-
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2022is a multidrug-resistant bacterium that is difficult to treat in hospitals worldwide, leading to high mortality. Published data describing the use of monotherapy or...
is a multidrug-resistant bacterium that is difficult to treat in hospitals worldwide, leading to high mortality. Published data describing the use of monotherapy or combination therapy and which one is better is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of infections. We performed a systematic review of combination therapy and additionally a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of monotherapy versus combination therapy on mortality in infections. Electronic databases: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and OpenGrey were accessed. Of the 5030 articles identified, 17 studies were included for a systematic review of combination therapy, of which 4 cohort studies were finally included for meta-analysis. We found there is a trend of favorable outcomes with respect to mortality in the use of combination therapy to treat complex or severe infections. A meta-analysis of monotherapy showed a statistical significance in the decreasing rate of mortality in hospital-acquired pneumonia (hazard ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.94) compared to combination therapy, but not significant in bacteremia (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-3.18). Further studies should continue to explore this association.
PubMed: 36551445
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121788 -
BMC Microbiology Jul 2023While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line therapy of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections, colistin is one of the therapeutic options in cases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
While trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the first-line therapy of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections, colistin is one of the therapeutic options in cases of allergy or resistance to TMP-SMX. However, understanding the global status of resistance to colistin amongst S. maltophilia isolates could be helpful for appropriate antibiotic prescription. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical S. maltophilia isolates worldwide. According to eligibility criteria, a total of 61 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence for colistin resistance was 42% (95% CI: 35-49%), ranging from 0.1 to 97%. Subgroups analysis indicated that, the pooled prevalence of colistin resistance was 44% (95% CI: 29-60%) in 15 studies during 2000-2010, and it was estimated to be 41% (95% CI: 33-50%) in 46 articles from 2011 to 2021. It was 46% (95% CI: 35-58%) in the studies that used broth microdilution method, and 39% (95% CI: 30-49%) in the studies with other used methods. The resistance rate in Asian countries was 45% (95% CI: 31-60%), in European countries was 45% (95% CI: 34-56%) and in the countries of North and South America was 33% (95% CI: 20-46%). Our review showed notable resistance to colistin in clinical S. maltophilia isolates. Given the estimated resistance rates, alternative antibiotics could be preferred to treat serious infections due to S. maltophilia.
Topics: Humans; Colistin; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Prevalence; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 37507660
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-023-02950-6 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Jul 2019The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for decolonizing regimens targeting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) carriers in all...
SCOPE
The aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for decolonizing regimens targeting multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) carriers in all settings.
METHODS
These evidence-based guidelines were produced after a systematic review of published studies on decolonization interventions targeting the following MDR-GNB: third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCephRE), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (AGRE), fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (FQRE), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDRPA), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (CRSM), colistin-resistant Gram-negative organisms (CoRGNB), and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms (PDRGNB). The recommendations are grouped by MDR-GNB species. Faecal microbiota transplantation has been discussed separately. Four types of outcomes were evaluated for each target MDR-GNB:(a) microbiological outcomes (carriage and eradication rates) at treatment end and at specific post-treatment time-points; (b) clinical outcomes (attributable and all-cause mortality and infection incidence) at the same time-points and length of hospital stay; (c) epidemiological outcomes (acquisition incidence, transmission and outbreaks); and (d) adverse events of decolonization (including resistance development). The level of evidence for and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the GRADE approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached through a nominal-group technique for the final list of recommendations.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The panel does not recommend routine decolonization of 3GCephRE and CRE carriers. Evidence is currently insufficient to provide recommendations for or against any intervention in patients colonized with AGRE, CoRGNB, CRAB, CRSM, FQRE, PDRGNB and XDRPA. On the basis of the limited evidence of increased risk of CRE infections in immunocompromised carriers, the panel suggests designing high-quality prospective clinical studies to assess the risk of CRE infections in immunocompromised patients. These trials should include monitoring of development of resistance to decolonizing agents during treatment using stool cultures and antimicrobial susceptibility results according to the EUCAST clinical breakpoints.
Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Europe; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 30708122
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.01.005 -
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and... Mar 2024Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to treat S. maltophilia infection is a major challenge.
AIM
The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the global prevalence of antibiotic resistance among S. maltophilia isolates to the develop more effective therapeutic strategies.
METHOD
A systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases (May 2023). Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and the random effects model in R and the metafor package. A total of 11,438 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 289 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULT
Present analysis indicated that the highest incidences of resistance were associated with doripenem (97%), cefoxitin (96%), imipenem and cefuroxime (95%), ampicillin (94%), ceftriaxone (92%), aztreonam (91%) and meropenem (90%) which resistance to Carbapenems is intrinsic. The lowest resistance rates were documented for minocycline (3%), cefiderocol (4%). The global resistance rate to TMP-SMX remained constant in two periods before and after 2010 (14.4% vs. 14.6%). A significant increase in resistance to tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam was observed before and after 2010.
CONCLUSIONS
Minocycline and cefiderocol can be considered the preferred treatment options due to low resistance rates, although regional differences in resistance rates to other antibiotics should be considered. The low global prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMX as a first-line treatment for S. maltophilia suggests that it remains an effective treatment option.
Topics: Humans; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Minocycline; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefiderocol; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 38504262
DOI: 10.1186/s12941-024-00685-4 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... May 2019Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and EMBASE.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Clinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections.
PARTICIPANTS
Patients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia.
INTERVENTIONS
Fluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy.
METHODS
Systematic review with meta-analysis technique.
RESULTS
Seven retrospective cohort and seven case-control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Young Adult
PubMed: 30448331
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.008 -
Angiology 2002The disease characteristics, management, and outcome of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia endocarditis were evaluated by examining the reports on the subject identified... (Review)
Review
The disease characteristics, management, and outcome of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia endocarditis were evaluated by examining the reports on the subject identified through a comprehensive literature search. Twenty-three (17 male) cases of S.. maltophilia endocarditis were identified. Mean age was 41 +/- 15 years. All patients presented with fever. Prosthetic valves were involved in 12 (52%) cases. Among native valves, the aortic valve was most frequently involved (50%), followed by the tricuspid valve (36%). Twenty (87%) patients had underlying risk factors for the development of endocarditis, including prior valvular or congenital heart disease surgery (60%), intravenous drug abuse (32%), and infected intravascular lines (18%). The endocarditis was postoperative in 14 patients. Seventeen (74%) patients experienced complications including septic embolism (23%), cardiac abscesses (23%), and congestive heart failure (18%). A combination of two or more antibiotics was used in all cases except one. The frequently used antibiotics were aminoglycosides (59%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (48%), and penicillins (48%). One half of the patients required cardiac surgery, but the proportion of surgically treated cases was higher among prosthetic valve endocarditis (62%). Mortality was 39% and was equally distributed between patients with prosthetic and native valve endocarditis. The S. maltophilia endocarditis carries high complication and mortality rates. The antibiotic regimen should consist of a combination of multiple antibiotics guided by the sensitivity panel. Early surgery may be considered in patients not responding to antibiotic treatment and in those with prosthetic valve endocarditis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 11863309
DOI: 10.1177/000331970205300107 -
European Journal of Clinical... Jul 2009Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a pathogen that causes infections mainly in immunocompromised patients. However, community-acquired S. maltophilia infections have been... (Review)
Review
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a pathogen that causes infections mainly in immunocompromised patients. However, community-acquired S. maltophilia infections have been occasionally reported. The objective of this paper was to collect and evaluate the available published data referring to community-acquired S. maltophilia infections. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus for articles providing data for patients with community-acquired S. maltophilia infections. Eight case series and 23 case reports (involving 77 and 26 patients with community-acquired S. maltophilia infections, respectively) were regarded as eligible for inclusion in our review. Regarding the 77 patients with community-acquired S. maltophilia infections included in the identified case series, 45 had bacteremia, six ocular infections, five respiratory tract infections, four wound/soft tissue infections, two urinary tract infections, one conjunctivitis, one otitis, and one cellulitis; data were not reported for the remaining 12 patients. Comorbidity (such as malignancy, HIV infection, prior hospitalization) was common. Data included in the eight case series regarding the outcome of infection were limited. From the 26 patients with community-acquired S. maltophilia infections reported in the case reports, 22 were cured from the infection, whereas 4 of 26 patients died; one death was attributed to septic shock due to S. maltophilia. Several publications report patients with community-acquired S. maltophilia infections; the majority of them refer to patients with some kind of comorbidity. Physicians should be aware that S. maltophilia infections are not restricted to hospitalized patients.
