-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Aug 2022Absorbable suture is the preferred method of cesarean skin closure compared with metal staples, because it decreases wound complications. Two recently published trials... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Absorbable suture is the preferred method of cesarean skin closure compared with metal staples, because it decreases wound complications. Two recently published trials in patients with obesity contradict this evidence. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess whether suture remains the recommended method of cesarean skin closure, regardless of obesity status.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE through OVID, PubMed, Cochrane Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until September 24, 2021.
METHOD OF STUDY SELECTION
Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with nonabsorbable metal staples for cesarean skin closure were included. Non-RCTs, RCTs that did not compare staples with suture, and ongoing trials were excluded. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS
Data were individually abstracted and entered into RevMan. Fixed and random effects models were used. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess each study. The primary outcome, a sensitivity analysis of wound complications (excluding studies at high risk of bias), showed a significant decrease in wound complications when the cesarean skin incision was closed with suture compared with staples (10 studies; 71/1,497 vs 194/1,465; risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.87). When all studies were analyzed, there remained a significant decrease in wound complications when the skin was closed with suture (14 studies; 121/1,780 vs 242/1,750; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.97). Of the individual wound complications, wound separation was significantly decreased with suture closure compared with staples (11 studies; 55/1,319 vs 129/1,273; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32-0.58). In patients with obesity, there remained a significant decrease in wound complications with suture closure of the skin incision compared with staples (five studies; 34/507 vs 67/522; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.75).
CONCLUSION
Closure of the cesarean skin incision with suture decreased composite wound complications by 50% as compared with closure with staples; a significant decrease persisted regardless of obesity status.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42021270378.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Obesity; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 35852281
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004872 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Sep 2008Over 85% of women having a vaginal birth suffer some perineal trauma. Spontaneous tears requiring suturing are estimated to occur in at least a third of women in the UK... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Over 85% of women having a vaginal birth suffer some perineal trauma. Spontaneous tears requiring suturing are estimated to occur in at least a third of women in the UK and USA, with anal sphincter tears in 0.5% to 7% of women. Perineal trauma can lead to long-term physical and psychological problems.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of intrapartum surgical and non-surgical interventions on rates of perineal trauma? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of first- and second-degree tears and episiotomies? What are the effects of different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (third- and fourth-degree tears)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2007 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 38 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: active pushing, spontaneous pushing, and sustained breath-holding (Valsalva) method of pushing; continuous support during labour; conventional suturing; different methods and materials for primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries; episiotomies (midline and mediolateral incisions); epidural analgesia; forceps; methods of delivery ("hands-on" method, "hands poised"); water births; non-suturing of muscle and skin (or perineal skin alone); passive descent in the second stage of labour; positions (supine or lithotomy positions, upright position during delivery); restrictive or routine use of episiotomy; sutures (absorbable synthetic sutures, catgut sutures, continuous sutures, interrupted sutures); and vacuum extraction.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Humans; Lacerations; Obstetric Labor Complications; Perineum; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 19445799
DOI: No ID Found -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2017This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) and conventional circumcision (CC) in the treatment of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) and conventional circumcision (CC) in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the DCSD and CC for the treatment of redundant prepuce or phimosis in China and abroad. Nine RCTs (1898 cases) were included. Compared with the CC group, the DCSD group had a shorter operative time (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -21.44; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs] [-25.08, -17.79]; P < 0.00001), shorter wound healing time (SMD = -3.66; 95% CI [-5.46, -1.85]; P < 0.0001), less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -9.64; 95% CI [-11.37, -7.90]; P < 0.00001), better cosmetic penile appearance (odds ratio [OR] =8.77; 95% CI [5.90, 13.02]; P < 0.00001), lower intraoperative pain score, lower 24-h postoperative pain score, lower incidence of infection, less incision edema, and fewer adverse events. There were no differences between the CC and DCSD groups in the incidences of dehiscence, or hematoma. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the DCSD appears to be safer and more effective than CC. However, additional high-quality RCTs with larger study populations are needed.
Topics: Circumcision, Male; Disposable Equipment; Foreskin; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Male; Pain, Postoperative; Penis; Phimosis; Sutures
PubMed: 26975486
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.174855 -
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and... Oct 2015There is no consensus as to the treatment strategy for abdominal wall hernias in fertile women. This study was undertaken to review the current literature on treatment... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
There is no consensus as to the treatment strategy for abdominal wall hernias in fertile women. This study was undertaken to review the current literature on treatment of abdominal wall hernias in fertile women before or during pregnancy.
METHODS
A literature search was undertaken in PubMed and Embase in combination with a cross-reference search of eligible papers.
