-
Journal of Neuroimmunology Jul 2021N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a potentially treatable condition, although a small proportion of patients remains refractory to immunotherapy....
N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a potentially treatable condition, although a small proportion of patients remains refractory to immunotherapy. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has a promising role in autoimmune conditions. We performed an independent PubMed search employing "Anti-N-Methyl‑D-Aspartate encephalitis AND bortezomib", including papers published between January 1st, 2007 to April 15th, 2021. Fourteen articles were included, with 29 patients. 16 patients (55,2%) had a favorable outcome after bortezomib and 11 (37,9%) patients developed side effects. Quality of studies was overall poor and future trials should aim to include more homogeneous and larger cohorts.
Topics: Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis; Bortezomib; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 33975246
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577586 -
Oncotarget May 2018Carfilzomib (Carf) is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor approved for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who failed ≥ 1 prior lines...
OBJECTIVE
Carfilzomib (Carf) is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor approved for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who failed ≥ 1 prior lines of therapy. We performed a systematic review of Carf literature with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety in RRMM patients.
METHODS
Based on literature search, we included a total of 14 eligible phase I/II, phase II and phase III Carf based clinical trials. The cumulative incidence and odds ratios (OR) were calculated with random effect model, using ''R'' software with metaphor package.
RESULTS
2906 evaluable RRMM patients from published clinical trials included. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI: 29-62). The pooled clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 56% (95% CI: 41-71). OR from 3 randomized clinical trials showed that Carf significantly improved ORR and CBR compared to control groups (OR 2.4, < 0.0001; 2.02, = 0.0007, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed significantly better ORR ( < 0.0001) and CBR ( < 0.001) with combination regimens compared to monotherapy. Response was significantly higher with high dose of Carf (>20/27 mg/m) compared to standard dose (ORR 65% vs. 35%, = 0.03). Compared to control group, the OR of developing cardiotoxicity ( = 0.002) and hypertension ( < 0.0001) were significantly higher with Carf, while no difference in peripheral neuropathy ( = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Carf produces significantly better responses with acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients. Combination regimens and higher dose Carf offers better response with no significant extra toxicity. Its efficacy is regardless of cytogenetics or disease stage. Incidences of cardiotoxicity and hypertension seem higher with Carf.
PubMed: 29805768
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25281 -
Frontiers in Physiology 2020Misfolded proteins are the main common feature of neurodegenerative diseases, thereby, normal proteostasis is an important mechanism to regulate the neural survival and...
Misfolded proteins are the main common feature of neurodegenerative diseases, thereby, normal proteostasis is an important mechanism to regulate the neural survival and the central nervous system functionality. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a non-lysosomal proteolytic pathway involved in numerous normal functions of the nervous system, modulation of neurotransmitter release, synaptic plasticity, and recycling of membrane receptors or degradation of damaged and regulatory intracellular proteins. Aberrant accumulation of intracellular ubiquitin-positive inclusions has been implicated to a variety of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington disease (HD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and Multiple Myeloma (MM). Genetic mutation in deubiquitinating enzyme could disrupt UPS and results in destructive effects on neuron survival. To date, various agents were characterized with proteasome-inhibitory potential. Proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and in particular, E3 ubiquitin ligases, may be promising molecular targets for neurodegenerative drug discovery. Phytochemicals, specifically polyphenols (PPs), were reported to act as proteasome-inhibitors or may modulate the proteasome activity. PPs modify the UPS by means of accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, suppression of neuronal apoptosis, reduction of neurotoxicity, and improvement of synaptic plasticity and transmission. This is the first comprehensive review on the effect of PPs on UPS. Here, we review the recent findings describing various aspects of UPS dysregulation in neurodegenerative disorders. This review attempts to summarize the latest reports on the neuroprotective properties involved in the proper functioning of natural polyphenolic compounds with implication for targeting ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the neurodegenerative diseases. We highlight the evidence suggesting that polyphenolic compounds have a dose and disorder dependent effects in improving neurological dysfunctions, and so their mechanism of action could stimulate the UPS, induce the protein degradation or inhibit UPS and reduce protein degradation. Future studies should focus on molecular mechanisms by which PPs can interfere this complex regulatory system at specific stages of the disease development and progression.
PubMed: 32411012
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00361 -
Clinical Hematology International 2024Globally, multiple myeloma (MM) ranks 24 among the most common cancers. The Middle East and Africa are affected by an increasing trend in MM incidence, owing to several...
BACKGROUND
Globally, multiple myeloma (MM) ranks 24 among the most common cancers. The Middle East and Africa are affected by an increasing trend in MM incidence, owing to several underlying factors. This systematic review aims to assess the epidemiology, patient characteristics, and treatment outcomes associated with MM in selected countries in the Middle East and Africa.
METHODS
An electronic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and European Society for Medical Oncology and the GLOBOCAN registry were searched. Qualitative analysis was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 412 articles were screened, and 14 were selected. The five-year prevalence per 100,000 gathered from country-wise GLOBOCAN data ranged between 155 in Kuwait and 5,625 in North Africa. The identified treatment options were proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib, drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, and newer drugs such as daratumumab.
