-
Journal of Medical Internet Research Jun 2023Recent technological advances allow for the repeated sampling of real-time data in natural settings using electronic ecological momentary assessment (eEMA). These... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Recent technological advances allow for the repeated sampling of real-time data in natural settings using electronic ecological momentary assessment (eEMA). These advances are particularly meaningful for investigating physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in young adults who are in a critical life stage for the development of healthy lifestyle behaviors.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to describe the use of eEMA methodologies in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep research in young adults.
METHODS
The PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched through August 2022. Inclusion criteria were use of eEMA; sample of young adults aged 18 to 25 years; at least 1 measurement of physical activity, sedentary behavior, or sleep; English language; and a peer-reviewed report of original research. Study reports were excluded if they were abstracts, protocols, or reviews. The risk of bias assessment was conducted using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were conducted by independent authors, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis were used to identify overarching patterns within the following categories guided by the Checklist for Reporting Ecological Momentary Assessments Studies: study characteristics, outcomes and measures, eEMA procedures, and compliance.
RESULTS
The search resulted in 1221 citations with a final sample of 37 reports describing 35 unique studies. Most reports (28/37, 76%) were published in the last 5 years (2017-2022), used observational designs (35/37, 95%), consisted of samples of college students or apprentices (28/35, 80%), and were conducted in the United States (22/37, 60%). The sample sizes ranged from 14 to 1584 young adults. Physical activity was measured more frequently (28/37, 76%) than sleep (16/37, 43%) or sedentary behavior (4/37, 11%). Of the 37 studies, 11 (30%) reports included 2 movement behaviors and no reports included 3 movement behaviors. eEMA was frequently used to measure potential correlates of movement behaviors, such as emotional states or feelings (25/37, 68%), cognitive processes (7/37, 19%), and contextual factors (9/37, 24%). There was wide variability in the implementation and reporting of eEMA procedures, measures, missing data, analysis, and compliance.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of eEMA methodologies in physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep research in young adults has greatly increased in recent years; however, reports continue to lack standardized reporting of features unique to the eEMA methodology. Additional areas in need of future research include the use of eEMA with more diverse populations and the incorporation of all 3 movement behaviors within a 24-hour period. The findings are intended to assist investigators in the design, implementation, and reporting of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep research using eEMA in young adults.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021279156; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021279156.
Topics: Young Adult; Humans; Sedentary Behavior; Ecological Momentary Assessment; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electronics; Exercise
PubMed: 37384367
DOI: 10.2196/46783 -
Orvosi Hetilap Aug 2009Non-compliance and non-persistence to medication regimens are significant problems of realizing the optimal management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clears... (Review)
Review
Non-compliance and non-persistence to medication regimens are significant problems of realizing the optimal management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, clears up from the systematic review. Underuse and overuse are both important factors of inadequate therapy. Poor compliance increases the frequency of exacerbations, hospitalizations, and results higher mortality and reduced quality of life. When prescribing the medications, patient characteristics should be considered as well as the expected compliance and persistence. Patient education and better doctor-patient relationship can increase the efficiency of treatments.
Topics: Animals; Bronchodilator Agents; Hospitalization; Humans; Medication Adherence; Patient Compliance; Patient Education as Topic; Physician-Patient Relations; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Self Administration
PubMed: 19632916
DOI: 10.1556/OH.2009.28691 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Nov 2022Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may optimise pulmonary compliance, thereby potentially mitigating lung injury. This meta-analysis aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may optimise pulmonary compliance, thereby potentially mitigating lung injury. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of individualised PEEP vs fixed PEEP during abdominal surgery on postoperative pulmonary outcomes.
METHODS
Medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched for RCTs comparing fixed vs individualised PEEP. The composite primary outcome of pulmonary complications comprised hypoxaemia, atelectasis, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation (PO/FiO) and systemic inflammatory markers (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and club cell protein-16 [CC16]). We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was applied.
