-
Hepatology International Oct 2022Optimal treatment of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) remains debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Optimal treatment of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) during liver transplantation (LT) remains debated. We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions, treatment and outcomes of patients presenting SPSS undergoing LT.
METHODS
According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we used PubMed to retrieve all studies dealing with SPSS and LT between January 1987 and January 2020. The primary endpoints were definitions and outcomes according to the management of SPSS (treatment vs observation).
RESULTS
Thirteen studies detailing the management of 962 SPSS were retrieved. Hemodynamically significant SPSS were defined as those having diameter ≥ 10 mm in 41% (n = 395) of patients. SPSS were splenorenal (42%), cavo-gastric (15.2%), umbilical (7.4%), mesenterico-caval (n = 31; 3.2%), mesenterico-renal (0.1%) and unreported (31.9%), respectively. At the time of LT 372 shunts (38.7%) were treated while 590 were observed (61.3%). During a follow-up time ranging from 4 months to 5 years, the reported overall survival (OS) at 1 year was not significantly different except for one study. Portal vein anastomosis complications (i.e. reduced flow, stenosis or thrombosis) were similarly reported in observed [n = 26 (4%)] and ligated SPSS [n = 10 (2%)] (p = 0.22) but the rate of relaparotomy was significantly higher in observed SPPS (16 vs 2; p = 0.01) to rescue post LT portal vein thrombosis (n = 6) and reduced portal flow and graft dysfunction (n = 10).
CONCLUSIONS
There was a heterogeneous management of SPSS during LT in the literature. Ligation of SPPS did not reduce vascular complications neither improved survival. A randomized prospective study might contribute to identify best management of SPSS at time of LT.
Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Portal Vein; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic; Prospective Studies; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 35941400
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10377-w -
European Journal of Vascular and... Dec 2019There is currently uncertainty regarding the ideal treatment to salvage thrombosed or failing synthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in patients with end stage renal...
Short Term Success of Treatments to Salvage Thrombosed or Failing Synthetic Arteriovenous Grafts in End Stage Renal Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
OBJECTIVE
There is currently uncertainty regarding the ideal treatment to salvage thrombosed or failing synthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in patients with end stage renal disease. Therefore, a systematic review up to December 2018 and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCTs) that compared three month failure risk of available treatments was carried out.
METHODS
Medline, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were the data sources. Pairwise meta-analyses were based on random effects models. Network meta-analysis was conducted within a frequentist framework with a multivariable random effects approach to model treatment effects across studies. The metric of choice was the odds ratio (OR) along with the associated 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Sixteen two arm RCTs were included involving 2011 patients who were randomised to six different treatments (plain balloon angioplasty, open surgical repair, stents, stent grafts, drug eluting balloons (DEBs), and cutting balloons). The network of RCTs had a star like geometry with plain balloon angioplasty being the common comparator. There were no significant differences between treatments with regards to risk of failure at three months with the exception of stent graft use that significantly reduced the risk of failure compared with plain balloon angioplasty (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.84). Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, the best interventions to salvage thrombosed or failing AVGs were DEB and stent grafts.
CONCLUSIONS
Stent graft seems to perform better than plain balloon angioplasty in terms of saving thrombosed or failing AVGs. However, this network meta-analysis was limited by the lack of closed loops and thus unable to assess consistency between direct and indirect evidence. The efficacy of DEBs as a promising treatment deserves further investigation and new RCTs are required.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Arteries; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Catheters; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Salvage Therapy; Stents; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Failure; Vascular Patency; Veins
PubMed: 31706740
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.495 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Dec 2000To obtain reliable estimates of the effects of neuraxial blockade with epidural or spinal anaesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To obtain reliable estimates of the effects of neuraxial blockade with epidural or spinal anaesthesia on postoperative morbidity and mortality.
DESIGN
Systematic review of all trials with randomisation to intraoperative neuraxial blockade or not.
STUDIES
141 trials including 9559 patients for which data were available before 1 January 1997. Trials were eligible irrespective of their primary aims, concomitant use of general anaesthesia, publication status, or language. Trials were identified by extensive search methods, and substantial amounts of data were obtained or confirmed by correspondence with trialists.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
All cause mortality, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, transfusion requirements, pneumonia, other infections, respiratory depression, and renal failure.
