-
Mymensingh Medical Journal : MMJ Jan 2023Asthma is a major noncommunicable disease (NCD), affecting both children and adults, and is the most common chronic disease among children. It is common in all ages and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Asthma is a major noncommunicable disease (NCD), affecting both children and adults, and is the most common chronic disease among children. It is common in all ages and the prevalence is increasing in most countries, especially among children as because of urbanization. Multiple therapeutic modalities are available for management of acute asthma. The commonly used formulation is Racemic Salbutamol which contains equal amounts of both R and S isomers. Levosalbutamol contains only R isomer. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of levosalbutamol and racemic salbutamol for the treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma in children (5 to 15 years). A randomized double blind clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh from October 2013 to March 2014. In this study randomization was done in two groups. Group A received nebulized levosalbutamol (LEV) and Group B received nebulized racemic salbutamol (RAC). The study parameters were respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation in room air (SpO₂), PEFR, asthma score and serum K+ level. The results of treatment outcome were compared between two groups. After treatment the respiratory rate was 24.4±5.6 per minute versus 27.6±5.3 per minute (p<0.05); heart rate was 115.5±16.4 per minute versus 124.5±12.0 per minute (p<0.05); SpO₂ was 97.2±1.8% vs 95.0±1.6% (p<0.05); PEFR was found 159.6±30.7L/min versus 143.8±27.1L/min (p<0.05) in the LEV and RAC group respectively. LEV is more effective than RAC in respect to significant improvement of asthma score. Regarding adverse events racemic salbutamol causes significant tachycardia. The study concluded that nebulized levosalbutamol is superior to racemic salbutamol in children in the treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Albuterol; Bangladesh; Asthma; Levalbuterol; Administration, Inhalation; Double-Blind Method; Bronchodilator Agents; Acute Disease
PubMed: 36594293
DOI: No ID Found -
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin Jul 1990
Review
Topics: Administration, Oral; Albuterol; Asthma; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans
PubMed: 2131214
DOI: No ID Found -
Clinical Therapeutics 2008The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guideline recommends that dosing racemic albuterol be administered every 1 to 4 hours for treating patients with asthma or... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guideline recommends that dosing racemic albuterol be administered every 1 to 4 hours for treating patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the hospital. Previously published preliminary and retrospective studies suggested that levalbuterol can be administered every 8 hours for the treatment of bronchoconstriction in hospitalized patients. However, it is unclear how the different dosing regimens affect the total number of nebulizations (scheduled plus as-needed treatments) and the costs of treatment of bronchoconstriction in a hospital setting. Moreover, it is not clear how the different dosing regimens affect symptom outcomes and health status in hospitalized patients with asthma or COPD.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate these issues in hospitalized patients with acute asthma or COPD.
METHODS
In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study, hospitalized patients aged > or = 18 years were randomly assigned to receive 14-day treatment with levalbuterol 1.25 mg q6-8h or racemic albuterol 2.5 mg q1-4h, administered per routine hospital practice at each institution. The primary efficacy end point was total number of nebulizations during hospitalization. Pulmonary function, symptom evaluation (subject general well-being score [SGWB], disease symptom assessment [DSA], and beta-mediated adverse effect scores), hospital costs (excluding medication costs) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were also evaluated.
RESULTS
In the intent-to-treat population (n = 479; levalbuterol, 241;racemic albuterol, 238), the mean (SE) age was 55.3 (16.9) years, the majority of patients were white (57.8%), and the mean (SE) weight was 80.9 (24.5) kg. Demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 treatment groups, except that there were more females with COPD in the levalbuterol treatment group (63.88%) compared with the racemic albuterol treatment group (45.5%) (P = 0.005). Patients treated with levalbuterol required significantly fewer median total nebulizations (10 vs 12; P = 0.031) and scheduled nebulizations (9 vs 11; P = 0.009) compared with those in the racemic albuterol group. The 2 treatment groups required 0 rescue nebulizations. Mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved from baseline with both levalbuterol and racemic albuterol (0.06 [0.43] and 0.10 [0.37] L, respectively); these improvements were maintained throughout the hospital stay (0.11 [0.48] and 0.16 [0.52] L). DSA and SGWB scores improved significantly from baseline in both treatment groups, and beta-mediated adverse effects mean scores were significantly greater with levalbuterol versus racemic albuterol (P < 0.001). In the levalbuterol and racemic albuterol treatment groups, hospital LOS (70.6 and 65.7 hours, respectively), time to discharge (66.0 and 62.8 hours), and total hospital costs (least squares mean [SE], US $4869.30 [$343.58] and $4899.41 [$343.20]) were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
In these hospitalized patients with acute asthma or COPD treated with levalbuterol every 6 to 8 hours or racemic albuterol every 1 to 4 hours, significantly fewer total nebulizations were required with levalbuterol, without an increased need for rescue nebulizations during 14 days of hospitalization. Both treatments were associated with improvements from baseline in symptoms and health status. The costs of treating bronchoconstriction in hospitalized patients were similar between the levalbuterol and racemic albuterol groups.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Female; Hospital Costs; Hospitalization; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Respiratory Function Tests; Severity of Illness Index; Stereoisomerism
PubMed: 18640474
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.06.010 -
Lancet (London, England) Jan 1978
Comparative Study
Topics: Acute Disease; Aerosols; Albuterol; Asthma; Humans; Injections, Intravenous
PubMed: 74574
DOI: No ID Found -
American Journal of Health-system... Jun 2015Results of a prospective study comparing clinical outcomes and costs of levalbuterol versus albuterol therapy for exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
Results of a prospective study comparing clinical outcomes and costs of levalbuterol versus albuterol therapy for exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are presented.
