-
Stem Cell Research & Therapy Jul 2021Over the past decades, many studies focused on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for bone regeneration. Due to the efficiency of topical application has been widely... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Over the past decades, many studies focused on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for bone regeneration. Due to the efficiency of topical application has been widely dicussed and systemic application was also a feasible way for new bone formation, the aim of this study was to systematically review systemic therapy of MSCs for bone regeneration in pre-clinical studies.
METHODS
The article search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases. Original research articles that assessed potential effect of systemic application of MSCs for bone regeneration in vivo were selected and evaluated in this review, according to eligibility criteria. The efficacy of MSC systemic treatment was analyzed by random effects meta-analysis, and the outcomes were expressed in standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analyses were conducted on animal species and gender, MSCs types, frequency and time of injection, and bone diseases.
RESULTS
Twenty-three articles were selected in this review, of which 21 were included in meta-analysis. The results showed that systemic therapy increased bone mineral density (SMD 3.02 [1.84, 4.20]), bone volume to tissue volume ratio (2.10 [1.16, 3.03]), and the percentage of new bone area (7.03 [2.10, 11.96]). Bone loss caused by systemic disease tended to produce a better response to systemic treatment (p=0.05 in BMD, p=0.03 in BV/TV).
CONCLUSION
This study concluded that systemic therapy of MSCs promotes bone regeneration in preclinical experiments. These results provided important information for the systemic application of MSCs as a potential application of bone formation in further animal experiments.
Topics: Animals; Bone Regeneration; Bone and Bones; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Osteogenesis
PubMed: 34215342
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02456-w -
Advances in Experimental Medicine and... 2021Periodontitis is an infectious inflammatory disease characterized by clinical attachment loss and tooth supporting tissue destruction. As exosomes demonstrated...
Periodontitis is an infectious inflammatory disease characterized by clinical attachment loss and tooth supporting tissue destruction. As exosomes demonstrated pro-regenerative ability, their use in periodontal treatment has been suggested. The aim of this systematic review is to gather and summarize the most recent data regarding exosomes to determine their potential impact in bone and periodontal regeneration. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science) were searched up to February 2020. Studies assessing the impact of exosomes administration in experimental bone and periodontal defects have been identified according to PRISMA guidelines. Among the 183 identified articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Experimental bone defects were mainly surgically induced with a dental bur or distraction tools. All studies considered bone healing after exosomes administration as the primary outcome. Results showed that mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes administration promoted bone healing and neovascularization. Nevertheless, a dose-effect relationship was observed. Exosomes administration appears to promote significantly the bone healing and periodontal regeneration. However, only a limited number of studies have been carried out so far and the optimized protocols in this context need to be evaluated.
Topics: Bone Regeneration; Bone and Bones; Exosomes; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Periodontitis
PubMed: 33159304
DOI: 10.1007/5584_2020_593 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Jul 2014Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Analyse the effectiveness of different materials and techniques used in guided tissue regeneration (GTR) applied in periapical surgery, comparing the success rate obtained in 4-wall defects and in through-and-through bone lesions as well as to establish prognostic factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A Cochrane, PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database search (October 2012 to March 2013) was conducted with the search terms "periapical surgery", "surgical endodontic treatment", "guided tissue regeneration", "bone regeneration", "bone grafts", "barrier membranes" and "periapical lesions" individually and next, using the Boolean operator "AND". The inclusion criteria were the use of GTR (bone graft and/or membrane barrier), clinical studies including at least 10 patients, 10 years aged articles published in English or French. The exclusion criteria were case reports and nonhuman studies.
RESULTS
34 publications were selected from a total of 483. 9 of the 34 were excluded. Finally, the systematic review included 25 articles: 2 metaanalysis, 8 reviews, 13 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. They were stratified according to their level of scientific evidence using the SORT criteria. The 4-wall periapical and through-and-through lesions improve more their prognosis by combining bone grafts and barrier membranes than using these materials exclusively, respect to the control groups. The results show lower failure rates in 4-wall lesions than in through-and-through lesions using GTR.
CONCLUSIONS
The combined GTR technique (filling material and membranes) obtains a greater success rate both in 4-wall lesions and in through-and-through lesions, respect to the control groups. The use of regeneration materials seems to be more necessary in through-and-through lesions, > 5mm lesions, lower teeth and apicomarginal lesions as they have the worst healing prognosis. In function of the articles scientific quality, a type B recommendation is given in favour to the use of GTR in association of periapical surgery in case of 4-wall and through-and-through lesions.
Topics: Bone Regeneration; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal; Humans; Periapical Diseases; Prognosis
PubMed: 24608211
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.19453 -
Dermatologic Surgery : Official... Jan 2020Microneedling is a popular, minimally invasive skin rejuvenation modality for acne scarring. Recent reports have evaluated the efficacy and safety of microneedling...
BACKGROUND
Microneedling is a popular, minimally invasive skin rejuvenation modality for acne scarring. Recent reports have evaluated the efficacy and safety of microneedling monotherapy and combination treatment for scarring.
OBJECTIVE
This review aims to systematically analyze the current literature on microneedling techniques used for acne scarring.