RESULTS
Overall mortality was reduced by about a third in patients allocated to neuraxial blockade (103 deaths/4871 patients versus 144/4688 patients, odds ratio=0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.90, P=0. 006). Neuraxial blockade reduced the odds of deep vein thrombosis by 44%, pulmonary embolism by 55%, transfusion requirements by 50%, pneumonia by 39%, and respiratory depression by 59% (all P<0.001). There were also reductions in myocardial infarction and renal failure. Although there was limited power to assess subgroup effects, the proportional reductions in mortality did not clearly differ by surgical group, type of blockade (epidural or spinal), or in those trials in which neuraxial blockade was combined with general anaesthesia compared with trials in which neuraxial blockade was used alone.
CONCLUSIONS
Neuraxial blockade reduces postoperative mortality and other serious complications. The size of some of these benefits remains uncertain, and further research is required to determine whether these effects are due solely to benefits of neuraxial blockade or partly to avoidance of general anaesthesia. Nevertheless, these findings support more widespread use of neuraxial blockade.
Topics: Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Spinal; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 11118174
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2011A significant proportion of patients starting dialysis do so with a temporary or tunnelled haemodialysis catheter. Insertion of these catheters can be achieved either by... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A significant proportion of patients starting dialysis do so with a temporary or tunnelled haemodialysis catheter. Insertion of these catheters can be achieved either by using the anatomical landmarks for the veins into which they are inserted or using ultrasound guidance. It has been suggested that the use of ultrasound guidance reduces the immediate complications of haemodialysis catheter insertions such as pneumothorax or arterial puncture.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the review was to compare the use of real-time 2-dimensional (2-D) Doppler ultrasound venous imaging in the insertion of percutaneous central venous catheters for dialysis versus the traditional "blind" landmark method.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Reference lists of identified studies and relevant narrative reviews were also screened. Search date: January 2011.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating ultrasound guidance in the percutaneous insertion of central venous catheters for dialysis (both cuffed and uncuffed) against the traditional blind landmark method.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
We identified seven studies enrolling 767 patients and with 830 catheter insertions. Three of seven studies described the method of random sequence generation, none described allocation concealment, and blinding of participants and personnel was not possible. Real-time ultrasound guidance was found to significantly reduce the risk of catheter placement failure on the first attempt (5 studies, 595 catheters): RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.52), significantly reduce the risk of arterial puncture (6 studies, 535 catheters: RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.37) and haematomas (4 studies, 323 catheters: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.81) when compared to the landmark method. The time taken for successful cannulation was significantly lower with the use of real-time ultrasound guidance (1 study, 73 catheters: MD -1.40 min, 95% CI -2.17 to -0.63) and there were less attempts/catheter insertion (1 study, 110 catheters: -0.35, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.16).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Use of real-time 2-D Doppler ultrasound guidance has significant benefits with respect to the number if catheters successfully inserted on the first attempt, reduction in the risk of arterial puncture and haematomas and the time taken for successful vein puncture.
Topics: Anatomic Landmarks; Catheterization, Central Venous; Hematoma; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Wounds, Stab
PubMed: 22071820
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005279.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2021Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterised by clonal plasma cells that cause end-organ damage such as renal failure, lytic bone lesions,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterised by clonal plasma cells that cause end-organ damage such as renal failure, lytic bone lesions, hypercalcaemia and/or anaemia. People with multiple myeloma are treated with immunomodulatory agents including lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and thalidomide. Multiple myeloma is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, which appears to be further increased in people receiving immunomodulatory agents.
OBJECTIVES
(1) To systematically review the evidence for the relative efficacy and safety of aspirin, oral anticoagulants, or parenteral anticoagulants in ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents who otherwise have no standard therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. (2) To maintain this review as a living systematic review by continually running the searches and incorporating newly identified studies.
