-
Journal of Neuro-oncology Oct 2023To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum... (Review)
Review
Single-fraction radiosurgery outcomes for large vestibular schwannomas in the upfront or post-surgical setting: a systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and/or classified as Koos Grade IV, and to present consensus recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).
METHODS
The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. We considered eligible prospective and retrospective studies, written in the English language, reporting treatment outcomes for large VS; SRS for large post-operative tumors were analyzed in aggregate and separately.
RESULTS
19 of the 229 studies initially identified met the final inclusion criteria. Overall crude rate of tumor control was 89% (93.7% with no prior surgery vs 87.7% with prior surgery). Rates of salvage microsurgical resection, need for shunt, and additional SRS in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 9.6% vs 3.3%, 4.7% vs 6.4% and 1% vs 0.9%, respectively. Rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 1.3% vs 3.4% and 34.2% vs 40.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Upfront SRS resulted in high rates of tumor control with acceptable rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation as compared to the results in those series including patients with prior surgery (level C evidence). Therefore, although large VS are considered classic indication for microsurgical resection, upfront SRS can be considered in selected patients and we recommend a prescribed marginal dose from 11 to 13 Gy (level C evidence).
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Neuroma, Acoustic; Prospective Studies; Facial Paralysis; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 37843727
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04455-8 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jan 2024Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with treatment aims shifting from short-term palliation to long-term symptom or disease control. There is consequently a need to better define the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of spinal metastases.
METHODS
This ESTRO clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic literature review conducted according to PRISMA standards, which formed the basis for answering four key questions about the indication and practice of SBRT for spine metastases.
RESULTS
The analysis of the key questions based on current evidence yielded 22 recommendations and 5 statements with varying levels of endorsement, all achieving a consensus among experts of at least 75%. In the majority, the level of evidence supporting the recommendations and statements was moderate or expert opinion, only, indicating that spine SBRT is still an evolving field of clinical research. Recommendations were established concerning the selection of appropriate patients with painful spine metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recommendations about the practice of spinal SBRT covered technical planning aspects including dose and fractionation, patient positioning, immobilization and image-guided SBRT delivery. Finally, recommendations were developed regarding quality assurance protocols, including description of potential SBRT-related toxicity and risk mitigation strategies.
CONCLUSIONS
This ESTRO clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and statements regarding the selection of patients with spinal metastases for SBRT and its safe implementation and practice. Enrollment of patients into well-designed prospective clinical trials addressing clinically relevant questions is considered important.
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Prospective Studies; Spinal Neoplasms; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Spine
PubMed: 37925107
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109966 -
Annals of Internal Medicine Feb 2010Most women undergoing breast biopsy are found not to have cancer. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
Most women undergoing breast biopsy are found not to have cancer.
PURPOSE
To compare the accuracy and harms of different breast biopsy methods in average-risk women suspected of having breast cancer.
DATA SOURCES
Databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, searched from 1990 to September 2009.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies that compared core-needle biopsy diagnoses with open surgical diagnoses or clinical follow-up.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data were abstracted by 1 of 3 researchers and verified by the primary investigator.
DATA SYNTHESIS
33 studies of stereotactic automated gun biopsy; 22 studies of stereotactic-guided, vacuum-assisted biopsy; 16 studies of ultrasonography-guided, automated gun biopsy; 7 studies of ultrasonography-guided, vacuum-assisted biopsy; and 5 studies of freehand automated gun biopsy met the inclusion criteria. Low-strength evidence showed that core-needle biopsies conducted under stereotactic guidance with vacuum assistance distinguished between malignant and benign lesions with an accuracy similar to that of open surgical biopsy. Ultrasonography-guided biopsies were also very accurate. The risk for severe complications is lower with core-needle biopsy than with open surgical procedures (<1% vs. 2% to 10%). Moderate-strength evidence showed that women in whom breast cancer was initially diagnosed by core-needle biopsy were more likely than women with cancer initially diagnosed by open surgical biopsy to be treated with a single surgical procedure (random-effects odds ratio, 13.7 [95% CI, 5.5 to 34.6]).
LIMITATION
The strength of evidence was rated low for accuracy outcomes because the studies did not report important details required to assess the risk for bias.
