-
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jun 2022The scope of dermatologic adverse events to ibrutinib has not been systematically described. We sought to determine the incidence and severity of ibrutinib-associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The scope of dermatologic adverse events to ibrutinib has not been systematically described. We sought to determine the incidence and severity of ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities and provide management recommendations. We conducted a systematic literature search of clinical trials and cohorts investigating ibrutinib monotherapy for cancer or chronic graft-versus-host disease through June 2020. Thirty-two studies with 2258 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade toxicities included cutaneous bleeds (24.8%; 95%CI, 18.6-31.0%), mucocutaneous infections (4.9%; 95%CI, 2.9-7.0%), rash (10.8%; 95%CI. 6.1-15.5%), mucositis (6%; 95%CI, 3.6-8.5%), edema (15.9%; 95%CI, 11.1-20.6%), pruritus (4.0%; 95%CI, 0.0-7.9%), xerosis (9.2%; 95%CI, 5.5-13.0%), nail changes (17.8%; 95%CI, 4.1-31.5%), and hair changes (7.9%; 95%CI, 0.0-21.3%). The incidence of high-grade toxicities included mucocutaneous infection (1.3%; 95%CI, 0.5-2.2%), rash (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%), mucositis (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.3%), and edema (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%). It is imperative that clinicians familiarize themselves with ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities to learn how to manage them, prevent discontinuation, and improve patient outcomes.
Topics: Adenine; Exanthema; Humans; Mucositis; Piperidines
PubMed: 35523374
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103696 -
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and... Dec 2023Obeticholic acid (OCA) is the second-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), as well as an attractive candidate as a treatment for metabolic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effect on lipid profile and clinical outcomes of obeticholic acid for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Obeticholic acid (OCA) is the second-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), as well as an attractive candidate as a treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of OCA on lipid profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with PBC and MASH. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from five major databases were conducted. Changes in lipid profiles from baseline were compared between groups receiving placebo and OCA. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated separately for PBC and MASH trials, while safety outcomes included pruritus, gastrointestinal disturbances, and headache. OCA treatment exhibited a significant increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.39; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 to 0.63) and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD = -0.80; 95 % CI = -1.13 to -0.47) in both PBC and MASH patients compared to placebo. OCA demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo in treating PBC and MASH, evident in both primary and secondary outcomes. The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher with OCA compared to placebo (risk ratio = 1.78, 95 % CI = 1.42 to 2.25). OCA is more efficacious than a placebo in the treatment of PBC and MASH. However, caution is needed given the association of OCA use with a significant increase in LDL-C levels and a decrease in HDL-C levels among patients with these conditions.
Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Cholesterol, LDL; Fatty Liver; Pruritus
PubMed: 37884091
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102227 -
Experimental Dermatology May 2023Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin inflammatory disease. Dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune systems plays a major role in the pathophysiology of AD.... (Review)
Review
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin inflammatory disease. Dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune systems plays a major role in the pathophysiology of AD. JAKi (Janus Kinase Inhibitors) reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and represent a promising novel treatment for AD. To assess and summarize the overall efficacy and safety of topial JAKi in the treatment of AD in adults and pediatrics, a broad search was performed on Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar until 14 June 2022. After screening, 19 studies remained for the final review. The current systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID #CRD42022303321). Topical delgocitinib, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, cerdulatinib and ifidancitinib are effective in treating AD and significantly improve EASI, IGA, pruritus-NRS score and some other indexes in adults. Moreover, topical delgocitinib was observed to have a great efficacy in the treatment of AD in paediatrics. All topical JAKi showed minimal risk of mild-to-moderate adverse effects. Available topical JAKi are effective and safe modalities in treating AD. Nevertheless, further studies with longer duration and head-to-head comparative trials are necessary to find the best option with the least adverse effects.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Child; Dermatitis, Atopic; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Pruritus; Time Factors; Pediatrics; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36691705
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14753 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Nov 2017Atopic dermatitis, a chronic inflammatory disease, has a lifetime prevalence of 10-20%. Atopic dermatitis reduces quality of life, primarily due to pruritus.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Atopic dermatitis, a chronic inflammatory disease, has a lifetime prevalence of 10-20%. Atopic dermatitis reduces quality of life, primarily due to pruritus. Interleukin-31 and its target receptor are newly discovered entities that are involved in pruritus.