SEARCH METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive literature search that included (1) a major electronic search (14 June 2021) of the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid, and Embase via Ovid; (2) hand-searching of conference proceedings; (3) checking of reference lists of included studies; and (4) a search for ongoing studies in trial registries. As part of the living systematic review approach, we are running continual searches, and we will incorporate new evidence rapidly after it is identified.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of oral anticoagulants such as vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), anti-platelet agents such as aspirin (ASA), and parenteral anticoagulants such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)in ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Using a standardised form, we extracted data in duplicate on study design, participants, interventions, outcomes of interest, and risk of bias. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding, and minor bleeding. For each outcome we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) and the risk difference (RD) with its 95% CI. We then assessed the certainty of evidence at the outcome level following the GRADE approach (GRADE Handbook).
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 1015 identified citations and included 11 articles reporting four RCTs that enrolled 1042 participants. The included studies made the following comparisons: ASA versus VKA (one study); ASA versus LMWH (two studies); VKA versus LMWH (one study); and ASA versus DOAC (two studies, one of which was an abstract). ASA versus VKA One RCT compared ASA to VKA at six months follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of ASA relative to VKA on all-cause mortality (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.24; RD 2 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 72 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.33; RD 27 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 48 fewer to 21 more; very low-certainty evidence); PE (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 3.95; RD 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 14 fewer to 54 more; very low-certainty evidence); major bleeding (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.36 to 134.72; RD 6 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 134 more; very low-certainty evidence); and minor bleeding (RR 6.00, 95% CI 0.73 to 49.43; RD 23 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 220 more; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT compared ASA to VKA at two years follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of ASA relative to VKA on all-cause mortality (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.47; RD 5 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 9 fewer to 41 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.44; RD 22 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 50 fewer to 34 more; very low-certainty evidence); and PE (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 3.95; RD 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 14 fewer to 54 more; very low-certainty evidence). ASA versus LMWH Two RCTs compared ASA to LMWH at six months follow-up. The pooled data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of ASA relative to LMWH on all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.81; RD 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 2 fewer to 38 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.08; RD 5 more per 1000, 95% CI 11 fewer to 43 more; very low-certainty evidence); PE (RR 7.71, 95% CI 0.97 to 61.44; RD 7 more per 1000, 95% CI 0 fewer to 60 more; very low-certainty evidence); major bleeding (RR 6.97, 95% CI 0.36 to 134.11; RD 6 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 133 more; very low-certainty evidence); and minor bleeding (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.35 to 5.78; RD 4 more per 1000, 95% CI 7 fewer to 50 more; very low-certainty evidence). One RCT compared ASA to LMWH at two years follow-up. The pooled data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of ASA relative to LMWH on all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.89; RD 0 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 4 fewer to 68 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.72; RD 9 more per 1000, 95% CI 21 fewer to 78 more; very low-certainty evidence); and PE (RR 9.00, 95% CI 0.49 to 166.17; RD 8 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 165 more; very low-certainty evidence). VKA versus LMWH One RCT compared VKA to LMWH at six months follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of VKA relative to LMWH on all-cause mortality (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.10; RD 3 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 5 fewer to 32 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 2.32, 95% CI 0.91 to 5.93; RD 36 more per 1000, 95% CI 2 fewer to 135 more; very low-certainty evidence); PE (RR 8.96, 95% CI 0.49 to 165.42; RD 8 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 164 more; very low-certainty evidence); and minor bleeding (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.17; RD 9 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 13 fewer to 30 more; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported that no major bleeding occurred in either arm. One RCT compared VKA to LMWH at two years follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of VKA relative to LMWH on all-cause mortality (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.18 to 21.90; RD 5 more per 1000, 95% CI 4 fewer to 95 more; very low-certainty evidence); symptomatic DVT (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.80 to 3.63; RD 32 more per 1000, 95% CI 9 fewer to 120 more; very low-certainty evidence); and PE (RR 9.00, 95% CI 0.49 to 166.17; RD 8 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 165 more; very low-certainty evidence). ASA versus DOAC One RCT compared ASA to DOAC at six months follow-up. The data did not confirm or exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect of ASA relative to DOAC on DVT, PE, and major bleeding and minor bleeding (minor bleeding: RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.31 to 79.94; RD 4 more per 1000, 95% CI 1 fewer to 79 more; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported that no DVT, PE, or major bleeding events occurred in either arm. These results did not change in a meta-analysis including the study published as an abstract.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The certainty of the available evidence for the comparative effects of ASA, VKA, LMWH, and DOAC on all-cause mortality, DVT, PE, or bleeding was either low or very low. People with multiple myeloma considering antithrombotic agents should balance the possible benefits of reduced thromboembolic complications with the possible harms and burden of anticoagulants. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. Living systematic reviews offer a new approach to review updating in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Multiple Myeloma
