-
Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Oct 2022Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of preemptive local analgesia (LA) on postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing VH.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov ) was performed for articles published up to January 2021. All randomized controlled trials that presented outcomes of patients who underwent VH due to pelvic floor disorders or other benign gynecological disorders and received local infiltration analgesia were finally included.
RESULTS
A total of 5 studies with 277 women (138 LA group vs 199 no-LA group) who underwent a VH were included in the present meta-analysis. Mean pain scores at both 30 minutes to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (220 patients: mean difference [MD], -1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -0.74; P = 0.0007; and 220 patients: MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.28 to 1.09; P < 0.00001, respectively). Morphine/narcotic opioid-based consumption up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (197 patients MD, -9.47 mg; 95% CI, -16.51 to -2.43; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of preemptive LA during VH seems to be beneficial especially with regard to short-term postoperative pain and opioid use. However, further studies are needed to identify the optimal anesthetic regimen, the dosage, and sites of application aiming to achieve the optimal benefit in the postoperative management.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anesthetics, Local; Hysterectomy, Vaginal; Analgesics, Opioid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pain, Postoperative; Morphine Derivatives
PubMed: 35759786
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001221 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Jun 2019Objective Hysterectomy is the second most frequently performed surgical procedure for women of reproductive age topped only by caesarean section. Hysterectomies may be...
Objective Hysterectomy is the second most frequently performed surgical procedure for women of reproductive age topped only by caesarean section. Hysterectomies may be associated with a significant risk of ultrasonographically detected vault haematomas in up to 59% with consequent postoperative morbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to compare women who had a vaginal drain placed intraoperatively after a hysterectomy and the impact on peri and postoperative outcomes related to vault haematomas. Study Design Electronic searches of AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, HBE, HMIC, Medline, PsycINFO and PubMed, Cochrane register of controlled trials (CCTR), Cochrane database of systematic reviews (CDSR) CINAHL and Google scholar were performed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing women with and without a vaginal drain after a hysterectomy and the impact on different outcomes was carried out. Results Ten studies involving 1778 women, 811 with a vaginal drain and 967 without a drain, were included in the meta-analysis. This suggests that the use of a vaginal drain after hysterectomy may significantly reduce the incidence of vault haematoma (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 - 0.57) and febrile morbidity (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.73), non- significantly reduce the rate of usage of antibiotics (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.46-1.42) and makes no difference to the length of hospital stay (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.38). Conclusion The use of a vaginal drain after hysterectomy could reduce the incidence of vault haematoma and febrile morbidity.
Topics: Drainage; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Length of Stay; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31063968
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.020 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2013Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical vaginal hysterectomy (LAVRH), a minimally invasive technique that seems to be an attractive alternative to traditional surgery,... (Review)
Review
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical vaginal hysterectomy (LAVRH), a minimally invasive technique that seems to be an attractive alternative to traditional surgery, remains unexplored in the treatment of cervical cancer. We searched Medline (1966-2013) and Scopus (2004-2013) search engines, as well as reference lists from all included studies. Ten studies were retrieved; including 6 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective randomized trial, and a phase II randomized control trial. LAVRH provided equal recurrence-free rates when performed in patients with tumors not exceeding 2 cm in greatest diameter. Its main advantages seem to be less intraoperative blood loss and more radical pelvic lymphadenectomy. The primary disadvantages of the technique are a higher rate of disease-positive surgical margins, resulting in the need for adjuvant therapy, and the slow learning curve required for a surgeon to gain expertise. With use in minimally invasive surgery of newer techniques such as total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy, and possible future adoption of more conservative techniques such as cervical conization with pelvic lymphadenectomy, the question remains as to whether LAVRH will be adopted by the surgical community or lost to oblivion.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy, Vaginal; Laparoscopy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23850361
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.021 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Sep 2015Total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy represents one of the most performed gynecological procedures nowadays. Minimally invasive procedures seem to increase the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy represents one of the most performed gynecological procedures nowadays. Minimally invasive procedures seem to increase the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD). Barbed suture is a new class of suture introduced to aid surgeons during laparoscopic suturing, with the aim to reduce operative time, blood loss, and vaginal dehiscence.
