-
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery May 2017Outcomes after implant arthroplasty for primary degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint were different according to the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Outcomes after implant arthroplasty for primary degenerative and posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint were different according to the implant design and surgical approach. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes of various types of implant arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis, with an emphasis on different surgical approaches.
METHODS
The authors searched all available literature in the PubMed and EMBASE databases for articles reporting on outcomes of implant arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. Data collection included active arc of motion, extension lag, and complications. The authors combined the data of various types of surface replacement arthroplasty into one group for comparison with silicone arthroplasty.
RESULTS
A total of 849 articles were screened, yielding 40 studies for final review. The mean postoperative arc of motion and the mean gain in arc of motion of silicone implant with the volar approach were 58 and 17 degrees, respectively, which was greater than surface replacement implant with the dorsal approach at 51 and 8 degrees, respectively. The mean postoperative extension lag of silicone implant with the volar approach and surface replacement with the dorsal approach was 5 and 14 degrees, respectively. The revision rate of silicone implant with the volar approach and surface replacement with the dorsal approach was 6 percent and 18 percent at a mean follow-up of 41.2 and 51 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Silicone implant with the volar approach showed the best arc of motion, with less extension lag and fewer complications after surgery among all the implant designs and surgical approaches.
Topics: Adolescent; Arthroplasty; Finger Joint; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28445369
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003260 -
The Knee Aug 2022Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) ganglion cysts are rare; however, their optimal management remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the surgical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) ganglion cysts are rare; however, their optimal management remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the surgical treatment options with a focus on recurrence rates and complications.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed, searching three electronic databases, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The presentation, treatment, and outcomes of PTFJ ganglion cysts of minimum 1-year follow-up was collected. Study quality was assessed using the Modified Downs and Blacks checklist. Surgical interventions were considered ordinally from simple to more extensive as follows; cyst aspiration, cyst excision, cyst excision with an intervention to the PTFJ, either a hemi-resection or arthrodesis.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies comprising 100 patients (101 knees) met inclusion criteria. Among all patients, pain was present in 59.7%, a lateral fullness in 71.6% and symptoms of the common peroneal nerve in 57.4%. The overall rate of recurrence after primary treatment was 28.9%. Recurrence rates for aspiration, cyst excision, PTFJ hemi-resection and PTFJ arthrodesis were 81.8%, 27.4%, 8.3% and 0%, respectively. Revision excision for recurrence failed in all cases. Outcomes beyond recurrence were poorly reported.
CONCLUSION
Addressing the PTFJ at the time of cyst excision reduces recurrence rates, however, the morbidity from PTFJ hemi-resection and arthrodesis are poorly reported. Whilst primary excision offers resolution in most cases (73%), revision cyst excision in isolation for the treatment of recurrent cysts is an inadequate treatment option. Cyst aspiration is ineffective. Data pertaining to patient reported outcomes for all treatment types are lacking.
Topics: Arthrodesis; Ganglion Cysts; Humans; Knee Joint; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Peroneal Nerve
PubMed: 35696835
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.05.009 -
Hepato-gastroenterology 2012To compare effectiveness between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
To compare effectiveness between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer.
METHODOLOGY
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Chinese CNKI databases were searched to select eligible studies comparing TG to PG for proximal gastric cancer. Outcome measures included overall survival, recurrence, mortality and morbidity rates, as well as nutritional states. Meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 5.0.
RESULTS
One randomized controlled trial and 7 retrospective studies involving 1077 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference of 5-year overall survival rate (OR=0.89, p=0.53). However, TG achieved a lower recurrence rate (Peto OR=0.53, p=0.004). PG experienced higher morbidity risk (OR=0.11, p<0.00001), concerning higher risks of reflux esophagitis (OR=0.04, p<0.00001) and anastomotic stenosis (OR=0.14, p<0.00001) in a short period. TG performed longer operation time (p=0.002) and more blood loss (p<0.00001). Operative mortality and nutritional states were comparable without significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on current retrospective evidences, TG and PG had similar overall survival outcome for proximal gastric cancer, but TG showed lower recurrence rate. PG with gastroesophagostomy had higher incidence of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stenosis. TG can be recommendation for proximal gastric cancer, although more high-quality trials are still expected.
Topics: Gastrectomy; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Nutritional Status; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22328267
DOI: 10.5754/hge11834 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2023Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, initially intended for thoracic aortic disease treatment, has extended its application to the proximal zone of the aorta. However,...
