-
The International Journal of Lower... Sep 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize randomized controlled trials on the impact of foot care education on knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize randomized controlled trials on the impact of foot care education on knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior in patients with diabetes. A search was made using PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar, YOK National Thesis Center and Google Scholar electronic databases for studies published between March 2003-January 2022. The search medical subject headings (MeSH) terms were diabetic foot, knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior. Studies suitable for the systematic review and the meta-analysis met the following criteria (PICOS): target participants would be diagnosed with diabetes (population), diabetic foot education (intervention), comparison of the group receiving diabetic foot care education and routine care education, and the control group receiving only routine care education (comparison), studies evaluating the levels of knowledge, self-efficacy and behavior (outcome), randomized controlled trials (study design). Twenty-six studies were included in systematic review. Three studies for knowledge, 5 studies for behavior, 8 studies for self-efficacy were included in the meta-analysis (total sample: 2534, experiment: 1464, control: 1071). All of the studies had low reporting bias. The mean duration of educations for knowledge was 5.2 months. This duration was 4.8 months for behavior and 4.5 months for self-efficacy. In the random effect (since the homogeneity test: < .001, this model was used), there were significantly difference in terms of knowledge (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.656, 95% [CI]: 1.014-2.299, < .001), and behavior (SMD: 1.045, 95% CI: 0.849-1.242, < .001). But no difference was observed in terms of self-efficacy (SMD: 0.557, 95%CI: -0.402-1.517, > .05). The results of a systematic review of twenty-six studies and a meta-analysis of 9 studies showed that diabetic foot education improved the level of knowledge and behavior of patients with diabetes, while not affecting their self-efficacy. Educational interventions with long-term follow-up are needed to address the growing health care needs of patients with diabetes.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Foot; Humans; Self Efficacy
PubMed: 35711163
DOI: 10.1177/15347346221109047 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Apr 2021To review the evidence and determine the effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
To review the evidence and determine the effectiveness of smartphone-based self-management interventions on self-efficacy, self-care activities, health-related quality of life, glycated hemoglobin, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure (BP) levels of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus .
METHODS
A systematic search of five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL and Scopus) was conducted. Studies published in English from January 2007 to January 2018 were considered. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of smartphone-based self-management interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that reported any of the study outcomes were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies. Meta-analyses were conducted for the different study outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 26 articles, consisting of 22 studies with 2645 participants, were included in the review. The results from meta-analysis on the studies revealed that as compared to control group, participants received smartphone-based self-management intervention had better self-efficacy with large effect size of 0.98 (P < 0.001), self-care activities with effect size of 0.90 (P < 0.001), health related quality of life with effect size of 0.26 (p=0.01), and lower glycated hemoglobin (pooled MD=-0.55; p<0.001). Subgroup analyses were also conducted for self-efficacy as significant heterogeneity was present among the studies. The effects on BMI and BP were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Smartphone-based self-management interventions appear to have beneficial effects on self-efficacy, self-care activities and health-relevant outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, more research with good study design is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone-based self-care interventions for T2DM.
Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Quality of Life; Self Care; Self Efficacy; Self-Management; Smartphone
PubMed: 30827741
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.003 -
Rheumatology International Feb 2017The complexity and burden of systemic sclerosis (SSc) pose challenges to developing and sustaining disease management self-efficacy. The objective of this systematic... (Review)
Review
The complexity and burden of systemic sclerosis (SSc) pose challenges to developing and sustaining disease management self-efficacy. The objective of this systematic review was to compare scores on a commonly used self-efficacy measure, the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease (SEMCD) Scale, between SSc and other diseases. Data sources included the CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases, searched through January 25, 2016, and reference lists of included articles and relevant reviews. Studies in any language that reported total SEMCD scores or individual item scores in adult non-psychiatric medical patients were eligible. We identified one eligible non-intervention study of SSc patients (n = 553), 13 other non-intervention studies, and 21 studies with pre-intervention data for patients enrolled in a self-management program or a trial of a program. Of 13 non-intervention studies with published total score means in cancer, cardiovascular disease, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injuries, organ transplant candidates and recipients, dialysis, and lupus, SEMCD scores were statistically significantly lower (poorer self-efficacy) in SSc than 6 other disease samples, not significantly different from 6, and significantly higher than lupus patients. Compared to 18 studies of patients in self-management programs or trials with published total score means, SSc patients were similar or lower than 9 samples and significantly higher than 9 samples. Compared to patients with other diseases not enrolled in programs to improve self-efficacy, SSc patients report lower self-efficacy scores than most patient groups. Rigorously tested self-care interventions designed to meet the unique needs of patients with SSc are needed.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Disease Management; Humans; Scleroderma, Systemic; Self Care; Self Efficacy
PubMed: 27866246
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-016-3602-4 -
Health Psychology Open 2020This systematic review answered two questions among adults with chronic conditions: When included in the same statistical model, are Common Sense Model constructs and... (Review)
Review
This systematic review answered two questions among adults with chronic conditions: When included in the same statistical model, are Common Sense Model constructs and self-efficacy both associated with (1) self-management behaviors and (2) health outcomes? We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and included 29 articles. When included in the same statistical model, Common Sense Model constructs and self-efficacy were both correlated with outcomes. Self-efficacy was more consistently associated with self-management behaviors, and Common Sense Model constructs were more consistently associated with health outcomes. Findings support the continued inclusion and integration of both frameworks to understand and/or improve chronic illness self-management and outcomes.