RESULTS
Ten RCTs (n=1117 patients) met the criteria for inclusion, with six reporting the primary endpoint. Individualised PEEP reduced the incidence of overall pulmonary complications (141/412 [34.2%]) compared with 183/415 (44.1%) receiving fixed PEEP (RR 0.69 [95% CI: 0.51-0.93]; P=0.016; I=43%). Risk-of-bias analysis did not alter these findings. Individualised PEEP reduced postoperative hypoxaemia (74/392 [18.9%]) compared with 110/395 (27.8%) participants receiving fixed PEEP (RR 0.68 [0.52-0.88]; P=0.003; I=0%) but not postoperative atelectasis (RR 0.93 [0.81-1.07]; P=0.297; I=0%). Individualised PEEP resulted in higher PO/FiO (MD 20.8 mm Hg [4.6-36.9]; P=0.012; I=80%) and reduced systemic inflammation (lower plasma IL-6 [MD -6.8 pg ml; -11.9 to -1.7]; P=0.009; I=6%; and CC16 levels [MD -6.2 ng ml; -8.8 to -3.5]; P<0.001; I=0%) at the end of surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Individualised PEEP may reduce pulmonary complications, improve oxygenation, and reduce systemic inflammation after abdominal surgery.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
CRD42021277973.
Topics: Humans; Interleukin-6; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Hypoxia; Inflammation
PubMed: 36031417
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.009 -
Respiratory Medicine Sep 2022Apps can play a role in self-management of symptoms such as breathlessness. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of breathlessness apps and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Apps can play a role in self-management of symptoms such as breathlessness. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of breathlessness apps and assess the quality of those publicly available.
METHODS
The full protocol for this systematic review is available on PROSPERO (CRD42021246277). Studies published between January 2010 to 2022 were obtained from six academic databases and included if they evaluated apps that offered breathlessness education and personalised feedback. Outcomes of interest included change in breathlessness and quality of life. Additionally, quality assessment was conducted on apps addressing breathlessness publicly available from Google Play, iOS app store, and regulatory agency libraries.
RESULTS
A total of 2774 records were screened and 16 studies included in the systematic review. Disease groups addressed were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, fibrotic lung disease, lung cancer, and heart failure. Use of mobile apps was found to result in clinical benefit especially when utilised for longer periods of time. For publicly available apps, a total of 776 apps were screened and 6 apps included. The mean quality rating using the Mobile App Rating Scale was 3.43 out of 5. Most apps were found to have good functionality and aesthetics; however, they were lacking in their quality of information and engagement.
CONCLUSION
This review suggests that apps may provide clinical benefit to patients with breathlessness and can support clinical practice. However, few of those researched are available for public use and those accessible publicly were lacking in quality and compliance with m-Health best practices.
Topics: Dyspnea; Humans; Mobile Applications; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Self-Management
PubMed: 36037561
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106947 -
International Journal of Evidence-based... Mar 2014The objective of this study is to review and synthesise the best available research evidence that investigates the effectiveness of strategies to promote adherence to... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to review and synthesise the best available research evidence that investigates the effectiveness of strategies to promote adherence to treatment by patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).
METHODS
The search sought to find published and unpublished studies. The search covered articles published from 1990 to 2010 in English and Thai. The database search included Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Science Direct, Current Content Connect, Thai Nursing Research Database, Thai thesis database, Digital Library of Thailand Research Fund, Research of National Research Council of Thailand and Database of Office of Higher Education Commission. Studies were additionally identified from reference lists of all studies retrieved. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that explored different strategies to promote adherence to TB treatment of patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB and also included quasiexperimental studies. Two of the investigators independently assessed the studies and then extracted and summarised data from eligible studies. Extracted data were entered into Review Manager software and analysed.
