-
Neuro-oncology Practice Feb 2023Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) including valproic acid (VPA) have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce treatment adverse events (AE)...
BACKGROUND
Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) including valproic acid (VPA) have the potential to improve radiotherapy (RT) efficacy and reduce treatment adverse events (AE) via epigenetic modification and radio-sensitization of neoplastic cells. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and AE associated with HDACi used as radio-sensitizers in adult solid organ malignancy patients.
METHODS
A systematic review utilized electronic searches of MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase(Ovid), The Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify studies examining the efficacy and AEs associated with HDACi treatment in solid organ malignancy patients undergoing RT. Meta-analysis was performed with overall survival (OS) reported as hazard ratios (HR) as the primary outcome measure. OS reported as median survival difference, and AEs were secondary outcome measures.
RESULTS
Ten studies reporting on the efficacy and/or AEs of HDACi in RT-treated solid organ malignancy patients met inclusion criteria. All included studies focused on HDACi valproic acid (VPA) in high-grade glioma patients, of which 9 studies ( = 6138) evaluated OS and 5 studies ( = 1055) examined AEs. The addition of VPA to RT treatment protocols resulted in improved OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96). No studies focusing on non-glioma solid organ malignancy patients, or non-VPA HDACi met the inclusion criteria for this review.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests that glioma patients undergoing RT may experience prolonged survival due to HDACi VPA administration. Further randomized controlled trials are required to validate these findings. Additionally, more research into the use of HDACi radio-adjuvant treatment in non-glioma solid organ malignancies is warranted.
PubMed: 36659976
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac078 -
Journal of Clinical PsychopharmacologyHyperammonemia is an adverse effect that poses clinical uncertainty around valproic acid (VPA) use. The prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperammonemia and its...
BACKGROUND
Hyperammonemia is an adverse effect that poses clinical uncertainty around valproic acid (VPA) use. The prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic hyperammonemia and its relationship to VPA concentration is not well established. There is also no clear guidance regarding its management. This results in variability in the monitoring and treatment of VPA-induced hyperammonemia. To inform clinical practice, this systematic review aims to summarize evidence available around VPA-associated hyperammonemia and its prevalence, clinical outcomes, and management.
METHODS
An electronic search was performed through Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO using search terms that identified hyperammonemia in patients receiving VPA. Two reviewers independently performed primary title and abstract screening with a third reviewer resolving conflicting screening results. This process was repeated during the full-text review process.
RESULTS
A total of 240 articles were included. Prevalence of asymptomatic hyperammonemia (5%-73%) was higher than symptomatic hyperammonemia (0.7%-22.2%) and occurred within the therapeutic range of VPA serum concentration. Various risk factors were identified, including concomitant medications, liver injury, and defects in carnitine metabolism. With VPA discontinued, most symptomatic patients returned to baseline mental status with normalized ammonia level. There was insufficient data to support routine monitoring of ammonia level for VPA-associated hyperammonemia.
CONCLUSIONS
Valproic acid-associated hyperammonemia is a common adverse effect that may occur within therapeutic range of VPA. Further studies are required to determine the benefit of routine ammonia level monitoring and to guide the management of VPA-associated hyperammonemia.
Topics: Humans; Valproic Acid; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Hyperammonemia; Ammonia; Clinical Decision-Making; Uncertainty; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
PubMed: 37126830
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001689 -
Molecular Psychiatry Feb 2022A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of pharmacological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and random-effects model network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy, acceptability, tolerability, and safety of pharmacological interventions for adults with acute bipolar mania. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for eligible studies published before March 14, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral medication monotherapy lasting ≥10 days in adults with mania were included, and studies that allowed the use of antipsychotics as a rescue medication during a trial were excluded. The primary outcomes were response to treatment (efficacy) and all-cause discontinuation (acceptability). The secondary outcomes were the improvement of mania symptoms and discontinuation due to inefficacy. Of the 79 eligible RCTs, 72 double-blind RCTs of 23 drugs and a placebo were included in the meta-analysis (mean study duration = 3.96 ± 2.39 weeks, n = 16442, mean age = 39.55 years, with 50.93% males). Compared with the placebo, aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, tamoxifen, valproate, and ziprasidone outperformed response to treatment (N = 56, n = 14503); aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone had lower all-cause discontinuation; however, topiramate had higher all-cause discontinuation (N = 70, n = 16324). Compared with the placebo, aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, tamoxifen, valproate, and ziprasidone outperformed the improvement of mania symptoms (N = 61, n = 15466), and aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, cariprazine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, valproate, and ziprasidone had lower discontinuation due to inefficacy (N = 50, n = 14284). In conclusions, these antipsychotics, carbamazepine, lithium, tamoxifen, and valproate were effective for acute mania. However, only aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone had better acceptability than the placebo.
Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Aripiprazole; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Carbamazepine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Lithium; Male; Mania; Network Meta-Analysis; Olanzapine; Paliperidone Palmitate; Quetiapine Fumarate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risperidone; Tamoxifen; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 34642461
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01334-4 -
The Journal of Emergency Medicine Oct 2017Chlorpromazine is the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hiccups; however, many other pharmacologic treatments have been... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chlorpromazine is the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hiccups; however, many other pharmacologic treatments have been proposed for intractable and persistent hiccups. Currently, there is little evidence to support the use of one agent over another.
OBJECTIVE
This review aims to identify literature concerning the use of pharmacologic treatments for intractable and persistent hiccups with the goal of evaluating therapies in terms of their level of evidence, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, onset of action, and adverse effects.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the New York Academy of Medicine was performed to find articles where a pharmacologic agent was used to treat intractable or persistent hiccups between the years 1966 and 2016. The GRADE method was used to assess the level of evidence for the studies included in this review.
RESULTS
This review identified 26 articles involving 10 pharmacologic treatment options that met our inclusion criteria. Amitriptyline, baclofen, gabapentin, haloperidol, metoclopramide, midazolam, nifedipine, nimodipine, orphenadrine, and valproic acid were found in the literature to be successful in treating hiccups.
CONCLUSION
Baclofen, gabapentin, and metoclopramide were the only agents that were studied in a prospective manner, while only baclofen and metoclopramide were studied in randomized controlled trials. No specific recommendations can be made for treating intractable and persistent hiccups with the evidence currently available in the literature. Therapy selection should be specific to individual patients, their underlying comorbidities, etiology of hiccups, and take into account the individual properties of the drugs.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Chlorpromazine; Dopamine Antagonists; Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists; Emergency Service, Hospital; GABA-B Receptor Agonists; Hiccup; Humans
PubMed: 29079070
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.033 -
International Journal of Dermatology Sep 2019Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly used antiepileptic drug (AED). Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis are the rare but fatal cutaneous adverse...
Valproic acid (VPA) is a commonly used antiepileptic drug (AED). Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis are the rare but fatal cutaneous adverse drug reactions for VPA. We aimed to identify and critically evaluate all the literature of SJS in association with VPA and to describe the clinical features of the condition. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed from inception to December 2017 and updated in July 2018 without any restrictions, and the references of included studies were also searched. The descriptive studies discussing any patients who experienced SJS followed by the use of VPA alone or along with any other AED for its main indication were included. Two authors were independently involved in the study selection and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or by the discussion with a third reviewer. A total of 19 studies including 17 case reports and two case series of 98 were included in the review. In all studies, the dose of VPA ranged from 100 mg/day to a maximum dose of 1,000 mg/day and was administered for indications including epilepsy, seizures, schizophrenic affective disorders, and bipolar disorder. The mortality seen with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions can be decreased by immediate withdrawal of opposing medications, providing symptomatic relief, and offering supportive care, all of which are the mainstay of controlling the condition. It is essential for healthcare professionals to be aware of the importance of monitoring SJS or any other cutaneous reactions followed by the use of valproic acid even though the incidence is low, but it is injurious to the patient.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Antimanic Agents; Bipolar Disorder; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Humans; Incidence; Schizophrenia; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 30809807
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14411 -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2020The neuroprotective effect of valproic acid has been observed in the animal models of neurodegeneration, which suggests it as a potential candidate for clinical trials.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The neuroprotective effect of valproic acid has been observed in the animal models of neurodegeneration, which suggests it as a potential candidate for clinical trials. In this paper, we aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of valproic acid in the treatment of dementia.
METHODS
We searched the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure until March 2020 for the eligible randomized controlled trials, as well as the unpublished and ongoing trials. We pooled the results using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
We included seven studies with 770 randomized patients with dementia, which compared valproic acid with placebo. Indeed, there were no significant differences found in the scores of Mini-mental State Examination, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory and number of patients with adverse events. Valproic acid is generally well-tolerated in patients with dementia, even in long-term therapy for 24 months.
CONCLUSION
Insufficient evidences are found to support valproic acid in the treatment of dementia for cognitive, psychiatric symptoms or disease-modifying. The anticipations for a success in the trial of valproic acid for dementia in the future look not optimistic based on the available evidence.
Topics: Dementia; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Psychomotor Agitation; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 32413690
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104091 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2023Long-term medication with valproic acid has been associated with acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the features of this... (Review)
Review
Long-term medication with valproic acid has been associated with acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the features of this pancreatitis. A preregistered literature search (CRD42023438294) was performed on the National Library of Medicine, Excerpta Medica, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Patients with alcohol abuse disorder, gallstone disease, hypertriglyceridemia or hypercalcemia, patients with acute valproic acid intoxication, and patients with a pre-existing pancreatitis were excluded. For the final analysis, we retained 73 reports published between 1979 and 2023, which described 125 subjects (83 children and 42 adults predominantly affected by an epilepsy) with an acute pancreatitis related to valproic acid. The diagnosis was made 11 (3.0-24) months (median and interquartile range) after starting valproic acid. One hundred and five cases (84%) recovered and twenty (16%) died. Sex, age, dosage or circulating level of valproic acid, latency time, prevalence of intellectual disability, and antiepileptic co-medication were similar in cases with and without a lethal outcome. Nineteen subjects were rechallenged with valproic acid after recovery: sixteen (84%) cases developed a further episode of pancreatitis. In conclusion, pancreatitis associated with valproic acid presents at any time during treatment and has a high fatality rate.
