-
Stem Cell Research & Therapy Apr 2023The increasing incidence of osteoporosis in recent years has aroused widespread public concern; however, existing effective treatments are limited. Therefore, new... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The increasing incidence of osteoporosis in recent years has aroused widespread public concern; however, existing effective treatments are limited. Therefore, new osteoporosis treatment methods, including stem cell transplantation and exosome therapy, have been proposed and are gaining momentum. Exosomes are considered to have greater potential for clinical application owing to their immunocompatibility. This study summarises the latest evidence demonstrating the efficacy of exosomes in improving bone loss in the treatment of osteoporosis.
MAIN TEXT
This systematic review and meta-analyses searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 26 March 2022 for osteoporosis treatment studies using stem cell-derived exosomes. Six endpoints were selected to determine efficacy: bone mineral density, trabecular bone volume/tissue volume fraction, trabecular number, trabecular separation, trabecular thickness, and cortical thickness. The search generated 366 citations. Eventually, 11 articles that included 15 controlled preclinical trials and 242 experimental animals (rats and mice) were included in the meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
The results were relatively robust and reliable despite some publication biases, suggesting that exosome treatment increased bone mass, improved bone microarchitecture, and enhanced bone strength compared with placebo treatments. Moreover, stem cell-derived exosomes may favour anabolism over catabolism, shifting the dynamic balance towards bone regeneration.
Topics: Rats; Mice; Animals; Exosomes; Osteoporosis; Bone Density; Bone and Bones; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37038180
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-023-03317-4 -
European Journal of Radiology May 2012Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) allows non-invasive assessment of the coronary arteries and simultaneously can provide measurement of left ventricular ejection... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Accuracy of multi-slice computed tomography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) allows non-invasive assessment of the coronary arteries and simultaneously can provide measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The accuracy of newer MSCT generations (64-slice or more) for assessment of LVEF compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has not been evaluated in a meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To evaluate, via a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, whether MSCT can assess LVEF with high accuracy compared with MRI and TTE.
METHODS
Electronic databases and reference lists for relevant published studies were searched. Twenty-seven eligible studies provided mean LVEF% with its standard deviation (SD) measured by MSCT versus MRI and TTE. Meta-analysis of weighted mean difference (WMD) and Bland-Altman method were used to quantify the mean difference and agreement between MSCT compared with MRI and TTE.
RESULTS
The results of combining 12 studies showed no significant difference in LVEF% between MSCT and MRI with a WMD of -0.11 (-1.48, 1.26, 95% CI), p=0.88. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between MSCT and MRI with a bias of 0.0 (-3.7, 3.7 ± 1.96SD) with 95% CI. The results of combining 15 studies showed no significant difference in LVEF between MSCT versus TTE measurements with a WMD of 0.19 (-1.13 to 1.50; 95% CI), p=0.87. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between MSCT and TTE with a bias of 0.3 (-4.7, 5.7 ± 1.96SD) with 95% CI.
CONCLUSION
The newer MSCT generations can provide accurate LVEF measurement compared to MRI and TTE. MSCT represents a valid technique for the combined evaluation of LVEF and coronary artery disease.
Topics: Comorbidity; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Echocardiography; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prevalence; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke Volume; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 22381439
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.002 -
Heart Failure Reviews Jan 2023The impact of exercise training and physiotherapy on heart function and pulmonary circulation parameters in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)... (Review)
Review
The impact of exercise training and physiotherapy on heart function and pulmonary circulation parameters in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients is uncertain. Hence, we performed a systematic review of published trials studying physical training in HFpEF population, with a focus on exercise and physiotherapy effect on left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV) morphological, functional, and pulmonary circulation parameters. We searched Cochrane Library and MEDLINE/PubMed for trials that evaluated the effect of exercise training and/or physiotherapy in adult HFpEF patients (defined as LVEF ≥ 45%), including publications until March 2021. Our systematic review identified eighteen articles (n = 418 trained subjects, 4 to 52 weeks of training) and covered heterogeneous trials with various populations, designs, methodologies, and interventions. Five of twelve trials revealed a significant reduction of mitral E/e' ratio after the training (- 1.2 to - 4.9). Seven studies examined left atrial volume index; three of them showed its decrease (- 3.7 to - 8 ml/m). Findings were inconsistent regarding improvement of cardiac output, E/A ratio, and E wave DecT and uncertain for RV function and pulmonary hypertension parameters. For now, no reliable evidence about rehabilitation effect on HFpEF cardiac mechanisms is available. There are some hypotheses generating findings on potential positive effects to parameters of LV filling pressure (E/e'), left atrium size, cardiac output, and RV function. This encourages a broader and more complex assessment of parameters reflecting cardiac function in future HFpEF exercise training studies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Exercise; Physical Therapy Modalities
PubMed: 35831689
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-022-10259-1 -
International Urology and Nephrology Jun 2022The prevalence and mortality of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is still a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The prevalence and mortality of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are high in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is still a lack of recommendations for the medication therapy of these patients in the guideline so far.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the studies assessing medication therapy for patients with CKD and HFpEF by July 21, 2021. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effect model and the quality assessment was performed. In our research, we followed to the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO.
