-
Gynecologic Oncology Nov 2022
Corrigendum to "Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for minimal invasive surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis" [Gynecologic Oncology Volume 166, Issue 1, July 2022, Pages 188195].
PubMed: 37850593
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.002 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2018Single-incision approach in robotic gynecology is a relatively new concept. The role of single-port systems in robotic hysterectomy, their advantages and disadvantages,... (Review)
Review
Single-incision approach in robotic gynecology is a relatively new concept. The role of single-port systems in robotic hysterectomy, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the technical challenges, are still under investigation. A systematic review was performed by searching in PubMed and Scopus databases. In 810 out of 1225 patients, hysterectomy was performed for non-neoplastic disease. Single-Site was the most common port system. Duration of the procedure and relative blood loss ranged from 60 to 311 min and 7 to 750 ml, respectively. The weight of the removed uteri ranged from 39 to 520 g. 4.9% of the included patients presented complications, among which bleeding, vaginal haematoma, laceration and dehiscence, umbilical hernia, and visceral injuries. Conversion rate to laparotomy reached 2.8%. Although some technical difficulties are still described in the literature, the single-port approach is becoming more standardized nowadays and performed by more surgeons. The initial phase of the learning curve can be achieved after five cases, while a proficiency in intracorporeal cuff suturing after 14 cases. Uterus weight and previous abdominal surgical history can still be limitations of the technique. Compared to our previous study, we can see that the technique has been used in more elderly or obese patients. The complication rate can reach 4.9% while the conversion rate can reach 2.8%. However, we consider that complication and conversion rates as well as surgical time could be improved with experience. Regarding post-operative pain and cosmetic outcomes, the lack of information do not allow us to draw any safe conclusions.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Loss, Surgical; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Young Adult
PubMed: 29453728
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0789-2 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Jun 2021To systematically review objective and subjective success and complications of apical suspensions for symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault pelvic organ prolapse (POP). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review objective and subjective success and complications of apical suspensions for symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE (2002-2019) were searched using multiple terms for apical POP surgeries, including comparative studies in French and English.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
From 2,665 records, we included randomized controlled trials and comparative studies of interventions with or without hysterectomy, including abdominal apical reconstruction through open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches and vaginal apical reconstructions. Repairs using transvaginal mesh, off-the-market products, procedures without apical suspension, and follow-up less than 6 months were excluded.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
Relative risk (RR) was used to estimate the effect of surgical procedure on each outcome. For each outcome and comparison, a meta-analysis was conducted to pool the RRs when possible. Meta-regression and bias tests were performed when appropriate. The GRADE (Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system for quality rating and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting were used. Sixty-two articles were included in the review (N=22,792) and 50 studies in the meta-analyses. There was heterogeneity in study quality, techniques used, and outcomes reported. Median follow-up was 1-5 years. Vaginal suspensions showed higher risk of overall and apical anatomic recurrence compared with sacrocolpopexy (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.74 and RR 2.70, 95% CI 1.33-5.50) (moderate), whereas minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy showed less overall and posterior anatomic recurrence compared with open sacrocolpopexy (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75 and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.80, respectively) (low). Different vaginal approaches, and hysterectomy and suspension compared with hysteropexy had similar anatomic success. Subjective POP recurrence, reintervention for POP recurrence and complications were similar between most procedures.