METHODS
We identified all articles that report a series of laparoscopic or robotic-assisted hysterectomy using barbed suture compared to conventional suture for vaginal cuff closure. The main outcome measures were vaginal cuff suturing time, vaginal bleeding, and vaginal dehiscence with or without small bowel evisceration. Suturing time was meta-analyzed as the standardized mean difference, which is the difference in means of two arms divided by pooled standard deviation with 95 % confidence intervals. For vaginal bleeding and dehiscence risk difference were calculated for each study and then meta-analyzed. Fixed models were considered if heterogeneity was low (I (2) < 50 %), otherwise random models were preferred.
RESULTS
We show that minor bleeding (RD = 0, 95 % CI 0.03-0.03; p value = 0.907) and VCD (RD = -0.01, 95 % CI 0.02-0.00; p value = 0.119) are comparable in minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without the use of barbed suture. The major bleeding (RD = -0.03; 95 % CI 0.05-0.00; p value = 0.047) appears borderline significant, but the difference between the two types of sutures is not high and the upper limit of 95 % IC is equal to 0 so they were considered comparable. Instead, meta-analysis on vaginal cuff suturing time demonstrates that suturing time is reduced with the use of barbed suture (SMD = -0.96, 95 % CI 1.26-0.70; p value <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Barbed suture is safe and well tolerated as traditional sutures and is associated with reduced operative time of laparoscopic vaginal vault closure.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Colpotomy; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Operative Time; Pregnancy; Robotics; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vagina
PubMed: 25700658
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3653-x -
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2023Minimally invasive surgery aims to reduce surgical trauma and post-operative morbidity. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery is a safe and valid surgical...
Hysterectomy Using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A New Advantageous Approach? A Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION
Minimally invasive surgery aims to reduce surgical trauma and post-operative morbidity. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery is a safe and valid surgical option for hysterectomy. The present systematic review aims to compare hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) with laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of efficacy, surgical outcomes, complications, and cost.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It includes randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, prospective or retrospective cohorts, case-control studies, and previous systematic reviews. Inclusion criteria are as follows: female patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign pathologies by vNOTES or laparoscopic hysterectomy. The assessed outcomes were the following: conversion rate, mean uterus weight (g), operative time (mins), hospital stay (days), peri-operative complications, post-operative complications, peri-operative blood loss (mL), blood transfusion needs, post-operative day 1 hemoglobin (Hb) change (g/dL), post-operative pain level (VAS), and cost (USD) in both techniques.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included. vNOTES hysterectomy was not inferior to laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding surgical outcomes, with a shorter operative time, shorter recovery time, less post-operative pain, and fewer post-operative complications. There was no significant difference in the rate of peri-operative complications and no differences in peri-operative blood loss, post-operative day 1 Hb change, and transfusions. Nevertheless, vNOTES hysterectomy was shown to be more expensive than its laparoscopic counterpart.
CONCLUSIONS
While the feasibility and safety of the vNOTES hysterectomy were already established, this review also underlines the noninferiority of this technique when compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. In addition, vNOTES hysterectomy was associated with faster operating time, shorter hospital stay, and better post-operative pain scores compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Blood Loss, Surgical; Prospective Studies; Vagina; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Pain, Postoperative; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37231836
DOI: 10.1159/000530797 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Apr 2020To assess the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of uterine balloon tamponade for treating postpartum hemorrhage. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of uterine balloon tamponade for treating postpartum hemorrhage.
STUDY DESIGN
We searched electronic databases (from their inception to August 2019) and bibliographies. We included randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, and case series that reported on the efficacy, effectiveness, and/or safety of uterine balloon tamponade in women with postpartum hemorrhage. The primary outcome was the success rate of uterine balloon tamponade for treating postpartum hemorrhage (number of uterine balloon tamponade success cases/total number of women treated with uterine balloon tamponade). For meta-analyses, we calculated pooled success rate for all studies, and relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for studies that included a comparative arm.
