-
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and... Aug 2023To compare the difference in outcomes in laparoscopic large hiatus hernia (LHH) repair using suture-based and mesh-based repair techniques. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To compare the difference in outcomes in laparoscopic large hiatus hernia (LHH) repair using suture-based and mesh-based repair techniques.
METHODS
A systematic search of articles was conducted in PubMed, Medline and Embase using the PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing recurrences and reoperations in those patients with large hiatal hernia repair (> 30% stomach in the chest, > 5 cm hiatal defect, hiatal surface area > 10 cm) who had mesh vs no mesh were assessed quantitatively. The impact of mesh on significant intraoperative/postoperative surgical complications was qualitatively assessed.
RESULTS
Pooled data included six randomized controlled trials and thirteen observational studies with 1670 patients (824 with no mesh, 846 with mesh). There was a significant reduction in the total recurrence rate with mesh (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.80, p = 0.007). Mesh use did not cause significant reduction in recurrences > 2 cm (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52-1.67, p = 0.83) or in reoperation rates (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.07, p = 0.09). None of the specific meshes assessed were found to be superior in the reduction of recurrence or reoperation rates. Cases of mesh erosion with eventual foregut resection were noted and were associated with synthetic meshes only.
CONCLUSION
Mesh reinforcement seemed protective against total recurrence in LHH although this has to be interpreted with caution given the level of heterogeneity introduced by the inclusion of observational studies in the analysis. There was no significant reduction in large recurrences (> 2 cm) or reoperation rate. If the synthetic mesh is to be used patients need to be informed of the risk of mesh erosion.
Topics: Humans; Hernia, Hiatal; Herniorrhaphy; Laparoscopy; Surgical Mesh; Suture Techniques; Recurrence; Postoperative Complications; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37010656
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2 -
The Journal of Hospital Infection Jun 2024We aimed to compare which suture devices could reduce the incidence of incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after gastrointestinal surgery using a systematic... (Review)
Review
AIM
We aimed to compare which suture devices could reduce the incidence of incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after gastrointestinal surgery using a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
METHODS
The CENTRAL, PubMed, and ICHUSHI-Web databases were searched from January 1st, 2000, to December 31st, 2022, for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the incidence of incisional SSI after gastrointestinal surgery among patients treated with different surgical suture devices, including non-absorbable sutures, absorbable sutures, skin staplers, and tissue adhesives (last searched in August 23th 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. To estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for each comparison, we employed a fixed-effect inverse-variance model based on the Mantel-Haenszel approach. This study was registered in PROSPERO and supported in part by the Japan Surgical Infection Society.
RESULTS
A total of 18 RCTs with 5,496 patients were included in this study. The overall SSIs in absorbable sutures were significantly lower than the ones in skin staplers (OR: 0.77; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.63-0.95) and non-absorbable sutures (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.99). On the other hand, SSIs in absorbable sutures were not statistically different from the SSIs in tissue adhesive. The highest P-score was 0.91 for absorbable sutures. A funnel plot for estimating the heterogeneity of the studies revealed that a publication bias would be minimal (Egger test, P = 0.271).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that absorbable sutures reduced incisional SSIs in gastrointestinal surgical operations compared to any other suture devices.
PubMed: 38901769
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.029 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Feb 2024To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute... (Review)
Review
Suture Button Could Result in More Functional Outcomes Improvement and Pain Relief Than Hook Plate Technique for Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
PURPOSE
To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACD).
METHODS
Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was performed and Level I-IV evidence studies comparing the SB and HP procedures for acute ACD were included. Studies that met the following exclusion criteria were excluded: (1) letters, comments, case reports, reviews, animal studies, cadaveric studies, biomechanical studies, and study protocols; (2) incomplete data; and (3) repeated studies and data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, operation time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and complications were recorded and the mean differences of VAS and Constant were compared with preset minimal clinically important difference.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies with 363 patients treated with SB procedures and 432 patients with the HP procedure were included. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, 5 of the 13 included studies reported significantly greater Constant score in SB group and most (4/5) used arthroscopic SB technique. Statistically significant differences in favor of SB were found in 3 of the 7 included studies in terms of VAS score whereas none of them reached the minimal clinically important difference. In terms of recurrent instability, no statistically significant difference was noted. All studies showed that the SB technique resulted in lower estimated blood loss. No difference was detected in CCD and complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the current body of evidence, it is suggested that employment of the SB technique may confer advantageous outcomes when compared to the HP technique in acute ACD patients. These potential benefits may include higher Constant scores, lower pain levels, and no discernible increases in operation time, CCD, or complication rates.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
Topics: Humans; Joint Dislocations; Acromioclavicular Joint; Treatment Outcome; Shoulder Dislocation; Bone Plates; Sutures; Pain
PubMed: 37315745
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.023 -
Surgical Innovation Oct 2015Knotless barbed sutures are an innovative suturing material that can facilitate laparoendoscopic operations. The purpose of this study is to examine the available... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Knotless barbed sutures are an innovative suturing material that can facilitate laparoendoscopic operations. The purpose of this study is to examine the available evidence on the application of barbed sutures on both laparoscopic and robotic operations in the field of gynecologic surgery. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. In total, 1991 patients were included in the study. The duration of closure with knotless suture ranged from 3.9 to 13 minutes, which was less than the use of conventional suture in every study. The duration of suturing was significantly less in the barbed suture group during hysterectomy, the mean difference between the observed groups was 2.41 minutes per operation (95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.59) whereas in myomectomy there was no statistically significant difference between compared groups. Concerning the estimated blood loss and the presence of major bleeding in hysterectomy, no statistical difference between the 2 groups was observed, while the estimated blood loss in myomectomy was found to be statistically significant (P = .04). Regarding the dehiscence of vaginal cuff in hysterectomy, no statistically significant difference was observed (1031 patients, odds ratio = 1.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.37-7.25). The complete absence of knots, the even distribution of tissue strength along the wound, and the reduction of operation time are the main advantages of this type of sutures. Additional clinical trials of higher methodological quality are necessary to further clarify suturing advantages and postoperative outcomes of the barbed sutures.