METHODS
In a single-center open-label study, selected adults hospitalized for asthma or COPD exacerbations over a 21-month period were randomly assigned to receive levalbuterol 1.25 mg three times daily (n = 55) or albuterol 2.5 mg four times daily (n = 57); dosage reductions and other respiratory therapies were permitted. Study outcomes included scheduled and rescue nebulizations, total treatment costs, hospital length of stay, and change in heart rate from baseline.
RESULTS
The numbers of scheduled nebulizations were similar in the levalbuterol and albuterol groups (mean ± S.D., 19.6 ± 13.4 versus 20.7 ± 14.4; p = 0.692), as were the numbers of rescue nebulizations (mean ± S.D., 0.7 ± 1.4 versus 0.8 ± 2.0; p = 0.849). The mean change from baseline in heart rate did not differ significantly between groups. Mean total treatment costs per patient were significantly greater with the use of levalbuterol ($8003, bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI], $6628-$9379) versus albuterol ($5772, bootstrap 95% CI, $5051-$6494; p = 0.006). Hospital length of stay was significantly greater in the levalbuterol group (mean ± S.D., 8.5 ± 5.2 days versus 6.8 ± 3.6 days with albuterol use; p = 0.040).
CONCLUSION
Clinical outcomes were similar with the use of levalbuterol versus albuterol for exacerbations of COPD or asthma. On average, patients receiving levalbuterol had longer and more costly hospital stays.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Length of Stay; Levalbuterol; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 26025994
DOI: 10.2146/ajhp140551 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Sep 2008The short-acting beta(2)-agonists levalbuterol and racemic albuterol are available for administration through a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The short-acting beta(2)-agonists levalbuterol and racemic albuterol are available for administration through a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI).
OBJECTIVE
This study compared the short-term safety and efficacy of cumulative doses of levalbuterol HFA MDI and racemic albuterol HFA MDI in asthmatic subjects.
METHODS
This was a randomized, modified-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, 2-way crossover study. Subjects (n = 49) were randomized to 16 cumulative doses (1x, 2x, 4x, 8x, and 16x) of levalbuterol (45 microg per dose) or racemic albuterol (90 microg per dose) administered over a 2-hour period. After a 7-day washout period, subjects were crossed over to the other treatment. After each dose, safety outcomes and pulmonary function were assessed.
RESULTS
Heart rate and (R)-albuterol exposure increased for both racemic albuterol HFA and levalbuterol HFA. For cumulative doses of 8x or greater, racemic albuterol HFA treatment had greater increases in mean heart rate than levalbuterol HFA (least-squares mean [+/- SD] difference at the 8x dose was 2.8 beats/min [95% CI, 0.3-5.3] and at the 16x dose was 3.5 beats/min [95% CI, 0.6-6.4]). (R)-albuterol plasma levels ranged from 10% to 18% higher after racemic albuterol HFA MDI dosing versus after levalbuterol HFA MDI. FEV(1) improvements were similar for both treatments. The relative potencies of the 2 therapies, based on FEV(1), were similar (ratio, 1.1 [90% CI, 0.9-1.2]; Finney method).
