-
European Journal of Haematology Oct 2022Treatment options for multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) remain limited. The only FDA-approved drug is siltuximab for idiopathic MCD (iMCD), but the response rate with... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Treatment options for multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) remain limited. The only FDA-approved drug is siltuximab for idiopathic MCD (iMCD), but the response rate with siltuximab is less than 50%. We performed a systematic review to examine the efficacy and safety of various regimens used for the treatment of MCD.
METHODS
A database search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov using the terms "Castleman disease," "treatment outcome," and "patient safety" was done.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Results from a randomized controlled trial and an extension study highlighted the efficacy and long-term safety of siltuximab for iMCD; other trials showed tocilizumab to be a suitable alternative. A recent trial reported high response rates with thalidomide in iMCD patients. Promising results were reported for bortezomib in relapsed/ refractory MCD. For human herpesvirus-8 (HHV8)-associated MCD, rituximab along with doxorubicin therapy followed by maintenance with zidovudine and valganciclovir is the most effective therapy. A single-arm trial has highlighted the potential role of tocilizumab in HHV8-MCD. Data for these regimens are limited and mostly comprise nonrandomized trials. Further research on emerging agents could have a major impact on the treatment of this rare disease.
Topics: Castleman Disease; Herpesvirus 8, Human; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rituximab; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35770616
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13823 -
Transplantation Direct Aug 2023The optimal strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in CMV donor/recipient kidney transplant recipients remains uncertain. Conclusions of prior...
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Optimized CMV Preemptive Therapy and Antiviral Prophylaxis for CMV Disease Prevention in CMV High-Risk (D+R-) Kidney Transplant Recipients.
UNLABELLED
The optimal strategy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in CMV donor/recipient kidney transplant recipients remains uncertain. Conclusions of prior meta-analyses that CMV disease rates with preemptive therapy (PET) and universal prophylaxis (UP) were comparable may have been affected by inclusion of studies lacking key determinants of efficacy of the respective strategies.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PET with weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction monitoring for ≥3 mo and UP with 6 mo of valganciclovir. PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010, to April 1, 2022. Risk of bias was assessed with 3 instruments (Cochrane RoB, Cochrane RoBINS-I, and an instrument for assessing risk in observational studies). The primary outcome was CMV disease incidence by 1-y posttransplant. Secondary outcomes by 1-y were graft loss, acute allograft rejection, and mortality. Results were synthesized using generalized linear mixed model meta-analysis. PET studies were stratified into low-threshold (LT) and high-threshold (HT) PET based on the viral load threshold for initiation of antiviral therapy.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies met inclusion criteria (6 PET, 19 UP). CMV disease incidence was significantly higher in HT (0.30 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-0.39]) versus LT PET (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]). LT PET was associated with a significantly lower CMV disease incidence (0.06 [95% CI, 0.03-0.12]) versus UP (0.21 [95% CI, 0.17-0.27]). Incidence of graft loss, acute allograft rejection, or mortality was not significantly different between LT PET and UP ( > 0.05 for all comparisons). Receipt of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies was not associated with a significant difference in CMV disease incidence (odds ratio = 1.34 [95% CI, 0.80-2.25]).
CONCLUSIONS
LT PET is associated with a significantly lower incidence of CMV disease compared to UP with similar rates of other clinical outcomes. These findings provide rationale and preliminary data for a randomized superiority trial of optimized LT-PET versus UP in donor seropositive recipient seronegative kidney transplant recipients.
PubMed: 37456587
DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001514 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Dec 2023Glioma is a challenging malignant tumor with a low survival rate and no effective treatment. Recently, ganciclovir, an antiviral drug, combined with gene therapy and its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Glioma is a challenging malignant tumor with a low survival rate and no effective treatment. Recently, ganciclovir, an antiviral drug, combined with gene therapy and its own antiviral ability, has been proposed as a potential treatment for glioma. However, there are differences in the results of various clinical trials. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ganciclovir in treating glioma.
