. I: 1.7%. = 0.966) regarding the adverse effects, indicating no significant difference between evogliptin and linagliptin or sitagliptin in affecting the HbA1c level and adverse effects.
CONCLUSION
The study provides preliminary evidence regarding the similarity in the efficacy of evogliptin compared to other DPP-4i drugs, including sitagliptin and linagliptin, for managing HbA1c levels and adverse events.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate
PubMed: 36060938
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.962385 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Dec 2021The aim of this study was to continually evaluate the association between cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes (susceptibility to infection,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The aim of this study was to continually evaluate the association between cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes (susceptibility to infection, disease severity, hospitalization, hospitalization length, and all-cause mortality) in patients at risk of/with confirmed COVID-19.
METHODS
Eligible publications were identified from more than 500 databases on 1 November 2020. One reviewer extracted data with 20% of the records independently extracted/evaluated by a second reviewer.
RESULTS
Of 52 735 screened records, 429 and 390 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The most-reported drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) with ACEI/ARB exposure having borderline association with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.31). Among COVID-19 patients, unadjusted estimates showed that ACEI/ARB exposure was associated with hospitalization (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.32), disease severity (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.26-1.55) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33) but not hospitalization length (mean difference -0.27, 95% CI -1.36-0.82 days). After adjustment, ACEI/ARB exposure was not associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19), hospitalization (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.24), disease severity (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.38) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.00). Similarly, subgroup analyses involving only hypertensive patients revealed that ACEI/ARB exposure was not associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.09), hospitalization (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.22), hospitalization length (mean difference -0.14, 95% CI -1.65-1.36 days), disease severity (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11) while it decreased the odds of dying (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88). A similar trend was observed for other cardiovascular drugs. However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high level of heterogeneity and serious risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Cardiovascular drugs are not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes in adjusted analyses. Patients should continue taking these drugs as prescribed.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; COVID-19; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34101232
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14927 -
Diabetes & Metabolism Feb 2017Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and an unfavourable outcome following stroke. Apart from pioglitazone, glucose-lowering... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and an unfavourable outcome following stroke. Apart from pioglitazone, glucose-lowering modalities have not been shown to protect against stroke. Nevertheless, there is evidence from experimental studies of potential neuroprotective effects with dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, especially if treatment starts before stroke.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a meta-analysis of available evidence regarding the risk of stroke in individuals taking DPP-4 inhibitors.
METHODS
All available data from prospective randomized placebo-controlled trials involving DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM patients published up to December 2015 were considered. The included trials reported data on the incidence of stroke with a recruitment rate of at least 100 diabetes patients and a follow-up of at least 12 weeks.
RESULTS
A total of 19 small randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of gliptins (n=9278), along with three multicentre prospective double-blind placebo-controlled RCTs assessing cardiovascular outcomes as the primary endpoint and involving 36,395 T2DM patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis of the small RCTs showed a non-significant trend towards benefit with DPP-4 inhibitors against stroke [odds ratio (OR): 0.639, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.336-1.212; P=0.170]. In contrast, in the analysis of RCTs reporting on cardiovascular safety, there was no difference in the risk of stroke with gliptin treatment compared with a placebo (OR: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.850-1.166; P=0.958).
CONCLUSION
The promising data from experimental studies regarding cardioprotective gliptin-associated effects against stroke were not supported by available data from trials specifically looking at cardiovascular safety.
