-
Stroke Oct 2011The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) compared with external ventricular drainage alone on mortality and functional... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) compared with external ventricular drainage alone on mortality and functional outcome in the management of intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.
METHODS
The authors conducted a systematic review and performed a meta-analysis. They reviewed the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Liliacs databases. In addition, they conducted a manual review of article bibliographies.
RESULTS
Using a prespecified search strategy, 4 randomized and 8 observational studies were included in a meta-analysis. These studies involved a total of 316 patients with intraventricular hemorrhage at baseline, of whom 167 had IVF (52.8%). Pooled odds ratios of the impact of IVF on patient mortality, functional outcomes, and complications were calculated. The overall mortality risk decreased from 46.7% in the external ventricular drainage alone group to 22.7% in the external ventricular drainage+IVF group, corresponding to an overall pooled Peto OR of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.52). This result was highly significant with urokinase, not with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. IVF was also associated with an increase in good functional outcome. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of shunt dependence and complications.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of IVF and external ventricular drainage in the management of severe intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to small intracerebral hemorrhage in young patients was associated with better survival and functional outcome results. Urokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator could not have the same therapeutic effects. Well-designed randomized trials with special considerations to the fibrinolytic agents are needed.
Topics: Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebral Ventricles; Drainage; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Injections, Intraventricular; Thrombolytic Therapy; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21817146
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615724 -
Neuroradiology Jun 2022Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumors of the young (PLNTY) is a newly recognized brain tumor with genetic abnormalities frequently involving either BRAF or...
PURPOSE
Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumors of the young (PLNTY) is a newly recognized brain tumor with genetic abnormalities frequently involving either BRAF or FGFR2/FGFR3. There are few publications available about the neuroradiological features of PLNTY. In this systematic review, we assessed the demographic, clinical, and neuroradiological features of PLNTY.
METHODS
Literature data were extracted from database searches in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases up to June 10, 2021. Studies reporting on pathologically proven PLNTY with neuroradiological findings were included. After reviewing 103 abstracts, 9 articles encompassing 19 cases met the inclusion criteria. We also added five patients from our hospital. The correlations between the presence of "transmantle-like sign" and the following three factors: duration of seizures; tumor size; and pathologically proven cortical dysplasia, were examined.
RESULTS
The median patient age was 15.5 years (range, 5-57 years), and 15/24 (62.5%) were female. All tumors were localized supratentorialy. The main radiological features included cortical or subcortical masses (95.8%) in the temporal lobe (66.7%), calcification (83.3%), well-defined margins (72.7%), solid and cystic components (66.6%), and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) hyperintensity (50.0%). The duration of seizure was significantly longer (positive vs. negative (median [range]), 24 months [6 - 96 months] vs. 5 months [1 - 12 months], p = 0.042), and the presence of the cortical dysplasia was significantly more frequent (3/8 vs 0/16, p = 0.042) in the patients with transmantle-like sign.
CONCLUSION
PLNTY typically represents a calcified, well-defined mass in the supratentorial cortical or subcortical regions. The radiological findings defined here could facilitate the diagnosis of PLNTY.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Malformations of Cortical Development; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial; Seizures; Young Adult
PubMed: 35001164
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02879-5 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Nov 2020These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. QUESTION 1 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed...
The role of radiation therapy in treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update.
TARGET POPULATION
These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. QUESTION 1 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the addition of radiation therapy (RT) more beneficial than management without RT in improving survival?
RECOMMENDATIONS
Level I: Radiation therapy (RT) is recommended for the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant glioblastoma in adults. QUESTION 2 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is the RT regimen of 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions more beneficial than alternative regimens in providing survival benefit while minimizing toxicity?
RECOMMENDATIONS
Level I: Treatment schemes should include dosage of up to 60 Gy given in 2 Gy daily fractions that includes the enhancing area. QUESTION 3 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, is a tailored target volume superior to regional RT for reduction of radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining efficacy?
RECOMMENDATION
Level II: It is recommended that radiation therapy planning include 1-2 cm margin around the radiographically T1 weighted contrast-enhancing tumor volume or the T2 weighted abnormality on MRI. Level III: Recalculation of the radiation volume during RT treatment may be necessary to reduce the radiated volume of normal brain since the volume of surgical defect will change during the long period of RT. QUESTION 4 : In adult patients (aged 65 and under) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT of the subventricular zone to standard tumor volume treatment improve tumor control and overall survival?
RECOMMENDATION
No recommendation can be formulated as there is contradictory evidence in favor of and against intentional radiation of the subventricular zone (SVZ) QUESTION 5 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does the addition of RT to surgical intervention improve disease control and overall survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level I: Radiation therapy is recommended for treatment of elderly and frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to improve overall survival. QUESTION 6 : In elderly (age > 65 years) and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, does modification of RT dose and fractionation scheme from standard regimens decrease toxicity and improve disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level II: Short RT treatment schemes are recommended in frail and elderly patients as compared to conventional 60 Gy given in 2 daily fractions because overall survival is not different while RT risk profile is better for the short RT scheme. Level II: The 40.05 Gy dose given in 15 fractions or 25 Gy dose given in 5 fractions or 34 Gy dose given in 10 fractions should be considered as appropriate doses for Short RT treatments in elderly and/or frail patients. QUESTION 7 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is there advantage to delaying the initiation of RT instead of starting it 2 weeks after surgical intervention in decreasing radiation-induced toxicity and improving disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level III: It is suggested that RT for patients with newly diagnosed GBM starts within 6 weeks of surgical intervention as compared to later times. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the optimal specific post-operative day within the 6 weeks interval to start RT for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that have undergone surgical resection. QUESTION 8 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma is Image-Modulated RT (IMRT) or similar techniques as effective as standard regional RT in providing tumor control and improve survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level III: There is no evidence that IMRT is a better RT delivering modality when compared to conventional RT in improving overall survival in adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Hence, IMRT should not be preferred over the Conventional RT delivery modality. QUESTION 9 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma does the use of radiosensitizers with RT improve the efficacy of RT as determined by disease control and overall survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level III: Iododeoxyuridine is not recommended to be used as radiosensitizer during RT treatment for patients with newly diagnosed GBM QUESTION 10 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the use of Ultrafractionated RT superior to standard fractionation regimens in improving disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
There is insufficient evidence to formulate a recommendation regarding the use of ultrafractionated RT schemes and patient population that could benefit from it. QUESTION 11 : In patients with poor prognosis with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is hypofractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level I: Hypofractionated RT schemes may be used for patients with poor prognosis and limited survival without compromising response. There is insufficient evidence in the literature for us to be able to recommend the optimal hypofractionated RT scheme that will confer longest overall survival and/or confer the same overall survival with less toxicities and shorter treatment time. QUESTION 12 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of brachytherapy to standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level I: Brachytherapy as a boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in the routine management of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 13 : In elderly patients (> 65 year old) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma under what circumstances is accelerated hyperfractionated RT indicated instead of a standard fractionation regimen as measured by extent of toxicity, disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level III: Accelerated Hyperfractionated RT with a total RT dose of 45 Gy or 48 Gy has been shown to shorten the treatment time without detriment in survival when compared to conventional external beam RT and should be considered as an option for treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed GBM. QUESTION 14 : In adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma is the addition of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) boost to conventional standard fractionated RT indicated to improve disease control and survival?
RECOMMENDATION
Level I: Stereotactic Radiosurgery boost to external beam RT has not been shown to be beneficial and is not recommended in patients undergoing routine management of newly diagnosed malignant glioma.
Topics: Adult; Disease Management; Evidence-Based Practice; Glioblastoma; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 33215344
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03612-7