METHODS
We searched databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library before March 30, 2023. The search terms included glioma, ganciclovir, valganciclovir and treatment. Calculated 1, 2 and 4-year survival rate by risk difference (RD), and overall survival (OS) by odds ratio (OR).
RESULTS
Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 606 high-grade glioma patients were included. The results showed that ganciclovir can improve 2-yeaer (RD = 0.179, 95% CI 0.012-0.346, P = 0.036) and 4-year survival rate (RD = 0.185, 95% CI 0.069-0.3, P = 0.002) and OS (OR 2.393, 95% CI 1.212-4.728, P = 0.012) compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis showed that ganciclovir significantly improved the prognosis of glioma patients. Therefore, we suggest that more cases of ganciclovir as a glioma treatment can be conducted, or a large clinical trial can be designed.
Topics: Humans; Ganciclovir; Glioma; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38066255
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04503-3 -
Transplant Infectious Disease : An... Aug 2023Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Considering significant differences in healthcare systems, a...
Epidemiology, management, and burden of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients in selected countries outside of Europe and North America: A systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Considering significant differences in healthcare systems, a systematic review was conducted to describe the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-SOT in selected countries outside of Europe and North America.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies in SOT recipients across 15 countries in the regions of Asia, Pacific, and Latin America (search period: January 1, 2011 to September 17, 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatment patterns and guidelines, refractory and/or resistant CMV, patient-reported outcomes, and economic burden.
RESULTS
Of 2708 studies identified, 49 were eligible (n = 43/49; 87.8% in adults; n = 34/49, 69.4% in kidney recipients). Across studies, selection of CMV preventive strategy was based on CMV serostatus. Overall, rates of CMV infection (within 1 year) and CMV disease post-SOT were respectively, 10.3%-63.2% (9 studies) and 0%-19.0% (17 studies). Recurrence occurred in 35.4%-41.0% cases (3 studies) and up to 5.3% recipients died of CMV-associated causes (11 studies). Conventional treatments for CMV infection/disease included ganciclovir (GCV) or valganciclovir. Up to 4.4% patients were resistant to treatment (3 studies); no studies reported on refractory CMV. Treatment-related adverse events with GCV included neutropenia (2%-29%), anemia (13%-48%), leukopenia (11%-37%), and thrombocytopenia (13%-24%). Data on economic burden were scarce.
CONCLUSION
Outside of North America and Europe, rates of CMV infection/disease post-SOT are highly variable and CMV recurrence is frequent. CMV resistance and treatment-associated adverse events, including myelosuppression, highlight unmet needs with conventional therapy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Europe; North America; Ganciclovir; Organ Transplantation; Leukopenia
PubMed: 37254966
DOI: 10.1111/tid.14070 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Jun 2021Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the first-line agents used to prevent and treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell...
A Systematic Review of the Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicodynamics of Ganciclovir/Valganciclovir in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.
BACKGROUND
Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) are the first-line agents used to prevent and treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) patients.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this work was to describe available data for the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV and VGCV and the potential of a therapeutic drug monitoring strategy to improve outcomes in the alloHCT population.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the pharmacokinetics (dose-exposure), pharmacodynamics (exposure-efficacy) and toxicodynamics (exposure-toxicity) of GCV and VGCV in alloHCT patients with CMV infection. Studies including alloHCT patients treated for CMV infection reporting the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV or VGCV were searched for using the PUBMED and EMBASE databases from 1946 to 2019. Only studies involving participants > 12 years of age and available in the English language were included.
RESULTS
A total of 179 patients were included in the 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 examined GCV pharmacokinetics only, while 8 also examined GCV pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics. Reported pharmacokinetic parameters showed considerable interpatient variability and were different from other populations, such as solid organ transplant and human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Only one study found a correlation between neutropenia and elevated peak and trough GCV concentrations, with no other significant pharmacodynamic and toxicodynamic relationships identified. While therapeutic drug monitoring of GCV is performed in some institutions, no association between GCV therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical outcomes was identified.