RESULTS
Ninety-one studies, including 4729 women, met inclusion criteria (6 randomized trials, 1 cluster randomized trial, 15 nonrandomized studies, and 69 case series). The overall pooled uterine balloon tamponade success rate was 85.9% (95% confidence interval, 83.9-87.9%). The highest success rates corresponded to uterine atony (87.1%) and placenta previa (86.8%), and the lowest to placenta accreta spectrum (66.7%) and retained products of conception (76.8%). The uterine balloon tamponade success rate was lower in cesarean deliveries (81.7%) than in vaginal deliveries (87.0%). A meta-analysis of 2 randomized trials that compared uterine balloon tamponade vs no uterine balloon tamponade in postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony after vaginal delivery showed no significant differences between the study groups in the risk of surgical interventions or maternal death (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-16.69). A meta-analysis of 2 nonrandomized before-and-after studies showed that introduction of uterine balloon tamponade in protocols for managing severe postpartum hemorrhage significantly decreased the use of arterial embolization (relative risk, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.63). A nonrandomized cluster study reported that use of invasive procedures was significantly lower in the perinatal network that routinely used uterine balloon tamponade than that which did not use uterine balloon tamponade (3.0/1000 vs 5.1/1000; P < .01). A cluster randomized trial reported that the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage-related invasive procedures and/or maternal death was significantly higher after uterine balloon tamponade introduction than before uterine balloon tamponade introduction (11.6/10,000 vs 6.7/10,000; P = .04). Overall, the frequency of complications attributed to uterine balloon tamponade use was low (≤6.5%).
CONCLUSION
Uterine balloon tamponade has a high success rate for treating severe postpartum hemorrhage and appears to be safe. The evidence on uterine balloon tamponade efficacy and effectiveness from randomized and nonrandomized studies is conflicting, with experimental studies suggesting no beneficial effect, in contrast with observational studies. Further research is needed to determine the most effective programmatic and healthcare delivery strategies on uterine balloon tamponade introduction and use.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Maternal Mortality; Parturition; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Placenta, Retained; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Uterine Artery Embolization; Uterine Balloon Tamponade; Uterine Inertia
PubMed: 31917139
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1287 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Jan 2024Despite the rising rates of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of surgery for non-malignant conditions, salpingectomy is not widely adopted during vaginal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite the rising rates of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of surgery for non-malignant conditions, salpingectomy is not widely adopted during vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and has not been extensively investigated.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the primary study was to determine the feasibility of bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of VH. Secondary aims included surgical outcomes, factors associated with patient selection, and the prevalence of incidental tubal malignancies.
SEARCH STRATEGY
In this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched Pubmed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to September 1, 2023, using relevant keywords.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Original articles with no language restriction reporting outcomes of women undergoing planned VH with opportunistic salpingectomy, were considered eligible. Studies including patients undergoing VH with and without opportunistic salpingectomy were also included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess quality of observational studies. DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis was performed and pooled effect estimates and proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic.
RESULTS
Seven observational cohort studies including 4808 women undergoing opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of VH and 10 295 patients undergoing VH alone were selected. The pooled proportion of success was 81.83 per 100 observations (95% CI: 75.35-87.54). Opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of VH, when feasible, was associated with a significant reduction in intraoperative complications (OR 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01, -0.37, P = 0.03) and total operative time (95% CI: -17.80, -1.07, P = 0.03) compared to those where it failed. Successful salpingectomy was significantly hindered by nulliparity (OR 0.12, 95% CI: -17.69, -1.21, P < 0.001) and favored by pelvic organ prolapse (OR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.35, 7.55, P = 0.008). Immunohistochemical tubal abnormalities were found in 13/579 (2.1%) patients. The overall quality of the evidence, according to the GRADE assessment, was low.
CONCLUSION
Opportunistic salpingectomy is safe, effective, and feasible at the time of VH. Nulliparity and pelvic organ prolapse are factors potentially influencing surgical outcomes.
PubMed: 38247214
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15386 -
International Urogynecology Journal Jul 2019A frequent complication following vaginal hysterectomy is the formation of vaginal vault hematoma. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the impact of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
A frequent complication following vaginal hysterectomy is the formation of vaginal vault hematoma. The objective of our systematic review was to assess the impact of various interventions in reducing the incidence of vault hematoma or postoperative febrile morbidity following vaginal hysterectomy.
METHODS
We carried out a systematic search of Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, HTA database, PROSPERO, meta-Register of Controlled Trials (mRCT), PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, conference abstracts, and a hand search of journals from inception until September 2018. Our search strategy included interventions in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with modified vault closure with inclusion of peritoneal edges, vaginal vault drainage, or vaginal packing to reduce the incidence of clinically significant vault hematomas. Two independent reviewers (SR and AD) extracted data using a structured proforma. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.