BACKGROUND
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, initially intended for thoracic aortic disease treatment, has extended its application to the proximal zone of the aorta. However, the safety and surgical outcomes of extending the proximal landing zone into the ascending aorta (zone 0) in selected cases remain unknown. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of zone 0 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to obtain a deeper understanding of its safety, outcomes, and trends over time.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, from January, 1997 to January, 2022. Only studies involving zone 0 TEVAR were included. The retrieved data from the eligible studies included basic study characteristics, 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate, indications, comorbidities, stent grafts, techniques, and complications. Summary effect measures of the primary outcomes were obtained by logarithmically pooling the data with an inverse variance-weighted fixed-effects model.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies with 1,013 patients were eligible for analysis. The pooled 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate of zone 0 TEVAR was 7.49%. The rates of post-operative stroke, type Ia endoleak, retrograde type A aortic dissection, and spinal cord ischemia were 8.95, 9.01, 5.72, and 4.12%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Although many novel stent grafts and techniques targeting zone 0 TEVAR are being investigated, a consensus on technique and device selection in zone 0 TEVAR is yet to be established in current practice. Furthermore, the post-operative stroke rate is relatively high, while other complication rates and perioperative death rate are comparable to those of TEVAR for other aortic zones.
PubMed: 36910538
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1034354 -
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics Oct 2022Minimally displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures can be reliably managed non-operatively; however, there is considerable debate regarding the appropriate... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Minimally displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures can be reliably managed non-operatively; however, there is considerable debate regarding the appropriate management of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures, particularly in older children and adolescents with limited remodeling potential. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to answer the questions: "What are the functional and quality-of-life outcomes of pediatric proximal humerus fractures?" and "What factors have been associated with a poorer outcome?"
METHODS
A review of Medline and Embase was performed on 4 July 2021 using search terms relevant to proximal humerus fractures, surgery, non-operative management, pediatrics, and outcomes. Studies including ≥10 pediatric patients with proximal humerus fractures, which assessed clinical outcomes by use of an established outcome measure, were selected. The following clinical information was collected: participant characteristics, treatment, complications, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Twelve articles were selected, including four prospective cohort studies and eight retrospective cohort studies. Favorable outcome scores were found for patients with minimally displaced fractures, and for children aged less than 10 years, irrespective of treatment methodology or grade of fracture displacement. Older age at injury and higher grade of fracture displacement were reported as risk factors for a poorer patient-reported outcome score.
CONCLUSION
An excellent functional outcome can be expected following non-operative management for minimally displaced pediatric proximal humerus fractures. Prospective trials are required to establish a guideline for the management of severely displaced proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents according to fracture displacement and the degree of skeletal maturity.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
level V.
PubMed: 36238150
DOI: 10.1177/18632521221117445 -
Spine Dec 2014Systematic review of literature. (Review)
Review
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review of literature.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a comprehensive English language systematic literature review of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF), concentrating on incidence, risk factors, health related quality of life impact, prevention strategy, and classification systems.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
PJK and PJF are well described clinical pathologies and are a frequent cause of revision surgery. The development of a PJK classification that correlates with clinical outcomes and guides treatment decisions and possible prevention strategies would be of significant benefit to patients and surgeons.
METHODS
The phrases "proximal junctional," "proximal junctional kyphosis," and "proximal junctional failure" were used as search terms in PubMed for all years up to 2014 to identify all articles that included at least one of these terms.
RESULTS
Fifty-three articles were identified overall. Eighteen articles assessed for risk factors. Eight studies specifically reviewed prevention strategies. There were no randomized prospective studies. There were 3 published studies that have attempted to classify PJK. The reported incidence of PJK ranged widely, from 5% to 46% in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation and fusion for adult spinal deformity. It is reported that 66% of PJK occurs within 3 months and 80% within 18 months after surgery. The reported revision rates due to PJK range from 13% to 55%. Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for PJK have been characterized.
CONCLUSION
PJK and PJF affect many patients after long segment instrumentation after the correction of adult spinal deformity. The epidemiology and risk factors for the disease are well defined. A PJK and PJF scoring system may help describe the severity of disease and guide the need for revision surgery. The development and prospective validation of a PJK classification system is important considering the prevalence of the problem and its clinical and economic impact.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
N/A.
Topics: Female; Humans; Kyphosis; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Scoliosis; Spinal Fusion; Spine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25271516
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000627 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery May 2023The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing conservative to surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of both randomized controlled and observational studies comparing conservative to surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar articles comparing surgical treatment to conservative treatment, including all level 1-3 studies from 2000 to 2022. Clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and complications were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's ROB2 tool and ROBINs-I tool. The GRADE system was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence, and heterogeneity was assessed using χ and I statistics. Twenty-two studies were incorporated into the analysis. Ten studies had a high risk of bias, and all included studies were of low quality.
