-
Sports Medicine - Open Jun 2018This review aims to (1) consolidate evidence regarding the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), (2) conduct a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This review aims to (1) consolidate evidence regarding the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), (2) conduct a meta-analysis of the association between SES and CRF using methodologically comparable data, stratified by sex, and (3) test whether the association varies after adjustment for physical activity (PA).
METHODS
A systematic review of studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (ScIELO), and Cochrane Library without time or language restrictions, which investigated associations between SES and CRF. Risk of bias within studies was assessed using a customized quality assessment tool. Results were summarized in table format and methodologically similar studies were synthesized using meta-analysis of Hedges' g effect sizes. Synthesized results were appraised for cross-study bias. Results were tested for the impact of PA adjustment using meta-regression.
RESULTS
Compared to individuals with low education, both men and women showed higher CRF among individuals with high education (men 0.12 [0.04-0.20], women 0.19 [0.02-0.36]), while participants with medium education showed no significant difference in CRF (men 0.03 [- 0.04-0.11], women 0.09 [- 0.03-0.21]). Adjustment for PA did not significantly impact the association between education and CRF.
CONCLUSIONS
There is fair evidence for an association between high levels of education and increased CRF. This could have implications for monitoring, of health target compliance and of chronic disease risk among higher risk populations, to detect and prevent non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and to diminish social health inequalities.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42017055456.
PubMed: 29882063
DOI: 10.1186/s40798-018-0137-0 -
BioMed Research International 2020This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for pneumoconiosis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for pneumoconiosis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP databases and Wanfang Data from their inception to June 1, 2019. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PR for pneumoconiosis was conducted and reported in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed bias risk. All statistical analyses were performed using the RevMan software. Sixteen RCTs with 1307 subjects were ultimately included for analysis. Compared with routine treatment, PR was able to improve the 6-minute walking distance (mean difference (MD) 69.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 61.95-76.25); the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey total score (MD 17.60, 95% CI 13.59-21.61); physical function score (MD 15.45, 95% CI 3.20-27.69); role physical score (MD 17.87, 95% CI 12.06-23.69); body pain score (MD 14.34, 95% CI 10.33-18.36); general health score (MD 20.86, 95% CI 16.87-24.84); vitality score (MD 11.66, 95% CI 0.18-23.13); social function score (MD 9.67, 95% CI 1.27-18.08); mental health score (MD 20.60, 95% CI 13.61-27.59); forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD 0.20, 95% CI 0.12-0.29); forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (MD 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.38); FEV1% (MD 5.19, 95% CI 1.48-8.90); maximal voluntary ventilation (MD 4.47, 95% CI 1.14-7.81); reduction in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (MD -9.60, 95% CI -16.40 to -2.80); and the modified Medical Research Council Scale score. Furthermore, PR did not increase the FEV1/FVC (MD 3.61, 95% CI -3.43 to 10.65), nor the emotional score (MD 6.18, 95% CI -23.01 to 35.38) compared with the control. We found no reports of adverse events associated with PR. Thus, to some extent, PR can improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients with pneumoconiosis. However, these results should be interpreted with caution because of high heterogeneity. This trial is registered with registration number CRD42018095266.
Topics: Exercise Tolerance; Humans; Lung; Pneumoconiosis; Quality of Life; Respiratory Function Tests
PubMed: 32802860
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6174936 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Jun 2022Prehabilitation is a promising method to enhance postoperative recovery, especially in patients suffering from cancer. Particularly during times of social distancing,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Prehabilitation is a promising method to enhance postoperative recovery, especially in patients suffering from cancer. Particularly during times of social distancing, providing home-based programmes may have become a suitable solution to increase compliance and effectiveness.
METHODS
In line with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted including trials that investigated the effect of home-based prehabilitation (HBP) in patients undergoing surgery for cancer. The primary outcome was postoperative functional capacity (6 min walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and compliance.
RESULTS
Five randomized controlled trials were included with 351 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, oesophagogastric cancer, bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Three studies presented results of significant progress after eight weeks. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement of the 6MWT in the prehabilitation group compared to the control group preoperatively (MD 35.06; 95% CI 11.58 to 58.54; p = .003) and eight weeks postoperatively (MD 44.91; 95% CI 6.04 to 83.79; p = .02) compared to baseline. Compliance rate varied from 63% to 83% with no significant difference between prehabilitation and control groups. These data must be interpreted with caution because of a high amount of heterogeneity and small sample sizes.
DISCUSSION
In conclusion, HBP may enhance overall functional capacity of patients receiving oncological surgery compared to standard of care. This could be a promising alternative to hospital-based prehabilitation regarding the current pandemic and further digitalization in the future. In order to increase accessibility and effectiveness of prehabilitation, home-based solutions should be further investigated.
