-
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Feb 2022Neonatal infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are commonly treated with vancomycin. However, there is a lack of agreement on the optimal vancomycin dosing regimen...
INTRODUCTION
Neonatal infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are commonly treated with vancomycin. However, there is a lack of agreement on the optimal vancomycin dosing regimen and corresponding vancomycin exposure to correlate with efficacy and toxicity.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to evaluate dosing of vancomycin in neonates, therapeutic target attainment and clinical toxicity and efficacy outcomes.
METHODS
Two electronic databases - Embase and PubMed (Medline) - were systematically searched between 1995-2020. Studies that reported dosing regimens, drug concentrations, toxicity, and efficacy of vancomycin in neonates were eligible for inclusion. Descriptive analysis and a narrative synthesis were performed.
RESULTS
The systematic review protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic reviews in 2020 (registration number: CRD42020219568). Twenty-four studies were included for final analysis. Overall, the data from the included studies showed a great degree of heterogeneity. Therapeutic drug monitoring practices were different between institutions. Although most studies used trough concentration with a target range of 10-20 mg/L, target attainment was different across the studies. The probability of target attainment was < 80% in all tested dosing algorithms. Few studies reported on vancomycin efficacy and toxicity.
CONCLUSION
This is a comprehensive overview of dosing strategies of vancomycin in neonates. There was inadequate evidence to propose an optimal therapeutic regimen in the newborn population, based on the data obtained, due to the heterogeneity in the design and objectives of the included studies. Consistent and homogeneous comparative randomised clinical trials are needed to identify a dosing regimen with a probability of target attainment of > 90% without toxicity.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Monitoring; Retrospective Studies; Vancomycin
PubMed: 35031450
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106515 -
Porto Biomedical Journal 2021Enterococci are opportunistic pathogens and are one of the most important bacteria in hospital-acquired infections. Their resistance to antibiotics such as vancomycin... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Enterococci are opportunistic pathogens and are one of the most important bacteria in hospital-acquired infections. Their resistance to antibiotics such as vancomycin has led to life-threatening and difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections. The true prevalence in clinical settings in Nigeria is not well known due to the lack of a comprehensive antibiotic surveillance system. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in clinical infections in Nigeria.
METHODS
Databases (PubMed, , and Google scholar) were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statements for articles reporting VRE prevalence, and were published before August 5, 2020. Data from the studies were extracted and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA 3.0), respectively. The pooled prevalence of VRE was estimated with the random-effects model and the 95% confidence interval (CI). The heterogeneity level was assessed using Cochran Q and tests.
RESULTS
A total of 35 articles were scanned for eligibility, among which 7 were included in the study after fulfilling the eligibility criteria. The studies analyzed a total of 832 enterococci isolates and 90 VRE strains. The prevalence of and in this study are 361 (59.3%) and 248 (40.7%), respectively, among which 41 (63.1%) of the and 24 (36.9%) of the were vancomycin resistant. The pooled prevalence of VRE was estimated at (95% CI; 10.0-53.9%; = 93.50%; < .001). The highest prevalence of VRE was reported from western Nigeria, 14.6% (95% CI; = 97.27; < .001).
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of VRE in Nigeria according to the reports from this study is relatively high. The report of this study should help policymakers to put in place measures that will help curb the spread of VRE and associated resistant genes to other important clinical pathogens like .
PubMed: 33884321
DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000125 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2021Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality globally constituting 13% of overall neonatal mortality....
BACKGROUND
Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality globally constituting 13% of overall neonatal mortality. Despite the high burden of neonatal sepsis, high-quality evidence in diagnosis and treatment is scarce. Due to the diagnostic challenges of sepsis and the relative immunosuppression of the newborn, many neonates receive antibiotics for suspected sepsis. Antibiotics have become the most used therapeutics in neonatal intensive care units, and observational studies in high-income countries suggest that 83% to 94% of newborns treated with antibiotics for suspected sepsis have negative blood cultures. The last Cochrane Review was updated in 2005. There is a need for an updated systematic review assessing the effects of different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase Ovid; CINAHL; LILACS; Science Citation Index EXPANDED and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science on 12 March 2021. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs comparing different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis. We included participants older than 72 hours of life at randomisation, suspected or diagnosed with neonatal sepsis, meningitis, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, or necrotising enterocolitis. We excluded trials that assessed treatment of fungal infections.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and our secondary outcomes were: serious adverse events, respiratory support, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, necrotising enterocolitis, and ototoxicity. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five RCTs (580 participants). All trials were at high risk of bias, and had very low-certainty evidence. The five included trials assessed five different comparisons of antibiotics. We did not conduct a meta-analysis due to lack of relevant data. Of the five included trials one trial compared cefazolin plus amikacin with vancomycin plus amikacin; one trial compared ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid with flucloxacillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared cloxacillin plus amikacin with cefotaxime plus gentamicin; one trial compared meropenem with standard care (ampicillin plus gentamicin or cefotaxime plus gentamicin); and one trial compared vancomycin plus gentamicin with vancomycin plus aztreonam. None of the five comparisons found any evidence of a difference when assessing all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, or necrotising enterocolitis; however, none of the trials were near an information size that could contribute significantly to the evidence of the comparative benefits and risks of any particular antibiotic regimen. None of the trials assessed respiratory support or ototoxicity. The benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the lack of well-powered trials and the high risk of systematic errors.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. RCTs assessing different antibiotic regimens in late-onset neonatal sepsis with low risks of bias are warranted.
