-
Journal of Neurology Mar 2024Stroke is a significant medical condition, and blood pressure stands out as the most prevalent treatable risk factor associated with it. Researches link blood pressure... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stroke is a significant medical condition, and blood pressure stands out as the most prevalent treatable risk factor associated with it. Researches link blood pressure variability (BPV) with stroke; however, the specific relationship between with the outcomes of stroke patients remains unclear. As blood pressure variability and mean blood pressure are interrelated, it remains uncertain whether BPV adds additional information to understanding the outcome of acute stroke patients.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review studies investigating the association between blood pressure variability and prognosis in acute stroke patients.
METHODS
Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English language full-text articles from the inception to 1 January 2023. Stroke patients aged ≥ 18 years were included in this analysis. Stroke types were not restricted.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis shows that higher systolic blood pressure variability is linked to a higher risk of poor outcome, including function disability, mortality, early neurological deterioration, and stroke recurrence, among acute stroke patients without thrombolysis. A higher diastolic blood pressure variability is linked with to a higher risk of mortality and functional disability.
CONCLUSIONS
This review reveals that blood pressure variability is a novel and clinically relevant risk factor for stroke patients' outcome. Future studies should investigate how best to measure and define BPV in acute stroke. Larger studies are warranted to provide more robust evidence in this area.
Topics: Humans; Blood Pressure; Stroke; Prognosis; Blood Pressure Determination; Autonomic Nervous System Diseases; Thrombolytic Therapy
PubMed: 38036920
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-12054-w -
Journal of Hypertension Dec 2012Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages worldwide and is known to acutely raise blood pressure (BP), but the effects of chronic consumption on BP is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages worldwide and is known to acutely raise blood pressure (BP), but the effects of chronic consumption on BP is unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies to assess the effect of chronic coffee consumption on BP and the development of hypertension.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid, MEDLINE (from 1948), EMBASE (from 1988), and all of Web of Science and Scopus.
STUDY SELECTION
RCTs and cohort studies of at least 1-week duration that assessed BP and/or the incidence of hypertension in coffee consumers compared with a control group that consumed less or no coffee.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Data were abstracted using standardized forms. Risk of bias in the RCTs was examined using the method described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Quality of the cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Six hundred and ten articles were retrieved and a total of 15 (10 RCTs and five cohort studies) met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrated a pooled weighted difference in mean change in SBP of -0.55 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.46 to 1.36) and DBP -0.45 mmHg (95% CI -1.52 to 0.61). Meta-analysis of the cohort studies demonstrated a pooled risk ratio for developing hypertension of 1.03 (95% CI 0.98-1.08).
CONCLUSION
Low-quality evidence did not show any statistically significant effect of coffee consumption on BP or the risk of hypertension. Given the quality of the currently available evidence, no recommendation can be made for or against coffee consumption as it relates to BP and hypertension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure; Coffee; Drinking Behavior; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Risk Factors
PubMed: 23032138
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283588d73 -
Journal of Clinical Hypertension... Jun 2013Allopurinol is a potent xanthine oxidase inhibitor that is used in hyperuricemic patients to prevent gout. It has also been shown to decrease cardiovascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Allopurinol is a potent xanthine oxidase inhibitor that is used in hyperuricemic patients to prevent gout. It has also been shown to decrease cardiovascular complications in a myriad of cardiovascular conditions. However, studies have reported conflicting evidence on its effects on blood pressure (BP). A systematic review was conducted using Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all the longitudinal studies that assessed the efficacy of allopurinol on systolic and diastolic BP. A total of 10 clinical studies with 738 participants were included in the analysis. Compared with the control group, systolic BP decreased by 3.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-5.3 mm Hg; P=.001) and diastolic BP decreased by 1.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.1-2.5 mm Hg; P=.03) in patients treated with allopurinol. When analysis was restricted to the higher-quality randomized controlled trials, similar changes in systolic and diastolic BPs were found: 3.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.8-5.8 mm Hg; P<.001) and 1.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.1-2.7 mm Hg; P=.04), respectively. Allopurinol is associated with a small but significant reduction in BP. This effect can be potentially exploited to aid in controlling BP in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.