RESULTS
We finally identified six studies, three of which were randomized controlled trials and the others were retrospective cohort studies. The results of meta-analysis including three retrospective cohort studies showed that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors had significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 14% (3 studies, 3816 patients, HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.95; I = 49%; P = 0.003), and all-cause hospitalization by 11% (2 studies, 2350 patients, HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.85-0.94; I = 0%; P < 0.00001) in patients with CKD and HFpEF. However, there was no significant reduction in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (3 studies, 3816 patients, HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75-1.04; I = 75%; P = 0.13). One of the studies focused on the sacubitril-valsartan showed that sacubitril-valsartan was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.95). The study focused on the carvedilol did not show a significant reduction in the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death (HR 0.917, 95% CI 0.501-1.678).
CONCLUSIONS
For patients with CKD and HFpEF, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is associated with significant benefits in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization but has no significant effect on hospitalization for heart failure. The subgroup analysis of one RCT study focused on ARNI showed that although long-term treatment with sacubitril-valsartan may reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death, more studies are needed to confirm that.
Topics: Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Valsartan
PubMed: 34669107
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-03025-z -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023Despite recent advances in heart failure (HF) therapy, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, morbidity, and HF hospitalization (HFH) are major challenges in HF... (Review)
Review
Despite recent advances in heart failure (HF) therapy, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, morbidity, and HF hospitalization (HFH) are major challenges in HF treatment. We aimed to review the potential of vericiguat as a treatment option for HF. A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Four randomized controlled trials were identified, which study the safety and efficacy of vericiguat in HF patients. Vericiguat activates soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) by binding to the beta-subunit, bypassing the requirement for NO-induced activation. The nitric oxide (NO)-sGC-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway plays an essential role in cardiovascular (CV) regulation and the protection of healthy cardiac function but is impaired in HF. Vericiguat reduced the risk of CV death and HFH in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but showed no therapeutic effect on HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The trials demonstrated a favorable safety profile with most common adverse events such as hypotension, syncope, and anemia. Therefore, vericiguat is recommended for patients with HFrEF and a minimum systolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg. Treatment with vericiguat is considered when the individual patient experiences decompensation despite being on guideline-recommended medication, e.g., angiotensin-converting inhibitor/AT1 receptor antagonist, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, spironolactone, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors. Furthermore, larger studies are required to investigate any potential effect of vericiguat in HFpEF patients. Despite the limitations, vericiguat can be recommended for patients with HFrEF, where standard-of-care is insufficient, and the disease worsens.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Treatment Outcome; Stroke Volume; Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase; Cardiotonic Agents; Diuretics
PubMed: 37511587
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411826 -
International Journal of Cardiology Jan 2016Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure frequently coexist, commonly resulting in serious adverse events. With both conditions increasing in prevalence and justified... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure frequently coexist, commonly resulting in serious adverse events. With both conditions increasing in prevalence and justified concerns about treatment efficacy, it is vital to understand how the type of heart failure impacts on prognosis.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of studies examining cardiovascular outcomes in AF patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (AF-HFrEF) compared to those with preserved ejection fraction (AF-HFpEF). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Prospective registration: PROSPERO-CRD42014007305.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review (n=54,587) with 10 suitable for meta-analysis, including retrospective/prospective cohorts and sub-group analyses of randomized trials. AF-HFrEF was present in 49% and these patients were younger, more often male and with higher NYHA class than AF-HFpEF. Oral anticoagulation use was 55% versus 50% respectively (p<0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in AF-HFrEF; risk ratio (RR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.36, p<0.001 (n=45,100), with absolute death rates of 24% compared to 18% in AF-HFpEF over 2 years. There were no significant differences in incident stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03, p=0.094; n=33,773) or heart failure hospitalization (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.53, p=0.115; n=31,583). The risk of bias was generally low, but heterogeneity was substantial.