PubMed: 34582035
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014739 -
European Journal of Pharmacology Feb 2023The risk of thromboembolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients remains uncertain and was assessed in this review to better weigh benefits vs. risks of prophylactic... (Review)
Review
The risk of thromboembolism in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients remains uncertain and was assessed in this review to better weigh benefits vs. risks of prophylactic anticoagulation in this population. A search was performed through three databases: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library until 2022. Self-controlled case series, case-control and cohort studies were included, and findings summarized narratively. Meta-analyses for risk of thromboembolism including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and myocardial infarction (MI) between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 non-hospitalized patients were conducted. Frequency, incidence rate ratio (IRR), and risk ratio (RR) of stroke were used to assess risk in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients considering the lack of studies to conduct a meta-analysis. Ten studies met inclusion criteria characterized by adult non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Risk of bias was relatively low. Risk of DVT (RR: 1.98 with 95% CI: 1.03-3.83) and PE (OR: 6.72 with 95% CI: 4.81-9.39 and RR: 4.44 with 95% CI: 1.98-9.99) increased in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to controls. Risk of MI (OR: 1.91 with 95% CI: 0.89-4.09) is possibly increased in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients with moderate certainty when compared to controls. A trend in favor of stroke was documented in the first week following infection. Our meta-analyses support the increase in risk of DVT and PE, and likely increase of MI, in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The risk of stroke appears significant in the first week following infection but drops to insignificance two weeks later. More studies are needed to establish evidence-based recommendations for prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Anticoagulants; COVID-19; Pulmonary Embolism; Stroke; Thromboembolism
PubMed: 36641102
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175501 -
Medical Ultrasonography Jun 2013Endoscopic surveilance of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis is expensive for the health system and uncomfortable for the patients. Recently,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Endoscopic surveilance of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis is expensive for the health system and uncomfortable for the patients. Recently, non-invasive ultrasound-based parameters seem to offer valuable informations about the status of esophaeal varices and thus challenge the need for repetitive endoscopic monitoring.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
We have performed a systematic review of the literature published in PubMed from January 2000 until March 2012 over the role of ultrasound-based parameters on the evaluation of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.
RESULTS
Eleven papers studied the role of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound and two further studies analyzed the relationship between liver stiffness and staging of esophageal varices. The parameters that proved to be valuable for diagnosis of esophageal varices and reached statistcal significance were: diameter of the spleen > 15 cm, congestion index of the portal vein > 0.154 cm x sec, portal hipertensive index > 2.08, liver stiffness > 43.97kPa, portal vein diameter > 13 mm, renal artery resistance index >/= 0.7 and development of new porto-systemic collaterals. Other parameters such as: pattern of hepatic venous waveforms or flow parameters of the hepatic or splenic veins did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
Altough esophagogastroduodenoscopy remains the golden standard, there are some ultrasound-based parameters which, used within complex algorithms, may represent a viable alternative for the diagnosis and surveilance of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Topics: Causality; Comorbidity; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Prevalence; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 23702501
DOI: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.152.ab1ric2 -
Journal of Vascular and Interventional... Apr 2019To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing patency outcomes following drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) in hemodialysis circuits. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing patency outcomes following drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) in hemodialysis circuits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE and EMBASE systematic searches were performed from inception to November 2018 to identify comparative studies assessing DCBA vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in hemodialysis circuits. Abstract selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers. Primary outcome was loss of target lesion patency at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months for autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF), prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG), and hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis.