Topics: Allopurinol; Blood Pressure; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Hypertension
PubMed: 23730993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00701.x -
Experimental Physiology Jun 2021What is the topic of this review? We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the current evidence for the effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
NEW FINDINGS
What is the topic of this review? We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the current evidence for the effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and vascular function. What advances does it highlight? We found that heat therapy reduced mean arterial, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We also observed that heat therapy improved vascular function, as assessed via brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation. Our results suggest that heat therapy is a promising therapeutic tool that should be optimized further, via mode and dose, for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
ABSTRACT
Lifelong sauna exposure is associated with reduced cardiovascular disease risk. Recent studies have investigated the effect of heat therapy on markers of cardiovascular health. We aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the effects of heat therapy on blood pressure and indices of vascular function in healthy and clinical populations. Four databases were searched up to September 2020 for studies investigating heat therapy on outcomes including blood pressure and vascular function. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. A total of 4522 titles were screened, and 15 studies were included. Healthy and clinical populations were included. Heat exposure was for 30-90 min, over 10-36 sessions. Compared with control conditions, heat therapy reduced mean arterial pressure [n = 4 studies; mean difference (MD): -5.86 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.63, -3.10; P < 0.0001], systolic blood pressure (n = 10; MD: -3.94 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.22, -0.67; P = 0.02) and diastolic blood pressure (n = 9; MD: -3.88 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.13, -1.63; P = 0.0007) and improved flow-mediated dilatation (n = 5; MD: 1.95%, 95% CI: 0.14, 3.76; P = 0.03). Resting heart rate was unchanged (n = 10; MD: -1.25 beats/min; 95% CI: -3.20, 0.70; P = 0.21). Early evidence also suggests benefits for arterial stiffness and cutaneous microvascular function. The certainty of evidence was moderate for the effect of heat therapy on systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate and low for the effect of heat therapy on mean arterial pressure and flow-mediated dilatation. Heat therapy is an effective therapeutic tool to reduce blood pressure and improve macrovascular function. Future research should aim to optimize heat therapy, including the mode and dose, for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Hot Temperature; Humans; Systole; Vascular Stiffness
PubMed: 33866630
DOI: 10.1113/EP089424 -
Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical Care (London, England) Sep 2023Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acutely ill patients might be influenced by a number of clinical and technical factors. We aim to identify variables potentially... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acutely ill patients might be influenced by a number of clinical and technical factors. We aim to identify variables potentially modifying the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors commonly used in clinical practice.
METHODS
A sensitive strategy was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases to search for prospective studies assessing the operative performance of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raising (PLR), end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), mini-fluid challenge, and tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill and acutely ill surgical patients published between January 1999 and February 2023. Adjusted diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated by subgroup analyses (inverse variance method) and meta-regression (test of moderators). Variables potentially modifying the operative performance of such predictor tests were classified as technical and clinical.
RESULTS
A total of 149 studies were included in the analysis. The volume used during fluid loading, the method used to assess variations in macrovascular flow (cardiac output, stroke volume, aortic blood flow, volume‒time integral, etc.) in response to PLR/EEOT, and the apneic time selected during the EEOT were identified as technical variables modifying the operative performance of such fluid responsiveness predictor tests (p < 0.05 for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). In addition, the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors was also influenced by clinical variables such as the positive end-expiratory pressure (in the case of EEOT) and the dose of norepinephrine used during the fluid responsiveness assessment for PLR and EEOT (for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs).
CONCLUSION
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in critically and acutely ill patients is strongly influenced by a number of technical and clinical aspects. Such factors should be considered for individual intervention decisions.