CONCLUSION
Despite variations in anatomic outcomes, subjective outcomes and complications were similar for apical POP procedures at 1-5 years. Standardization of outcome reporting and comparative studies with longer follow-up are urgently needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42019133869.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Observational Studies as Topic; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Recurrence; Reoperation; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Sacrum; Surgical Mesh; Vagina
PubMed: 33957652
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004393 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Nov 2009Prolapse of the uterus or vagina is usually the result of loss of pelvic support, and causes mainly non-specific symptoms. It may affect over half of women aged 50 to 59... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Prolapse of the uterus or vagina is usually the result of loss of pelvic support, and causes mainly non-specific symptoms. It may affect over half of women aged 50 to 59 years, but spontaneous regression may occur. Risks of genital prolapse increase with advancing parity and age, increasing weight of the largest baby delivered, and hysterectomy.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-surgical treatments in women with genital prolapse? What are the effects of surgical treatments in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse? What are the effects of surgical treatments in women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse? What are the effects of surgical treatments in women with upper vaginal wall prolapse? What are the effects of using different surgical materials in women with genital prolapse? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 14 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: abdominal Burch colposuspension; abdominal sacral colpopexy; abdominal sacrohysteropexy; anterior colporrhaphy with mesh reinforcement; laparoscopic surgery; mesh or synthetic grafts; native (autologous) tissue; open abdominal surgery; pelvic floor muscle exercises; posterior colporrhaphy (with or without mesh reinforcement); posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy); sacrospinous colpopexy (vaginal sacral colpopexy); sutures; traditional anterior colporrhaphy; transanal repair; ultralateral anterior colporrhaphy alone or with cadaveric fascia patch; vaginal hysterectomy; vaginal oestrogen; vaginal pessaries; and vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy.
Topics: Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hysterectomy, Vaginal; Incidence; Pelvic Floor; Prolapse; Surgical Mesh; Transplants; Uterine Prolapse; Vagina
PubMed: 21726473
DOI: No ID Found -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Sep 2016This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH compared to OH and LH for endometrial cancer. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AIM
This study aimed to evaluate the surgical safety and clinical effectiveness of RH compared to OH and LH for endometrial cancer.
METHODS
We searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and the Cochrane library for studies published through May 2015. The outcomes of interest included safety (overall; peri-operative and post-operative complications; death within 30-days; and specific morbidities), effectiveness (survival, recurrence, length of stay [LOS], estimated blood loss [EBL], and operative time [OT]), and patient-reported outcomes (pain score, pain medication use, length of pain medication use, and time to return to work). Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies comparing RH to OH and 24 comparing RH to LH were identified. No significant differences were found in survival outcomes. The LOS was shorter, there was less EBL, and the rates of complications, readmission, and transfusion were lower with RH compared to OH. However, RH showed a longer OT and a higher incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence compared to those for OH. Compared to LH, the LOS was shorter, there was less EBL, and the rates of conversion to laparotomy, intra-operative complications, urinary tract injuries, and cystotomy were lower in RH. Several patient-reported outcomes showed a significant benefit of RH, but each outcome was reported in only one study.
CONCLUSIONS
RH may be a generally safer and better option than OH and LH for patients with endometrial cancer. Further prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell; Analgesics; Blood Loss, Surgical; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Conversion to Open Surgery; Disease-Free Survival; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Length of Stay; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Readmission; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27439723
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400 -
Current Urology Reports May 2015Pelvic organ prolapse is a prevalent condition, with up to 12 % of women requiring surgery in their lifetime. This manuscript reviews the treatment options for apical... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Pelvic organ prolapse is a prevalent condition, with up to 12 % of women requiring surgery in their lifetime. This manuscript reviews the treatment options for apical prolapse, specifically. Both conservative and surgical management options are acceptable and should be based on patient preferences. Pessaries are the most commonly used conservative management options. Guided pelvic floor muscle training is more beneficial than self-taught Kegel exercises, though may not be effective for high stage or apical prolapse. Surgical treatment options include abdominal and vaginal approaches, the latter of which can be performed open, laparoscopically, and robotically. A systematic review has demonstrated that sacrocolpopexy has better long-term success for treatment of apical prolapse than vaginal techniques, but vaginal surgery can be considered an acceptable alternative. Recent data has demonstrated equal efficacy between uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension at 1 year. To date, two randomized controlled trials have demonstrated equal efficacy between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Though abdominal approaches may have increased long-term durability, when counseling their patients, surgeons should consider longer operating times and increased pain and cost with these procedures compared to vaginal surgery.