Topics: COVID-19; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Colorectal Neoplasms; Communicable Disease Control; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care
PubMed: 35183411
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.010 -
Journal of Sports Sciences Feb 2020High-intensity-interval-training (HIIT) has been suggested to have beneficial effects in multiple populations across individual systematic reviews, although there is a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
High-intensity-interval-training (HIIT) has been suggested to have beneficial effects in multiple populations across individual systematic reviews, although there is a lack of clarity in the totality of the evidence whether HIIT is effective and safe across different populations and outcomes. The aim of this meta-review was to establish the benefits, safety and adherence of HIIT interventions across all populations from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Major databases were searched for systematic reviews (with/without meta-analyses) of randomised & non-randomised trials that compared HIIT to a control. Thirty-three systematic reviews (including 25 meta-analyses) were retrieved encompassing healthy subjects and people with physical health complications. Evidence suggested HIIT improved cardiorespiratory fitness, anthropometric measures, blood glucose and glycaemic control, arterial compliance and vascular function, cardiac function, heart rate, some inflammatory markers, exercise capacity and muscle mass, versus non-active controls. Compared to active controls, HIIT improved cardiorespiratory fitness, some inflammatory markers and muscle structure. Improvements in anxiety and depression were seen compared to pre-training. Additionally, no acute injuries were reported, and mean adherence rates surpassed 80% in most systematic reviews. Thus, HIIT is associated with multiple benefits. Further large-scale high-quality studies are needed to reaffirm and expand these findings. ACSM: American College of Sports Medicine; BMI: Body Mass Index; BNP: Brain Natriuretic Peptide; BP: Blood Pressure; CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; CHD: Coronary Heart Disease; COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CRP: c- reactive Protein; CVD: Cardiovascular Disease; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; ES: Effect Size; FAS: Reduced Fatty Acid Synthase; FATP-1: Reduced Fatty Acid Transport Protein 1; FMD: Flow Mediated Dilation; Hs-CRP: High-sensitivity c- reactive Protein; HDL: High Density Lipoprotein; HIIT: High-Intensity Interval Training; HOMA: Homoeostatic Model Assessment; HR: Heart Rate; HTx: Heart Transplant Recipients; IL-6: Interleukin-6; LDL: Low Density Lipoprotein; LV: Left Ventricular; LVEF: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction; MD: Mean Difference; MetS: Metabolic Syndrome; MPO: Myeloperoxidase; MICT: Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training; NO: Nitric Oxide; NRCT: Non-Randomised Controlled Trial; PA: Physical Activity; PAI-1: Plasminogen-activator-inhibitor-1; QoL: Quality of Life; RCT: Randomised Controlled Trial; RoB: Risk of Bias; RPP: Rate Pressure Product; RT: Resistance Training; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; SD: Standardised Difference; SMD: Standardised Mean Difference; TAU: Treatment-As-Usual; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; TNF-alfa: Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha; UMD: Unstandardised Mean Difference; WC: Waist Circumference; WHR: Waist-to-Hip Ratio; WMD: Weighted Mean Difference: HIIT may improve cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiovascular function, anthropometric variables, exercise capacity, muscular structure and function, and anxiety and depression severity in healthy individuals and those with physical health disorders.Additionally, HIIT appears to be safe and does not seem to be associated with acute injuries or serious cardiovascular events.
Topics: Anthropometry; Anxiety; Biomarkers; Cardiorespiratory Fitness; Depression; Exercise Tolerance; High-Intensity Interval Training; Humans; Inflammation; Mental Health; Muscle, Skeletal; Quality of Life
PubMed: 31889469
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1706829 -
The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine Dec 2022The association of respiratory mechanics, particularly respiratory system static compliance (C), with severity of hypoxaemia in patients with COVID-19-related acute... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Respiratory system mechanics, gas exchange, and outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The association of respiratory mechanics, particularly respiratory system static compliance (C), with severity of hypoxaemia in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been widely debated, with some studies reporting distinct ARDS phenotypes based on C. Ascertaining whether such phenotypes exist is important, because they might indicate the need for ventilation strategies that differ from those used in patients with ARDS due to other causes. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between Dec 1, 2019, and March 14, 2022, we evaluated respiratory system mechanics, ventilator parameters, gas exchange parameters, and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Among 11 356 patients in 37 studies, mean reported C, measured close to the time of endotracheal intubation, was 35·8 mL/cm HO (95% CI 33·9-37·8; I=96·9%, τ=32·6). Pooled mean C was normally distributed. Increasing ARDS severity (assessed by PaO/FiO ratio as mild, moderate, or severe) was associated with decreasing C. We found no evidence for distinct C-based clinical phenotypes in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, and we therefore conclude that no change in conventional lung-protective ventilation strategies is warranted. Future studies should explore the personalisation of mechanical ventilation strategies according to factors including respiratory system mechanics and haemodynamic status in patients with ARDS.