Topics: Humans; Prospective Studies; Aorta; Blood Pressure; Cardiac Output; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37730622
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04629-w -
Journal of Hypertension Feb 2024The acute and long-term benefits of exercise on cardiovascular health are well established, yet the optimal mode of exercise training that improves arterial stiffness in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The acute and long-term benefits of exercise on cardiovascular health are well established, yet the optimal mode of exercise training that improves arterial stiffness in women with high blood pressure remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the influence of aerobic and resistance training on arterial stiffness in women with high blood pressure. After an extensive search of four online databases, six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in meta-analyses. Data were extracted from six studies examining the influence of exercise on arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) and were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). Whereas aerobic exercise significantly reduced arterial PWV in women with high blood pressure after long-term training [SMD -1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.34 to -1.40], resistance training had a more modest effect that was borderline statistically significant (SMD -0.31, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.03). These findings suggest regular long-term aerobic exercise training (i.e. 12-20 week interventions) reduces arterial stiffness in women with high blood pressure. Although not statistically significant, the modest number of included trials and lack of publication bias encourages further assessments on the efficacy of resistance exercise for improving arterial stiffness in women with high blood pressure. Given the unique benefits of aerobic and resistance training, particularly for postmenopausal women (e.g. bone health and muscular strength), both modes of training should be encouraged for women with high blood pressure to enhance arterial function and support favorable cardiovascular outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Vascular Stiffness; Pulse Wave Analysis; Exercise; Hypertension; Resistance Training; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 37851002
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003594 -
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) Mar 2023Pressure wave reflections (PWRs) within the circulation are assessed at various arterial sites by various noninvasive methods. We aimed at reviewing the conflicting data... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pressure wave reflections (PWRs) within the circulation are assessed at various arterial sites by various noninvasive methods. We aimed at reviewing the conflicting data regarding the hypothesis that higher PWRs are associated with higher left ventricular mass and tested whether this association stands for all available indices of PWRs, all (proximal or distal to the heart) sites of assessment, and is modified by sex, age and heart rate.
METHODS
Based on a predefined protocol applying the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, we identified eligible for meta-analysis data regarding: augmentation index, augmentation pressure, backward pressure (Pb), reflection index, and their association with left ventricular mass index (19 studies, total population n=8686).
RESULTS
We found statistically significant associations, independent from blood pressure level, for all indices of PWRs at all arterial sites (carotid augmentation index; odds ratio; standardized beta coefficient [β]: 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07% to 0.21%], per SD increase), radial augmentation index (β: 0.21; 0.11 to 0.31), central augmentation pressure (β: 0.15; 0.03 to 0.27), central Pb (β: 0.23; 0.05 to 0.42), and central reflection index (β: 0.14; 0.06 to 0.22), except for aortic augmentation index as estimated by generalized transfer functions. Meta-regression analysis showed that the association between carotid augmentation index and left ventricular mass was higher among populations with higher heart rate (=0.036, beta: 0.017 [95% CI, 0.001 to 0.033]) and tended to be higher in middle-aged (=0.07, beta: -0.001; -0.021 to 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
A clinically meaningful association between PWRs and left ventricular mass, assessed at either central or peripheral arterial sites by most available methods was shown, suggesting that PWR reduction strategies might be useful. Based on the present evidence, such trials should target middle-aged populations with high normal heart rate.