CONCLUSION
Improved diagnostic capability has increased the incidence of MM in this region. However, advanced drugs and treatment regimens remain unaffordable in many countries of these regions. Therefore, understanding the trends of the disease and improving healthcare settings are imperative.
PubMed: 38817690
DOI: 10.46989/001c.92555 -
Annals of Hematology Mar 2021Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease, and patients usually receive multiple lines of therapy. Due to the abundance of novel treatments for MM, we conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease, and patients usually receive multiple lines of therapy. Due to the abundance of novel treatments for MM, we conducted a network meta-analysis to identify combinations that could fare better than others in relapsed/refractory MM, in the setting of novel drugs. We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for phase III trials in previously treated MM that had lenalidomide or bortezomib in the control arm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), extracted as hazard-ratio. We used the P score to rank treatments. Thirteen studies were included. All but two studies compared one novel agent against two, with or without dexamethasone. Based on the P score, daratumumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin had a higher probability of achieving better PFS, followed by isatuximab, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat. Although most overall survival data were not mature enough, the addition of a second or third novel agent to either immunomodulatory (IMID) or proteasome inhibitor (PI) backbone seemed to improve survival (HR = 0.84, 95CI 0.77-0.92). Severe adverse events were more frequent with isatuximab, panobinostat, and pomalidomide. In summary, in the absence of trials directly comparing two novel agents-based therapies, we provide a tool that indirectly compares these newer therapies and that can help physicians to prioritize some regimens over others.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Lenalidomide; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Network Meta-Analysis; Progression-Free Survival; Recurrence
PubMed: 33432438
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04404-3 -
OncoTargets and Therapy 2019To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab-based combination therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), we conducted this meta-analysis by pooling the rates...
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab-based combination therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), we conducted this meta-analysis by pooling the rates of overall response, major response, complete response, and grade ≥3 hematological adverse events.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We searched for relevant studies in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The qualitative assessment of all the included articles was conducted with reference to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was selected to perform all pooled analyses.
RESULTS
We identified altogether 22 studies with a total of 806 symptomatic WM patients enrolled. The pooled analysis indicated that the rituximab-based combination therapy achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 84% (95% CI: 81%-87%), a major response rate (MRR) of 71% (95% CI: 66%-75%), and a complete response rate (CRR) of 7% (95% CI: 5%-10%). Rituximab plus conventional alkylating agents-containing chemotherapy (subgroup A) yielded an ORR of 86% (95% CI: 81%-89%), an MRR of 74% (95% CI: 69%-79%), and a CRR of 8% (95% CI: 4%-14%). Rituximab plus purine analog (subgroup B) resulted in an ORR of 85% (95% CI: 79%-89%), an MRR of 74% (95% CI: 66%-81%), and a CRR of 9% (95% CI: 4%-15%). Rituximab plus proteasome inhibitor (subgroup C) resulted in an ORR of 86% (95% CI: 81%-90%), an MRR of 68% (95% CI: 58%-77%), and a CRR of 7% (95% CI: 3%-11%). Rituximab plus immunomodulatory drug (subgroup D) attained relatively lower response rates, with an ORR of 67% (95% CI: 51%-81%), an MRR of 56% (95% CI: 27%-83%), and a CRR of 5% (95% CI: 1%-12%). Common grade ≥3 hematological adverse events consisted of neutropenia (33%, 95% CI: 17%-52%), thrombocytopenia (7%, 95% CI: 3%-11%), and anemia (5%, 95% CI: 3%-9%).
CONCLUSION
Rituximab in combination with an alkylating agent, purine analog, or proteasome inhibitor is highly effective with tolerable hematological toxicities for WM.
PubMed: 31043792
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S191179 -
Expert Review of Hematology Oct 2019: The genomic landscape of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by recurrent () and mutations (), detected in 90% and 30% of cases, respectively. The...
: The genomic landscape of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by recurrent () and mutations (), detected in 90% and 30% of cases, respectively. The role of in clinical features and outcomes to therapy in WM patients is evolving. : We performed a systematic review aimed at evaluating the prevalence of in WM patients, and at assessing differences in clinical features and outcomes to therapy between WM patients with and without . Seventeen studies were included in our analysis. The pooled prevalence of in WM patients was 31%; 34% in and 5% in patients. were associated with higher serum IgM levels and higher risk of hyperviscosity than patients. Very good partial response (VGPR) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates to ibrutinib, with and without rituximab, appeared lower in than in patients. Response and PFS rates were not affected by status on patients treated with proteasome inhibitors. : Our systematic review shows that WM patients with have specific clinical features and have lower response and PFS rates to BTK inhibitors. Our findings support standardization of testing and development of CXCR4-directed therapy.
Topics: Adenine; Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Viscosity; Gene Expression; Humans; Immunoglobulin M; Mutation; Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Proteasome Inhibitors; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Receptors, CXCR4; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
PubMed: 31343930
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2019.1649132 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Jul 2021Lenalidomide use in nearly all induction regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) has led to the treatment of lenalidomide-refractory disease becoming one of the most...