PURPOSE
To summarize the current understanding of interleukin-31 and its role in atopic dermatitis, potential therapeutic interventions and future prospects.
METHODS
A systematic review was designed to identify articles related to interleukin-31 and its role in pruritus. Predefined queries containing interleukin-31 and related key terms were searched with no past date restriction, through 31 August 2016, using MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal database.
RESULTS
Of 151 identified articles, 61 met eligibility criteria. Interleukin-31 receptors are expressed constitutively on the surface of keratinocytes, eosinophils and small diameter neurons. Overexpression of interleukin-31, independent of mast cells and lymphocytes, induces clinical and histological features consistent with atopic dermatitis. In addition, overexpression of interleukin-31 causes reversible alopecia. Human monoclonal interleukin-31 antagonist, CIM331, decreased pruritus in phase-I and phase-II clinical trials.
CONCLUSIONS
Interleukin-31 plays an important role in atopic dermatitis and alopecia. Inhibiting this pathway may provide an alternative to antihistamines for the pruritus of atopic dermatitis.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dermatitis, Atopic; Eczema; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Interleukins; Pruritus; Receptors, Interleukin
PubMed: 28145790
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1290205 -
Journal of Physiotherapy Jan 2024In adults with a burn injury, do non-invasive therapies improve pain and burn scar pruritus, elasticity and vascularisation? Are any effects maintained beyond the...
QUESTIONS
In adults with a burn injury, do non-invasive therapies improve pain and burn scar pruritus, elasticity and vascularisation? Are any effects maintained beyond the intervention period?
DESIGN
Systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analyses.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults with burn scars.
INTERVENTION
The experimental intervention was a non-invasive (ie, non-surgical or non-pharmacological) therapy applied to the burn scar.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Pain intensity, pruritus intensity, elasticity and vascularisation.
RESULTS
Fifteen trials involving 780 participants were included. The results indicated a beneficial effect on pain intensity on a 0-to-10 scale after massage (MD -1.5, 95% CI -1.8 to -1.1), shockwave therapy (MD -0.8, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4) and laser (MD -4.0, 95% CI -6.0 to -2.0). The results indicated a beneficial effect on pruritus intensity on a 0-to-10 scale after massage (MD -0.4, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.2), shockwave therapy (MD -1.3, 95% CI -2.3 to -0.3) and laser (MD -4.8, 95% CI -6.1 to -3.5). Massage, shockwave therapy and silicone produced negligible or unclear benefits on scar elasticity and vascularisation. The quality of evidence varied from low to moderate.
CONCLUSION
Among all commonly used non-invasive therapies for the treatment of burn scars, low-to-moderate quality evidence indicated that massage, laser and shockwave therapy reduce pain and the intensity of scar pruritus. Low-to-moderate quality evidence suggested that massage, shockwave therapy and silicone have negligible or unclear effects for improving scar elasticity and vascularisation.
REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42021258336).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic; High-Energy Shock Waves; Pruritus; Pain; Lasers; Burns; Massage; Silicones
PubMed: 38072714
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2023.10.010 -
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine 2022Knowledge of the safety of vaccines is crucial, both to prevent and cure them and to decrease the public hesitation in receiving vaccines. Therefore, this study aimed to... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Knowledge of the safety of vaccines is crucial, both to prevent and cure them and to decrease the public hesitation in receiving vaccines. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the adverse events reported for inactivated vaccines and Novavax.
METHODS
In this systematic review, the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched on September 15, 2021. Then we identified the eligible studies using a two-step title/abstract and full-text screening process. Data on the subjects, studies, and types of adverse events were extracted and entered in a word table, including serious, mild, local, and systemic adverse events as well as the timing of side effects' appearance.
RESULTS
Adverse effects of inactivated coronavirus vaccines side effects were reported from phases 1, 2, and 3 of the vaccine trials. The most common local side effects included injection site pain and swelling, redness, and pruritus. Meanwhile, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, fever, and gastrointestinal symptoms including abdominal pain and diarrhea were among the most common systemic adverse effects.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review indicates that inactivated COVID-19 vaccines, including Sinovac, Sinopharm, and Bharat Biotech, as well as the protein subunit vaccines (Novavax) can be considered as safe choices due to having milder side effects and fewer severe life-threatening adverse events.