METHODS
A PubMed search (2009-current) was used to identify literature on microneedling treatment for acne. All randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials, case cohorts, case reports, and case series were included with the exception of 2 studies, which were excluded due to unavailability.
RESULTS
All 33 articles evaluated showed improvement of acne scar appearance after microneedling treatment. Evidence was inconsistent when comparing microneedling monotherapy to dual therapy or to fractional laser treatment.
CONCLUSION
Microneedling improves acne scarring, and further studies are needed to compare microneedling with other minimally invasive treatments.
Topics: Acne Vulgaris; Cicatrix; Cosmetic Techniques; Humans; Needles; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31356435
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002020 -
European Archives of... Feb 2022Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) results in satisfactory wound healing. This analysis focuses on assessing the effectiveness of PRF in the treatment of tympanic membrane (TM)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) results in satisfactory wound healing. This analysis focuses on assessing the effectiveness of PRF in the treatment of tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The literature was searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from inception to February 28th, 2021. The following healing and hearing outcomes were measured: closure rate, pre-and postoperative auditory results, and incidence of postoperative infections. Data were pooled and expressed as the odds ratio (OR).
RESULTS
Ten studies were eligible for qualitative review, and seven of them were included for the final quantitative comparison. The OR for the closure rate of acute perforations was 4.30 (95% CI 1.35-13.70, I = 0%), and the OR in the chronic subgroup was 5.42 (95% CI 2.57-11.43, I = 0%). The total OR value for the completed closure rate was 5.10 (95% CI 2.72-9.54, I = 0%), indicating that the utilization of PRF can enhance the closure of both acute and chronic perforations. The qualitative review did not find improved hearing results with the use of PRF. In addition to promoting closure, PRF can reduce the incidence of infections (OR = 0.14). The sensitivity analysis did not change the final results, and there was no publication bias in this analysis.
CONCLUSION
PRF can increase the closure rate of acute perforations, enhance the survival rate of autografts in TM surgeries and reduce the incidence of infections. However, the literature indicates that PRF does not influence the hearing outcomes. This study shows that PRF is an effective agent for TM regeneration.
Topics: Humans; Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Tympanic Membrane; Tympanic Membrane Perforation; Wound Healing
PubMed: 34086080
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06915-1 -
Stem Cell Research & Therapy May 2023Human adult dental pulp stem cells (hDPSC) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) hold promise in bone regeneration for their easy accessibility,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Human adult dental pulp stem cells (hDPSC) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) hold promise in bone regeneration for their easy accessibility, high proliferation rate, self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation capacity. Various organic and inorganic scaffold materials were pre-seeded with human dental pulp stem cells in animals, with promising outcomes in new bone formation. Nevertheless, the clinical trial for bone regeneration using dental pulp stem cells is still in its infancy. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesise the evidence of the efficacy of human dental pulp stem cells and the scaffold combination for bone regeneration in animal bone defect models.
METHODOLOGY
This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD2021274976), and PRISMA guideline was followed to include the relevant full-text papers using exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data were extracted for the systematic review. Quality assessment and the risk of bias were also carried out using the CAMARADES tool. Quantitative bone regeneration data of the experimental (scaffold + hDPSC/SHED) and the control (scaffold-only) groups were also extracted for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Forty-nine papers were included for systematic review and only 27 of them were qualified for meta-analysis. 90% of the included papers were assessed as medium to low risk. In the meta-analysis, qualified studies were grouped by the unit of bone regeneration measurement. Overall, bone regeneration was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in experimental group (scaffold + hDPSC/SHED) compared to the control group (scaffold-only) (SMD: 1.863, 95% CI 1.121-2.605). However, the effect is almost entirely driven by the % new bone formation group (SMD: 3.929, 95% CI 2.612-5.246) while % BV/TV (SMD: 2.693, 95% CI - 0.001-5.388) shows a marginal effect. Dogs and hydroxyapatite-containing scaffolds have the highest capacity in % new bone formation in response to human DPSC/SHED. The funnel plot exhibits no apparent asymmetry representing a lack of remarkable publication bias. Sensitivity analysis also indicated that the results generated in this meta-analysis are robust and reliable.
CONCLUSION
This is the first synthesised evidence showing that human DPSCs/SHED and scaffold combination enhanced bone regeneration highly significantly compared to the cell-free scaffold irrespective of scaffold type and animal species used. So, dental pulp stem cells could be a promising tool for treating various bone diseases, and more clinical trials need to be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of dental pulp stem cell-based therapies.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Dogs; Humans; Bone Regeneration; Cell Differentiation; Dental Pulp; Osteogenesis; Stem Cell Transplantation; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 37189187
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03357-w -
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Dec 2022Critical-sized bone defects are always difficult to treat, and they are associated with a significant burden of disease in clinical practice. In recent decades, due to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Critical-sized bone defects are always difficult to treat, and they are associated with a significant burden of disease in clinical practice. In recent decades, due to the fast development of biomaterials and tissue engineering, many bioinspired materials have been developed to treat large bone defects. Due to the excellent osteoblastic ability of black phosphorous (BP), many BP-based biomaterials have been developed to treat bone defects. Therefore, there are abundant studies as well as a tremendous amount of research data. It is urgent to conduct evidence-based research to translate these research data and results into validated scientific evidence. Therefore, in our present study, a qualitative systematic review and a quantitative meta-analysis were performed. Eighteen studies were included in a systematic review, while twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our results showed that the overall quality of experimental methods and reports of biomaterials studies was still low, which needs to be improved in future studies. Besides, we also proved the excellent osteoblastic ability of BP-based biomaterials. But we did not find a significant effect of near-infrared (NIR) laser in BP-based biomaterials for treating bone defects. However, the quality of the evidence presented by included studies was very low. Therefore, to accelerate the clinical translation of BP-based biomaterials, it is urgent to improve the quality of the study method and reporting in future animal studies. More evidence-based studies should be conducted to enhance the quality and clinical translation of BP-based biomaterials.
