-
Drugs Jun 2013Because of the increasing prevalence and changing microbiological spectrum of invasive fungal infections, some form of amphotericin B still provides the most reliable... (Review)
Review
Because of the increasing prevalence and changing microbiological spectrum of invasive fungal infections, some form of amphotericin B still provides the most reliable and broad spectrum therapeutic alternative. However, the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate is accompanied by dose-limited toxicities, most importantly, infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. In an attempt to improve the therapeutic index of amphotericin B, three lipid-associated formulations were developed, including amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD). The lipid composition of all three of these preparations differs considerably and contributes to substantially different pharmacokinetic parameters. ABLC is the largest of the lipid preparations. Because of its size, it is taken up rapidly by macrophages and becomes sequestered in tissues of the mononuclear phagocyte system such as the liver and spleen. Consequently, compared with the conventional formulation, it has lower circulating amphotericin B serum concentrations, reflected in a marked increase in volume of distribution and clearance. Lung levels are considerably higher than those achieved with other lipid-associated preparations. The recommended therapeutic dose of ABLC is 5 mg/kg/day. Because of its small size and negative charge, L-AmB avoids substantial recognition and uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Therefore, a single dose of L-AmB results in a much higher peak plasma level (Cmax) than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate and a much larger area under the concentration-time curve. Tissue concentrations in patients receiving L-AmB tend to be highest in the liver and spleen and much lower in kidneys and lung. Recommended therapeutic dosages are 3-6 mg/kg/day. After intravenous infusion, ABCD complexes remain largely intact and are rapidly removed from the circulation by cells of the macrophage phagocyte system. On a milligram-to-milligram basis, the Cmax achieved is lower than that attained by conventional amphotericin B, although the larger doses of ABCD that are administered produce an absolute level that is similar to amphotericin B. ABCD exhibits dose-limiting, infusion-related toxicities; consequently, the administered dosages should not exceed 3-4 mg/kg/day. The few comparative clinical trials that have been completed with the lipid-associated formulations have not demonstrated important clinical differences among these agents and amphotericin B for efficacy, although there are significant safety benefits of the lipid products. Furthermore, only one published trial has ever compared one lipid product against another for any indication. The results of these trials are particularly difficult to interpret because of major heterogeneities in study design, disease definitions, drug dosages, differences in clinical and microbiological endpoints as well as specific outcomes examined. Nevertheless, it is possible to derive some general conclusions given the available data. The most commonly studied syndrome has been empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients, where the lipid-associated preparations did not appear to provide a survival benefit over conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate, but did offer a significant advantage for the prevention of various breakthrough invasive fungal infections. For treatment of documented invasive fungal infections that usually involved hematological malignancy patients, no individual randomized trial has demonstrated a mortality benefit due to therapy with one of the lipid formulations. Results from meta-analyses have been contradictory, with one demonstrating a mortality benefit from all-cause mortality and one that did not demonstrate a mortality benefit. In the only published study to examine HIV-infected patients with disseminated histoplasmosis, clinical success and mortality were significantly better with L-AmB compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate; there were no differences in microbiological outcomes between treatment groups. The lipid-associated preparations were not significantly better than amphotericin B deoxycholate for treatment of AIDS-associated acute cryptococcal meningitis for either clinical or microbiological outcomes that were studied. In all of the trials that specifically examined renal toxicity, the lipid-associated formulations were significantly less nephrotoxic than amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related reactions occurred less frequently with L-AmB when compared with amphotericin B deoxycholate; however, ABCD had equivalent or more frequent infusion-related reactions than conventional amphotericin B, and this resulted in the cessation of at least one clinical trial. At the present time, this particular lipid formulation is no longer commercially available. For the treatment of most invasive fungal infections, an amphotericin B lipid formulation provides a safer alternative than conventional amphotericin B, with at least equivalent efficacy. As the cost of therapy with these agents continues to decline, these drugs will likely maintain their important role in the antifungal drug armamentarium because of their efficacy and improved safety profile.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Antifungal Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Fungi; Humans; Lipids; Mycoses
PubMed: 23729001
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4 -
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aug 2005Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficient individuals (such as AIDS patients) and in transplant recipients or tumor... (Review)
Review
Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunodeficient individuals (such as AIDS patients) and in transplant recipients or tumor patients undergoing immunosuppressive chemotherapy. Amphotericin B is one of the oldest, yet most efficient antimycotic agents. However, its usefulness is limited due to dose-dependent side-effects, notably nephrotoxicity. In order to improve its safety margin, new pharmaceutical formulations of amphotericin B have been designed especially to reduce its detrimental effects on the kidneys. Since the 1980s, a wide variety of new amphotericin B formulations have been brought forward for clinical testing, many of which were approved and reached market value in the 1990s. This review describes and discusses the molecular genetics, pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical aspects of amphotericin B itself and many of its innovative formulations.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Anti-Infective Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Cholesterol; Genetic Engineering; Ion Channels; Kinetics; Models, Molecular