RESULTS
We identified two studies on modified vaginal vault closure incorporating peritoneal edges that reported a significant reduction in vault hematoma incidence. Meta-analysis of two randomized trials on vaginal drains showed no difference in postoperative febrile morbidity secondary to vault hematoma [risk ratio (RR) 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.43-1.50]. Similar results were seen on meta-analysis of four randomized trials on the use of vaginal packing (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.43-1.50).
CONCLUSIONS
Inclusion of peritoneal edges in vaginal vault closure may reduce the incidence of vault hematoma. The routine use of vaginal vault drainage and/or packing has not shown to reduce vault hematoma incidence or postoperative febrile morbidity. We recommend a change of practice to include peritoneal edges in vault closure based on the evidence available in our systematic review.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Drainage; Female; Hematoma; Humans; Hysterectomy, Vaginal; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Vaginal Diseases; Young Adult
PubMed: 30498932
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6 -
Gynecologic Oncology Jan 2021The treatment strategy for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) 2-3 has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of imiquimod in VaIN 2-3. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The treatment strategy for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) 2-3 has not been established. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of imiquimod in VaIN 2-3.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from their inception until October 2019 and articles reporting imiquimod treatment for VaIN 2-3 were extracted. Additionally, the clinical records of women with VaIN 2-3 who had been treated with imiquimod in Shizuoka General Hospital from January 2016 to May 2020 were investigated. The data from the systematic search and the data from our hospital were analyzed, and a pooled complete response (CR) rate and response rate of imiquimod treatment for VaIN 2-3 were estimated. As a subgroup analysis, the CR rates and response rates were compared between women with and without a history of hysterectomy, and the rate ratio was calculated.
RESULTS
Five articles described 28 women with VaIN 2-3 who underwent imiquimod treatment, and nine women with VaIN 2-3 were treated with imiquimod in our hospital. The discontinuation of the treatment was required in only one patient of the reported cases. The pooled CR rate and response rate of imiquimod, regardless of a history of hysterectomy, was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.59-0.87) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the CR rate in patients with hysterectomy was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.11-1.0) and in those without hysterectomy was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.30-0.84), and the rate ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.48-1.19). The pooled response rates with and without a history of hysterectomy were not estimated, and the rate ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.54-1.09).
CONCLUSION
Imiquimod can be an effective treatment for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma in Situ; Female; Humans; Imiquimod; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vaginal Neoplasms
PubMed: 33010966
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.031 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jul 2023This meta-analysis was conducted to (1) assess the quantity and dose of perioperatively dispensed opioids for benign hysterectomy by procedure route and (2) identify the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis was conducted to (1) assess the quantity and dose of perioperatively dispensed opioids for benign hysterectomy by procedure route and (2) identify the predictors of persistent opioid use after the procedure.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched from study inception to 25 March 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies reporting data on opioid dispensing among patients undergoing benign hysterectomy were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the dosage of opioids dispensed perioperatively (from 30 preoperative days to 21 postoperative days). The secondary outcome was the predictors of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy (from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively). Total opioid dispensing was measured in morphine milligram equivalents units.
METHODS
The random-effects model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS
A total of 8 studies presenting data on 377,569 women undergoing benign hysterectomy were included. Of these women, 83% (95% confidence interval, 81-84) were dispensed opioids during the perioperative period. The average amount of perioperatively dispensed opioids was 143.5 morphine milligram equivalents (95% confidence interval, 40-247). Women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were dispensed a significantly lower amount of opioids than those undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomies. The overall rate of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy was 5% (95% confidence interval, 2-8). Younger patient age (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.63), smoking history (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.10), alcohol use (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.34-4.27), back pain (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.05), and fibromyalgia (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.83) were significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy. However, there was no significant effect of hysterectomy route and operative complexity on persistent opioid use postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
Perioperative opioid dispensing was significantly dependent on the route of hysterectomy, with the lowest dispensed morphine milligram equivalents of opioids for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy. Nevertheless, hysterectomy route did not significantly predict persistent opioid use postoperatively, whereas younger age, smoking, alcohol use, back pain, and fibromyalgia were significantly associated with persistent opioid use.
Topics: Humans; Female; Analgesics, Opioid; Fibromyalgia; Pain, Postoperative; Hysterectomy; Opioid-Related Disorders; Morphine Derivatives
PubMed: 36539027
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.015