-
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Jun 2021The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or a macrolide as a first-line antibiotic treatment for Legionella pneumonia, but it is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or a macrolide as a first-line antibiotic treatment for Legionella pneumonia, but it is unclear which antibiotic leads to optimal clinical outcomes. We compared the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone versus macrolide monotherapy in Legionella pneumonia using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of literature in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 1 June 2019. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing macrolide with fluoroquinolone monotherapy using clinical outcomes in patients with Legionella pneumonia were included. Twenty-one publications out of an initial 2073 unique records met the selection criteria. Following PRISMA guidelines, 2 reviewers participated in data extraction. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of complications. The review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019132901).
RESULTS
Twenty-one publications with 3525 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the population was 60.9 years and 67.2% were men. The mortality rate for patients treated with fluoroquinolones was 6.9% (104/1512) compared with 7.4% (133/1790) among those treated with macrolides. The pooled odds ratio assessing risk of mortality for patients treated with fluoroquinolones versus macrolides was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, .71-1.25, I2 = 0%, P = .661). Clinical cure, time to apyrexia, LOS, and the occurrence of complications did not differ for patients treated with fluoroquinolones versus macrolides.
CONCLUSIONS
We found no difference in the effectiveness of fluoroquinolones versus macrolides in reducing mortality among patients with Legionella pneumonia.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Community-Acquired Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Legionella; Macrolides; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia
PubMed: 32296816
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa441 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Feb 2024Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Cefiderocol is a last resort option for carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria, especially metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and CR Acinetobacter baumannii. Monitoring global levels of cefiderocol non-susceptibility (CFDC-NS) is important.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically collate and examine studies investigating in vitro CFDC-NS and estimate the global prevalence of CFDC-NS against major Gram-negative pathogens.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and Scopus, up to May 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Eligible were studies reporting CFDC-NS in Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.
RISK-OF-BIAS ASSESSMENT
Two independent reviewers extracted study data and assessed the risk of bias on the population, setting, and measurement (susceptibility testing) domains.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Binomial-Normal mixed-effects models were applied to estimate CFDC-NS prevalence by species, coresistance phenotype, and breakpoint definition (EUCAST, CLSI, and FDA). Sources of heterogeneity were investigated by subgroup and meta-regression analyses.
RESULTS
In all, 78 studies reporting 82 035 clinical isolates were analysed (87% published between 2020 and 2023). CFDC-NS prevalence (EUCAST breakpoints) was low overall but varied by species (S. maltophilia 0.4% [95% CI 0.2-0.7%], Enterobacterales 3.0% [95% CI 1.5-6.0%], P. aeruginosa 1.4% [95% CI 0.5-4.0%]) and was highest for A. baumannii (8.8%, 95% CI 4.9-15.2%). CFDC-NS was much higher in CR Enterobacterales (12.4%, 95% CI 7.3-20.0%) and CR A. baumannii (13.2%, 95% CI 7.8-21.5%), but relatively low for CR P. aeruginosa (3.5%, 95% CI 1.6-7.8%). CFDC-NS was exceedingly high in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (38.8%, 95% CI 22.6-58.0%), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing A. baumannii (44.7%, 95% CI 34.5-55.4%), and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Enterobacterales (36.6%, 95% CI 22.7-53.1%). CFDC-NS varied considerably with breakpoint definition, predominantly among CR bacteria. Additional sources of heterogeneity were single-centre investigations and geographical regions.
CONCLUSIONS
CFDC-NS prevalence is low overall, but alarmingly high for specific CR phenotypes circulating in some institutions or regions. Continuous surveillance and updating of global CFDC-NS estimates are imperative while cefiderocol is increasingly introduced into clinical practice. The need to harmonize EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints was evident.
Topics: Humans; Cefiderocol; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Cephalosporins; Acinetobacter baumannii; Prevalence; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Carbapenems; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 37666449
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.029 -
Journal of Infection and Public Health Mar 2023There is paucity of data describing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance. This review evaluated the changes in the rate of multidrug resistant... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is paucity of data describing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance. This review evaluated the changes in the rate of multidrug resistant gram negative and gram positive bacteria during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
A search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases to identify eligible studies. Studies that reported the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase inhibitor (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CPE) were selected. Studies published in English language from the start of COVID-19 pandemic to July 2022 were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS
Thirty eligible studies were selected and most of them were from Italy (n = 8), Turkey (n = 3) and Brazil (n = 3). The results indicated changes in the rate of multidrug resistant bacteria, and the changes varied between the studies. Most studies (54.5%) reported increase in MRSA infection/colonization during the pandemic, and the increase ranged from 4.6 to 170.6%. Five studies (55.6%) reported a 6.8-65.1% increase in VRE infection/colonization during the pandemic. A 2.4-58.2% decrease in ESBL E. coli and a 1.8-13.3% reduction in ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae was observed during the pandemic. For CRAB, most studies (58.3%) reported 1.5-621.6% increase in infection/colonization during the pandemic. Overall, studies showed increase in the rate of CRE infection/colonization during the pandemic. There was a reduction in carbapenem-resistant E. coli during COVID-19 pandemic, and an increase in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Most studies (55.6%) showed 10.4 - 40.9% reduction in the rate of CRPA infection during the pandemic.