PubMed: 37762984
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186044 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2020To evaluate the incidence and risk of tremor in patients treated with valproic aid (VPA) monotherapy. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to...
To evaluate the incidence and risk of tremor in patients treated with valproic aid (VPA) monotherapy. We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to gather relevant data on tremor in patients taking VPA and other drugs and performed a meta-analysis using Stata15.1 software. Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of tremor in patients receiving VPA therapy was 14% [OR = 0.14, 95% CI (0.10-0.17)]. The pooled estimate risk of tremor showed a significant difference between patients treated with VPA and all other drugs [OR = 5.40, 95% CI (3.22-9.08)], other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) [OR = 5.78, 95% CI (3.18-10.50)], and other non-AEDs [OR = 4.77, 95% CI (1.55-14.72)]. Both a dose of <1,500 mg/d of VPA [included 500 mg/d: OR = 3.57, 95% CI (1.24-10.26), 500-999 mg/d: OR = 3.99, 95% CI (1.95-8.20), 1,000-1,499 mg/d: OR = 8.82, 95% CI (3.25-23.94)] and a VPA treatment duration of <12 m [included ≤ 3 months: OR = 3.06, 95% CI (1.16-8.09), 3-6 months: OR = 16.98, 95% CI (9.14-31.57), and 6-12 months: OR = 4.15, 95% CI (2.74-6.29)] led to a higher risk of tremor than did other drugs, as did higher doses and longer treatment times. Compared with other drugs, VPA led to a higher risk of tremor, and the level of risk was associated with the dose and duration of treatment.
PubMed: 33384651
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.576579 -
Psychiatry Research May 2022There are currently no evidence-based treatment recommendations for impulse control disorders, which include intermittent explosive disorder (IED), kleptomania and... (Review)
Review
There are currently no evidence-based treatment recommendations for impulse control disorders, which include intermittent explosive disorder (IED), kleptomania and pyromania. Therefore, this systematic review sought to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated pharmacological treatments for impulse control disorders, to evaluate their efficacy and tolerability. Searches were conducted within MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Eight studies were included, six investigated pharmacotherapies for IED, while two investigated management for kleptomania. For the treatment of IED, oxcarbazepine and fluoxetine were the most efficacious. Importantly, divalproex was not superior to placebo in decreasing IED symptoms and was associated with significant adverse effects. In the treatment of kleptomania, only naltrexone was effective. The existing data suggest that the pharmacological treatment for impulse control disorders is an understudied area of psychiatry. Much of the current research on impulse control disorders focuses on management with anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Further studies conducted on these interventions in this population may yield promising results.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders; Fluoxetine; Humans; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 35305343
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114499 -
Seizure Jul 2019We systematically reviewed studies to provide current evidence about the incidence and risk of alopecia in patients undergoing valproic acid (VPA) therapy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
We systematically reviewed studies to provide current evidence about the incidence and risk of alopecia in patients undergoing valproic acid (VPA) therapy.
METHODS
We retrieved relevant publications and gathered data on alopecia in patients taking VPA and other drugs from prospective studies.
RESULTS
Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria, and the overall incidence of alopecia in patients receiving VPA therapy was 11% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08-0.13). The pooled risk of alopecia showed a significant difference between patients treated with VPA and all other drugs (odds ratio (OR) 5.02, 95% CI: 3.58-7.03), other epileptic drugs (AEDs) (OR 4.82, 95% CI: 3.32-7.00) and other non-AEDs (OR 5.84, 95% CI: 2.67-12.81). Compared to other drugs, VPA increased the risk of alopecia both in patients with migraine headaches (OR 6.05, 95% CI: 2.89-12.63) and patients with epilepsy (OR 5.29, 95% CI: 3.53-7.92), and the increase risk was reported more frequently in patients with migraine. Both lower doses (OR 4.38, 95% CI: 2.32-8.25) and shorter treatments (OR 4.98, 95% CI: 2.41-10.25) with VPA posed a high risk of alopecia compared to other drugs, as did higher doses and longer treatment times.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on our findings, VPA was significantly associated with a risk of alopecia compared to other drugs, and the risk did not depend on the dose and treatment time.
Topics: Alopecia; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Incidence; Prospective Studies; Valproic Acid
PubMed: 30981051
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.04.003