Topics: Amikacin; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aztreonam; Bias; Cefazolin; Clavulanic Acid; Drug Therapy, Combination; Floxacillin; Gentamicins; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Neonatal Sepsis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ticarcillin; Vancomycin
PubMed: 33998665
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013836.pub2 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Sep 2020Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) are on the rise worldwide. Here, we report the first prevalence of VRE in Nigeria using systematic review and meta-analysis.... (Review)
Review
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) are on the rise worldwide. Here, we report the first prevalence of VRE in Nigeria using systematic review and meta-analysis. International databases MedLib, PubMed, International Scientific Indexing (ISI), Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and African journals online (AJOL) were searched. Information was extracted by two independent reviewers, and results were reviewed by the third. Two reviewers independently assessed the study quality using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. OpenMeta analyst was used. The random effect was used, and publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed, and the sources were analysed using the leave-one-out meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression. Nineteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were added to the final meta-analysis, and the study period was from 2009-2018. Of the 2552 isolates tested, 349 were VRE, and was reported the most. The pooled prevalence of VRE in Nigeria was estimated at 25.3% (95% CI; 19.8-30.8%; = 96.26%; < 0.001). Between-study variability was high ( = 0.011; heterogeneity = 96.26% with heterogeneity chi-square (Q) = 480.667, degrees of freedom (df) = 18, and = 0.001). The funnel plot showed no publication bias, and the leave-one-out forest plot did not affect the pooled prevalence. The South-East region had a moderate heterogeneity though not significant ( = 51.15%, = 0.129). Meta-regression showed that all the variables listed contributed to the heterogeneity except for the animal isolate source ( = 0.188) and studies that were done in 2013 ( = 0.219). Adherence to proper and accurate antimicrobial usage, comprehensive testing, and continuous surveillance of VRE are required.
PubMed: 32882963
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9090565 -
Neurocritical Care Feb 2014Central nervous system infections requiring treatment with intraventricular (IVT) vancomycin are becoming increasingly common with advent of intracranial devices and... (Review)
Review
Central nervous system infections requiring treatment with intraventricular (IVT) vancomycin are becoming increasingly common with advent of intracranial devices and increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant and nosocomial organisms. Administering vancomycin via IVT route bypasses the blood-brain barrier to allow localized and controlled delivery directly to the desired site of action, achieving high concentrations for more reliable bactericidal action. This article systematically reviews current literature on IVT vancomycin in adults, compiles current knowledge, and integrates available evidence to serve as a practical reference.Medline (1946-July 2012), Embase (1974-July 2012), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2012) were searched using terms vancomycin, intraventricular, shunt infection, cerebrospinal fluid, and intraventriculitis. Seventeen articles were included in this review. Indications for IVT vancomycin included meningitis unresponsive to intravenous antibiotics, ventriculitis, and intracranial device infections. No serious adverse effects following IVT vancomycin have been reported. Dosages reported in literature ranged from 0.075-50 mg/day, with the most evidence for dosages of 5 to 20 mg/day. Duration of therapy most commonly ranged from 7 to 21 days. Therapeutic drug monitoring was reported in 11 studies, with CSF vancomycin levels varying widely from 1.1 to 812.6 mg/L, without clear relationships between CSF levels and efficacy or toxicity. Using IVT vancomycin to treat meningitis, ventriculitis, and CNS device-associated infections appears safe and effective based on current evidence. Optimal regimens are still unclear, and dosing of IVT vancomycin requires intricate consideration of patient specific factors and their impact on CNS pathophysiology. Higher-quality clinical trials are necessary to characterize the disposition of vancomycin within CNS, and to determine models for various pathophysiological conditions to facilitate better understanding of effects on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cerebral Ventriculitis; Humans; Injections, Intraventricular; Meningoencephalitis; Vancomycin
PubMed: 23090839
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-012-9784-z -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Oct 2023To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022 for studies that compared vancomycin with other antibiotic regimens for treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, relapse rate and mortality were considered.
RESULTS
Fifteen randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies were included. The efficacy and safety data of vancomycin differed from those of the comparators group. After subgroup analysis, the differences came mainly from the trials compared with daptomycin. Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin showed a lower microbiological cure rate (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41∼0.82, I = 0%, P = 0.002) and clinical cure rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42∼0.68, I = 3%, P < 0.00001), as well as more adverse events (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.43∼7.19, I = 59%, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of vancomycin in treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is still excellent but slightly inferior in adverse events. However, this does not affect its use as a first-line drug. Daptomycin is expected to be a better antimicrobial drug.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Staphylococcal Infections; Daptomycin; Bacteremia; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Staphylococcus aureus; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 37543121
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106946 -
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection... Jun 2021Vancomycin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) is a serious public health challenging concern worldwide. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vancomycin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) is a serious public health challenging concern worldwide.