PubMed: 32030192
DOI: 10.1177/2055102919898846 -
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Dec 2023Interventional approaches based on Bandura's cognition theory are effective in improving self-efficacy poststroke. However, a systematical investigation for identifying... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Interventions for improving self-efficacy in patients after stroke based on self-efficacy-related principles of Bandura's cognition theory: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Interventional approaches based on Bandura's cognition theory are effective in improving self-efficacy poststroke. However, a systematical investigation for identifying effectives therapeutic components of the intervention has not yet been conducted.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically investigated the effects of interventions with different principles on improving self-efficacy after stroke.
METHODS
Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and two randomized controlled trials registration websites for randomized controlled trials from inception to 18th January 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager and Stata software.
RESULTS
In total, 36 RCTs were included. Interventions using any one of the self-efficacy principles - principle 1 (Mastery), principle 2 (Modeling), principle 3 (Social persuasion), and principle 4 (Understanding), were more effective in improving self-efficacy in patients with stroke at post-training and follow-up, compared with the control group. Psycho-educational interventions might significantly improve self-efficacy in both post-intervention and follow-up stages, compared with control group. Meta-regression revealed time since stroke onset was significantly associated with effect sizes.
CONCLUSION
Interventions developed based on Bandura's cognition theory are beneficial to the improvement of self-efficacy. This review highlights principles of Bandura's cognition theory are worth considering to be integrated to interventions targeted at improving self-efficacy. The application of self-efficacy principles with Bandura's cognitive theory could be encouraged in clinical practice in the future.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42020154984.
Topics: Humans; Stroke; Self Efficacy; Cognition; Patients
PubMed: 36755444
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2172832 -
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Sep 2022This study aimed to (a) review what theories have been applied to the development of digital self-management interventions for people with neurological disorders; (b)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effectiveness of theory-based digital self-management interventions for improving depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy in people with neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to (a) review what theories have been applied to the development of digital self-management interventions for people with neurological disorders; (b) examine their effectiveness to improve depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy; and (c) identify the optimal mode of intervention delivery.
METHODS
Electronic databases (SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched. Two investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality and use of theory were also assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 944 studies were screened, and 16 randomised controlled trials were included. Theory-based digital self-management interventions were effective in reducing depression (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.04 to -0.49), anxiety (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.21) and fatigue (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.27) and in enhancing self-efficacy (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI 0.11-2.18). Cognitive-behavioural theory (CBT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.39), anxiety (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.44) and fatigue (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.54) and in improving self-efficacy (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.05), whereas social cognitive theory (SCT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.28). Partially digital interventions were more effective than fully digital interventions.
DISCUSSION
Our findings support the use of theory to guide the development of digital self-management interventions to increase intervention effectiveness. In particular, CBT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy, whereas SCT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression.
Topics: Anxiety; Depression; Fatigue; Humans; Nervous System Diseases; Self Efficacy; Self-Management
PubMed: 32954920
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20955122 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Dec 2017To describe the association between self-efficacy and secondary health conditions (SHCs) in people living with spinal cord injury (SCI). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To describe the association between self-efficacy and secondary health conditions (SHCs) in people living with spinal cord injury (SCI).
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were systematically searched from database inception to September 2016.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies describing patients living with SCI in which self-efficacy was measured by a standardized questionnaire and an association was made with somatic or psychological SHCs.