CONCLUSION
Further studies of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of GCV/VGCV in alloHCT patients are required to identify a more robust therapeutic range and to subsequently quantify the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring of GCV/VGCV in the alloHCT population.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Ganciclovir; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 33515202
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00982-z -
American Journal of Transplantation :... Oct 2008The precise impact of valganciclovir as preventive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is not fully defined. Data from studies... (Review)
Review
The precise impact of valganciclovir as preventive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is not fully defined. Data from studies using valganciclovir as preemptive therapy or prophylaxis for CMV in SOT recipients were synthesized for descriptive analysis. CMV disease occurred in 2.6% and 9.9% of the patients receiving valganciclovir as preemptive therapy and prophylaxis, respectively. Although the incidence of early-onset (
valganciclovir prophylaxis, the incidence of late-onset (>90 days posttransplant) CMV disease rose up to 8.9% and 17.7% in the prophylactic group, respectively. On the contrary, no patients developed late-onset CMV disease in preemptive group. Both approaches with valganciclovir have successfully decreased CMV disease in SOT recipients. Late-onset CMV disease is a complication observed uniquely with valganciclovir prophylaxis, particularly in R-/D+ patients, but not with preemptive therapy. Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Ganciclovir; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Transplantation; Liver Diseases; Liver Transplantation; Risk; Time Factors; Transplantation Immunology; Treatment Outcome; Valganciclovir; Virology
PubMed: 18828771
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02369.x -
Transplant Infectious Disease : An... Aug 2023Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease impacts morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This systematic review summarized data on the...
Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and disease burden of cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients in selected countries outside of Europe and North America: A systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease impacts morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This systematic review summarized data on the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-HCT outside of Europe and North America.
METHODS
The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies and treatment guidelines in HCT recipients across 15 selected countries from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East (search period: 1 January 2011-17 September 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatments, refractory, resistant CMV, and burden.
RESULTS
Of 2708 references identified, 68 were eligible (67 studies and one guideline; 45/67 studies specific to adult allogeneic HCT recipients). The rates of CMV infection and disease within 1 year of allogeneic HCT were 24.9%-61.2% (23 studies) and 2.9%-15.7% (10 studies), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 19.8%-37.9% of cases (11 studies). Up to 10% of HCT recipients died of CMV-related causes. In all countries, first-line treatment for CMV infection/disease involved intravenous ganciclovir or valganciclovir. Conventional treatments were associated with serious adverse events such as myelosuppression (10.0%) or neutropenia only (30.0%, 39.8%) and nephrotoxicity (11.0%) (three studies), frequently leading to treatment discontinuation (up to 13.6%). Refractory CMV was reported in 2.9%, 13.0%, and 28.9% of treated patients (three studies) with resistant CMV diagnosed in 0%-10% of recipients (five studies). Patient-reported outcomes and economic data were scarce.
CONCLUSION
The incidence of CMV infection and disease post-HCT is high outside of North America and Europe. CMV resistance and toxicity highlight a major unmet need with current conventional treatments.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cytomegalovirus; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplant Recipients; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Cost of Illness; Europe; North America
PubMed: 37287436
DOI: 10.1111/tid.14083 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2022Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is the most common form of ocular manifestation of CMV in immunocompetent individuals. The difficulty in diagnosing CMV anterior... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is the most common form of ocular manifestation of CMV in immunocompetent individuals. The difficulty in diagnosing CMV anterior uveitis may delay adequate treatment and affect outcomes. We sought to review systemically the overall clinical characteristics and compare treatment outcomes in CMV anterior uveitis and endotheliitis. A literature search was performed, and studies describing clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes that included more than 5 treated eyes were included. In these 23 studies, acute CMV anterior uveitis commonly presented with high intraocular pressure (95.31%, 95% CI 90.45-98.60) and mild anterior chamber inflammation (cells >2+ = 3.18%, 95% CI 0.21-0.54). About two-thirds of CMV endotheliitis cases presented with high intraocular pressure and coin-shaped corneal lesions. Acute CMV anterior uveitis showed good clinical response to topical 0.15% ganciclovir (GCV) gel or oral valganciclovir (VGCV) (90%, 95% CI 74-100% and 95%, 95% CI 88-100%, respectively). For chronic CMV anterior uveitis, both topical GCV and oral VGCV yielded comparable results. Topical 0.5-2% GCV or a combination of topical and oral VGCV for CMV endotheliitis both resulted in good clinical response. Recurrence of inflammation was common after cessation of maintenance therapy. Overall, topical GCV resulted in an optimal outcome for CMV anterior uveitis. Escalated concentration and frequency of usage are needed for chronic CMV anterior uveitis and endotheliitis. Adequate induction and maintenance phases of anti-CMV treatment seem necessary to prevent recurrences.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Aqueous Humor; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; DNA, Viral; Eye Infections, Viral; Ganciclovir; Glaucoma; Humans; Inflammation; Treatment Outcome; Uveitis, Anterior; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 34954093
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.006 -
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical... 2017Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation recipients.