KEY POINTS
• Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) with a physical therapist is the best approach to conservative management of apical prolapse [10]. • Pessaries should be managed with regular follow-up care to minimize complications [14•]. • Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy appears as effective as the gold standard abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) [42•]. • Robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) and laparoscopic assisted sacrocolpopexy (LASC) are equally effective and should be utilized by pelvic floor surgeons based on their skill level and expertise in laparoscopy [44, 45•]. • Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) and sacrospinous ligament suspension (SSLS) are considered equally effective procedures and can be combined with a vaginal hysterectomy. • Obliterative procedures are effective but are considered definitive surgery [24••]. • The use of transvaginal mesh has been shown in some studies to be superior to native tissue repairs with regard to anatomic outcomes, but complication rates are higher. Transvaginal mesh should be reserved for surgeons with adequate training so that complications are minimized.
Topics: Disease Management; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Surgery, Computer-Assisted
PubMed: 25874589
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-015-0498-6 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2013The modality of surgical specimen extraction is extremely important in the setting of minimally invasive operations. To assess the feasibility, safety, and applicability... (Review)
Review
STUDY OBJECTIVE
The modality of surgical specimen extraction is extremely important in the setting of minimally invasive operations. To assess the feasibility, safety, and applicability of transvaginal specimen extraction through posterior colpotomy in women with uterus in situ, we present our 11-year experience with this technique and perform a systematic review of the available studies in the field of gynecologic laparoscopy.
DESIGN
A retrospective analysis and systematic review of the literature (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING
A tertiary care center.
PATIENTS
Two hundred thirty women with uterus in situ undergoing minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic disease at our institution with transvaginal specimen removal in the period between 2001 and 2012. We then reviewed 17 studies, collecting data on a total of 899 transvaginal retrieval procedures.
INTERVENTIONS
Transvaginal specimen retrieval after operative laparoscopy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Overall, 259 retrieval procedures were performed in the 230 patients operated on at our institution (including extraction of adnexal specimens [n = 190], uterine myomectomies [n = 36], bowel resections [n = 17], and other [n = 16]). All interventions were completed laparoscopically. Two (0.8%) women required secondary surgery because of postoperative intraperitoneal bleeding. Three additional (1.3%) minor postoperative complications were observed. No intra- and postoperative complications associated with the extraction technique occurred. In our literature review, a total of 58 (6.5%) complications were recorded. Only 1 (0.1%) adverse event was related to the transvaginal extraction procedure.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that transvaginal specimen retrieval after operative laparoscopy represents a safe, feasible, and applicable technique. Further research is needed to assess the real advantages of this natural orifice extraction procedure.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Middle Aged; Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery; Retrospective Studies; Specimen Handling; Treatment Outcome; Vagina
PubMed: 23623269
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.022 -
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey Jun 2021The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of preemptive paracervical block or uterosacral ligament infiltration in reducing postoperative pain and opioid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of preemptive paracervical block or uterosacral ligament infiltration in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption after benign minimally invasive hysterectomy.
DATA SOURCES
We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from inception until February 2020.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
We identified randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the primary outcome of pain and opioid consumption after paracervical block or uterosacral infiltration in benign laparoscopic, vaginal, or robotic hysterectomy. Two investigators evaluated studies for risk of bias and quality of evidence.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
We reviewed 219 abstracts; 6 studies met the inclusion criteria: 3 using paracervical block (2 vaginal and 1 laparoscopic) and 3 using uterosacral ligament infiltration (all vaginal). Two studies were included in the meta-analysis (both vaginal hysterectomy). Because of lack of numerical data, or comparison, the other 4 studies are reported in narrative form. Three controlled trials reported a moderate benefit from paracervical block up to 8 hours after vaginal and 4 hours after laparoscopic surgery. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the lack of numerical data for pooling results or the lack of a laparoscopic hysterectomy comparison group. Three trials reported that uterosacral infiltration decreases pain up to 6 hours after vaginal hysterectomy, and meta-analysis pooling the results of 2 of these studies demonstrated improvement in pain up to 4 hours on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale for pain (-19.97 mm; 95% confidence interval, -29.02 to -10.91; < 0.000). Five trials reported a moderate reduction in cumulative opioid use within 24 hours after vaginal surgery for both paracervical block and uterosacral infiltration. Meta-analysis was not performed for paracervical block because only 1 trial provided suitable data for pooling. Meta-analysis pooling the results of 2 trials of uterosacral infiltration demonstrated opioid consumption of 20.73 morphine milligram equivalents less compared with controls (95% confidence interval, -23.54 to -17.91; < 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS
There were a total of 6 randomized placebo-controlled studies evaluated in this study. Although a meta-analysis was unable to be performed for all studies because of lack of comparison groups or numerical data, there is evidence that preemptive uterosacral ligament infiltration may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after vaginal hysterectomy. Our study does not allow us to make any substantive conclusions on the use of paracervical block in vaginal hysterectomy or the use of either type of injection in laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy.