CONCLUSION
There is an increase in the rate of multidrug resistant gram positive and gram negative bacteria during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the rate of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and CRPA has decrease during the pandemic. Both infection prevention and control strategies and antimicrobial stewardship should be strengthen to address the increasing rate of multidrug resistant gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Pandemics; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Escherichia coli; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Gram-Positive Bacteria; COVID-19; Enterobacteriaceae; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Carbapenems; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 36657243
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.022 -
Emerging Microbes & Infections Dec 2022Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are global health challenges. The burden of antibiotic resistance in HAIs is still unclear in low-... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are global health challenges. The burden of antibiotic resistance in HAIs is still unclear in low- and lower-middle-income countries (L-LMICs). This study summarizes recent data on antibiotic resistance in priority HAIs (ESKAPE-E) in L-LMICs and compares them with data from high-income countries (HICs). EMBASE, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus were searched for studies on AMR patterns in HAIs published from 01/2010 to 10/2020. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain pooled estimates. In total, 163 eligible studies were included in the review and meta-analysis. The pooled methicillin resistance proportion in was 48.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 41·7-55·2, n = 80). Pooled carbapenem resistance proportions were high in Gram-negative pathogens: : 16·6% (95%CI 10·7-23·4, n = 60); : 34·9% (95%CI 24·6-45·9, n = 50); : 37.1% (95%CI 24·6-45·9, n = 56); spp.: 51·2% (95%CI 27·5-74·7, n = 7); and 72·4% (95%CI 62·1-81·7%, n = 36). A higher resistance proportions were observed for third-generation cephalosporins: : 78·7% (95%CI 71·5-85·2, n = 46); 78·5% (95%CI 72·1-84·2%, n = 58); and spp.: 83·5% (95%CI 71·9-92·8, n = 8). We observed a high between-study heterogeneity (I > 80%), which could not be explained by our set of moderators. Pooled resistance proportions for Gram-negative pathogens were higher in L-LMICs than regional and national estimates from HICs. Patients in resource-constrained regions are particularly affected by AMR. To combat the high resistance to critical antibiotics in L-LMICs, and bridge disparities in health, it is crucial to strengthen local surveillance and the health systems in general.
Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Developing Countries; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Hospitals; Humans; Klebsiella pneumoniae
PubMed: 35034585
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2030196 -
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Jul 2019spp. are among the most important foodborne pathogens and the third leading cause of human death among diarrheal diseases worldwide. Animals are the primary source of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
spp. are among the most important foodborne pathogens and the third leading cause of human death among diarrheal diseases worldwide. Animals are the primary source of this pathogen, and animal-based foods are the main transmission route to humans. Thus, understanding the global epidemiology of serovars is key to controlling and monitoring this bacterium. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and diversity of serovars in animal-based foods (beef, pork, poultry, and seafood) throughout the five continents (Africa, the Americas [North and Latin America], Asia, Europe, and Oceania). The meta-analysis consisted of a chemometric assessment (hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis) to identify the main epidemiological findings, including the prevalence and diversity of the serovars in each matrix. Regarding the serovar distribution, Typhimurium presented a cosmopolitan distribution, reported in all four assessed matrices and continents; poultry continues to play a central role in the dissemination of the Enteritidis serovar to humans, and Anatum and Weltevreden were the most frequently found in beef and seafood, respectively. Additionally, we recommended careful monitoring of certain serovars, such as Derby, Agona, Infantis, and Kentucky. Finally, given the scientific data regarding the most frequently reported serovars and which matrices constitute the main vehicles for the transmission of this pathogen, control programs may be improved, and specific interventions may be implemented in an attempt to reduce the risk of this pathogen reaching humans. Salmonellosis is caused by spp. and is the third leading cause of death among food-transmitted diseases. This pathogen is commonly disseminated in domestic and wild animals, and the infection's symptoms are characterized by acute fever, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. The animals are the primary source of salmonellae, and animal-based foods are the main transmission route to humans. Therefore, data collected from these sources could contribute to future global interventions for effective control and surveillance of along the food chain. In light of this, the importance of our research is in identifying the prevalence of serovars in four animal-based food matrices (pork, poultry, beef, and seafood) and to evaluate the importance that each matrix has as the primary source of this pathogen to humans.
