-
Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Jun 2017Living organisms are continuously exposed to a myriad of DNA damaging agents that can impact health and modulate disease-states. However, robust DNA repair and... (Review)
Review
Living organisms are continuously exposed to a myriad of DNA damaging agents that can impact health and modulate disease-states. However, robust DNA repair and damage-bypass mechanisms faithfully protect the DNA by either removing or tolerating the damage to ensure an overall survival. Deviations in this fine-tuning are known to destabilize cellular metabolic homeostasis, as exemplified in diverse cancers where disruption or deregulation of DNA repair pathways results in genome instability. Because routinely used biological, physical and chemical agents impact human health, testing their genotoxicity and regulating their use have become important. In this introductory review, we will delineate mechanisms of DNA damage and the counteracting repair/tolerance pathways to provide insights into the molecular basis of genotoxicity in cells that lays the foundation for subsequent articles in this issue. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:235-263, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Topics: Animals; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Humans; Mutagenesis; Telomere
PubMed: 28485537
DOI: 10.1002/em.22087 -
Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology Aug 2017DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most dangerous type of DNA damage because they can result in the loss of large chromosomal regions. In all mammalian cells, DSBs... (Review)
Review
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most dangerous type of DNA damage because they can result in the loss of large chromosomal regions. In all mammalian cells, DSBs that occur throughout the cell cycle are repaired predominantly by the non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Defects in NHEJ result in sensitivity to ionizing radiation and the ablation of lymphocytes. The NHEJ pathway utilizes proteins that recognize, resect, polymerize and ligate the DNA ends in a flexible manner. This flexibility permits NHEJ to function on a wide range of DNA-end configurations, with the resulting repaired DNA junctions often containing mutations. In this Review, we discuss the most recent findings regarding the relative involvement of the different NHEJ proteins in the repair of various DNA-end configurations. We also discuss the shunting of DNA-end repair to the auxiliary pathways of alternative end joining (a-EJ) or single-strand annealing (SSA) and the relevance of these different pathways to human disease.
Topics: Animals; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA End-Joining Repair; DNA Repair; Humans
PubMed: 28512351
DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.48 -
Annual Review of Biochemistry 2004DNA damage is a relatively common event in the life of a cell and may lead to mutation, cancer, and cellular or organismic death. Damage to DNA induces several cellular... (Review)
Review
DNA damage is a relatively common event in the life of a cell and may lead to mutation, cancer, and cellular or organismic death. Damage to DNA induces several cellular responses that enable the cell either to eliminate or cope with the damage or to activate a programmed cell death process, presumably to eliminate cells with potentially catastrophic mutations. These DNA damage response reactions include: (a) removal of DNA damage and restoration of the continuity of the DNA duplex; (b) activation of a DNA damage checkpoint, which arrests cell cycle progression so as to allow for repair and prevention of the transmission of damaged or incompletely replicated chromosomes; (c) transcriptional response, which causes changes in the transcription profile that may be beneficial to the cell; and (d) apoptosis, which eliminates heavily damaged or seriously deregulated cells. DNA repair mechanisms include direct repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, and cross-link repair. The DNA damage checkpoints employ damage sensor proteins, such as ATM, ATR, the Rad17-RFC complex, and the 9-1-1 complex, to detect DNA damage and to initiate signal transduction cascades that employ Chk1 and Chk2 Ser/Thr kinases and Cdc25 phosphatases. The signal transducers activate p53 and inactivate cyclin-dependent kinases to inhibit cell cycle progression from G1 to S (the G1/S checkpoint), DNA replication (the intra-S checkpoint), or G2 to mitosis (the G2/M checkpoint). In this review the molecular mechanisms of DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints in mammalian cells are analyzed.