Topics: Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Middle Aged; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 25320107
DOI: 10.1177/1553350614554235 -
PloS One 2013To systematically evaluate the evidence across surgical specialties as to whether staples or sutures better improve patient and provider level outcomes. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate the evidence across surgical specialties as to whether staples or sutures better improve patient and provider level outcomes.
DESIGN
A systematic review of systematic reviews and panoramic meta-analysis of pooled estimates.
RESULTS
Eleven systematic reviews, including 13,661 observations, met the inclusion criteria. In orthopaedic surgery sutures were found to be preferable, and for appendicial stump sutures were protective against both surgical site infection and post surgical complications. However, staples were protective against leak in ilecolic anastomosis. For all other surgery types the evidence was inconclusive with wider confidence intervals including the possibly of preferential outcomes for surgical site infection or post surgical complication for either staples or sutures. Whilst reviews showed substantial variation in mean differences in operating time (I(2) 94%) there was clear evidence of a reduction in average operating time across all surgery types. Few reviews reported on length of stay, but the three reviews that did (I(2) 0%, including 950 observations) showed a non significant reduction in length of stay, but showed evidence of publication bias (P-value for Egger test 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence across surgical specialties indicates that wound closure with staples reduces the mean operating time. Despite including several thousand observations, no clear evidence of superiority emerged for either staples or sutures with respect to surgical site infection, post surgical complications, or length of stay.
Topics: Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Orthopedic Procedures; Surgical Stapling; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 24116028
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075132 -
Journal of Pediatric Surgery May 2021Tissue adhesive (TiA), adhesive tape (AdT), and sutures can be used to close surgical wounds and lacerations in children. However, it is unclear which technique produces... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tissue adhesive (TiA), adhesive tape (AdT), and sutures can be used to close surgical wounds and lacerations in children. However, it is unclear which technique produces the best results.
METHODS
In this prospectively registered study, the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Database, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. English language studies published between January 1980 and August 2017 evaluating TiA and/or AdT for primary skin closure of surgical wounds or lacerations in patients aged ≤18 years were included. Study endpoints included clinician-rated wound cosmesis and incidence of wound complications.
RESULTS
Thirty-one studies were included in the systematic review and 16 studies in the meta-analysis. Amongst heterogeneous studies, AdT yielded marginally better cosmetic outcomes than TiA (p = 0.04). There was no difference in cosmesis between sutured wounds and those closed with TiA (p = 0.2). No difference in overall risk of wound infection or dehiscence was identified when comparing TiA with AdT (p = 0.3), and TiA with sutures (p = 0.9 and 0.3 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
TiA, AdT, and sutures can all be used for wound closure with equivalent risk of wound infection and dehiscence. AdT appears to convey better cosmesis. Further adequately powered studies directly comparing techniques are required.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Child; Humans; Surgical Tape; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Surgical Wound Infection; Sutures; Tissue Adhesives
PubMed: 32888718
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.037 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology... Jan 2024Surgical site infections (SSI) are common causes of postoperative morbidity at cesarean delivery (CD). The objective of this study was to compare the risk of SSI and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Surgical site infections (SSI) are common causes of postoperative morbidity at cesarean delivery (CD). The objective of this study was to compare the risk of SSI and other wound complications associated with different suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at CD.
DATA SOURCES
We searched Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to June 3, 2021, and limited our search to English, peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.
STUDY SELECTION
Of 1541 titles identified, 4 studies met the selection criteria and were included. Studies were included if the population was pregnant individuals undergoing transverse incision primary or repeat, elective or emergent CD with subcuticular skin closure, and if outcomes related to SSI, wound seroma, hematoma, or dehiscence were reported. We completed the assessment using Covidence review management software.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two authors independently reviewed studies and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools for cohort studies. We compared SSI risk and secondary outcomes of hematoma, seroma, and dehiscence between skin closure with monofilament (poliglecaprone 25 or polypropylene) versus multifilament (polyglactin 910) sutures using a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was estimated using the I statistic. Monofilament sutures were associated with a reduced risk of SSI (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.98, I = 0%) compared to multifilament sutures. There was no difference in the risk of secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Monofilament suture for subcuticular skin closure at CD was associated with decreased risk of SSI compared to multifilament suture.