Topics: Animals; Food Microbiology; Prevalence; Salmonella Infections, Animal; Salmonella enterica; Serogroup
PubMed: 31053586
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00591-19 -
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2021Morganella morganii is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, facultative anaerobic bacillus divided into two subspecies, morganii and sibonii. Previously classified as Proteus... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Morganella morganii is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, facultative anaerobic bacillus divided into two subspecies, morganii and sibonii. Previously classified as Proteus morganii, it belongs to human gut commensal microbiota. Nevertheless, on rare occasions, especially in nosocomial and postoperative environment as well as in patients with the impaired immune system and young children, it may cause potentially fatal systemic infection.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of our systematic review was to determine whether and what invasive infections in humans were caused by Morganella morganii and to estimate outcomes of administered antibiotic management.
DATA SOURCES
This systematic review was registered at the PROSPERO database of systematic reviews and meta-analyses before initiation of the research (registration number CRD42020171919). Study eligibility criteria and participants. patients of any age and both sex harbouring Morganella morganii as the only microorganism in bodily fluids or tissues, from where it was isolated and identified by one or more of the following diagnostic methods: conventional techniques including colony morphology, Vitek 2, API or BD Phoenix biochemical systems, as well as more sophisticated methods, such as Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and species-specific PCR for M. morganii.
METHODS AND INTERVENTIONS
We have systematically searched MEDLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS, SCINDEX and GOOGLE SCHOLAR for case reports and case series with M. morganii invasive infections.
RESULTS
M. morganii can cause serious infections of different tissue in patients of any age. The most isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, imipenem and amikacin. Majority of the patients completely recovered after antibiotic treatment. About 15% of the patients died despite of the therapy. Gentamicin was the most frequently used antibiotic in the treatment of infection caused by M. morganii.
CONCLUSION
M. morganii invasive infections should be taken into consideration by the clinicians, especially in hospital conditions, due to its high degree of mortality and high potential of this bacterium to develop multidrug resistance. Treatment of M. morganii infections should include gentamycin in combination with third generation cephalosporin or another antibiotic to which M. morganii is susceptible (after testing isolates for third cephalosporin generation for the production of AmpC β -lactamases).
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Humans; Morganella morganii
PubMed: 34193353
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.06.005 -
The Journal of Hospital Infection Dec 2023Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) cases increases every year in Denmark and the proportion of CPE-positive cases with a travel history decreases. Several... (Review)
Review
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) cases increases every year in Denmark and the proportion of CPE-positive cases with a travel history decreases. Several epidemiological links show transmission in Danish healthcare setting indicating infection prevention and control challenges and raising questions about the Danish CPE screening protocol. The aim of this review was to identify additional risk factors to those described in the Danish CPE-screening protocol in order to detect the Danish CPE-positive patients and thereby reduce the risk of transmission and outbreaks. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library during March 2022. A total of 1487 articles were screened, and 19 studies were included. Retrieved studies dealt with patients with laboratory-confirmed CPE (colonization and/or infection) and associated risk factors. Antimicrobial therapy, especially broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, prior or current hospitalization of approximately one week in ICU and 20-28 days in other wards and travel history with or without hospitalization abroad were significant risk factors associated with CPE acquisition. Comorbidities and invasive procedures were identified as risk factors, but without identifying specific comorbidities or invasive procedures associated with risk for CPE-acquisition. This study suggests the need to develop an additional algorithm for CPE-screening in Denmark. In addition to risk-based screening on admission, screening of inpatients should be considered. The screening protocol might include screening of inpatients with comorbidities who are hospitalized >1 week in ICU or >3 weeks in other wards and who have previously received or currently are receiving antibiotic treatment. Further research is needed to develop a new CPE-screening algorithm.
Topics: Humans; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae; Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Gammaproteobacteria
PubMed: 37802236
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.09.018 -
Infection Control and Hospital... Apr 2024To identify and report the pathogens and sources of contamination associated with bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To identify and report the pathogens and sources of contamination associated with bronchoscopy-related outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
SETTING
Inpatient and outpatient outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks after bronchoscopy.