PubMed: 15821914
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-005-1955-9 -
Drug Safety 1990The frequency of fungal infections is increasing. Amphotericin B remains the anti-fungal drug of choice for most systemic infections, but a limiting factor for its use... (Review)
Review
The frequency of fungal infections is increasing. Amphotericin B remains the anti-fungal drug of choice for most systemic infections, but a limiting factor for its use is the development of nephrotoxicity. Amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity is manifested as azotaemia, renal tubular acidosis, impaired renal concentrating ability and electrolyte abnormalities like hypokalaemia and sodium and magnesium wasting. All these abnormalities occur to varying degrees in almost all patients receiving the drug. Upon withdrawal of therapy renal function gradually returns to baseline, although in some instances permanent damage is sustained, especially when the cumulative dose exceeds 5g. Salt depletion enhances the development of nephrotoxicity. The mechanism of nephrotoxicity involves direct cell membrane actions to increase permeability, as well as indirect effects secondary to activation of intrarenal mechanisms (tubuloglomerular feedback) and/or release of mediators (thromboxane A2). The latter effects are presumably responsible for the observed acute decreases in renal blood flow and filtration rate, responses that are inhibited by several physiological and pharmacological interventions. Changes in intracellular calcium levels may also contribute to the observed effects. In the clinical situation, and in long term models of nephrotoxicity in the rat, salt loading protects against deterioration in renal function; recommendations are made for the optimisation of amphotericin B therapy by salt loading. New preparations of the drug, such as liposomal amphotericin B, may also prove useful in minimising nephrotoxicity while maintaining antifungal activity, but further research is needed with both salt loading and liposomal amphotericin B to confirm or deny their protective effect on kidney function.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Humans; Kidney Diseases
PubMed: 2182052
DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199005020-00003 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Oct 1991Amphotericin B has a broad spectrum of action that includes most of the major fungal pathogens of man. This drug binds to the membrane sterols of fungal cells, causing... (Review)
Review
Amphotericin B has a broad spectrum of action that includes most of the major fungal pathogens of man. This drug binds to the membrane sterols of fungal cells, causing impairment of their barrier function and loss of cell constituents. Metabolic disruption and cell death are consequent upon membrane alterations. Investigations of the sterol content of mutant strains of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans has demonstrated that resistance is often associated with alterations in membrane sterol composition. Treatment failure due to the development of amphotericin B resistance is an uncommon problem. It has tended to occur in patients receiving treatment with cytotoxic drugs. Interactions between amphotericin B and a number of other antimicrobial drugs have been observed in tests in vitro and in vivo. However, apart from one report that the combination with flucytosine is superior to amphotericin B on its own in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis, there have been no controlled trials to support the use of drug combinations in human infections.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Humans; Mycoses
PubMed: 1778890
DOI: 10.1093/jac/28.suppl_b.27 -
Pathogens and Global Health May 2012
Review
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Fungi; Humans; Mycoses
PubMed: 22943542
DOI: 10.1179/204777312X13419245939566 -
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Mar 2011Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children. The increased incidence and high mortality rates... (Review)
Review
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children. The increased incidence and high mortality rates associated with IFIs has led to development of novel antifungal agents to expand the breadth and effectiveness of treatment options available to clinicians. Since its initial approval in 1958, conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate had been considered the standard in treatment for IFIs. However, because of the dose-limiting toxicity of conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid formulations of amphotericin have been developed to potentially improve outcomes and mitigate the adverse effects associated with antifungal therapy. While less frequently employed today as prophylaxis (given the expanded availability of safer alternatives), amphotericin B is still considered a treatment option in select cases of severe or life-threatening IFIs. This article reviews the clinical use of amphotericin B for the prevention and treatment of IFIs.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Aspergillosis; Candidiasis, Invasive; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Child; Cryptococcosis; Humans; Lipids; Zygomycosis
PubMed: 21417875
DOI: 10.1586/eri.11.5 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Feb 2002Amphotericin B is a polyene macrolide antibiotic derived from the actinomycete Streptomyces nodosus. Of the 200 known polyene agents, amphotericin B is the only one with... (Review)
Review