Topics: Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Stroke
PubMed: 27916514
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.10.006 -
Endocrine Journal Jun 2021This review evaluated the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Dpp-4i). The MEDLINE (via... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This review evaluated the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Dpp-4i). The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library databases and web of science were used to search the effects of Dpp-4i on rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes from inception to 7 September, 2020. We included studies that met the following criteria:(i) A randomized controlled trial (RCT), prospective or retrospective cohort study examining the relationship between Dpp-4i and rheumatoid arthritis. Exclusion criteria included the following: Reviews and researches related to other diseases or subjects; and studies without data on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Risk of Bias table contained in Review Manager 5.3 and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) were used for quality assessment of included RCT and observational studies separately. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the risk of disease. We conducted a subgroup analysis of duration of follow-up, adjusted (adjusted RR or unadjusted RR), sample size and study design. A total of 10 independent studies assessing 1,420,414 patients were included in this analysis. In this meta-analysis, we found that there was nonsignificant increase of rheumatoid arthritis with Dpp-4 inhibitor exposure (RR 0.96, 95%CI (0.69-1.32)). Our results revealed that Dpp-4 inhibitors do not seem to increase the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term follow-up monitoring is necessary.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents
PubMed: 33642418
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0647 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2022The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients receiving guideline-directed treatment to identify the proportion of under-treatment patients and those who are treated with optimal doses, to evaluate the correlation of under-treatment patients' characteristics with the prescribed therapy, and finally, to evaluate the combined effect of the above on incidental mortality and rehospitalization. We conducted a systematic review of the literature indexed in Medline. We screened 1224 papers and excluded 1166 as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 58 papers, which were evaluated by studying the full text, 11 papers that referred to 45866 patients were finally studied in this work. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and Angiotensin II-Receptor Blocker (ARB) use was estimated to be 80.9% (95% CI: 73.9%, 86.4%), β-blockers' use was 78% (95% CI: 70.4%, 84.1%), Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists' use was 47.4% (95% Cl 41.6%, 53.4%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy's use was 5.8% (95% Cl 3.4%, 9.6%). Meta-regression analysis showed that prescription of more than the half of target dose of ACEI/ARBs was found to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality (Z = -3.61, P = 0.0003), while the relationship with β-blockers was borderline (Z = -1.56, P = 0.11). A satisfactory adherence to the prescription of guideline-recommended treatment in patients with HF was observed. However, the under titration of the life-saving HF drugs need to be improved as only ultimate adherence to guideline-directed treatments may lead to the reduction of HF burden.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 35508296
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.04.006 -
PloS One 2018To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of saxagliptin for type 2 diabetes (T2D). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of saxagliptin for type 2 diabetes (T2D).
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and two Chinese databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing saxagliptin with placebo or active comparators was performed up to July 2017. A complementary search was done to cover literature until March 2018. For continuous data, estimates were pooled using inverse variance methodology to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs). Dichotomous data were presented as Mantel-Haenzel risk ratios (RRs).
RESULTS
Thirty-nine references of 30 RCTs involving 29,938 patients were analyzed. Compared with placebo, saxagliptin significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, WMD -0.52%, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.44) and fasting plasma glucose (WMD -13.78 mg/dL, 95% CI -15.31 to -12.25), and increased the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.75). When combined with submaximal-dose metformin, saxagliptin significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% compared with acarbose (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.83) and uptitrated metformin (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.63). Saxagliptin was similar to other DPP-4 inhibitors but inferior to liraglutide and dapagliflozin on glycemic control. Saxagliptin significantly decreased the incidences of overall adverse events compared with acarbose (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) and liraglutide (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71) when added to metformin. Weight gain and hypoglycemia with saxagliptin was slightly but significantly higher than placebo and lower than sulfonylureas. Saxagliptin did not increase the risk of arthralgia, heart failure, pancreatitis and other adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Generally, saxagliptin has similar efficacy compared with most oral antidiabetic drugs and may be more effective than acarbose, while having a better safety profile than both acarbose and sulfonylureas.
Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29787616
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197321 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... Dec 2023Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is indicated to cure type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This systematic literature search aims to assess the current... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is indicated to cure type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This systematic literature search aims to assess the current knowledge about the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of vildagliptin to provide recommendations for clinical use to prevent the harmful effects of this drug.
METHODS
The PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases were screened for articles related to the clinical PK of vildagliptin using systematic search strategies.
RESULTS
The literature search identified 2118 records, among which 28 were subsumed in this systematic review that fulfilled the inclusion standards.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review can help dose optimization among critically ill patients (e.g. renal impairment) without exposing them to the drug's toxic effects.
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Vildagliptin
PubMed: 38008954
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2288252 -
The Australasian Journal of Dermatology Feb 2020There have been a number of case reports and small clinical series reporting the potential association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPPIs) for diabetes and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
There have been a number of case reports and small clinical series reporting the potential association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPPIs) for diabetes and the onset of bullous pemphigoid (BP). The aim of this study was to assess the association between DPPI use and BP, and whether this varied according to DPPI type.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified five studies with cases and controls. We performed unadjusted and adjusted meta-analyses to assess the potential association.