RESULTS
We included 31 papers of which 23 were case reports. In fertile women undergoing sutured or mesh repair, pain was described in a few patients during the last trimester of a subsequent pregnancy. Emergency surgery of incarcerated hernias in pregnant women, as well as combined hernia repair and cesarean section appears as safe procedures. No major complications were reported following hernia repair before or during pregnancy. The combined procedure of elective cesarean section and abdominal wall hernia repair was reported in 102 patients without major complications.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature on abdominal wall hernia and pregnancy is sparse. Abdominal wall hernia repair with suture or mesh may cause pain in the last trimester of a subsequent pregnancy. Hernia repair in conjunction with cesarean section appear as the optimal treatment of a pregnant patient with a symptomatic abdominal wall hernia.
Topics: Abdominal Wall; Adult; Cesarean Section; Female; Hernia, Ventral; Herniorrhaphy; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Surgical Mesh
PubMed: 25862027
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-015-1373-6 -
International Orthodontics Jun 2022The aim of this study was to perform an updated review of the in vivo methods to evaluate human midpalatal suture maturation and ossification, since this evaluation... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to perform an updated review of the in vivo methods to evaluate human midpalatal suture maturation and ossification, since this evaluation process remains an unsolved and critical problem in orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched up to November 30, 2021. Literature selection was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA, 2020 Edition) statement and was based on predetermined inclusion criteria. The overall and methodological characteristics of the selected studies were collected. The risk of bias was evaluated mainly through inter- and intra-evaluator agreement outcomes reported in each study. As there was a high heterogeneity among methodological studies, meta-analysis of the included studies was not applicable, and results were analysed descriptively.
RESULTS
Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Maxillary occlusal radiograph and computed tomography (CT), especially cone beam CT (CBCT), were reported. The occlusal radiograph is not adequate for evaluating the status of midpalatal suture maturation, and has been replaced by CBCT. Qualitative and quantitative CBCT evaluation methods provide limited evidence; however, opinions differ regarding the efficacy of these methods.
CONCLUSIONS
For midpalatal suture maturation and ossification status evaluation, evidence for the current methods is still limited. Further methodological studies should use image information comprehensively and provide verification evidence on larger samples.
Topics: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Cranial Sutures; Humans; Osteogenesis; Palatal Expansion Technique; Sutures
PubMed: 35589538
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100634 -
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) May 2022The impact of suture type on tensile strength, re-rupture rates and infection risk in Achilles tendon rupture repair is not been well established. The aim of this review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The impact of suture type on tensile strength, re-rupture rates and infection risk in Achilles tendon rupture repair is not been well established. The aim of this review is to evaluate existing literature on the associated risk of postoperative infection with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials in Achilles tendon rupture repair.
METHODS
A systematic review of search databases PubMed; Google Scholar; and OVID Medline was made to identify studies related to complications associated with Achilles tendon rupture repair. PRISMA guidelines were utilised for this review. Meta-analysis was used to compare rupture rates and infections following rupture repair.
RESULTS
12 studies with a total of 460 patients, 230 in both nonabsorbable and absorbable suture groups were included for analysis. Risk of wound complications was significantly higher in patients with non-absorbable sutures (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Nonabsorbable braided sutures is associated with the highest risk of postoperative wound complications following Achilles tendon rupture repair.
Topics: Achilles Tendon; Ankle Injuries; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Rupture; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tendon Injuries; Tensile Strength
PubMed: 35461151
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101875 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Dec 2023This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study provides a systematic review on cosmetic satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC.
METHODS
A systematic review of all articles published from inception to 1 June 2022 was performed. Articles were included if they reported on subjective assessment of cosmetic satisfaction or other PROMs by patients or their families using questionnaires or interviews.
RESULTS
Twelve articles, describing 724 surgical treatments of SSC, met the inclusion criteria. Cosmetic satisfaction was evaluated in the following ways: 1) use of the VAS score, binary questions or a 5-point scale to rate general, facial or skull appearance; 2) use of an aesthetic outcome staging in which personal opinion was added to the treating surgeon's opinion; and 3) use of an evaluation of anatomical proportions of the skull and face. A trend towards an overall improvement in cosmetic satisfaction following surgical treatment of SSC was observed. Reported PROMs included general health, socioeconomic status, patients' and their families' rating of the normalcy and noticeability of their appearance and how much this bothered them, and patients' answers to the Youth Quality of Life with Facial Differences (YQOL-FD) questionnaire. No clear overall trend of the reported PROMs was identified.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review illuminates that there is a wide variation in outcomes for evaluating cosmetic satisfaction and other PROMs of patients who underwent surgical treatment of SSC, suggesting that further research is needed to develop an inclusive and uniform approach to assess these outcomes.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Craniosynostoses; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Sutures; Personal Satisfaction
PubMed: 37477663
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06063-3 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Nov 2015To determine whether there are differences in retear rates among arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To determine whether there are differences in retear rates among arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair.