CONCLUSIONS
All-cause mortality is significantly higher in AF patients with HFrEF compared to HFpEF, although stroke risk and heart failure hospitalization are similar. Further studies are needed to address the prevention of adverse outcomes in all AF patients with heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Humans; Prognosis; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 26580351
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.10.220 -
Heart Failure Reviews Mar 2021Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is characterized by temporary wall motion abnormality of the left ventricle. There is much debate upon the prognostic parameters. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is characterized by temporary wall motion abnormality of the left ventricle. There is much debate upon the prognostic parameters. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether LVEF and the presence of apical ballooning predict long-term mortality in TCM. PubMed and Embase were searched through to October 30, 2017 without language restrictions, followed by an additional search through to February 2, 2020. Our search identified 18 studies that met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 5168 patients. Reduced LVEF as a categorical variable was associated with more than threefold increase in mortality risk in TCM patients (HR 3.10; 95% CI 1.78-5.42; P < 0.0001; I = 57%). Further subset analyses with the exclusion of studies consisting of patients with coronary artery disease revealed another significant relationship between LVEF and mortality (HR 3.13; 95% CI 1.392-7.031; P < 0.006; I = 58%). LVEF as a continuous variable was also found to be associated with increased mortality risk. However, this relationship only retained significance when computing odds ratios instead of hazard ratios (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.98; P < 0.001; I = 0%). Finally, the existence of apical ballooning failed to demonstrate any link with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.97-1.64; P = 0.09; I = 34%). LVEF and apical ballooning are both potential prognostic markers for mortality.
Topics: Heart Ventricles; Humans; Prognosis; Stroke Volume; Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
PubMed: 32895749
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-020-10018-0 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Dec 2023Existing evidence suggested that the role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFpEF) might be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Existing evidence suggested that the role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFpEF) might be divergent. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between EAT and HF. Several databases were searched from their inception to January 20, 2023. We calculated the standard mean difference (SMD) in EAT between the HF and control groups, as well as the correlation coefficient between EAT and left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) function. This meta-analysis included 23 studies, involving 1563 HFrEF and 1351 HFpEF patients. Our findings indicated that EAT was significantly higher in HFpEF patients (SMD: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.27-0.94), but not in total HF or HFrEF patients compared to controls. In HFrEF, EAT was positively correlated with LVEF, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LA global longitudinal strain (LAGLS), and negatively correlated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP). However, no significant relationship existed between EAT and LV mass index (LVMI) or LVGLS. For HFpEF, EAT correlated positively with LVMI, LVEDVI, LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), LA volume index (LAVI), cardiac troponin T, and extracellular volume (ECV), but negatively with LVGLS and LAGLS. EAT was shown to be higher in HFpEF, but not in HFrEF. Less EAT was linked with worse LA function but not worse LV function in HFrEF, while more EAT was associated with worse LA/LV function in HFpEF.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Heart Atria; Prognosis
PubMed: 37481217
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101979 -
ESC Heart Failure Dec 2021While the interplay between heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been extensively studied, little is known regarding HF and atrial flutter (AFL), which... (Review)
Review
While the interplay between heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been extensively studied, little is known regarding HF and atrial flutter (AFL), which may be managed differently. We reviewed the incidence, prevalence, and predictors of HF in AFL and vice versa, and the outcomes of treatment of AFL in HF. A systematic literature review of PubMed/Medline and EMBASE yielded 65 studies for inclusion and qualitative synthesis. No study described the incidence or prevalence of AFL in unselected patients with HF. Most cohorts enrolled patients with AF/AFL as interchangeable diagnoses, or highly selected patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. The prevalence of HF in AFL ranged from 6% to 56%. However, the phenotype of HF was never defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). No studies reported the predictors, phenotype, and prognostic implications of AFL in HF. There was significant variation in treatments studied, including the proportion that underwent ablation. When systolic dysfunction was tachycardia-mediated, catheter ablation demonstrated LVEF normalization in up to 88%, as well as reduced cardiovascular mortality. In summary, AFL and HF often coexist but are understudied, with no randomized trial data to inform care. Further research is warranted to define the epidemiology and establish optimal management.
Topics: Atrial Flutter; Catheter Ablation; Heart Failure; Humans; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 34505352
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13526 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Feb 2024The volume retention of breast autologous fat grafting is unpredictable, and the volume retention rate and related influencing factors have not been systematically... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The volume retention of breast autologous fat grafting is unpredictable, and the volume retention rate and related influencing factors have not been systematically reviewed. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the volume retention rate and related influencing factors of breast autologous fat grafting, which is for reconstructive or esthetic purposes. Literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception of study to December 2022. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all outcomes. Begg's test was performed to test publication bias. Subgroup analysis was performed based on population, method of fat preparation, method of volume measurement, number of fat grafting, and injected fat grafting volume. A total of 25 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 36 months. Results showed that the pooled volume retention rate at the latest follow-up point was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI): 48.5%-59.5%]. Based on the fat preparation methods, the pooled rate was 51.5% (95%CI: 41.5%-61.5%) for centrifugation, which was higher than that for sedimentation [38.7% (95%CI: 30.9%-46.5%)]. In addition, the enrichment of stromal vascular fraction obtained after centrifugation was found to be associated with higher volume retention rate (weighted mean difference: 17.36, 95%CI: 8.84-25.87). Our findings may provide guidance for evaluating the volume retention rate of breast autologous fat grafting in clinical settings. Further studies are needed to verify our findings.
Topics: Humans; Adipose Tissue; Transplantation, Autologous; Breast; Autografts; Mammaplasty
PubMed: 38160589
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.003