Topics: Community-Acquired Infections; Comorbidity; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 19224257
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-009-0709-5 -
Journal of Chemotherapy (Florence,... Oct 2019can cause serious infections in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this systematic review was to establish what invasive infections in humans are caused by and to...
can cause serious infections in immunocompromised patients. The aim of this systematic review was to establish what invasive infections in humans are caused by and to evaluate the optimal choice of antibiotics for their treatment. MEDLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS, SCINDEKS and GOOGLE SCHOLAR were systematically searched for clinical trials, observational studies, case reports or case series describing invasive infections with in patients of any age. may cause invasive infections of various tissues in hospitalized patients. In the great majority of cases it was susceptible to co-trimoxazole, levofloxacin and ceftazidime. In about three fourths of the cases, the treatment was successful, while less than 20% of the patients died. is increasingly associated with serious invasive infections in hospitalized patients and due to growing trend of resistance to almost all antibiotics requires a careful approach to patients who is harboring this bacterium.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
PubMed: 31130079
DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2019.1620405 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jan 2024There is a need for information regarding the clinical picture of hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by in patients with hematologic malignancies. In this study, we aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
There is a need for information regarding the clinical picture of hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by in patients with hematologic malignancies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by : A review of the clinical picture of hemorrhagic pneumonia based on reported cases in the literature was performed. In addition, patients with hematologic malignancies who had a infection were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate risk factors for hemorrhagic pneumonia. : A total of 91 patients had hemorrhagic pneumonia. Acute myeloid leukemia was present in 57 patients (62.6%). Those with bacteremia accounted for 94%, while those with neutropenia accounted for 95% and those with thrombocytopenia accounted for 86.7%. Hemorrhagic pneumonia was a risk factor for mortality of infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were identified as risk factors for hemorrhagic pneumonia. : bacteremia with hemorrhagic pneumonia in patients with hematologic malignancies is a situation with rapid development and high mortality. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were risk factors for hemorrhagic pneumonia in patients with hematologic malignancies and with bacteremia; thus, these patients should be managed with caution.
Topics: Humans; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Neutropenia; Hematologic Neoplasms; Pneumonia; Thrombocytopenia; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 38256422
DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010162 -
Future Microbiology Nov 2009Although Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is commonly isolated from clinical specimens, mainly of immunocompromised patients, mortality directly attributable to this... (Review)
Review
AIM
Although Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is commonly isolated from clinical specimens, mainly of immunocompromised patients, mortality directly attributable to this organism is controversial. We searched PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane and assessed the available literature regarding mortality attributable to infection with S. maltophilia.
METHOD
Crude mortality and mortality of case patients receiving appropriate or inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment were evaluated. A total of 15 articles (six matched case-control, seven case-control and two controlled cohort studies) were identified; 13 studies (the six matched case-control and the seven case-control studies) were included in the analysis.
RESULTS
In seven studies, mortality of cases differed significantly from that of controls. Mortality was significantly higher in cases than controls in six of these studies; it was lower in cases than controls in the one study where controls had Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. In six studies, mortality of cases did not differ significantly compared with the respective controls. In three of four studies providing relevant data, mortality of cases treated with inappropriate initial antibiotic treatment was significantly higher compared with cases treated with appropriate initial antibiotic treatment.
CONCLUSION
A considerable mortality rate (up to 37.5%) can be attributed to S. maltophilia infection. Thus, clinicians should not underestimate the clinical significance of S. maltophilia infections.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Virulence
PubMed: 19895214
DOI: 10.2217/fmb.09.84