CONCLUSION
In this study single-day cumulative dosing of asthmatic subjects with levalbuterol HFA MDI or racemic albuterol HFA MDI resulted in similar improvements in FEV(1) and tolerability. Plasma (R)-albuterol levels and mean heart rate were less with levalbuterol HFA MDI.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume; Heart Rate; Humans; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Spirometry
PubMed: 18692886
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.015 -
Pediatric Pulmonology Aug 2009Bronchodilators have been used in premature infants. Levalbuterol (LEV) an R-isomer of Albuterol has fewer hemodynamic side effects than Racemic Albuterol (RAC) in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Bronchodilators have been used in premature infants. Levalbuterol (LEV) an R-isomer of Albuterol has fewer hemodynamic side effects than Racemic Albuterol (RAC) in adults and children. In a retrospective study we sought to investigate the effects of LEV (0.31 mg) versus RAC (1.25 mg) in very low-birth weight infants (VLBW) who were treated with a beta-2 agonist for > or =2 weeks. Medical records (between January 2001 and December 2006) were reviewed for patients' demographics, medications use, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, hypokalemia and hyperglycemia. Among 811 VLBW infants who were admitted to our NICU, 16 infants received RAC and 31 infants received LEV for > or =2 weeks. Infants who received RAC were younger, smaller, and received less Ipratropium Bromide (IB) than infants who received LEV [26.1 +/- 1.2 weeks vs. 28.1 +/- 3.7 weeks (P = 0.01), 817 +/- 211 g vs. 1,127 +/- 589 g (P = 0.01) and 2/16 (12%) vs. 15/31 (48%; P = 0.01); respectively]. In infants treated exclusively with RAC or LEV without IB, mean arterial blood pressures were lower in the RAC (n = 14) than the LEV group (n = 16, P = 0.05 by general linear model with repeated measures); however there were no differences in daily heart rates, oxygen supplementations, oxygen saturations, or respiratory rates. Also there were no differences between the two groups in hypokalemia or hyperglycemia. We conclude that LEV at a dose of 0.31 mg might have an indication in VLBW infants who are at risk for hemodynamic instability.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Blood Glucose; Bronchodilator Agents; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight; Ipratropium; Male; Oximetry; Potassium
PubMed: 19598281
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21056 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Jan 2001Salbutamol (albuterol) is a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist used as a bronchodilator for the treatment of asthma and as a uterine relaxant for the suspension of premature... (Review)
Review
Salbutamol (albuterol) is a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist used as a bronchodilator for the treatment of asthma and as a uterine relaxant for the suspension of premature labour. Salbutamol has been marketed as a racemic mixture, although beta2-agonist activity resides almost exclusively in the (R)-enantiomer. The enantioselective disposition of salbutamol and the possibility that (S)-salbutamol has adverse effects have led to the development of an enantiomerically pure (R)-salbutamol formulation known as levosalbutamol (levalbuterol). Salbutamol is metabolised almost exclusively by sulphotransferase (SULT) 1A3 to an inactive metabolite. (R)-Salbutamol is metabolised up to 12 times faster than (S)-salbutamol. This leads to relatively higher plasma concentrations of (S)- salbutamol following all routes of administration, but particularly following oral administration because of extensive metabolism by the intestine. Enantiomer concentrations are similar for the first hour following an inhaled dose, reflecting the fact that salbutamol in the lung probably undergoes little metabolism. Subsequently, (S)-salbutamol predominates due to absorption and metabolism of the swallowed portion of the inhaled dose. Following oral or inhaled administration of enantiomerically pure salbutamol, a small amount (6%) is converted to the other enantiomer, probably by acid-catalysed racemisation in the stomach. Tissue binding of salbutamol is not enantioselective and plasma protein binding is relatively low. Both enantiomers are actively excreted into the urine. Compared with healthy individuals, patients with asthma do not have substantially different pharmacokinetics of the salbutamol enantiomers, but they do appear to have less drug delivered to the lung following inhaled administration because of their narrowed airways. Levosalbutamol elicits an equal or slightly larger response than an equivalent dose of the racemic mixture. This is probably due to competitive inhibition between the enantiomers at beta-adrenoceptors. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for levosalbutamol show relatively large interindividual variations. Functionally significant genetic polymorphisms have been identified for beta2-adrenoceptors, SULT1A3 and organic action transporters, all of which affect the disposition or action of levosalbutamol. Animal, in vitro and some clinical studies have reported deleterious effects of (S)-salbutamol on smooth muscle contractility or lung function. However, well-designed clinical studies in patients with asthma have failed to find evidence of significant toxicity associated with (S)-salbutamol. The clinical consequences of relatively higher plasma concentrations of (S)-salbutamol following administration of racemate remain unclear, but in the absence of clear evidence of toxicity the clinical superiority of levosalbutamol over racemic salbutamol appears to be small.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Albuterol; Animals; Area Under Curve; Asthma; Humans; Male; Polymorphism, Genetic; Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2; Stereoisomerism
PubMed: 11236808
DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140010-00003 -
The Journal of Pediatrics Dec 2003
Topics: Albuterol; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Isomerism; Research Design
PubMed: 14657810
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.018 -
The American Journal of Emergency... Mar 1995The cases of two asthmatic patients who became hypokalemic after inhalation of normal doses of albuterol are presented. One patient was symptomatic and the other had...
The cases of two asthmatic patients who became hypokalemic after inhalation of normal doses of albuterol are presented. One patient was symptomatic and the other had only electrocardiographic changes. Both were treated successfully with oral potassium. Albuterol-induced hypokalemia and its potential cardiac toxicity are discussed briefly.
Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Asthma; Electrocardiography; Humans; Hypokalemia; Male
PubMed: 7893301
DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90086-1