Topics: Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Seroma; Surgical Wound Infection; Polyglactin 910; Sutures; Hematoma; Suture Techniques
PubMed: 37595945
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.07.010 -
BJS Open Jan 2021This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare recurrence rates of rectal prolapse following ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and suture rectopexy (SR). (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare recurrence rates of rectal prolapse following ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and suture rectopexy (SR).
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on the recurrence rates of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) or intussusception (IS) after SR and VMR. Results were pooled and procedures compared; a subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients with CRP and IS who underwent VMR using biological versus synthetic meshes. A meta-analysis of studies comparing SR and VMR was undertaken. The Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies score, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to assess the quality of studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies with 976 patients were included in the SR group and 31 studies with 1605 patients in the VMR group; among these studies, five were eligible for meta-analysis. Overall, in patients with CRP, the recurrence rate was 8.6 per cent after SR and 3.7 per cent after VMR (P < 0.001). However, in patients with IS treated using VMR, the recurrence rate was 9.7 per cent. Recurrence rates after VMR did not differ with use of biological or synthetic mesh in patients treated for CRP (4.1 versus 3.6 per cent; P = 0.789) and or IS (11.4 versus 11.0 per cent; P = 0.902). Results from the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity, and the difference in recurrence rates between SR and VMR groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.76).
CONCLUSION
Although the systematic review showed a higher recurrence rate after SR than VMR for treatment of CRP, this result was not confirmed by meta-analysis. Therefore, robust RCTs comparing SR and biological VMR are required.
Topics: Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Humans; Intussusception; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Prolapse; Recurrence; Surgical Mesh; Sutures
PubMed: 33609376
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa037 -
Journal of Orthopaedics May 2024Soft tissue injuries are frequently repaired using various suture material. The ideal suture should have the biomechanical properties of low displacement, high maximum... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Soft tissue injuries are frequently repaired using various suture material. The ideal suture should have the biomechanical properties of low displacement, high maximum load to failure, and high stiffness to avoid deformation. Since tendon healing occurs over a period of months, it is important for the surgeon to select the proper suture with certain biomechanical properties. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to qualitative summarize the published literature on biomechanical properties of different suture materials used in orthopaedic procedures.
METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed and Cochrane databases were queried for original articles containing "biomechanic(s)" and "suture" keywords. Following screening for inclusion and exclusion, final articles were reviewed for relevant data and collected for qualitative analysis. Data collected from each study included the tissue type repaired, suture material, and biomechanical properties, such as elongation, maximum load to failure, stiffness, and method of failure.
RESULTS
17 articles met final inclusion criteria. Two studies found No.2 Fiberwire™ to have the lowest elongation and 4 studies found No. 2 Ultrabraid™ to have the greatest. 12 studies reported Maximum load to failure was highest in No. 2 Fiberwire™, No. 2 Ultrabraid™, and FiberTape™ while No. 2 Ethibond ™ had the lowest in 5 studies. 3 of the 5 studies that evaluated No. 2 Fiberwire™ found it to have the highest stiffness. No. 2 Ethibond™, No. 2 Orthocord™, and No. 2 PDS™ were reported as the least stiff sutures in 2 studies each.
CONCLUSION
Fiberwire™, FiberTape™, and Ultrabraid™ demonstrated the highest load to failure while Ethibond™ consistently was the weakest. Fiberwire™ was found to have the lowest elongation while Ultrabraid™ had the highest. Fiberwire™ was also noted to be the stiffest while PDS, Ethibond™, and Orthocord™ were found to be the least stiff. Final treatment decisions on which suture to utilize to optimize repair integrity and healing are complex, and rarely solely dependent upon the biomechanical properties of the materials used.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic Review, Level IV.
PubMed: 38371350
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.01.011 -
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and... Aug 2022The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date review to compare glue versus suture fixation in primary open Lichtenstein IHR.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer were systematically searched till June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR. Primary outcomes were early (at 1 year) and late recurrence (5 years or more). Secondary outcomes were the length of operation, postoperative haematoma and seroma, and chronic pain at 1 year.
RESULTS
A total of 17 RCTs with 3150 hernias (glue n = 1582, suture n = 1568) were included. Only three studies reported late recurrence. Glue fixation was associated with shorter operative duration (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 4.82, - 3.52; p < 0.001 and a lower incidence of haematoma formation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32, 0.81; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35, 1.49; p = 0.38), chronic pain after 1 year (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73, 1.65; p = 0.65), early recurrence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45, 2.76; p = 0.81, I = 0%), and late recurrence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.59, 2.59; p = 0.59, I = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Early and late recurrence were comparable between glue and suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR patients. Glue fixation had shorter operating time and lower haematoma formation than suture fixation. Chronic pain and seroma formation were comparable. More RCTs should report long-term outcomes.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Hematoma; Hernia, Inguinal; Herniorrhaphy; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Recurrence; Seroma; Surgical Mesh; Sutures
PubMed: 35113292
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02571-4