-
PloS One 2017Previous studies have shown the correlation between p-STAT3 overexpression and prognosis in a variety of human tumors. However, their correlation in lung cancer remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Previous studies have shown the correlation between p-STAT3 overexpression and prognosis in a variety of human tumors. However, their correlation in lung cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the correlation between p-STAT3 overexpression and prognosis in lung cancer patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data to identify relevant studies. Two reviewers independently screened the literature search results, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14 software. A random-effect model was employed to evaluate all related pooled results. Statistical heterogeneity of each study was assessed by I2. Publication bias was determined by funnel plot and the Begg's or Egger's tests.
RESULTS
Eventually, 13 studies were included in present meta-analysis. Among these 13 studies, 8 studies were associated with the overall survival of lung cancer and 10 studies with other clinicopathological characteristics. The results of this meta-analysis suggested that p-STAT3 overexpression may be a poor prognosis biomarker in lung cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.46; P = 0.02). In terms of other clinicopathological characteristics, p-STAT3 overexpression was more frequent to advanced TNM stages ranging from III to IV (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.13-3.27; P = 0.02) and lymphatic node metastasis (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.20-2.72; P = 0.004). But, it was not associated with tumor differentiation (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.44-1.53; P = 0.54).
CONCLUSION
p-STAT3 overexpression has significant correlation with poorer overall survival of lung cancer patients, as well as with more advanced TNM stages and lymph node metastasis. Thus, it may serve a biomarker for poor prognosis in lung cancer. Nevertheless, our findings should be confirmed by large prospective studies.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Phosphoproteins; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; STAT3 Transcription Factor
PubMed: 28797050
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182282 -
Medicine Aug 2018Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) plays an important role in cancer progression. Recently, several clinical studies investigated how the overexpression of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) plays an important role in cancer progression. Recently, several clinical studies investigated how the overexpression of hTERT predicts the poor prognosis of solid tumors. However, the results were inconclusive, partly because of the small numbers of patients included.
METHOD
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase to identify relevant studies until August 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the association of hTERT expression and survival outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 27studies enrolling 2530 solid tumor patients were included in this meta-analysis. There were strong significant associations between hTERT overexpression and all endpoints: overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.31-1.73, P = .00), disease-free survival (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.38-2.46; P = .00), and recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.07-2.99; P = .028). In the subgroup analysis, it was found that the overexpression of hTERT induced poor OS in lung cancer (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.21-1.89; P = .00).
CONCLUSION
Our comprehensive systematic review concluded that the overexpression of hTERT was associated with poor survival in human solid tumors. hTERT may be a valuable predictive biomarker for prognosis.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Telomerase
PubMed: 30170373
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011794 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jan 2018The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the ErbB family of membrane tyrosine-kinase receptors. Studies exploring the prognostic role of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the ErbB family of membrane tyrosine-kinase receptors. Studies exploring the prognostic role of EGFR-overexpression in early breast cancer have shown variable results, and the true prognostic value of EGFR is unknown.
METHODS
A systematic review of identified publications exploring the association between EGFR-overexpression (as defined from different techniques and cut-offs) and outcomes [disease-free (DFS) and, overall survival (OS)] in women with early breast cancer. The hazard ratios (HR) for DFS and OS were weighted and pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse variance and random effects modeling.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies comprising 21,418 women were included. EGFR-overexpression was found in 27% of the patients. Primary analysis included studies reporting HRs from multivariable analyses (10 studies including 4857 patients with HRs for OS and 17 studies comprising 8747 patients with HRs for DFS), EGFR-overexpression was associated with worse OS (HR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59-2.47, p < .001) and DFS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.30-1.95, p < .001). The influence of EGFR overexpression on DFS was greater in women with triple negative tumors compared to women with non-triple negative tumors (HR 2.35 versus HR 1.45, respectively; p = .01). Analysis looking at odd ratios for both 5-year and 10-year for DFS and OS showed similar results.
CONCLUSION
EGFR-overexpression appears to be associated with reduced OS and DFS in women with early breast cancer. Patients with triple negative and EGFR-overexpression have poorer OS and DFS than those with triple negative tumors and normal EGFR expression.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Odds Ratio; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Survival Rate; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 29126017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.008 -
Oral Oncology Mar 2022To evaluate the current evidence in relation to the predictive value of p53 overexpression as a biomarker of the malignant transformation risk in oral potentially... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the current evidence in relation to the predictive value of p53 overexpression as a biomarker of the malignant transformation risk in oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus for studies published before July-2021, not restricted by date or publication language, with longitudinal design and assessing p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry. We evaluated the quality of primary-level studies using QUIPS tool. We carried out meta-analyses, examined inter-study heterogeneity through subgroup and meta-regression analyses, and performed sensitivity and small-study effects analyses to test the stability and reliability of results.
