-
British Journal of Anaesthesia Apr 2017Safe and efficacious modalities of perioperative analgesia are essential for enhanced recovery after surgery. Truncal nerve blocks are one potential adjunct for...
BACKGROUND.
Safe and efficacious modalities of perioperative analgesia are essential for enhanced recovery after surgery. Truncal nerve blocks are one potential adjunct for analgesia of the abdominal wall, and in recent years their popularity has increased. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and rectus sheath block (RSB) have been shown to reduce morphine consumption and improve pain relief after abdominal surgery. These blocks typically require large volumes of local anaesthetic (LA). We aimed to synthesize studies evaluating systemic concentrations of LA after perioperative TAP and RSB to enhance our understanding of systemic LA absorption and the risk of systemic toxicity.
METHODS.
An independent literature review was performed in accordance with the methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed) was conducted. Primary articles measuring systemic concentrations of LA after single-shot bolus TAPB or RSB were included.
RESULTS.
Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Rapid systemic LA absorption was observed in all studies. Of a total of 381 patients, mean peak concentrations of LA exceeded toxic thresholds in 33 patients, of whom three reported mild adverse effects. The addition of epinephrine reduced systemic absorption of LA. No instances of seizure or cardiac instability were observed.
CONCLUSIONS.
Local anaesthetic in TAPB and RSB can lead to detectable systemic concentrations that exceed commonly accepted thresholds of LA systemic toxicity. Our study highlights that these techniques are relatively safe with regard to LA systemic toxicity.
Topics: Abdominal Wall; Anesthetics, Local; Humans; Nerve Block
PubMed: 28403398
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex005 -
Irish Journal of Medical Science Mar 2024Perianal wound healing and/or complications are common following abdominoperineal resection (APR). Although primary closure is commonly undertaken, myocutaneous flap... (Review)
Review
Primary closure versus vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap closure of perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE/AIM
Perianal wound healing and/or complications are common following abdominoperineal resection (APR). Although primary closure is commonly undertaken, myocutaneous flap closure such as vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM) is thought to improve wound healing process and outcome. A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes of primary closure versus VRAM flap closure of perineal wound following APR.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched until the 8th of August 2023. Included studies underwent meta-analysis to compare outcomes of primary closure versus VRAM flap closure of perineal wound following APR. The primary outcome of interest was perineal wound complications, and the secondary outcomes were abdominal wound complications, dehiscence, wound healing time, length of hospital stay, and mortality.
RESULTS
Ten studies with 1141 patients were included. Overall, 853 patients underwent primary closure (74.8%) and 288 patients underwent VRAM (25.2%). Eight studies reported on perineal wound complications after APR: 38.2% (n = 263/688) in the primary closure group versus 32.8% (n = 80/244) in the VRAM group. Perineal complication rates were statistically significantly lower in the VRAM group versus primary closure ((M-H OR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.04-2.49;
CONCLUSION
We highlight the advantage of VRAM flap closure over primary closure for perineal wounds following APR. However, tailoring operative strategy based on patient and disease factors remains important in optimising outcomes.
PubMed: 38532236
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03651-3 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Oct 2014Chronic pelvic sepsis is a challenging problem, which may require muscle flaps to fill the pelvic cavity. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the relative... (Review)
Review
AIM
Chronic pelvic sepsis is a challenging problem, which may require muscle flaps to fill the pelvic cavity. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the relative success of rectus and gracilis flaps used for this purpose.
METHOD
A systematic review was conducted to identify papers that reported the outcome of rectus or gracilis myocutaneous flaps in the treatment of persistent perineal sinuses or chronic pelvic sepsis. Reports of muscle flaps used for reconstruction or treatment of fistula in the absence of chronic sepsis were excluded. A successful outcome was defined as complete perineal healing within 12 months of surgery.
RESULTS
The review identified 19 studies reporting the outcome of 73 rectus and 87 gracilis flaps. Their respective success was 84% and 64%. Heterogeneity of the underlying cases did not allow for direct comparison of the flaps. Full healing of the flaps was generally achieved within 3 months. Donor site morbidity was minimal.
CONCLUSION
The surgical treatment of chronic pelvic sepsis should be tailored to the individual, but the rectus flap has a reasonable success rate with little morbidity.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Cutaneous Fistula; Humans; Myocutaneous Flap; Pelvic Infection; Perineum; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Rectal Fistula; Rectus Abdominis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24831668
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12663 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Dec 2023Fascial plane blocks provide effective analgesia after midline laparotomy; however, the most efficacious technique has not been determined. We conducted a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative efficacy and safety of non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
Fascial plane blocks provide effective analgesia after midline laparotomy; however, the most efficacious technique has not been determined. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to synthesise the evidence with respect to pain, opioid consumption, and adverse events.