Amphotericin B is a polyene macrolide antibiotic derived from the actinomycete Streptomyces nodosus. Of the 200 known polyene agents, amphotericin B is the only one with toxicities that are sufficiently limited to permit intravenous administration. All polyenes have a common mechanism of action in that they preferentially bind to ergosterol, the primary sterol in the fungal cell membrane. The consequence of this binding includes disruption of the osmotic integrity of the membrane, with leakage of intracellular potassium and magnesium, and also the disruption of oxidative enzymes in target cells. Amphotericin B has a relatively broad spectrum of action and is useful in treating cases of candidosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, aspergillosis, extracutaneous sporotrichosis and mucormycosis, and some cases of hyalohyphomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis. Resistance (MIC > 2 mg/L) tends to be species-dependent and emerges uncommonly and slowly in isolates from patients treated with amphotericin B. These include some individual strains of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida lusitaniae, which may acquire resistance during treatment. Some isolates of Scedosporium apiospermum, Fusarium spp. and Sporothrix schenckii also show primary resistance, whereas all strains of Scedosporium prolificans demonstrate resistance. The main problems associated with the use of conventional amphotericin B have always been due to its poor aqueous solubility and toxicity rather than antifungal resistance.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal; Humans; Mitosporic Fungi
PubMed: 11801575
DOI: 10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.7 -
Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi = Japanese... 2005Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) is a DDS (drug delivery system) formulation of amphotericin B (AMPH-B), and has been developed in an attempt to reduce the toxicity... (Review)
Review
Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) is a DDS (drug delivery system) formulation of amphotericin B (AMPH-B), and has been developed in an attempt to reduce the toxicity of AMPH-B while retaining its therapeutic efficacy. AMPH-B has been the "gold standard" of antifungal therapy over the past four decades. It has a broad spectrum of fungicidal activity against a number of clinically important pathogens including Aspergillus and Candida. The mechanism of action of AMPH-B involves binding to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes. Binding to ergosterol causes an increase in fungal membrane permeability, electrolyte leakage, and cell death. AMPH-B has affinity for cholesterol in mammalian membranes, which leads to severe side-effects including kidney damage. AmBisome is a unilamellar vesicle composed of AMPH-B and phospholipid. Upon administration, AmBisome remains intact in the blood and distributes to the tissues where fungal infection may occur, and is disrupted after attachment to the outside of fungal cells, resulting in fungal cell death. AmBisome and AMPH-B show similar in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity and clinical efficacy. However, AmBisome has less infusion-related toxicity and nephrotoxicity than AMPH-B.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Antifungal Agents; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans
PubMed: 16282964
DOI: 10.3314/jjmm.46.229 -
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Jul 2008Amphotericin B is a low-soluble polyene antibiotic which is able to self-aggregate. The aggregation state can modify its activity and pharmacokinetical characteristics.... (Review)
Review
Amphotericin B is a low-soluble polyene antibiotic which is able to self-aggregate. The aggregation state can modify its activity and pharmacokinetical characteristics. In spite of its high toxicity it is still widely employed for the treatment of systemic fungal infections and parasitic disease and different formulations are marketed. Some of these formulations, such as liposomal formulations, can be considered as classical examples of drug targeting. The pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity are clearly dependent on the type of amphotericin B formulation. New drug delivery systems such as liposomes, nanospheres and microspheres can result in higher concentrations of AMB in the liver and spleen, but lower concentrations in kidney and lungs, so decreasing its toxicity. Moreover, the administration of these drug delivery systems can enhance the drug accessibility to organs and tissues (e.g., bone marrow) otherwise inaccessible to the free drug. During the last few years, new AMB formulations (AmBisome, Abelcet, and Amphotec) with an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio have been marketed. This review compares the different formulations of amphotericin B in terms of pharmacokinetics, toxicity and activity and discusses the possible drug targeting effect of some of these new formulations.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Antifungal Agents; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Liposomes; Solubility
PubMed: 17893903
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21179 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Mar 2000Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform... (Review)
Review
Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion (ABCD) is a colloidal dispersion of a stable complex of amphotericin B with cholesteryl sulphate in a 1:1 proportion, forming uniform disk-shaped particles. ABCD is associated with less nephrotoxicity than conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Infusion-related adverse events are more frequent in patients receiving ABCD than in patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B deoxycholate. ABCD has been shown in a randomised, double-blind study, to be an effective alternative to amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical treatment of patients with fever and neutropenia. ABCD is active in the treatment of invasive Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. infections in immunocompromised hosts, however most of the data supporting its use for these types of infections is derived from non-comparative open-label clinical trials of patient refractory to or intolerant of conventional antifungal therapy. ABCD is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in patients where renal impairment of unacceptable toxicity precludes the use of amphotericin B deoxycholate in effective doses, and in patients with invasive aspergillosis where prior amphotericin B deoxycholate therapy has failed. Two other lipid formulations of amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex and liposomal amphotericin B, are available and, like ABCD, are associated with reduced nephrotoxicity as compared to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The role of ABCD in comparison with these other lipid formulations of amphotericin B is discussed herein. High cost remains an issue with all lipid formulations of amphotericin B.
Topics: Amphotericin B; Animals; Antifungal Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colloids; Humans; Mycoses
PubMed: 11249532
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.1.3.475