RESULTS
A total of 7972 newly diagnosed pulmonary TB patients participated in 10 randomised controlled trials and eight quasiexperimental studies. The studies reported on the effectiveness of a number of specific interventions to improve adherence to TB treatment among newly diagnosed pulmonary TB patients. These interventions included directly observed treatment (DOT) coupled with alternative patient supervision options, case management with DOT, short-course directly observed treatment, the intensive triad-model programme and an intervention package aimed at improved counselling and communication, decentralisation of treatment, patient choice of a DOT supporter and reinforcement of supervision activities.
CONCLUSION
This review found evidence of beneficial effects from the DOT with regard to the medication adherence among TB patients in terms of cure rate and success rate. However, no beneficial effect was found from DOT intervention with increasing completion rate. In addition, the combined interventions to improve adherence to tuberculosis treatment included case management with directly observed treatment short-course program, the intensive triad-model programme and intervention package. These interventions should be implemented by healthcare providers and tailored to local contexts and circumstances, wherever appropriate.
Topics: Case Management; Clinical Trials as Topic; Counseling; Directly Observed Therapy; Humans; Medication Adherence; Self Administration; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 24685895
DOI: 10.1097/01.XEB.0000444614.17658.46 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Oct 2012Pathophysiological changes due to obesity may complicate mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia. The ideal ventilation strategy is expected to optimize gas... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pathophysiological changes due to obesity may complicate mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia. The ideal ventilation strategy is expected to optimize gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics and to reduce the risk of respiratory complications.
METHODS
Systematic search (databases, bibliographies, to March 2012, all languages) was performed for randomized trials testing intraoperative ventilation strategies in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg m(-2)), and reporting on gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics, or pulmonary complications. Meta-analyses were performed when data from at least three studies or 100 patients could be combined.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies (505 obese surgical patients) reported on a variety of ventilation strategies: pressure- or volume-controlled ventilation (PCV, VCV), various tidal volumes, and different PEEP or recruitment manoeuvres (RM), and combinations thereof. Definitions and reporting of endpoints were inconsistent. In five trials (182 patients), RM added to PEEP compared with PEEP alone improved intraoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratio [weighted mean difference (WMD), 16.2 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.0-24.4] and increased respiratory system compliance (WMD, 14 ml cm H(2)O(-1); 95% CI, 8-20). Arterial pressure remained unchanged. In four trials (100 patients) comparing PCV with VCV, there was no difference in PaO2/FIO2 ratio, tidal volume, or arterial pressure. Comparison of further ventilation strategies or combination of other outcomes was not feasible. Data on postoperative complications were seldom reported.
CONCLUSIONS
The ideal intraoperative ventilation strategy in obese patients remains obscure. There is some evidence that RM added to PEEP compared with PEEP alone improves intraoperative oxygenation and compliance without adverse effects. There is no evidence of any difference between PCV and VCV.
Topics: Air Pressure; Bariatric Surgery; Humans; Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; Lung Volume Measurements; Obesity; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic; Publication Bias; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Surgical Procedures, Operative
PubMed: 22976857
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes338 -
Journal of Anesthesia Apr 2022Low tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Low tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.
Topics: Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tidal Volume
PubMed: 34757497
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-03012-9 -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Oct 2020It is unclear how positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers impact patients during one-lung ventilation (OLV). We conducted a systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It is unclear how positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers impact patients during one-lung ventilation (OLV). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of lung recruitment and PEEP on ventilation and oxygenation during OLV.
METHODS
A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were performed. Mean difference with standard deviation was calculated. Included studies were evaluated for quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Score where appropriate.