INTRODUCTION
Lenalidomide use in nearly all induction regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) has led to the treatment of lenalidomide-refractory disease becoming one of the most important clinical questions in its treatment. Given the lack of direct comparisons of treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory MM, we used a systematic review to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included lenalidomide-refractory subgroup analysis.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review to identify RCTs for MM that enrolled patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease, then performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) using random effects model to compare regimens.
RESULTS
We identified 123 discrete RCTs, of which 7 reported primary outcomes for lenalidomide-refractory MM. These were linked in 2 discrete networks totaling 1698 lenalidomide-refractory patients. Network 1 compared bortezomib (bort)/dexamethasone (dex) versus other treatments, and analysis showed triplet therapy with pomalidomide (pom)/bort/dex (hazard ratios [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.84), daratumumab (dara)/bort/dex (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.21-0.63), and dara/carfilzomib (carf)/dex (HR 0.38, 95% CI, 0.21-0.69) as more effective than bort/dex. Network 2 compared dex versus other treatments, and analysis showed pom/dex (HR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.40-0.62), isatuximab (isa)/pom/dex (HR 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20-0.44), and elotuzumab (elo)/pom/dex (HR 0.27, 95% CI, 0.16-0.45) as more effective than dex. Within each network, monoclonal antibody (mAb)-containing regimens had lower HRs and higher P-scores than non-mAb regimens, indicating higher likelihood of these regimens being most efficacious.
CONCLUSION
The results of our NMA demonstrated that for lenalidomide-refractory MM, triplet therapy containing mAbs are superior. There is need for further RCTs to better ascertain the best standard of care for these patients.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Network Meta-Analysis; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33962898
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.03.006 -
BMC Cancer Jun 2021Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remain at an increased risk of infection due to the disease process, as well as the ensuing treatments. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remain at an increased risk of infection due to the disease process, as well as the ensuing treatments.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review to evaluate the monthly risk of grade III/IV infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia in patients with myeloma enrolled in randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
RESULTS
The risk of grade III or higher infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia persists among all phases of treatment. There was no statistical difference in grade III or higher infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia between frontline and relapsed/refractory setting. In the maintenance setting, the complications of infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia were low, but not negligible. Three-drug regimens were no more likely than two-drug regimens to have an increased risk of Grade III or higher infection.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to quantify the monthly risk of grade III or higher infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia across different treatment regimens in the frontline, maintenance, and relapsed/refractory settings. The results of our systematic review demonstrate a significant risk for severe infection, pneumonia, and neutropenia in patients with MM. Further studies are needed to determine the value of antibiotic prophylaxis in a broader myeloma patient population, as well as other approaches that will further mitigate the morbidity and mortality related to infection in this vulnerable patient population.
Topics: History, 21st Century; Humans; Infections; Multiple Myeloma; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34172037
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08451-x -
Clinical Therapeutics Mar 2018New therapies, including daratumumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (DRd) and daratumumab plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (DVd), have recently been approved in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
New therapies, including daratumumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (DRd) and daratumumab plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (DVd), have recently been approved in the United States for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least 1 prior line of therapy. However, few treatments have been compared in head-to-head clinical trials to determine the most efficacious therapy. In an update of the POLLUX (Phase 3 Study Comparing DRd Versus Rd in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [RRMM]) trial, median progression-free survival (PFS) for DRd was not reached; the hazard ratio compared with Rd was 0.41. In an update of the CASTOR (Phase 3 Study Comparing DVd Versus Vd in Subjects with RRMM) trial, median PFS for DVd was 16.7 months, compared with 7.1 months for Vd with a PFS hazard ratio of 0.31. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate the relative efficacy of treatments for previously treated patients with MM.
METHODS
A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, BioSciences Information Service, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from initiation to September 2016. Abstracts published by international congresses (2014-2016) and bibliographies of pertinent systematic reviews and meta-analyses were also searched. Eligible studies consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or long-term follow-up studies with >1 treatment arm assessing the efficacy or safety of MM therapies. An NMA was conducted by using Bayesian fixed effect mixed-treatment comparisons. Outcomes considered were hazard ratios for PFS and odds ratios for overall response rate (ORR).
FINDINGS
In total, 108 articles reporting 27 RCTs were included in the NMA. Data formed 2 evidence networks: RCTs with DRd and RCTs with DVd. Primary analysis of PFS found that DRd and DVd had a higher probability of being the best treatments (probability, 0.997 and 0.999, respectively) and had the lowest risk of progression or death than other treatments approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MM. Results from sensitivity analyses using time to progression as a proxy for missing PFS data were consistent. DRd and DVd also showed improved ORR compared with other treatments. Subgroup analyses of PFS in patients treated with only 1 prior therapy were like the results of the primary analyses.
IMPLICATIONS
This NMA provides comparative efficacy for MM treatments not studied in head-to-head RCTs. The NMA suggests that, compared with other approved MM treatments in the United States, DRd and DVd have a higher probability of providing the longest PFS in patients who have received at least 1 prior therapy and in patients who have received only 1 prior therapy.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bayes Theorem; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29500140
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.01.014