Topics: Humans; Respiration, Artificial; COVID-19; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Respiratory Mechanics; Lung
PubMed: 36335956
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00393-9 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and... Apr 2023Nasal steroids are commonly prescribed to reduce nasal side effects, which are the primary cause of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerance in obstructive...
The use of topical nasal steroids to improve continuous positive airway pressure compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
BACKGROUND
Nasal steroids are commonly prescribed to reduce nasal side effects, which are the primary cause of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerance in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of OSA patients to assess the effect of nasal steroids on CPAP compliance and nasal symptoms.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Cochrane Library were searched through March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of nasal steroids on CPAP compliance in adult patients, which reported quantitative data on CPAP use and nasal symptoms, were included.
RESULTS
Three RCTs (224 patients) were eligible for the meta-analysis. At the 4-week follow-up, the study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in CPAP compliance (average hours of CPAP use per night: mean difference 0.45; 95% confident interval (CI) (-0.01, 0.90); P = 0.06, percentage of nights device used: mean difference 1.79; 95%CI (-2.59, 6.17); P = 0.42). There was also no difference in overall nasal symptoms (mean difference 0.47, 95%CI (-0.00, 0.94); P = 0.05), with significantly more sneezing and rhinorrhea among patients with nasal steroids (sneezing: mean difference 0.64, 95%CI (0.23, 1.05); P = 0.002, rhinorrhea: mean difference 0.78, 95%CI (0.24, 1.31); P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
At the 4-week follow-up, the pooled results did not demonstrate significant benefits of nasal steroids on CPAP compliance. There was also no significant benefit for relieving nasal symptoms. To further explore the benefit of nasal steroids on CPAP use, additional, longer-term studies are required.
PubMed: 37061937
DOI: 10.12932/AP-081122-1498 -
Pediatric Transplantation May 2017The process of pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) places new and increased stressors on patients and family members. Measures of family functioning may predict... (Review)
Review
The process of pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) places new and increased stressors on patients and family members. Measures of family functioning may predict psychological and health outcomes for pediatric patients and their families, and provide opportunity for targeted intervention. This systematic review investigated parent and family functioning and factors associated with poorer functioning in the pediatric SOT population. Thirty-seven studies were identified and reviewed. Studies featured a range of organ populations (eg, heart, liver, kidney, lung, intestine) at various stages in the transplant process. Findings highlighted that parents of pediatric SOT populations commonly report increased stress and mental health symptoms, including posttraumatic stress disorder. Pediatric SOT is also associated with increased family stress and burden throughout the transplant process. Measures of parent and family functioning were associated with several important health-related factors, such as medication adherence, readiness for discharge, and number of hospitalizations. Overall, findings suggest that family stress and burden persists post-transplant, and parent and family functioning is associated with health-related factors in SOT, highlighting family-level functioning as an important target for future intervention.
Topics: Caregivers; Child; Family; Family Health; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Organ Transplantation; Parenting; Parents; Patient Discharge; Postoperative Period; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 28181361
DOI: 10.1111/petr.12900 -
Respiratory Medicine Jan 2014Medication for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has shown to substantially reduce symptoms and slow progression of disease. However, non-adherence to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Medication for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has shown to substantially reduce symptoms and slow progression of disease. However, non-adherence to medication is common and associated with worsened clinical and economic outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of published literature to assess the impact of non-adherence to COPD medication on clinical and economic outcomes.
METHODS
A search in PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted of original studies published from database inception to 2012. Studies must report on the association between adherence to COPD medication and outcomes, published in English in peer-reviewed journals and full texts needed to be available.
RESULTS
Twelve full articles were included in the review. Most studies were retrospective database studies. Seven studies reported on the association between adherence and clinical outcomes, two on mortality, three on costs, four on quality of life and one on work productivity. Results indicated a clear association between adherence and both clinical and economic outcomes. Evidence from studies revealed increased hospitalizations, mortality, quality of life and loss of productivity among non-adherent patients.
CONCLUSION
This review revealed a clear association between non-adherence to COPD medication and worsened clinical and economic outcomes making non-adherent patients a priority for cost-effective interventions.