Topics: Animals; Cell Cycle; Cross-Linking Reagents; DNA; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; DNA Replication; Humans; Models, Biological; Photobiology; Recombination, Genetic; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 15189136
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 -
Molecular Cell Jun 2020Anti-cancer drugs targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) exploit genetic or functional defects in this pathway through synthetic lethal mechanisms. For example, defects... (Review)
Review
Anti-cancer drugs targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) exploit genetic or functional defects in this pathway through synthetic lethal mechanisms. For example, defects in homologous recombination (HR) repair arise in cancer cells through inherited or acquired mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or other genes in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway, and these tumors have been shown to be particularly sensitive to inhibitors of the base excision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Recent work has identified additional genomic and functional assays of DNA repair that provide new predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for these targeted therapies. Here, we examine the development of selective agents targeting DNA repair, including PARP inhibitors; inhibitors of the DNA damage kinases ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), CHK1, WEE1, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM); and inhibitors of classical non-homologous end joining (cNHEJ) and alternative end joining (Alt EJ). We also review the biomarkers that guide the use of these agents and current clinical trials with these therapies.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; DNA Damage; DNA End-Joining Repair; DNA Repair; Genes, BRCA1; Homologous Recombination; Humans; Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases
PubMed: 32459988
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.035 -
Clinical Oncology (Royal College of... May 2019It has been well established that an accumulation of mutations in DNA, whether caused by external sources (e.g. ultraviolet light, radioactivity) or internal sources... (Review)
Review
It has been well established that an accumulation of mutations in DNA, whether caused by external sources (e.g. ultraviolet light, radioactivity) or internal sources (e.g. metabolic by-products, such as reactive oxygen species), has the potential to cause a cell to undergo carcinogenesis and increase the risk for the development of cancer. Therefore, it is critically important for a cell to have the capacity to properly respond to and repair DNA damage as it occurs. The DNA damage response (DDR) describes a collection of DNA repair pathways that aid in the protection of genomic integrity by detecting myriad types of DNA damage and initiating the correct DNA repair pathway. In many instances, a deficiency in the DDR, whether inherited or spontaneously assumed, can increase the risk of carcinogenesis and ultimately tumorigenesis through the accumulation of mutations that fail to be properly repaired. Interestingly, although disruption of the DDR can lead to the initial genomic instability that can ultimately cause carcinogenesis, the DDR has also proven to be an invaluable target for anticancer drugs and therapies. Making matters more complicated, the DDR is also involved in the resistance to first-line cancer therapy. In this review, we will consider therapies already in use in the clinic and ongoing research into other avenues of treatment that target DNA repair pathways in cancer.
Topics: DNA Repair; Humans; Neoplasms
PubMed: 30876709
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.02.007 -
Current Opinion in Genetics &... Dec 2021Helicases are in the spotlight of DNA metabolism and are critical for DNA repair in all domains of life. At their biochemical core, they bind and hydrolyze ATP,... (Review)
Review
Helicases are in the spotlight of DNA metabolism and are critical for DNA repair in all domains of life. At their biochemical core, they bind and hydrolyze ATP, converting this energy to translocate unidirectionally, with different strand polarities and substrate binding specificities, along one strand of a nucleic acid. In doing so, DNA and RNA helicases separate duplex strands or remove nucleoprotein complexes, affecting DNA repair and the architecture of replication forks. In this review, we focus on recent advances on the roles and regulations of DNA helicases in homologous recombination repair, a critical pathway for mending damaged chromosomes and for ensuring genome integrity.
Topics: DNA Damage; DNA Helicases; DNA Repair; DNA Replication; Homologous Recombination; Recombinational DNA Repair
PubMed: 34271541
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.06.009 -
Mutation Research. Reviews in Mutation... 2019The comet assay offers the opportunity to measure both DNA damage and repair. Various comet assay based methods are available to measure DNA repair activity, but some... (Review)
Review
The comet assay offers the opportunity to measure both DNA damage and repair. Various comet assay based methods are available to measure DNA repair activity, but some requirements should be met for their effective use in human biomonitoring studies. These conditions include i) robustness of the assay, ii) sources of inter- and intra-individual variability must be known, iii) DNA repair kinetics should be assessed to optimize sampling timing; and iv) DNA repair in accessible surrogate tissues should reflect repair activity in target tissues prone to carcinogenic effects. DNA repair phenotyping can be performed on frozen and fresh samples, and is a more direct measurement than genomic or transcriptomic approaches. There are mixed reports concerning the regulation of DNA repair by environmental and dietary factors. In general, exposure to genotoxic agents did not change base excision repair (BER) activity, whereas some studies reported that dietary interventions affected BER activity. On the other hand, in vitro and in vivo studies indicated that nucleotide excision repair (NER) can be altered by exposure to genotoxic agents, but studies on other life style related factors, such as diet, are rare. Thus, crucial questions concerning the factors regulating DNA repair and inter-individual variation remain unanswered. Intra-individual variation over a period of days to weeks seems limited, which is favourable for DNA repair phenotyping in biomonitoring studies. Despite this reported low intra-individual variation, timing of sampling remains an issue that needs further investigation. A correlation was reported between the repair activity in easily accessible peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and internal organs for both NER and BER. However, no correlation was found between tumour tissue and blood cells. In conclusion, although comet assay based approaches to measure BER/NER phenotypes are feasible and promising, more work is needed to further optimize their application in human biomonitoring and intervention studies.