RESULTS
The pooled estimates failed to identify differences for clinical outcomes (P = .208), abduction (P = .275), forward flexion (P = .447), or external rotation (P = .696). Complication rates between groups were significantly lower (P = .00001) in the conservative group.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences for either clinical outcomes or range of motion between surgically managed and conservatively treated displaced proximal humerus fractures. The overall complication rate was 3.3 times higher, following surgical treatment. The validity of this result is compromised by the high risk of bias and very low level of certainty of the included studies, and the conclusion must therefore be interpreted with caution.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder Fractures; Fracture Fixation; Conservative Treatment; Range of Motion, Articular; Humeral Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Humerus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36736653
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.002 -
Animals : An Open Access Journal From... Jun 2021The assessment of limb conformations in veterinary orthopedics is a significant tool used to determine the quantitative degree of limb malalignments. As in human... (Review)
Review
The assessment of limb conformations in veterinary orthopedics is a significant tool used to determine the quantitative degree of limb malalignments. As in human medicine, various studies have been undertaken in veterinary medicine to determine the values in different dog breeds and to determine the values in healthy and diseased dogs. The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the reported values in these articles separately, to compile the standard values, and to compare the values between dogs with and without various orthopedic diseases. All of the articles included in this systematic review were collected by screening the Scopus, PubMed/Medline, and Web of Science databases. The articles were evaluated according to the measured alignments, imaging methods, dog breeds, and the health status of the dogs. Each alignment was investigated separately, and the results are summarized. Twenty-nine studies were included in this systematic review. According to the studies, in the frontal plane, distal femoral alignments, as well as proximal and distal tibial alignments, corresponded to the severity of the medial patellar luxation. The difference between affected and non-affected dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease was limited to the proximal tibial alignments in the sagittal plane.
PubMed: 34204283
DOI: 10.3390/ani11061804 -
JBJS Reviews Aug 2023In smaller studies, allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) has been used for proximal humerus bone loss with some success, although with notable complication risk. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In smaller studies, allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) has been used for proximal humerus bone loss with some success, although with notable complication risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to describe outcomes and complications after proximal humerus APC and how major APC complications are defined in the literature.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on APC for proximal humeral bone loss secondary to tumor, fracture, or failed arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included postoperative range of motion, outcome scores (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society [MSTS], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Constant, visual analog scale [VAS], and subjective shoulder value [SSV]), and complication incidence. We also described individual study definitions of APC malunion/nonunion, methods of postoperative evaluation, malunion/nonunion rates, allograft fracture/fragmentation rates, and mean union time, when available. Secondarily, we compared hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
RESULTS
Sixteen articles including 375 shoulders were evaluated (average age: 49 years, follow-up: 54 months). Fifty-seven percent of procedures were performed for tumors, 1% for proximal humerus trauma sequelae, and 42% for revision arthroplasty. Average postoperative forward elevation was 82° (69-94°), abduction 60° (30-90°), and external rotation 23° (17-28°). Average MSTS score was 82% (77%-87%), SST score 5.3 (4.5-6.1), ASES score 64 (54-74), Constant score 44 (38-50), VAS score 2.2 (1.7-2.7), and SSV 51 (45-58). There was a 51% complication rate with an 18% nonallograft surgical complication rate, 26% APC nonunion/malunion/resorption rate, and 10% APC fracture/fragmentation rate. Fifteen percent of nonunited APCs underwent secondary bone grafting; 3% required a new allograft; and overall revision rate was 12%. APC nonunion/malunion was defined in 2 of 16, malunion/nonunion rates in 14 of 16, fracture/fragmentation rates in 6 of 16, and mean union time (7 months) in 4 of 16 studies.
CONCLUSION
APC reconstruction of the proximal humerus remains a treatment option, albeit with substantial complication rates. In addition, there is a need for APC literature to report institutional definitions of nonunion/malunion, postoperative evaluation, and time to union for a more standardized evaluation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV; systematic review. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Shoulder; Humerus; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Fractures, Bone; Hemiarthroplasty; Allografts
PubMed: 37616466
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00061 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2023Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including... (Review)
Review
Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including screws, Kirschner wires, tension band wiring, intramedullary devices, and plate fixation. There remains no consensus as to the optimum method, and no recent summary of the literature exists. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. English-language articles reporting PIPJ arthrodesis outcomes were included and presented in a systematic review. Pearson χ and 2-sample proportion tests were used to compare fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate between arthrodesis techniques. The mean fusion time ranged from 5.1 to 12.9 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in fusion time between arthrodesis techniques. Nonunion rates ranged from 0.0% to 33.3%. Screw arthrodesis demonstrated a lower nonunion rate than wire fusion (3.0% and 8.5% respectively; = .01). Complication rates ranged from 0.0% to 22.1%. Aside from nonunions, there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between arthrodesis techniques. The available PIPJ arthrodesis techniques have similar fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate outcomes. The existing data have significant limitations, and further research would be beneficial to elucidate any differences between techniques.
Topics: Humans; Bone Wires; Bone Screws; Arthrodesis; Joint Diseases; Finger Joint
PubMed: 33682483
DOI: 10.1177/1558944721998019