DATA EXTRACTION
An independent extraction by multiple observers was performed based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statements checklist. A meta-analysis concerning the association between self-efficacy and SHCs in people with SCI was performed if a minimum of 4 comparable studies were available.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Of 670 unique articles screened, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Seven of these 22 studies investigated associations between self-efficacy and somatic SHCs. Only a trend toward an association between higher self-efficacy and less pain, fatigue, number of SHCs, and limitations caused by SHCs was found. Twenty-one studies described the association between self-efficacy and psychological SHCs. All correlations of higher self-efficacy with fewer depressive (18 studies) and anxiety symptoms (7 studies) were significant, and meta-analysis showed a strong negative correlation of -.536 (-.584 to -.484) and -.493 (-.577 to -.399), respectively. A small number of studies (2) showed a trend toward a positive correlation between self-efficacy and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS
Self-efficacy is negatively associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms in SCI. Therefore, self-efficacy seems an important target in the rehabilitation of patients living with SCI. More research is necessary to clarify the associations between self-efficacy and somatic SHCs. Future research should also focus on different types of self-efficacy and their association with SHCs.
Topics: Fatigue; Health Status; Humans; Mental Health; Pain; Quality of Life; Self Efficacy; Spinal Cord Injuries
PubMed: 28455193
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.024 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2020Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is prevalent and strongly associated with mental health problems. Women experiencing IPV attend health services frequently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is prevalent and strongly associated with mental health problems. Women experiencing IPV attend health services frequently for mental health problems. The World Health Organization recommends that women who have experienced IPV and have a mental health diagnosis should receive evidence-based mental health treatments. However, it is not known if psychological therapies work for women in the context of IPV and whether they cause harm.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of psychological therapies for women who experience IPV on the primary outcomes of depression, self-efficacy and an indicator of harm (dropouts) at six- to 12-months' follow-up, and on secondary outcomes of other mental health symptoms, anxiety, quality of life, re-exposure to IPV, safety planning and behaviours, use of healthcare and IPV services, and social support.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register (CCMDCTR), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and three other databases, to the end of October 2019. We also searched international trials registries to identify unpublished or ongoing trials and handsearched selected journals, reference lists of included trials and grey literature.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, cluster-RCTs and cross-over trials of psychological therapies with women aged 16 years and older who self-reported recent or lifetime experience of IPV. We included trials if women also experienced co-existing mental health diagnoses or substance abuse issues, or both. Psychological therapies included a wide range of interventions that targeted cognition, motivation and behaviour compared with usual care, no treatment, delayed or minimal interventions. We classified psychological therapies according to Cochrane Common Mental Disorders's psychological therapies list.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors extracted data and undertook 'Risk of Bias' assessment. Treatment effects were compared between experimental and comparator interventions at short-term (up to six months post-baseline), medium-term (six to under 12 months, primary outcome time point), and long-term follow-up (12 months and above). We used standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, and used random-effects meta-analysis, due to high heterogeneity across trials.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 33 psychological trials involving 5517 women randomly assigned to experimental (2798 women, 51%) and comparator interventions (2719 women, 49%). Psychological therapies included 11 integrative therapies, nine humanistic therapies, six cognitive behavioural therapy, four third-wave cognitive behavioural therapies and three other psychologically-orientated interventions. There were no trials classified as psychodynamic therapies. Most trials were from high-income countries (19 in USA, three in Iran, two each in Australia and Greece, and one trial each in China, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Spain and UK), among women recruited from healthcare, community, shelter or refuge settings, or a combination of any or all of these. Psychological therapies were mostly delivered face-to-face (28 trials), but varied by length of treatment (two to 50 sessions) and staff delivering therapies (social workers, nurses, psychologists, community health workers, family doctors, researchers). The average sample size was 82 women (14 to 479), aged 37 years on average, and 66% were unemployed. Half of the women were married or living with a partner and just over half of the participants had experienced IPV in the last 12 months (17 trials), 6% in the past two years (two trials) and 42% during their lifetime (14 trials). Whilst 20 trials (61%) described reliable low-risk random-sampling strategies, only 12 trials (36%) described reliable procedures to conceal the allocation of participant status. While 19 trials measured women's depression, only four trials measured depression as a continuous outcome at medium-term follow-up. These showed a probable beneficial effect of psychological therapies in reducing depression (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.01; four trials, 600 women; moderate-certainty evidence). However, for self-efficacy, there may be no evidence of a difference between groups (SMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; one trial with medium-term follow-up data, 346 women; low-certainty evidence). Further, there may be no difference between the number of women who dropped out from the experimental or comparator intervention groups, an indicator of no harm (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.44; five trials with medium-term follow-up data, 840 women; low-certainty evidence). Although no trials reported adverse events from psychological therapies or participation in the trial, only one trial measured harm outcomes using a validated scale. For secondary outcomes, trials measured anxiety only at short-term follow-up, showing that psychological therapies may reduce anxiety symptoms (SMD -0.96, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.63; four trials, 158 women; low-certainty evidence). However, within medium-term follow-up, low-certainty evidence revealed that there may be no evidence between groups for the outcomes safety planning (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.25; one trial, 337 women), post-traumatic stress disorder (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.06; four trials, 484 women) or re-exposure to any form of IPV (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.2; two trials, 547 women).