RESULTS
In total, 926 articles were identified, of which 16 were included in meta-analysis. Recruitment maneuvers increased arterial oxygen tension (PaO) by 82 mm Hg [20, 144 mm Hg] and reduced dead-space by 5.9% [3.8, 8.0%]. PEEP increased PaO by 30.3 mm Hg [11.9, 48.6 mm Hg]. Subgroup analysis showed a significant increase in PaO (P = .0003; +35.4 mm Hg [16.2, 54.5 mm Hg]) with PEEP compared with no PEEP but no such difference in comparisons with PEEP-treated controls. No significant difference in PaO was observed between "high" and "low" PEEP-treated subgroups (P = .29). No significant improvement in PaO was observed for subgroups coadministered PEEP, lung recruitment, and low tidal volumes. PEEP was associated with a modest but statistically significant increase in compliance (P = .03; 4.33 mL/cmHO [0.33, 8.32]). High risk of bias was identified in the majority of studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Recruitment maneuvers and PEEP have physiologic advantages during OLV. The optimal use of PEEP is yet to be determined. The evidence is limited by heavy use of surrogate outcomes. Future studies with clinical outcomes are necessary to determine the impact of recruitment maneuvers and PEEP during OLV.
Topics: Humans; Lung; One-Lung Ventilation; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Risk Factors; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury
PubMed: 32276803
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.077 -
International Journal of Clinical... Apr 2023Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a predominant cause of mortality. Pharmacists play an important role in secondary prevention of CVD, however, their role in cardiac... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a predominant cause of mortality. Pharmacists play an important role in secondary prevention of CVD, however, their role in cardiac rehabilitation is under-reported and services are under-utilised.
AIM
To explore the role of pharmacists in cardiac rehabilitation, the impact of their interventions on patient outcomes, and prospects of future role development.
METHOD
Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO from January 2006 to October 2021. Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials were selected if they assessed the role of pharmacists in cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane risk of bias tool, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) quality assessment tool, were used to assess quality and a narrative synthesis was conducted.
RESULTS
The search yielded 786 studies, only five met the inclusion criteria. The pharmacist-led interventions included patient education, medication review and reconciliation, and medication adherence encouragement. Four out of the five studies showed that pharmacist-led interventions in cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved patient clinical and non-clinical outcomes. One study showed a statistically significant reduction in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to optimal target of < 70 mg/dL (80% vs 60%, p = 0.0084). Two studies reported better medication adherence, and two studies showed greater improvement in all domains of health-related quality of life observed in the intervention group.
CONCLUSION
Pharmacist-led interventions in cardiac rehabilitation could lower CVD risk factors and hence recurrence. Although these findings support pharmacists' involvement in cardiac rehabilitation, larger intervention studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of pharmacist-led interventions and their impact on hospital admissions and mortality risk.
Topics: Humans; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Pharmacists; Quality of Life; Cardiovascular Diseases; Medication Adherence
PubMed: 36401764
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01517-1 -
Obesity Reviews : An Official Journal... Jun 2015Several intraoperative ventilation strategies are available for obese patients. However, the same ventilation interventions have exhibited different effects on PaO2... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Several intraoperative ventilation strategies are available for obese patients. However, the same ventilation interventions have exhibited different effects on PaO2 /FIO2 concerning obese patients in different trials, and the issue remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to identify the optimal mechanical ventilation strategy. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Web of Science for studies published up to June 2014, and the PaO2 /FIO2 in obese patients given different mechanical ventilation strategies was assessed. We assessed the studies for eligibility and extracted data and then pooled the data and used a Bayesian fixed-effect model to combine direct comparisons with indirect evidence. Eligible studies evaluated different ventilation strategies for obese patients and reported the intraoperative PaO2 /FIO2 ratio, atelectasis and pulmonary compliance. Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included for network meta-analysis, including 476 patients who received 1 of 12 ventilation strategies. Volume-controlled ventilation with higher PEEP plus single recruitment manoeuvres (VCV + higher PEEP + single RM) was associated with the highest PaO2 /FiO2 ratio, improving intraoperative pulmonary compliance and reducing the incidence of intraoperative atelectasis.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Humans; Hypoxia; Intraoperative Care; Intraoperative Complications; Lung; Lung Compliance; Obesity; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Risk
PubMed: 25788167
DOI: 10.1111/obr.12274