CONCLUSION
Stereotactic- and ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy procedures seem to be almost as accurate as open surgical biopsy, with lower complication rates.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Topics: Biopsy; Biopsy, Needle; Breast; Breast Neoplasms; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Risk; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stereotaxic Techniques; Ultrasonography, Mammary; Vacuum
PubMed: 20008742
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00190 -
Current Oncology Reports Jun 2022Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3-5 cm).
RECENT FINDINGS
We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22-90% for all techniques; 22-89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67-90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose. Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.
Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Electroporation; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Microwaves; Radiofrequency Ablation
PubMed: 35298796
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01248-6 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Nov 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment fast-growing vestibular schwannomas on the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were used. The ROBINS-I ('Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions') tool was utilised to assess for risk of bias. Proportionate meta-analysis and sub-analysis for fast-growing tumours were performed to explore the success rate of stereotactic radiosurgery in stabilising or decreasing the tumour burden in vestibular schwannomas.
RESULTS
Four moderate risk studies were included in the analysis. Overall, 91 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.83-0.97, < 0.01, = 80 per cent) of the tumours demonstrated successful size reduction or stabilisation following stereotactic radiosurgery. Nevertheless, the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in reducing or stabilising fast-growing vestibular schwannomas decreased by 79 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.64-0.91, = 0.11, = 62 per cent).
CONCLUSION
Stereotactic radiosurgery has a statistically significant success rate in stabilising or decreasing the vestibular schwannoma size. This success rate is diminished in fast-growing vestibular schwannomas.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Microsurgery
PubMed: 37194631
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215123000786 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jul 2020We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes for patients with acromegaly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes for patients with acromegaly treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).
METHODS
Primary outcomes were 5- and 10-year endocrine remission (ER) and endocrine control (EC). Secondary outcomes were 10-year radiographic local control (LC), visual toxicity, and hypopituitarism rates. Weighted random effects meta-analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird methods were conducted to characterize and compare effect sizes. Mixed effects regression models were used to examine correlations between potential prognostic factors and primary and secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
In total, 1533 patients across 20 published studies with acromegaly treated with SRS were included. At 5-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 43.2% (95% CI 31.7-54.6%) and 55.0% (95% CI 27.6-82.4%), respectively. At 10-years, estimated ER and EC rates were 56.9% (95% CI 47.5-66.4%) and 69.7% (95% CI 47.7-91.8%), respectively. The estimated 10-year LC rate was 92.8% (95% CI 83.0-100%). Visual toxicity and hypopituitarism following SRS were estimated to be 2.7% (95% CI 1.3-4.2%) and 26.8% (95% CI 16.9-36.7%), respectively. Every 1 Gy increase in margin prescription dose beyond 17 Gy was estimated to result in a 0.41% increased risk of visual toxicity (p = 0.03). No prognostic factors were associated with EC, ER, LC, or hypopituitarism.
CONCLUSIONS
SRS was well-tolerated in the management of pituitary acromegaly resulting in gradually improving ER and EC rates over time that approached 60% and 70%. SRS-related visual loss is an uncommon treatment-related side effect, and patient-specific clinical decision making remains critical.
Topics: Acromegaly; Humans; International Agencies; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32506372
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03552-2 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Apr 2019Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It is unclear if survival outcomes for SBRT are influenced by a lack... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It is unclear if survival outcomes for SBRT are influenced by a lack of pathological confirmation of malignancy and staging of disease in these patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess survival outcomes after SBRT in studies with patients with clinically diagnosed versus biopsy-proven early-stage NSCLC.
METHODS
The main databases were searched for trials and cohort studies without restrictions to publication status or language. Two independent researchers performed the screening and selection of eligible studies. Outcomes were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random effects method for meta-analysis were used to assess pooled survival estimates.