RESULTS
Adjusted meta-analysis revealed significant association between DPPI use and BP (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.59-2.86, I = 46%, P < 0.00001). This association was stronger between vildagliptin and BP (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.70-15.19, P = 0.004) compared to linagliptin (OR 2.87, 95%CI 1.06-7.79, P = 0.04), and no association was found between sitagliptin and BP (OR 1.29, 95%CI 0.79-2.08, P = 0.31). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the association between DPPI use and BP remained significant in males (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.46-3.78, P = 0.0005) and females (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.10-3.22, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
Limitations were that studies reviewed were retrospective by design which are susceptible to bias and lack of randomisation. Our adjusted analysis supports a significant association between DPPI use and onset of bullous pemphigoid. Vildagliptin had the highest odds of BP. These findings have clinical implications for dermatologists and the management of patients with diabetes and being treated with DPPI agents.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Linagliptin; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Vildagliptin
PubMed: 31215644
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13100 -
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology Mar 2015Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events. Recently, biomarkers have been proposed as a practical tool to predict adverse outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events. Recently, biomarkers have been proposed as a practical tool to predict adverse outcomes in patients with AF. The prognostic value of inflammatory and hemostatic markers in AF has been widely studied; however, the results of previous studies have been inconclusive.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of inflammatory and hemostatic markers with stroke and thromboembolic events in patients with AF.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies including 22,176 participants met our inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Our meta-analysis determined that elevated circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) were significantly associated with increased risk of stroke in patients with AF (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-1.59 and 1.43; 95% CI, 0.40-2.47, respectively). Higher levels of D-dimer were associated with increased subsequent thromboembolic event risk with a pooled hazard ratio of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.22-6.90) for cohort studies and an SMD of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.36-1.50) for case-control studies. There was also very limited evidence indicating that other biomarkers-such as interleukin-6, von Willebrand factor, P-selectin, and mean platelet volume-could predict adverse outcomes in AF.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, increased circulating PAI-1 and TAT levels were significantly associated with subsequent stroke in patients with AF, and high levels of D-dimer were associated with thromboembolic events in AF. Further epidemiologic studies are needed to accumulate more evidence on the prognostic role of inflammatory and hemostatic markers in AF.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Antithrombin III; Atrial Fibrillation; Biomarkers; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Interleukin-6; Mean Platelet Volume; Peptide Hydrolases; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Selectins; Sensitivity and Specificity; Serine Proteinase Inhibitors; Stroke; Thromboembolism; von Willebrand Factor
PubMed: 25746020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.12.002 -
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Jun 2023In recent years, the incidence of diabetes mellitus has been increasing annually, and cardiovascular complications secondary to diabetes mellitus have become the leading... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In recent years, the incidence of diabetes mellitus has been increasing annually, and cardiovascular complications secondary to diabetes mellitus have become the leading cause of death in diabetic patients. Considering the high incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) combined with cardiovascular disease (CVD), some new hypoglycemic agents with cardiovascular protective effects have attracted extensive attention. However, the specific role of these regimens in ventricular remodeling remains unknown. The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to compare the effects of sodium glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) on ventricular remodeling in patients with T2DM and/or CVD.
METHODS
Articles published prior to 24 August 2022 were retrieved in four electronic databases: the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a small number of cohort studies. The differences in mean changes of left ventricular ultrasonic parameters between the treatment and control groups were compared.
RESULTS
A total of 31 RCTs and 4 cohort studies involving 4322 patients were analyzed. GLP-1RA was more significantly associated with improvement in left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) [MD = -0.38 mm, 95% CI (-0.66, -0.10)] and LV mass index (LVMI) [MD = -1.07 g/m, 95% CI (-1.71, -0.42)], but significantly decreased e' [MD = -0.43 cm/s 95% CI (-0.81, -0.04)]. DPP-4i was more strongly associated with improvement in e' [MD = 3.82 cm/s, 95% CI (2.92,4.7)] and E/e'[MD = -5.97 95% CI (-10.35, -1.59)], but significantly inhibited LV ejection fraction (LVEF) [MD = -0.89% 95% CI (-1.76, -0.03)]. SGLT-2i significantly improved LVMI [MD = -0.28 g/m, 95% CI (-0.43, -0.12)] and LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) [MD = -0.72 ml, 95% CI (-1.30, -0.14)] in the overall population, as well as E/e' and SBP in T2DM patients combined with CVD, without showing any negative effect on left ventricular function.
CONCLUSION
The results of the network meta-analysis provided high certainty to suggest that SGLT-2i may be more effective in cardiac remodeling compared to GLP-1RA and DPP-4i. While GLP-1RA and DPP-4i may have a tendency to improve cardiac systolic and diastolic function respectively. SGLT-2i is the most recommended drug for reversing ventricular remodeling in this meta-analysis.
Topics: Humans; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hypoglycemic Agents; Network Meta-Analysis; Protease Inhibitors; Ventricular Remodeling
PubMed: 37296380
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03324-6