PubMed: 36033990
DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1585 -
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable therapeutic outcomes among cancer patients. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) is under investigation as a new... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown remarkable therapeutic outcomes among cancer patients. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) is under investigation as a new ICI combination therapy, and its efficacy has been reported in various types of cancer. However, the safety profile of DT remains unclear, especially considering rare adverse events (AEs).
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to assess the frequency of AEs associated with DT.
DESIGN
This study type is a systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
Four databases were searched for articles. Randomized trials, single-arm trials, and prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. The type of cancer, previous treatment, and performance status were not questioned. Major AE indicators such as any AE and the pooled frequency of each specific AE were used as outcomes. As a subgroup analysis, we also compared cases in which DT was performed as first-line treatment with those in which it was performed as second-line or later treatment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center website (ID: UMIN000046751).
RESULTS
Forty-one populations including 3099 patients were selected from 30 articles. Pooled frequencies of key AE indicators are shown below: any AEs, 77.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 67.9-87.6]; grade ⩾ 3 AEs, 29.3% (95% CI: 24.2-34.4); serious AEs, 34.9% (95% CI: 28.1-41.7); AE leading to discontinuation, 13.3% (95% CI: 9.3-17.4); treatment-related deaths, 0.98% (95% CI: 0.5-1.5). AEs with a frequency exceeding 15% are shown below: fatigue, 30.1% (95% CI: 23.8-36.3); diarrhea, 21.7% (95% CI: 17.8-25.6); pruritus 17.9% (95% CI: 14.4-21.3); decreased appetite, 17.7% (95% CI: 13.7-22.0); nausea, 15.6% (95% CI: 12.1-19.6). There were no significant differences in these pooled frequencies between subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
The incidence of any AE in DT therapy was approximately 78%, and the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was approximately 30%, which was independent of prior therapy.
PubMed: 37720498
DOI: 10.1177/17588359231198453 -
Cureus Jul 2023Uremic xerosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus (CKD-ap) are the most commonly occurring dermatological problems faced by most of the CKD patients on... (Review)
Review
Management of Uremic Xerosis and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)-Associated Pruritus (CKD-ap) With Topical Preparations: A Systematic Review and Implications in the Indian Context.
Uremic xerosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus (CKD-ap) are the most commonly occurring dermatological problems faced by most of the CKD patients on hemodialysis which are not only annoying and draining to the patients but also have an intense effect on patients' quality of life. The PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched for the literature with the following search terms: uremic xerosis OR CKD-ap OR uremic pruritus AND topical therapy OR topical ointment OR natural oil from the year 2002 -2022, and finally, 22 articles were chosen to write this review. Out of 22 studies, six used pharmacological preparations and remaining 16 studies used natural oils and components. All the articles were experimental studies (Pre/Quazi/RCT/True experimental) focusing on managing itch and xerosis associated with CKD and hemodialysis by topical application. The topical agents tried in various research studies are effective in managing itch and xerosis associated with CKD. They are safe, easy to use, and without allergic reactions. Natural oils like almond, chia seed, clove, glycerin, paraffin, and virgin coconut oil are readily available in home-care settings and can be used as a nurse-led intervention. Topical preparations for uremic xerosis and pruritus are effective, safe, and easy to apply on large body surface areas without systematic side effects. Natural oil-based topical preparations are cost-effective, safe, and easy to use.