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence that for women who experience IPV, psychological therapies probably reduce depression and may reduce anxiety. However, we are uncertain whether psychological therapies improve other outcomes (self-efficacy, post-traumatic stress disorder, re-exposure to IPV, safety planning) and there are limited data on harm. Thus, while psychological therapies probably improve emotional health, it is unclear if women's ongoing needs for safety, support and holistic healing from complex trauma are addressed by this approach. There is a need for more interventions focused on trauma approaches and more rigorous trials (with consistent outcomes at similar follow-up time points), as we were unable to synthesise much of the research.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anxiety; Depression; Female; Humans; Intimate Partner Violence; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Psychotherapy; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety; Self Efficacy; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Young Adult
PubMed: 32608505
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2 -
Psychosomatic Medicine May 2016Psychological distress has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), which is assumed to be partly due to poor HF self-care... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Psychological distress has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), which is assumed to be partly due to poor HF self-care behavior. This systematic review and meta-analysis describes the current evidence concerning psychological determinants of self-care in patients with chronic HF.
METHODS
Eligible studies were systematically identified by searching electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Web of Science) for relevant literature (1980-October 17, 2014). Study quality was assessed according to the level of risk of bias. Quantitative data were pooled using random-effects models.
RESULTS
Sixty-five studies were identified for inclusion that varied considerably with respect to sample and study characteristics. Risk of bias was high in the reviewed studies and most problematic with regard to selection bias (67%). Depression (r = -0.19, p < .001), self-efficacy (r = 0.37, p < .001), and mental well-being (r = 0.14, p = .030) were significantly associated with self-reported self-care. Anxiety was not significantly associated with either self-reported (r = -0.18, p = .24) or objective self-care (r = -0.04, p = .79), neither was depression associated with objectively measured medication adherence (r = -0.05, p = .44).
CONCLUSIONS
Psychological factors (depression, self-efficacy, and mental well-being) were associated with specific self-care facets in patients with chronic HF. These associations were predominantly observed with self-reported indices of self-care and not objective indices. Methodological heterogeneity and limitations preclude definite conclusions about the association between psychological factors and self-care and should be addressed in future research.
Topics: Depression; Heart Failure; Humans; Personal Satisfaction; Self Care; Self Efficacy
PubMed: 27082055
DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000270 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Jan 2021Diabetes is a debilitating health condition that is rapidly increasing in prevalence globally. Diabetes self-management is known as an important aspect of diabetes care,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effectiveness of lay-led, group-based self-management interventions to improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), self-efficacy, and emergency visit rates among adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Diabetes is a debilitating health condition that is rapidly increasing in prevalence globally. Diabetes self-management is known as an important aspect of diabetes care, and group-based self-management interventions led by lay leaders have been explored previously. However, the effects of such an interventional approach to improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, self-efficacy, and emergency visit rates among adults with type 2 diabetes remains inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES
To review and perform a meta-analysis systematically of the effectiveness of lay-led, group-based self-management interventions to improve HbA1c levels, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visit rates in adults with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted through the following seven databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. Screening and assessment for risk of bias were conducted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed for HbA1c levels, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visits, using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS
Sixteen randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Meta-analyses results indicated significant effects on HbA1c (pooled MD = 0.23, 95% CI [-0.41, -0.05], p = 0.01) self-efficacy (d = 0.27; 95% CI [0.19, 0.36]; p <0.00001), and frequency of emergency visits (pooled MD = 0.15; 95% CI [-0.26, -0.05]; p = 0.004], favoring the intervention groups. However, possible publication bias was detected. Significant heterogeneity was observed for HbA1c but not for self-efficacy or frequency of emergency visits.
CONCLUSIONS
Possible effects of lay-led, group-based self-management interventions on improving HbA1c, self-efficacy, and frequency of emergency visits among adults with type 2 diabetes were demonstrated in this review. Although possible publication bias and heterogeneity were detected for HbA1c, the results point toward a potentially feasible and effective treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes, allowing them to manage and sustain self-care behaviors.
Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Emergency Service, Hospital; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Self Efficacy; Self-Management
PubMed: 33080479
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103779