Topics: Animals; Biological Monitoring; Comet Assay; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Humans; Leukocytes, Mononuclear
PubMed: 31416580
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.03.002 -
Cells Jul 2020DNA is the source of genetic information, and preserving its integrity is essential in order to sustain life. The genome is continuously threatened by different types of... (Review)
Review
DNA is the source of genetic information, and preserving its integrity is essential in order to sustain life. The genome is continuously threatened by different types of DNA lesions, such as abasic sites, mismatches, interstrand crosslinks, or single-stranded and double-stranded breaks. As a consequence, cells have evolved specialized DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms to sustain genome integrity. By orchestrating multilayer signaling cascades specific for the type of lesion that occurred, the DDR ensures that genetic information is preserved overtime. In the last decades, DNA repair mechanisms have been thoroughly investigated to untangle these complex networks of pathways and processes. As a result, key factors have been identified that control and coordinate DDR circuits in time and space. In the first part of this review, we describe the critical processes encompassing DNA damage sensing and resolution. In the second part, we illustrate the consequences of partial or complete failure of the DNA repair machinery. Lastly, we will report examples in which this knowledge has been instrumental to develop novel therapies based on genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas.
Topics: Animals; Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Gene Editing; Humans
PubMed: 32664329
DOI: 10.3390/cells9071665 -
Life Sciences Apr 2022Various DNA breaks created via programmable CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease activity results in different intracellular DNA break repair pathways. Based on the cellular repair... (Review)
Review
Various DNA breaks created via programmable CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease activity results in different intracellular DNA break repair pathways. Based on the cellular repair pathways, CRISPR-based gene knock-in methods can be categorized into two major strategies: 1) Homology-independent strategies which are targeted insertion events based on non-homologous end joining, and 2) Homology-dependent strategies which are targeted insertion events based on the homology-directed repair. This review elaborates on various gene knock-in methods in mammalian cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and in sync with DNA-break repair pathways. Gene knock-in methods are applied in functional genomics and gene therapy. To compensate or correct genetic defects, different CRISPR-based gene knock-in strategies can be used. Thus, researchers need to make a conscious decision about the most suitable knock-in method. For a successful gene-targeted insertion, some determinant factors should be considered like cell cycle, dominant DNA repair pathway, size of insertions, and donor properties. In this review, different aspects of each gene knock-in strategy are discussed to provide a framework for choosing the most appropriate gene knock-in method in different applications.
Topics: Animals; CRISPR-Cas Systems; DNA; DNA Breaks; DNA End-Joining Repair; DNA Repair; Gene Editing; Gene Knock-In Techniques; Humans; Recombinational DNA Repair
PubMed: 35182556
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120409 -
Journal of Zhejiang University.... Jan 2021Alkylated DNA lesions, induced by both exogenous chemical agents and endogenous metabolites, represent a major form of DNA damage in cells. The repair of alkylation... (Review)
Review
Alkylated DNA lesions, induced by both exogenous chemical agents and endogenous metabolites, represent a major form of DNA damage in cells. The repair of alkylation damage is critical in all cells because such damage is cytotoxic and potentially mutagenic. Alkylation chemotherapy is a major therapeutic modality for many tumors, underscoring the importance of the repair pathways in cancer cells. Several different pathways exist for alkylation repair, including base excision and nucleotide excision repair, direct reversal by methyl-guanine methyltransferase (MGMT), and dealkylation by the AlkB homolog (ALKBH) protein family. However, maintaining a proper balance between these pathways is crucial for the favorable response of an organism to alkylating agents. Here, we summarize the progress in the field of DNA alkylation lesion repair and describe the implications for cancer chemotherapy.
Topics: AlkB Homolog 1, Histone H2a Dioxygenase; Alkylating Agents; Alkylation; DNA Adducts; DNA Damage; DNA Glycosylases; DNA Mismatch Repair; DNA Modification Methylases; DNA Repair; DNA Repair Enzymes; Humans; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Tumor Suppressor Proteins
PubMed: 33448187
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B2000344