RESULTS
Twelve studies comprising 908 patients were included. There was a significant improvement in patency among AVF after DCBA vs POBA at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (odds ratio 0.58 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.94]; odds ratio 0.40 [95% confidence interval 0.23-0.70]; odds ratio 0.39 [95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.61]; and odds ratio 0.20 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.62]). This benefit persisted on subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. Meta-analysis of results specific to AVG could not be performed, as only 1 RCT was identified that favored DCBA. Hemodialysis-associated central vein stenosis did not demonstrate a significant difference in patency rates between DCBA and POBA on meta-analysis. Twelve-month mortality and same-day complication rates did not differ between arms.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant improvement in patency was identified with DCBA in AVF at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A single comparative study identified benefit of DCBA use in the AVG group. No significant benefit was identified with DCBA for central stenosis.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Access Devices; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 30857987
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.01.012 -
Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill. :... Dec 2004To analyze the predictive values of selective venous sampling (SVS) in our own experience and in a systematic meta-analysis of the international literature and to... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Parathyroid hormone venous sampling before reoperative surgery in renal hyperparathyroidism: comparison with noninvasive localization procedures and review of the literature.
OBJECTIVES
To analyze the predictive values of selective venous sampling (SVS) in our own experience and in a systematic meta-analysis of the international literature and to compare them with the results of noninvasive localization studies before reoperative parathyroid surgery.
DATA SOURCES
Twenty-one consecutive patients with persistent or recurrent renal hyperparathyroidism underwent preoperative SVS and noninvasive imaging. These data were added to a systematic review of the literature on localization studies before reoperative surgery. The literature search included localization studies, recurrent hyperparathyroidism, and reoperation. STUDY SELECTION Prospective and retrospective studies that provided at least the true-positive rate of 1 procedure were included. Data from initial surgery, hyperfunctioning autografts, and case reports were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION
Thirty-one publications reported on SVS (n = 22), technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scintigraphy (n = 17), thallium-technetium scintigraphy (n = 11), ultrasonography (n = 18), magnetic resonance imaging (n = 12), and computed tomography (n = 13). The overall analysis was performed by dividing the overall number of true- and false-positive results by the total number of patients.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Localization by SVS was correct in 20 of 21 patients. In 1 patient with 2 localizations, only 1 was predicted correctly. Therefore, the sensitivity of SVS was at least 90%, with no false-positive results. Overall true- and false-positive rates, respectively, in 31 studies were 71% and 9% for SVS, 69% and 7% for technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scintigraphy, 54% and 16% for magnetic resonance imaging, 55% and 15% for thallium-technetium scintigraphy, 50% and 18% for ultrasonography, and 45% and 14% for computed tomography.
CONCLUSIONS
With its high sensitivity, SVS is the gold standard in patients with persistent or recurrent renal hyperparathyroidism and negative results of noninvasive localization procedures. The noninvasive procedure of choice is now technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scintigraphy, with high sensitivity and a low rate of false-positive results.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Catheterization, Peripheral; Child; Female; Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary; Male; Middle Aged; Parathyroid Hormone; Predictive Value of Tests; Reoperation; Sensitivity and Specificity; Veins
PubMed: 15613292
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1331 -
Cardiovascular and Interventional... Oct 2015To conduct a systematic review of management of current cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) and associated outcomes in the context of dysfunctional hemodialysis access. (Review)
Review
AIM
To conduct a systematic review of management of current cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) and associated outcomes in the context of dysfunctional hemodialysis access.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve literature on the management of CAS. Studies had to focus on management of access stenosis solely in the cephalic arch. Case reports and literature reviews were excluded. Studies were categorized by intervention, and primary and secondary patency data were compiled. Studies were aggregated, and meta-analyses were performed where possible.
RESULTS
Nine papers satisfied the aforementioned criteria: five were retrospective studies and four were prospective studies. CAS management strategies have included percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA), peripheral cutting balloons, surgical cephalic vein transpositions, bare stents, and stent grafts. Reporting strategies varied between studies. Meta-analyses showed that results were variable even within studies using the same modality, particularly for PTA.
CONCLUSION
No singular, definitive management strategy exists for CAS. Current studies are limited by being primarily single-center retrospective trials featuring heterogenous patient populations, interventions, and endpoints. Priorities for future studies should include larger randomized trials, more uniform management strategies and endpoints, and a longer duration of follow-up.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Brachiocephalic Veins; Constriction, Pathologic; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases
PubMed: 26220504
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1190-4