RESULTS
Twenty four studies (1,210 patients) met inclusion criteria. P53 overexpression was associated with a statistically significant about 2 fold risk (RR = 1.88, 95 %CI = 1.39-2.56, p < 0.001). Leukoplakia maintained this significant relationship after subgroup meta-analysis (p = 0.002). Regarding the immunohistochemical technique, better results were obtained by the subgroups using anti-p53 DO7 antibody (p = 0.001), at high concentration (dilution < 1: 100, p < 0.001), incubated for long periods (overnight, p = 0.02), and at low temperature (4 °C, p = 0.007). Furthermore, meta-regression analysis showed that the association between p53 overexpression and higher oral cancer risk was independent of the presence and/or severity of epithelial dysplasia (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis supports the assessment of p53 overexpression in the prediction of the malignant transformation risk of OPMD.
Topics: Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Humans; Leukoplakia, Oral; Mouth Diseases; Mouth Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions; Reproducibility of Results; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
PubMed: 35091134
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105734 -
PloS One 2017The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), but the clinical and prognostic significance of EpCAM... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is one of the most commonly used markers of cancer stem cells (CSCs), but the clinical and prognostic significance of EpCAM in gastric cancer (GC) remains disputable. Motivated by heterogeneous and inconclusive results, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically summarize and elucidate the association between EpCAM overexpression and GC patients.
METHODS
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Knowledge and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched to identify relevant studies. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were applied depending on the presence of heterogeneity. The pooled odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to estimate the associations between EpCAM and gastric cancer. For the significant heterogeneity studies, sensitivity analyses were applied based on the population to test the robustness of the pooled results and identify possible sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies including 1960 GC patients met our inclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analyses revealed that there were significant differences in EpCAM overexpression and tumour size (OR = 2.97, 95% CI: 2.13~4.13, P < 0.00001), the nature of the tissue (OR = 80.30, 95% CI: 29.21~220.81, P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.23~6.27, P = 0.01), and the cumulative 5-year overall survival rate (OR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.29~0.99, P = 0.05). No significant associations were identified between EpCAM overexpression and gender (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.66~1.19, P = 0.43), age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.58~2.20, P = 0.73), tumour stage (OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 0.79~6.45, P = 0.13), distant metastasis (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 0.20~22.69, P = 0.52), TNM stage (OR = 5.14, 95% CI: 0.77~34.37, P = 0.09), Lauren type (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.08~16.45, P = 0.9), differentiation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 0.65~5.41, P = 0.24). However, due to significant heterogeneity in tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, differentiation and Lauren type, these results should be taken carefully.
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis demonstrated that the expression of EpCAM in the gastric cancer group was greater than that in the control group. Moreover, EpCAM overexpression was associated with larger tumour size, lymphnode metastasis and worse prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to significant heterogeneity, the sensitivity analysis suggests that population factor may be an important source of heterogeneity, and these results should be treated with caution. EpCAM may be useful as a novel prognostic factor, and large-scale and well-designed studies are needed to validate our results in the future.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule; Gastric Mucosa; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prognosis; Stomach; Stomach Neoplasms; Up-Regulation
PubMed: 28403178
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175357 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Sep 2016Rodent defense behavior assays have been widely used as preclinical models of anxiety to study possibly therapeutic anxiety-reducing interventions. However, some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Rodent defense behavior assays have been widely used as preclinical models of anxiety to study possibly therapeutic anxiety-reducing interventions. However, some proposed anxiety-modulating factors - genes, drugs and stressors - have had discordant effects across different studies. To reconcile the effect sizes of purported anxiety factors, we conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the literature on ten anxiety-linked interventions, as examined in the elevated plus maze, open field and light-dark box assays. Diazepam, 5-HT1A receptor gene knockout and overexpression, SERT gene knockout and overexpression, pain, restraint, social isolation, corticotropin-releasing hormone and Crhr1 were selected for review. Eight interventions had statistically significant effects on rodent anxiety, while Htr1a overexpression and Crh knockout did not. Evidence for publication bias was found in the diazepam, Htt knockout, and social isolation literatures. The Htr1a and Crhr1 results indicate a disconnect between preclinical science and clinical research. Furthermore, the meta-analytic data confirmed that genetic SERT anxiety effects were paradoxical in the context of the clinical use of SERT inhibitors to reduce anxiety.