Topics: Anesthesia; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Ligaments; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Uterus; Visual Analog Scale
PubMed: 34192340
DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000901 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Vaginal vault prolapse, also known as apical prolapse, is a distressing condition that may affect women following hysterectomy, necessitating surgical intervention when...
Comparison of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with vaginal reconstructive procedures and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Vaginal vault prolapse, also known as apical prolapse, is a distressing condition that may affect women following hysterectomy, necessitating surgical intervention when conservative measures prove ineffective. The surgical management of apical compartment prolapse includes procedures such as laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP), abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASCP) or vaginal reconstructive procedures (VRP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the outcomes of these interventions.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify eligible studies. Fourteen studies comprising a total of 1,289 women were included. The selected studies were analyzed to evaluate outcomes such as duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, blood loss, complication rates, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS
LSCP did not demonstrate significant advantages over VRP in terms of perioperative or long-term outcomes. However, when compared to ASCP, LSCP showed shorter hospital stay, reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain, and lower rates of ileus.
DISCUSSION
This systematic review contributes to evidence-based decision-making for the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. While LSCP did not exhibit substantial benefits over VRP, it emerged as a preferable option compared to ASCP due to shorter hospital stays and reduced postoperative complications. The findings from this study provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical approach for vaginal vault prolapse. However, future research should focus on long-term follow-ups, standardizing outcomes, and outcome measures, and evaluating cost-effectiveness to further enhance clinical practice.
PubMed: 37766917
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1269214 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Dec 2023Iatrogenic bladder injury is a rare complication following obstetric and gynecologic surgery and only sparse information is available regarding length of transurethral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Iatrogenic bladder injury is a rare complication following obstetric and gynecologic surgery and only sparse information is available regarding length of transurethral catheterization following injuries, suturing techniques including choice of suture, and complications. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate length of transurethral catheterization in relation to complications following iatrogenic bladder injury. Second, we aimed to evaluate the number of complications following repair of iatrogenic bladder injuries and to describe suture technique and best choice of suture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, and the results were presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched, and followed by screening from two independent reviewers. Studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 describing methods of bladder injury repair following obstetric or gynecologic benign surgery were included. Data extraction was done using Covidence. We performed a meta-analysis on complications after repair and explored this with a meta-regression analysis (Metafor package R) on length of catheterization to determine if length of catheterization influenced the risk of complication. A risk of bias tool from Cochrane was used to assess risk of bias and the study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021290586).
RESULTS
Out of 2175 articles, we included 21 retrospective studies, four prospective studies, and one case-control study. In total, 595 bladder injuries were included. Cesarean section was the most prominent surgery type, followed by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. We found no statistically significant association between length of transurethral catheterization and numbers of complications following repair of iatrogenic bladder injuries. More than 90% of injuries were recognized intraoperatively. Approximately 1% had complications following iatrogenic bladder injury repair (0.010, 95% confidence interval 0.0015-0.0189, 26 studies, 595 participants, I = 4%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our review did not identify conclusive evidence on the length of postoperative catheterization following bladder injury warranting further research. However, the rate of complications was low following iatrogenic bladder injury with a wide range of repair approaches.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Urinary Bladder; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Case-Control Studies; Prospective Studies; Urinary Bladder Diseases; Obstetric Surgical Procedures; Iatrogenic Disease
PubMed: 37552010
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14641