Topics: Animals; Biocompatible Materials; Phosphorus; Bone Regeneration; Tissue Engineering
PubMed: 36496422
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01735-9 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2022One of the possible alternatives for creating materials for the regeneration of bone tissue supporting comprehensive reconstruction is the incorporation of active... (Review)
Review
One of the possible alternatives for creating materials for the regeneration of bone tissue supporting comprehensive reconstruction is the incorporation of active substances whose controlled release will improve this process. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize in vitro studies that assess the suitability of polyphenolics as additives to polymer-ceramic composite bone regeneration materials. Data on experimental studies in terms of the difference in mechanical, wettability, cytocompatibility, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of materials were synthesized. The obtained numerical data were compiled and analyzed in search of percentage changes of these parameters. The results of the systematic review were based on data from forty-six studies presented in nineteen articles. The addition of polyphenolic compounds to composite materials for bone regeneration improved the cytocompatibility and increased the activity of early markers of osteoblast differentiation, indicating a high osteoinductive potential of the materials. Polyphenolic compounds incorporated into the materials presumably give them high antioxidant properties and reduce the production of reactive oxygen species in macrophage cells, implying anti-inflammatory activity. The evidence was limited by the number of missing data and the heterogeneity of the data.
Topics: Antioxidants; Biocompatible Materials; Bone Regeneration; Ceramics; Polyphenols; Tissue Engineering
PubMed: 35806482
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137473 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Dec 2021Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is commonly used as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that interferes with multiple biological pathways. ASA acts by stimulating... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is commonly used as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug that interferes with multiple biological pathways. ASA acts by stimulating osteogenesis and inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of ASA in the bone regeneration in animal models. This review was structured based on the PRISMA Statement and registered on PROSPERO database according to protocol number #CDR42018111403. The quality of evidence was assessed by using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). With the development of search strategies, we identified studies on the use of ASA from the following databases: 1- Medline (via PubMed); 2 - Web of Science; 3 - Scopus; and 4 - EMBASE. A total of 296 articles were identified and after screening the title, abstract, and full text, only 18 studies were selected for qualitative analysis and 12 were selected for performance of the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). A meta-analysis of the amount of bone tissue formed showed a significant advantage when ASA was locally used, revealing a mean difference (MD) of 22.75% (95% CI: 15.39-30.12) p < 0.00001. Within the limitations of the available data, the results were promising and showed that ASA can be effective in bone formation in animal models.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Aspirin; Bone Regeneration; Bone and Bones; Osteogenesis
PubMed: 34736809
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.051 -
Systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies on scaffold use in knee ligament regeneration.Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy 2015The management and treatment of ligamentous injuries within an orthopaedic population has continued to evolve throughout the last several decades. Limitations with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The management and treatment of ligamentous injuries within an orthopaedic population has continued to evolve throughout the last several decades. Limitations with autograft, allograft and synthetics have led to research into tissue engineering using scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aims to examine and summarise the pre clinical in-vivo studies and limited clinical studies on the use of scaffolds in the treatment of ligamentous injuries Data sources:
DATABASES
PubMed, CINAHL, Web of science, Medline, Cochrane library and Embase. The following key words and search terms were used: scaffolds, ligament, mesenchymal stem cells, tissue engineering, clinical, and preclinical.
METHODS
A total of 118 articles were reviewed. 19 articles were identified as relevant for the purpose of this systematic literature review. An additional 2 articles were sourced from the reference list of reviewed articles.
RESULTS
Three tables of studies were constructed: pre clinical biological scaffolds, pre clinical synthetic scaffolds and clinical scaffolds.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a large body of pre clinical evidence that the use of scaffolds combined with mesenchymal stem cells can be a viable option in the regeneration of ligamentous structures with biological and mechanical properties suitable for function. There is, however, limited clinical evidence supporting the use of recently developed scaffolds and historical evidence of synthetic scaffolds failing in the management of anterior cruciate ligament repairs. There appears to be no consensus in the literature as to the nature of the scaffold material that is most suitable for clinical trials. No randomised control trials have yet been conducted.
Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Knee; Ligaments; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Regeneration; Tissue Engineering; Tissue Scaffolds
PubMed: 25012742
DOI: 10.2174/1574888x09666140710101435