METHODS
An electronic search was conducted up to November 29, 2016. The primary outcomes were incidences of CMV, CMV disease, mortality and opportunistic infection. The second outcomes were acute rejection, allograft loss, adverse drug reaction (ADR).
RESULTS
7 cohort studies, all with high quality involving (1431 patients) were included. There was no significant difference of the incidence of following CMV disease (1271 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.43, p=0.36), acute rejection (1343 patients, OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.14, p=0.19), allograft loss (1271 patients, OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.31-1.35, p=0.24), mortality (1271 patients, OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.20-1.47, p=0.23) and opportunistic infections (OI) (985 patients, OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.52-1.10, p=0.14) between the low-dose and the high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis. And no significant difference was observed for premature valganciclovir discontinuation (1010 patients, OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.52-1.25, p=0.33) and the incidence of leukopenia (1082 patients, OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34-1.22, p=0.18) between the two regimens.
CONCLUSION
450 mg and 900 mg doses of valganciclovir are equipotent for CMV universal prophylaxis. CMV 450 mg prophylaxis should be used for renal transplant recipients. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.
Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ganciclovir; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 28719361
DOI: 10.18433/J3805B -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2022Many antiviral agents have been studied in clinical trials for allograft rejection prevention following cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and Safety of Antiviral Agents in Preventing Allograft Rejection Following CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Many antiviral agents have been studied in clinical trials for allograft rejection prevention following cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients. However, data on the most effective and safest treatment are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank CMV prophylaxis agents for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients according to their efficacy and safety. We conducted searches on the MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases, as well as the reference lists of selected studies up to December 2021, for published and peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of CMV prophylaxis agents in high-risk kidney transplant patients. Thirteen studies were independently selected by three reviewers and included post-kidney transplant patients indicated for CMV prophylaxis who had been randomized to receive prophylactic antiviral agents or standard of care. The reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies, and direct and network meta-analyses were applied to assess the study outcomes. The probability of efficacy and safety was evaluated, and the drugs were assigned a numerical ranking. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The primary outcome was an incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, whereas the secondary outcome was a composite of major adverse drug reactions. Each outcome referred to the definition provided in the original studies. Valganciclovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir were identified to significantly decrease the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with pooled risk differences (RDs) of -20.53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -36.09% to -4.98%), -19.3% (95% CI = -32.7% to -5.93%), and -10.4% (95% CI = -19.7% to -0.12%), respectively. The overall major adverse drug reaction was 5.7% without a significant difference when compared with placebo. Valganciclovir had the best combined efficacy and safety among the examined antiviral agents and was the most effective and safest antiviral agent overall for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis. Valacyclovir was the optimal alternative antiviral agent for patients who were unable to tolerate intravenous ganciclovir or access oral valganciclovir as financial problem. However, compliance and dose-related toxicities should be closely monitored.
Topics: Allografts; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Ganciclovir; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Valacyclovir; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 35433502
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.865735