PubMed: 37641756
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42587 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Sep 2022Dupilumab has demonstrated a great reduction in chronic pruritus that is the hallmark of atopic dermatitis (AD). Underscoring relevant pathogenesis similarities emerging... (Review)
Review
Dupilumab has demonstrated a great reduction in chronic pruritus that is the hallmark of atopic dermatitis (AD). Underscoring relevant pathogenesis similarities emerging from AD, chronic idiopathic pruritus (CIP) and chronic prurigo (CP), several authors suggested the beneficial role of dupilumab in these conditions. The evidence on this subject is limited with no precise data available. In this study, we carried out a systematic literature review in order to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab on both pruritus and skin manifestations in the two largest retrospective cohorts of patients with CP and CIP and tried to identify potential response predictors. Electronic searches were conducted on 4 databases. Our primary outcome was the improvement in pruritus measured by a reduction in the patient's reported numerical rating scale of itch (NRSI) by >4. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with a complete response at the end of treatment, reduction in the number of lesions by the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), improvement in numerical rating scale of sleep (NRSS), improvement in quality of life measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), time until patient perceived any improvement (Time-First) and time until the patient-reported absence of pruritus (Time-Final). Descriptive statistics were calculated for each demographic and clinical variable. Univariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the association between response to dupilumab and potential predictive factors. We included 25 articles in the analysis, counting a total of 153 patients. Based on CP patients' cohort (n = 132), the mean NRSI at baseline was 8.79 ± 0.86 and the NRSI final was 2.32 ± 1.27. The mean time to first improvement was 5.18 ± 3.13 weeks, while the time to complete improvement of pruritus (Time-final) was 13.6 ± 12.0 weeks. Ninety patients out of 109 (83%) noticed an improvement in pruritus before 4 weeks of dupilumab therapy. At the end of treatment, 18 patients out of 126 (14%) had a complete remission of pruritus and 110 patients out of 123 (89%) had a reduction of NRSI >4. The reduction in NRSI was significantly greater in patients improving before 4 weeks of treatment (6.57 ± 1.71) compared with patients improving in more than 4 weeks (5.49 ± 1.39, P < 0.001). Patients with history of AD and those who have been previously treated with cyclosporine or methotrexate had a significantly lower reduction in NRSI (e.g. 6.05 ± 1.34 vs. 7.08 ± 1.90, P < 0.01 for nonassociated AD patients). Based on CIP patient's cohort (n = 21), the mean NRSI at baseline was 8.33 ± 0.80 and the NRSI final was 0.95 ± 0.59. The mean time to first improvement was 2 ± 0 weeks, while the time to complete improvement (Time-final) was 14.6 ± 10 weeks. At the end of treatment, 3 patients out of 21 (14%) had a complete remission of pruritus and 100% of patients had a reduction of NRSI >4. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. The most common adverse event was mild conjunctivitis (13 cases). We highlight the importance of one early sign of improvement as a predictor of the future response to dupilumab: the improvement before 4 weeks of treatment that leads significantly to a greater final reduction in NRSI. Furthermore, patients with the presence or history of atopy appear to be less responsive to dupilumab than nonatopic patients and develop more side effects, in particular conjunctivitis.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Conjunctivitis; Dermatitis, Atopic; Humans; Prurigo; Pruritus; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35569006
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18221 -
Dermatologic Therapy Jan 2021Accumulating evidence has showed the possibility of using NK1R antagonists for the treatment of chronic pruritus. However, the benefit and risk profile of NK1R... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Accumulating evidence has showed the possibility of using NK1R antagonists for the treatment of chronic pruritus. However, the benefit and risk profile of NK1R antagonists-serlopitant and aprepitant for the treatment of pruritus remains unclear. To assess the efficacy and safety of NK1R antagonists-serlopitant and aprepitant in patients with pruritus based on analysis of clinical trials. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 10 randomized clinical trials including 631 patients were enrolled. Four randomized controlled trials investigated the comparative treatment effect of serlopitant on pruritus. Our results showed that serlopitant had reasonable anti-pruritic effectiveness in patients, with mild toxicities. The overall proportion of 4-point improvement of NRS and VAS in serlopitant-treatment group were both significantly higher relative to placebo group (OR 2.345, 95%CI 1.557 to 3.531, P < .001; OR 3.308, 95% CI 1.949 to 5.616, P < .001). Serlopitant treatment was also found to be associated with a significant reduction in NRS score as compared with placebo (SMD -0.381, 95%CI -0.599 to -0.164, P = .001). Six clinical trials reported the treatment effect of aprepitant on pruritus. The meta-analysis result of fixed-effect model showed that there was no significant difference between aprepitant and controlled treatment in terms of improved pruritus VAS score (SMD -0.088, 95%CI -0.384 to 0.207, P = .558). There is promising high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy of serlopitant on pruritus. More large-sample randomized controlled trials with appropriate treatment regimen are urgently needed to further evaluate the effectiveness of aprepitant in pruritus.
Topics: Humans; Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists; Pruritus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33368902
DOI: 10.1111/dth.14698