Topics: Algorithms; Efficiency; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Length of Stay; Patient Compliance; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life
PubMed: 24070566
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.08.044 -
Vaccines Aug 2022Solid organ rejection post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 infection is extremely rare but can occur. T-cell recognition of antigen is the primary and central event... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Solid organ rejection post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 infection is extremely rare but can occur. T-cell recognition of antigen is the primary and central event that leads to the cascade of events that result in rejection of a transplanted organ.
OBJECTIVES
To describe the results of a systematic review for solid organ rejections following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, Scopus and Nature through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies on the incidence of solid organ rejection post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COVID-19 infection, published from 1 December 2019 to 31 May 2022, with English language restriction.
RESULTS
One hundred thirty-six cases from fifty-two articles were included in the qualitative synthesis of this systematic review (56 solid organs rejected post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and 40 solid organs rejected following COVID-19 infection). Cornea rejection (44 cases) was the most frequent organ observed post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and following COVID-19 infection, followed by kidney rejection (36 cases), liver rejection (12 cases), lung rejection (2 cases), heart rejection (1 case) and pancreas rejection (1 case). The median or mean patient age ranged from 23 to 94 years across the studies. The majority of the patients were male ( = 51, 53.1%) and were of White (Caucasian) ( = 51, 53.7%) and Hispanic ( = 15, 15.8%) ethnicity. A total of fifty-six solid organ rejections were reported post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [Pfizer-BioNTech ( = 31), Moderna ( = 14), Oxford Uni-AstraZeneca ( = 10) and Sinovac-CoronaVac ( = 1)]. The median time from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to organ rejection was 13.5 h (IQR, 3.2-17.2), while the median time from COVID-19 infection to organ rejection was 14 h (IQR, 5-21). Most patients were easily treated without any serious complications, recovered and did not require long-term allograft rejection therapy [graft success ( = 70, 85.4%), graft failure ( = 12, 14.6%), survived ( = 90, 95.7%) and died ( = 4, 4.3%)].
CONCLUSION
The reported evidence of solid organ rejections post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or COIVD-19 infection should not discourage vaccination against this worldwide pandemic. The number of reported cases is relatively small in relation to the hundreds of millions of vaccinations that have occurred, and the protective benefits offered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination far outweigh the risks.
PubMed: 36016180
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081289 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Apr 2024There is no consensus on the optimal endpoint(s) in cancer cachexia trials. Endpoint variation is an obstacle when comparing interventions and their clinical value. The... (Review)
Review
There is no consensus on the optimal endpoint(s) in cancer cachexia trials. Endpoint variation is an obstacle when comparing interventions and their clinical value. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and evaluate endpoints used to assess appetite and dietary intake in cancer cachexia clinical trials. A search for studies published from 1 January 1990 until 2 June 2021 was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies examined cancer cachexia treatment versus a comparator in adults with assessments of appetite and/or dietary intake as study endpoints, a sample size ≥40 and an intervention lasting ≥14 days. Reporting was in line with PRISMA guidance, and a protocol was published in PROSPERO (2022 CRD42022276710). This review is part of a series of systematic reviews examining cachexia endpoints. Of the 5975 articles identified, 116 were eligible for the wider review series and 80 specifically examined endpoints of appetite (65 studies) and/or dietary intake (21 studies). Six trials assessed both appetite and dietary intake. Appetite was the primary outcome in 15 trials and dietary intake in 7 trials. Median sample size was 101 patients (range 40-628). Forty-nine studies included multiple primary tumour sites, while 31 studies involved single primary tumour sites (15 gastrointestinal, 7 lung, 7 head and neck and 2 female reproductive organs). The most frequently reported appetite endpoints were visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) (40%). The appetite item from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30/C15 PAL (38%) and the appetite question from North Central Cancer Treatment Group anorexia questionnaire (17%) were also frequently applied. Of the studies that assessed dietary intake, 13 (62%) used food records (prospective registrations) and 10 (48%) used retrospective methods (24-h recall or dietary history). For VAS/NRS, a mean change of 1.3 corresponded to Hedge's g of 0.5 and can be considered a moderate change. For food records, a mean change of 231 kcal/day or 11 g of protein/day corresponded to a moderate change. Choice of endpoint in cachexia trials will depend on factors pertinent to the trial to be conducted. Nevertheless, from trials assessed and available literature, NRS or EORTC QLQ C30/C15 PAL seems suitable for appetite assessments. Appetite and dietary intake endpoints are rarely used as primary outcomes in cancer cachexia. Dietary intake assessments were used mainly to monitor compliance and are not validated in cachexia populations. Given the importance to cachexia studies, dietary intake endpoints must be validated before they are used as endpoints in clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Appetite; Cachexia; Eating; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38343065
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13434