RESULTS
A total of 11,195 nonduplicate records were identified by the original search strategy. After screening by title and abstract, 1051 potentially eligible records were identified. A total of 43 articles were included. The comparative studies showed lower 3-year overall survival and lower 2-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival for biopsy-proven disease compared to clinical disease. However, 5-year overall survival was the same for both groups. For the pooled estimates, 3-year disease-free survival and 2-year cancer-specific survival were lower for biopsied disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show a discrepancy in oncological outcomes for patients undergoing SBRT for suspected early-stage NSCLC in whom there is pathologic conformation of malignancy and those who there is only a clinical diagnose of NSCLC. These results emphasize the importance of obtaining pathologic proof of malignancy.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 30721798
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.12.035 -
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) Feb 2015Stereotactic radiotherapy is a non-invasive, ablative technique which may be particularly effective in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The study... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiotherapy is a non-invasive, ablative technique which may be particularly effective in treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The study objective was to analyse outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in metastatic RCC.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of Medline was performed in March 2013. Exclusion criteria included mixed histology studies and case series. Local control, overall survival and toxicities were analysed.
RESULTS
From 148 publications identified, 16 and 10 publications for cranial and extracranial metastatic RCC met inclusion criteria, respectively. There were 810 intracranial patients and 2433 targets. The weighted local control was 92%. Overall survival ranged from 6.7 to 25.6 months. Significant Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 6%. The weighted rate of treatment-related mortality was 0.6%, all secondary to intratumoral haemorrhage. There were 389 extracranial patients and 730 targets. The weighted local control was 89%. Median overall survival ranged from 11.7 to 22 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity ranged from 0% to 4%. Treatment-related mortality was 0.5%.
CONCLUSION
Stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with excellent local control and low rates of toxicity for intracranial and extracranial metastatic RCC. Future randomised studies are required to confirm the additional benefit of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) above standard conservative or palliative approaches.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Pain; Radiation Injuries; Radiosurgery; Spinal Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25140860
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.939298 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2020In pituitary tumors, the presence of residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery and recurrence of the tumor after resection are frequent, and the best treatment is not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In pituitary tumors, the presence of residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery and recurrence of the tumor after resection are frequent, and the best treatment is not well established. The effects and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery have not been extensively studied.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to reveal the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery on residual and recurrent adenomas.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Database, and Google Scholar was conducted using the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was structured according to the PICOT (i.e., Participants, types of Interventions, Comparator between the treatments, types of Outcome measures, and Follow-up [Time of duration]) strategy. The methodologic quality assessment (risk of bias) was performed according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale. The studies were grouped and analyzed after data extraction using the software "R".
RESULTS
Twenty-six articles including 2315 patients were analyzed, with an average follow-up duration of 57.8 months and mean radiation marginal dose of 19.6 Gy. The overall tumor control rate was 95%, tumor reduction rate was 46%, and hormonal control rate was 67%. The side effects were evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS
Stereotactic radiosurgery was efficient in residual or recurrence tumor control, with few side effects, and is recommended for treating residual or recurrent tumors, both secreting and nonsecreting tumors. A limitation of this study is that there were no randomized trials included in the synthesis.
Topics: Adenoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm, Residual; Pituitary Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31899390
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.041 -
Klinische Padiatrie May 2017To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy (SB) in children and adolescents with cerebral lesions. We performed a systematic... (Review)
Review
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy (SB) in children and adolescents with cerebral lesions. We performed a systematic review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of all pediatric and adolescent patients who underwent SB for unclear brain lesions at our center. We collected patient and lesion-associated parameters, analysed the rate of procedural complications and diagnostic yield. Our institutional series consisted of 285 SBs in 269 children and young adults between 1989 and 2016 (median age, 9 (range 1-18) years). There was no procedure-related mortality. Permanent and transient morbidity was 0.7% and 5.8%, respectively. Lesions were located in brain lobes (26.3%) and in midline structures (73.7%). The diagnostic yield was 97.5% and histology consisted low-grade gliomas (44.2%), high-grade gliomas (15.1%), non-glial tumors (22.8%), and non-neoplastic disease (15.4%). Morbidity was not associated with tumor location, age, histology or intraoperative position of the patient. In order to compare our findings with previous reports, we reviewed 25 studies with 1 109 children and young adults which had underwent SB. The diagnostic yield ranged between 83% and 100%. The reported morbidity and mortality rates range from 0-27% and 0-3.3%, respectively. SB in this particular patient population is a safe and a high-yield diagnostic procedure and indicates therefore its importance in the light of personalized medicine with the development of individual molecular treatment strategies.
Topics: Adolescent; Biopsy, Needle; Brain; Brain Diseases; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Feasibility Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Glioma; Humans; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stereotaxic Techniques; Young Adult
PubMed: 28561225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-101908