OBJECTIVES
Therefore, the objective of present study of 62 published studies was to evaluate the prevalence of VRSA based on different years, areas, isolate source, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and the genetic determinants.
METHODS
We searched the relevant articles that focused on the prevalence rates of VRSA in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from 2000 to 2019. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (version 14.0).
RESULTS
The prevalence of VRSA was 2% before 2006, 5% in 2006-2014, and 7% in 2015-2020 that showed a 3.5-fold increase in the frequency of VRSA between before 2006 and 2020 years. The prevalence of VRSA was 5% in Asia, 1% in Europe, 4% in America, 3% in South America, and 16% in Africa. The frequencies of VRSA isolated from clinical, non-clinical, and mixed samples were 6%, 7%, and 14%, respectively. The prevalence of VRSA was 12% using disk diffusion agar method, 7% using MIC-base methods, and 4% using mixed-methods. The prevalence of vanA, vanB, and vanC1 positive were 71%, 26%, and 4% among VRSA strains. The most prevalent genotype was staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec (SCCmec) II, which accounted for 57% of VRSA. The most prevalent staphylococcal protein A (spa) types were t002, t030, and t037.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of VRSA has been increasing in recent years particularly in Africa/Asia than Europe/America. The most prevalent of genetic determinants associated with VRSA were vanA and SCCmec II. This study clarifies that the rigorous monitoring of definite antibiotic policy, regular surveillance/control of nosocomial-associated infections and intensive surveillance of vancomycin-resistance are required for preventing emergence and further spreading of VRSA.
Topics: Africa; Asia; Europe; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; North America; Prevalence; South America; Staphylococcal Infections; Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 34193295
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00967-y -
Hospital Pharmacy Dec 2023Simultaneous administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) poses significant challenges related to physical and chemical compatibility, as well as... (Review)
Review
Simultaneous administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) poses significant challenges related to physical and chemical compatibility, as well as clinical practice. A systematic review of available literature related to VPT Y-site compatibility was performed. Data was collected from primary and tertiary sources. Seven articles were included in addition to one internal assessment and one review article and information from tertiary drug databases. The literature supports the simultaneous administration via Y-site of piperacillin-tazobactam 33.75 mg/mL in normal saline (NS) and vancomycin 4 to 8 mg/mL in NS. The same drug products at differing concentrations, diluents, storage conditions, or preparations outside of this recommendation should be considered incompatible.
PubMed: 38560538
DOI: 10.1177/00185787231169455 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2021Vancomycin is commonly used as a treatment for neonatal infections. However, there is a lack of consensus establishing the optimal vancomycin therapeutic regimen and... (Review)
Review
Vancomycin is commonly used as a treatment for neonatal infections. However, there is a lack of consensus establishing the optimal vancomycin therapeutic regimen and defining the most appropriate PK/PD parameter correlated with the efficacy. A recent guideline recommends AUC-guided therapeutic dosing in treating serious infections in neonates. However, in clinical practice, trough serum concentrations are commonly used as a surrogate PKPD index for AUC24. Despite this, target serum concentrations in a neonatal population remain poorly defined. The objective is to describe the relationship between therapeutic regimens and the achievement of clinical or pharmacokinetic outcomes in the neonatal population. The review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. A bibliographic search was manually performed for studies published on PubMed and EMBASE. Clinical efficacy and/or target attainment and the safety of vancomycin treatment were evaluated through obtaining serum concentrations. A total of 476 articles were identified, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. All of them evaluated the target attainment, but only two assessed the clinical efficacy. The enormous variability concerning target serum concentrations is noteworthy, which translates into a difficulty in determining which therapeutic regimen achieves the best results. Moreover, there are few studies that analyze clinical efficacy results obtained after reaching predefined trough serum concentrations, this information being essential for clinical practice.
PubMed: 33805874
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040347 -
Jornal de Pediatria 2024To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old.
DATA SOURCES
This is a systematic review in which five randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin, involving a total of 429 children with nosocomial infections, were evaluated. They were searched in scientific databases: PubMed, Bvs, and SciELO.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The main nosocomial infections that affected children were bacteremia, skin, and soft tissue infections followed by nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which all studies showed infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains being isolated. Both linezolid and vancomycin showed high therapeutic efficacy against different types of nosocomial infections, ranging from 84.4% to 94% for linezolid and 76.9% to 90% for vancomycin. Patients receiving linezolid had lower rates of rash and red man syndrome compared to those receiving vancomycin. However, despite the adverse reactions, antimicrobials can be safely administered to children to treat nosocomial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria.
CONCLUSION
Both linezolid and vancomycin showed good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria in hospitalized children. However, linezolid stands out regarding its pharmacological safety. Importantly, to strengthen this conclusion, further clinical trials are needed to provide additional evidence.
Topics: Humans; Linezolid; Cross Infection; Vancomycin; Child; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Child, Preschool; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Infant; Staphylococcal Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 38145631
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2023.08.011