METHODS
We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases for studies comparing commonly used non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy in adult patients. The co-primary outcomes of the study were 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain score, reported as i.v. morphine equivalents and 11-point numerical rating scale, respectively. We performed a frequentist meta-analysis using a random-effects model and a cluster-rank analysis of the co-primary outcomes.
RESULTS
Of 6115 studies screened, 67 eligible studies were included (n=4410). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h cumulative opioid consumption compared with placebo/no intervention were single-injection quadratus lumborum block (sQLB; mean difference [MD] -16.1 mg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -29.9 to -2.3, very low certainty), continuous transversus abdominis plane block (cTAP; MD -14.0 mg, 95% CI -21.6 to -6.4, low certainty), single-injection transversus abdominis plane block (sTAP; MD -13.7 mg, 95% CI -17.4 to -10.0, low certainty), and continuous rectus sheath block (cRSB; MD -13.2 mg, 95% CI -20.3 to -6.1, low certainty). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h resting pain score were cRSB (MD -1.2, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.6, low certainty), cTAP (MD -1.0, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2, low certainty), and continuous wound infusion (cWI; MD -0.7, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4, low certainty). Clustered-rank analysis including the co-primary outcomes showed cRSB and cTAP blocks to be the most efficacious interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on current evidence, continuous rectus sheath block and continuous transversus abdominis plane block were the most efficacious non-neuraxial techniques at reducing 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain scores after midline laparotomy (low certainty). Future studies should compare techniques for upper vs lower midline laparotomy and other non-midline abdominal incisions.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021269044.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Laparotomy; Network Meta-Analysis; Morphine; Pain; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 37770254
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.024 -
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Sep 2021
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Body Image; Diagnostic Self Evaluation; Diastasis, Muscle; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Muscle Weakness; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Quality of Life; Rectus Abdominis; Self Report; Symptom Assessment
PubMed: 33227494
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101995 -
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2016We summarized the evidence for ultrasound (US) guidance for truncal blocks in 2010 by performing a systematic literature review and rating the strength of evidence for... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
We summarized the evidence for ultrasound (US) guidance for truncal blocks in 2010 by performing a systematic literature review and rating the strength of evidence for each block using a system developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Since then, numerous studies of US guidance for truncal blocks have been published. In addition, 3 novel US-guided blocks have been described since our last review. To provide updated recommendations, we performed another systematic search of the literature to identify studies pertaining to US guidance for the following blocks: paravertebral, intercostal, transversus abdominis plane, rectus sheath, ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric, as well as the Pecs, quadratus lumborum, and transversalis fascia blocks. We rated the methodologic quality of each of the identified studies and then graded the strength of evidence supporting the use of US for each block based on the number and quality of available studies for that block.
WHAT'S NEW
Since our last review, numerous studies have been published, especially for the paravertebral and transversus abdominis plane blocks, and 3 novel US-guided blocks (Pecs, quadratus lumborum, and transversalis fascia blocks) have been described. Although some of these studies support the use of US for performing these blocks, others do not. Additional studies have used US to improve our understanding of the anatomy pertinent to these blocks and evaluated the effect on patient outcomes and risk of complications.
Topics: Abdominal Muscles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 26866299
DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000372 -
Cancers Feb 2021Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic exenteration (PE) for the treatment of cancer require extensive pelvic resection with a high rate of postoperative... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic exenteration (PE) for the treatment of cancer require extensive pelvic resection with a high rate of postoperative complications. The objective of this work was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAMf) and mesh closure on perineal morbidity following APR and PE (mainly for anal and rectal cancers).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE for eligible studies as of the year 2000. After data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed to compare perineal wound morbidity. The studies were distributed as follows: Group A comparing primary closure (PC) and VRAMf, Group B comparing PC and mesh closure, and Group C comparing PC and VRAMf in PE.
RESULTS
Our systematic review yielded 18 eligible studies involving 2180 patients (1206 primary closures, 647 flap closures, 327 mesh closures). The meta-analysis of Groups A and B showed PC to be associated with an increase in the rate of total (Group A: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43-0.71; < 0.01/Group B: OR 0.54, CI 0.17-1.68; = 0.18) and major perineal wound complications (Group A: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68; < 0.001/Group B: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.17; < 0.01). PC was associated with a decrease in total (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.39-4.35; < 0.01) and major (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.90-3.08; = 0.1) perineal complications in Group C.