Topics: Anxiety; Anxiety Disorders; Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone; Social Isolation
PubMed: 27328783
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.011 -
Oncotarget Aug 2016As there are millions of cancer deaths every year, it is of great value to identify applicable prognostic biomarkers. As an important alarm, the prognostic role of high... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
As there are millions of cancer deaths every year, it is of great value to identify applicable prognostic biomarkers. As an important alarm, the prognostic role of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) in cancer remains controversial. We aim to assess the association of HMGB1 expression with prognosis in cancer patients. Systematic literature searches of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were performed for eligible studies of HMGB1 as prognostic factor in cancer. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the influence of HMGB1 expression on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in cancer patients. 18 studies involving 11 different tumor types were included in meta-analysis. HMGB1 overexpression was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.99; 95% CI, 1.71-2.31) and PFS (HR: 2.26; 95% CI, 1.65-3.10) irrespective of cancer types including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, esophageal cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, and cervical carcinoma. Subgroup analyses indicated geographical area and size of studies did not affect the prognostic effects of HMGB1 for OS. Morever, HMGB1 overexpression had a consistent correlation with poorer OS when detected by immunohistochemistry in tissues and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum, whereas the correlation did not exist by quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in tissues. HMGB1 overexpression is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with various types of cancer, suggesting that it is a prognostic factor and potential biomarker for survival in cancer.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Geography; HMGB1 Protein; Humans; Neoplasms; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27391431
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10413 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Apr 2024Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive, heterogeneous, and fatal types of human cancer; therefore, more effective therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. Human... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive, heterogeneous, and fatal types of human cancer; therefore, more effective therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and amplification have been identified as a cornerstone in this pathology. The aim of this review is to identify HER2 membrane overexpression in relation to pancreatic cancer pathways that can be used in order to develop a targeted therapy. After searching the keywords, 174 articles were found during a time span of 10 years, between 2013 and 2023, but only twelve scientific papers were qualified for this investigation. The new era of biomolecular research found a significant relationship between HER2 overexpression and pancreatic cancer cells in 25-30% of cases. The variables are dependent on tumor-derived cells, with differences in receptor overexpression between PDAC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), BTC (biliary tract cancer), ampullary carcinoma, and PNETs (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors). HER2 overexpression is frequently encountered in human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, and the ERBB family is one of the targets in the near future of therapy, with good results in phase I, II, and III studies evaluating downregulation and tumor downstaging, respectively.
PubMed: 38793045
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050463 -
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers &... Aug 2014Breast cancer imaging phenotype is diverse and may relate to molecular alterations driving cancer behavior. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed relations... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Breast cancer imaging phenotype is diverse and may relate to molecular alterations driving cancer behavior. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed relations between breast cancer imaging features and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) overexpression as a marker of breast cancer aggressiveness. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for mammography, breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies through February 2013. Of 68 imaging features that could be pooled (85 articles, 23,255 cancers; random-effects meta-analysis), 11 significantly related to HER2 overexpression. Results based on five or more studies and robustness in subgroup analyses were as follows: the presence of microcalcifications on mammography [pooled odds ratio (pOR), 3.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.46-4.00] or ultrasound (mass-associated pOR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.34-3.71), branching or fine linear microcalcifications (pOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.07-4.14) or extremely dense breasts on mammography (pOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76), and washout (pOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11-2.21) or fast initial kinetics (pOR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.43-4.73) on MRI all increased the chance of HER2 overexpression. Maximum [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was higher upon HER2 overexpression (pooled mean difference, +0.76; 95% CI, 0.10-1.42). These results show that several imaging features relate to HER2 overexpression, lending credibility to the hypothesis that imaging phenotype reflects cancer behavior. This implies prognostic relevance, which is especially relevant as imaging is readily available during diagnostic work-up.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Diagnostic Imaging; Female; Humans; Phenotype; Receptor, ErbB-2
PubMed: 24807204
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1170 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2021Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in females worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play key... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in females worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play key roles in metastasis and are associated with survival in various cancers. The prognostic values of MMP2 and MMP9 expression in BC have been investigated, but the results remain controversial. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to investigate the associations between MMP2/9 expressions in tumor cells with clinicopathologic features and survival outcome in BC patients.
METHODS
Eligible studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI and Wanfang databases. The associations of MMP2/9 overexpression in tumor cells with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The associations of MMP2/9 overexpression with clinicopathological features were investigated by calculating odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and analysis for publication bias were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 41 studies comprising 6517 patients with primary BC were finally included. MMP2 overexpression was associated with an unfavorable OS (HR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.33 -1.94, P < 0.001) while MMP9 overexpression predicted a shorter OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 -1.77, P < 0.001). MMP2 overexpression conferred a higher risk to distant metastasis (OR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.35-5.39, P = 0.005) and MMP9 overexpression correlated with lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.86 - 4.53, P < 0.001). Moreover, MMP2 and MMP9 overexpression were both associated with higher clinical stage and histological grade in BC patients. MMP9 overexpression was more frequent in patients with larger tumor sizes.
CONCLUSIONS
Tumoral MMP2 and MMP9 are promising markers for predicting the prognosis in patients with BC.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinase 2; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33568081
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07860-2