Topics: Lead; Blood Pressure; Heart Rate; Carotid Arteries; Regression Analysis; Pulse Wave Analysis
PubMed: 36583390
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19980 -
Journal of the American Heart... Jul 2016Quercetin, the most abundant dietary flavonol, has antioxidant effects in cardiovascular disease, but the evidence regarding its effects on blood pressure (BP) has not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Quercetin, the most abundant dietary flavonol, has antioxidant effects in cardiovascular disease, but the evidence regarding its effects on blood pressure (BP) has not been conclusive. We assessed the impact of quercetin on BP through a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We searched PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EMBASE up to January 31, 2015 to identify placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of quercetin on BP. Meta-analysis was performed using either a fixed-effects or random-effect model according to I(2) statistic. Effect size was expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI. Overall, the impact of quercetin on BP was reported in 7 trials comprising 9 treatment arms (587 patients). The results of the meta-analysis showed significant reductions both in systolic BP (WMD: -3.04 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.75, -0.33, P=0.028) and diastolic BP (WMD: -2.63 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.26, -2.01, P<0.001) following supplementation with quercetin. When the studies were categorized according to the quercetin dose, there was a significant systolic BP and diastolic BP-reducing effect in randomized controlled trials with doses ≥500 mg/day (WMD: -4.45 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.70, -1.21, P=0.007 and -2.98 mm Hg, 95% CI: -3.64, -2.31, P<0.001, respectively), and lack of a significant effect for doses <500 mg/day (WMD: -1.59 mm Hg, 95% CI: -4.44, 1.25, P=0.273 and -0.24 mm Hg, 95% CI: -2.00, 1.52, P=0.788, respectively), but indirect comparison tests failed to significant differences between doses.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the meta-analysis showed a statistically significant effect of quercetin supplementation in the reduction of BP, possibly limited to, or greater with dosages of >500 mg/day. Further studies are necessary to investigate the clinical relevance of these results and the possibility of quercetin application as an add-on to antihypertensive therapy.
Topics: Antioxidants; Blood Pressure; Humans; Quercetin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27405810
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002713 -
European Journal of Cardiovascular... Jan 2020Although a number of clinical studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of auricular therapy for treating hypertension, the overall evidence remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although a number of clinical studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of auricular therapy for treating hypertension, the overall evidence remains uncertain.
AIMS
We aimed to evaluate the evidence for the effect of auricular therapy on blood pressure using meta-analysis methodology.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, Clinicalkey, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Scientific Journal Database and Wanfang Database and Chinese Biomedicine for trials that compared the effects of auricular therapy to that of sham auricular therapy, antihypertensive drugs, or no intervention on blood pressure. Blood pressure values before and after treatment, magnitude of blood pressure change between baseline and post-intervention, and the efficacy rate, as outcomes, were synthesized by RevMan 5.3. Continuous outcomes were expressed as weighted mean differences, and dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
We systematically reviewed 44 randomized controlled trials (involving 5022 patients through June 2018). Auricular acupressure plus antihypertensive drugs might be more effective than antihypertensive drugs alone in both reducing systolic blood pressure value after treatment (=464 patients; mean difference, -5.06 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -6.76- -3.36, <0.00001; =32%), decreasing diastolic blood pressure after treatment (=464 patients; mean difference, -5.30 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -6.27- -4.33, <0.00001; =0%) and the efficacy rate (relative risk, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.26; <0.00001; =0%).
CONCLUSION
Auricular therapy could be provided to patients with hypertension as an adjunct to antihypertensive drugs for lowering blood pressure value and achieving blood pressure targets.
Topics: Acupuncture, Ear; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Bloodletting; China; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Middle Aged
PubMed: 31583887
DOI: 10.1177/1474515119876778 -
Food Research International (Ottawa,... Feb 2020Genistein (4',5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) is a phytoestrogen with potential health benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence regarding... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Genistein (4',5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) is a phytoestrogen with potential health benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence regarding its effects on hypertension has not been conclusive. Therefore, we examined the impact of oral genistein supplementation on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane library databases (until August 2019) were searched to identify potential RCTs with information on genistein supplementation and hypertension. Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) was pooled using a random-effects model. Pooling four RCTs (four treatment arms) together did not show any significant reduction of SBP (WMD: -5.32 mmHg, 95% CI: -14.59 to 3.96) and DBP (WMD: -2.06 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.41 to 2.28) compared to that of the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis by intervention duration suggested that more than 6 months genistein supplementation in metabolic syndrome patients can significantly decrease SBP (WMD: -13.73 mmHg, 95% CI: -18.10 to -9.37) and DBP (WMD: -5.18 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.62 to -3.74). Generally, present study indicated that genistein supplementation had no effect on hypertension, but it seems that longer intervention duration of more than 6 months especially among metabolic syndrome patients may lead to the effectiveness of genistein.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Genistein; Humans; Hypertension; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 31955737
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108764