CONCLUSION
Our results confirm the contribution of the VRAMf in reducing major complications in APR. Similarly, biological prostheses offer an interesting alternative in pelvic reconstruction. For PE, an adapted reconstruction must be proposed with specialized expertise.
PubMed: 33578769
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040721 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Jun 2024The purpose of this systematic review is to present and compare results from studies that have been using autologous tissue for POP repair. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this systematic review is to present and compare results from studies that have been using autologous tissue for POP repair.
METHODS
Systematic review was done according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. We aimed to retrieve reports of published and ongoing studies on the efficacy and safety of autologous tissue in vaginal vault prolapse repair. The databases searched were MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Scopus, Cohrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov.
RESULTS
The success rate varied among studies. In fascia-lata group success rate reports varied from 83 to a 100%, with a median follow-up from 12 to 52 months among studies. Rectus fascia reported success rates from 87 to a 100% with a follow-up of 12 months to longest of 98 months.
CONCLUSION
Autologous tissues show satisfying outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy procedure with fascia lata has better outcome in term of treatment of prolapse. Harvesting place on lateral side of buttock has more complications in comparison with rectus fascia but size of the graft can be wider in fascia-lata group.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Fascia Lata; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Transplantation, Autologous; Fascia; Rectus Abdominis
PubMed: 38703280
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07531-0 -
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand... 2023The objective is to evaluate the inter-recti distance on ultrasound measurement at different locations in healthy nulliparas. Electronic databases were searched for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The objective is to evaluate the inter-recti distance on ultrasound measurement at different locations in healthy nulliparas. Electronic databases were searched for studies describing the inter-recti distance measured by ultrasound in healthy nulliparas. We excluded studies without descriptions of the measurement position or the condition of the abdominal wall. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the inter-recti distance on ultrasound measurement. Seven eligible studies with 295 healthy nulliparas were included. The location of the inter-recti distance measurement by ultrasound was not uniform. The pooled data divided the measurement locations into three areas. The meta-analytic summary values of the umbilical inter-recti distance of the nulliparas was 8.77 mm (6.56-10.99 mm), the distance at the epigastric area was 7.22 mm (2.76-11.68 mm), and that at the infraumbilical area was 4.09 mm (1.55-6.64 mm). The maximal reported inter-recti distance in healthy nulliparous women is smaller than 10 mm on ultrasound measurement at all locations and the range in the umbilical area is larger than that in the epigastric, infraumbilical areas. The values for the inter-recti distance reported in this systematic review can be used as the reference of feasible and desirable distance of the rectus muscles after rectus fascia plication. The limitation was that the methodological quality of the assessment in most studies was unclear or low.
Topics: Humans; Female; Rectus Abdominis; Abdominal Wall; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35001809
DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.2024555 -
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand... Aug 2021Rectus diastasis is characterized by widening and laxity of the linea alba, causing the abdominal content to bulge. Rectus diastasis is treated either conservatively... (Review)
Review
Rectus diastasis is characterized by widening and laxity of the linea alba, causing the abdominal content to bulge. Rectus diastasis is treated either conservatively with physiotherapy, or surgically, surgical treatment showing especially convincing results. The primary aim of this study was to describe surgical techniques used to correct abdominal rectus diastasis. Secondary, we wished to assess postoperative complications in relation to the various techniques. A systematic scoping review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Studies were included if they described a surgical technique used to repair abdominal rectus diastasis, with or without concomitant ventral hernia. Secondary outcomes were recurrence rate and other complications. A total of 61 studies were included: 46 used an open approach and 15 used a laparoscopic approach for repair of the abdominal rectus diastasis. All the included studies used some sort of plication, but various technical modifications were used. The most common surgical technique was classic low abdominoplasty. The plication was done as either a single or a double layer, most commonly with permanent sutures. There were overall low recurrence rates and other complication rates after both the open and the laparoscopic techniques. We identified many techniques for repair of abdominal rectus diastasis. Recurrence rate and other complication rates were in general low. However, there is a lack of high-level evidence and it is not possible to recommend one method over another. Thus, further randomized controlled trials are needed in this area.
Topics: Abdominal Wall; Abdominoplasty; Hernia, Ventral; Humans; Rectus Abdominis; Sutures
PubMed: 33502282
DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.1873794