METHODS
The literature was systematically reviewed for clinical outcome studies assessing arthroscopic single-row, double-row, or suture bridge rotator cuff repair. All included studies indicated the imaging-diagnosed retear rate stratified by preoperative tear size at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up, and retears were diagnosed with either magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, or arthrogram. Only studies with comprehensive surgical methods were included, and the repair type was confirmed by the number of rows of fixation and suture configuration. Studies from journals with an impact factor below 1.5 were excluded. Retear rates were grouped and statistically compared using χ(2) tests.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 2,048 repairs. Double-row repair (DR) and suture bridge repair (SB) both had significantly lower retear rates than single-row repair (SR) for tears sized 1 to 3 cm (DR, P < .001; SB, P < .001), less than 3 cm (DR, P < .001; SB, P = .004), greater than 3 cm (DR, P = .016; SB, P = .003), and greater than 5 cm (DR, P = .003; SB, P = .003), as well as total retear rates (DR, P = .024; SB, P = .022). DR and SB did not differ significantly from each other in any tear size category.
CONCLUSIONS
Both DR and SB have lower retear rates than SR in most tear size categories. No differences in retear rates were found between DR and SB.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Diagnostic Imaging; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Tendon Injuries
PubMed: 26188783
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.004 -
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical... Mar 2017As one of the earliest surgeries applying knotless barbed suture, the minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) was reported to have various effects on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
As one of the earliest surgeries applying knotless barbed suture, the minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) was reported to have various effects on the patients and the surgeons. This study reviewed the available evidence about the efficacy and safety of barbed sutures in MIRP. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Register of Clinical Studies, PubMed, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies addressing the application of barbed sutures and conventional sutures in MIRP (until August 2016). Quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane recommendations. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 5.3), and sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially omitting each study. A total of 12 studies, including three RCTs (low to moderate risk of bias, 211 patients) and nine cohort studies (low to moderate risk of bias, 698 patients), fulfilled the study criteria. The pooling of trials did not show statistical difference. Pooling data of cohort studies showed that suture time [mean difference (MD) = -8.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -12.60 to -4.43, p < 0.0001] and length of hospital stay (MD = -0.96, 95% CI = -1.80 to -0.11, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the barbed group. Results of continence rate varied according to different studies. Subgroup analysis by type of MIRP suggested that patients who underwent barbed suture during robot-assisted surgeries had a shorter hospital stay (MD = -1.13, 95% CI = -1.82 to -0.45, p = 0.001). During the laparoscopic surgery, patients in the barbed suture group had fewer postoperative complications [odds ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.08-0.98, p = 0.05). However, more evidence is needed to validate this state-of-the-art technology.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Odds Ratio; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 28254112
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.12.005 -
Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery Sep 2020The treatment of aortic valve disease is the most common valvular surgery in industrialized nations, with 3-9% of the population over the age of eighty having at least...
BACKGROUND
The treatment of aortic valve disease is the most common valvular surgery in industrialized nations, with 3-9% of the population over the age of eighty having at least moderate aortic stenosis. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become more established, newer surgical prostheses have been developed with a variety of anchoring systems that do not rely solely on sutures to hold the valve in an appropriate position. The Edwards Intuity valve is a bovine pericardial prosthesis that is modelled on the widely implanted Perimount MagnaEase aortic prosthesis. The Perceval valve is a bovine pericardial valve attached to a self-expanding nitinol stent, which uses the radial force exerted on the patient's aortic annulus and aortic root by the stent portion to hold the valve in position. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of comparative studies of these two valve systems.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the outcomes of rapid deployment valves (RDV) and sutureless valves (SURD) and was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and guidance. The search strategy interrogated six electronic databases. Outcomes measured included all-cause mortality at latest follow up, stroke, cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, pacemaker implantation rates, paravalvular leak and post-operative transvalvular gradient.
RESULTS
The search strategy identified 407 unique papers for initial assessment with seven studies qualifying for inclusion in the analysis. The outcomes of 4,076 patients (1,650 RDV, 2,426 SURD) were included. There was no difference in mortality, stroke or moderate or worse paravalvular regurgitation between the two groups. SURD had significantly shorter CPB time by 15.7 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2-27.1; P=0.007] and a shorter cross-clamp time by 11.3 minutes (95% CI: 6.3-16.3; P<0.001) compared to RDV. RDV had a lower post-operative transvalvular gradient by 2.5 mmHg (95% CI: 1.2-3.8; P<0.001) and a lower rate of mild paravalvular regurgitation (OR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.435-4.768; P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS
Both valve types have an adequate safety profile and are comparable to conventional sutured prostheses. There was a significant reduction in cross-clamp and CPB times associated with SURD. This may be of benefit for patients requiring multiple concomitant procedures and increases the utility of minimally invasive valve replacement. However, SURD was associated with higher post-operative transvalvular gradients and a higher incidence of paravalvular regurgitation.
PubMed: 33102175
DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-27