METHODS
PubMed/Medline databases were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms "bronchoscopy," "outbreak," and "pseudo-outbreak" from inception until December 31, 2022. From eligible publications, data were extracted regarding the type of event, pathogen involved, and source of contamination. Pearson correlation was used to identify correlations between variables.
RESULTS
In total, 74 studies describing 23 outbreaks and 52 pseudo-outbreaks were included in this review. The major pathogens identified in these studies were , , nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), , , , , and fungi. The primary sources of contamination were the use of contaminated water or contaminated topical anesthetics, dysfunction and contamination of bronchoscopes or automatic endoscope reprocessors, and inadequate disinfection of the bronchoscopes following procedures. Correlations were identified between primary bronchoscope defects and the identification of (r = 0.351; = .002) and (r = 0.346; = .002), and between the presence of a contaminated water source and NTM (r = 0.331; = .004) or (r = 0.280; = .015).
CONCLUSIONS
Continued vigilance in bronchoscopy disinfection practices remains essential because outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks continue to pose a significant risk to patient care, emphasizing the importance of stringent disinfection and quality control measures.
Topics: Humans; Bronchoscopy; Cross Infection; Equipment Contamination; Bronchoscopes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Disease Outbreaks; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Water
PubMed: 38099453
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.250 -
Gastroenterology Jul 2019Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is common but difficult to treat. Altering the gut microbiota has been proposed as a strategy for treatment of IBS, but the association...
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is common but difficult to treat. Altering the gut microbiota has been proposed as a strategy for treatment of IBS, but the association between the gut microbiome and IBS symptoms has not been well established. We performed a systematic review to explore evidence for this association.
METHODS
We searched databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CDSR, and CENTRAL, through April 2, 2018 for case-control studies comparing the fecal or colon microbiomes of adult or pediatric patients with IBS with microbiomes of healthy individuals (controls). The primary outcome was differences in specific gut microbes between patients with IBS and controls.
RESULTS
The search identified 2631 citations; 24 studies from 22 articles were included. Most studies evaluated adults presenting with various IBS subtypes. Family Enterobacteriaceae (phylum Proteobacteria), family Lactobacillaceae, and genus Bacteroides were increased in patients with IBS compared with controls, whereas uncultured Clostridiales I, genus Faecalibacterium (including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii), and genus Bifidobacterium were decreased in patients with IBS. The diversity of the microbiota was either decreased or not different in IBS patients compared with controls. More than 40% of included studies did not state whether cases and controls were comparable (did not describe sex and/or age characteristics).
CONCLUSIONS
In a systematic review, we identified specific bacteria associated with microbiomes of patients with IBS vs controls. Studies are needed to determine whether these microbes are a product or cause of IBS.
Topics: Bacteroides; Bifidobacterium; Clostridiales; Enterobacteriaceae; Faecalibacterium; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Lactobacillaceae
PubMed: 30940523
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.049 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Jul 2019The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for decolonizing regimens targeting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) carriers in all...
SCOPE
The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for decolonizing regimens targeting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) carriers in all settings.
METHODS
These evidence-based guidelines were produced after a systematic review of published studies on decolonization interventions targeting the following MDR-GNB: third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCephRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (AGRE), fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (FQRE), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDRPA), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (CRSM), colistin-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CoRGNB), and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms (PDRGNB). The recommendations are grouped by MDR-GNB species. Faecal microbiota transplantation has been discussed separately. Four types of outcomes were evaluated for each target MDR-GNB:(a) microbiological outcomes (carriage and eradication rates) at treatment end and at specific post-treatment time-points; (b) clinical outcomes (attributable and all-cause mortality and infection incidence) at the same time-points and length of hospital stay; (c) epidemiological outcomes (acquisition incidence, transmission and outbreaks); and (d) adverse events of decolonization (including resistance development). The level of evidence for and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the GRADE approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached through a nominal-group technique for the final list of recommendations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The panel does not recommend routine decolonization of 3GCephRE and CRE carriers. Evidence is currently insufficient to provide recommendations for or against any intervention in patients colonized with AGRE, CoRGNB, CRAB, CRSM, FQRE, PDRGNB and XDRPA. On the basis of the limited evidence of increased risk of CRE infections in immunocompromised carriers, the panel suggests designing high-quality prospective clinical studies to assess the risk of CRE infections in immunocompromised patients. These trials should include monitoring of development of resistance to decolonizing agents during treatment using stool cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility results according to the EUCAST clinical breakpoints.
Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Europe; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 30708122
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.01.005