-
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 1996A review of the literature concerning the effects of traditional antirheumatic drugs on cytokines and the cytokine and anticytokine approaches already used in the... (Review)
Review
A review of the literature concerning the effects of traditional antirheumatic drugs on cytokines and the cytokine and anticytokine approaches already used in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is presented. Many antirheumatic drugs are capable of cytokine modulation in vitro. Corticosteroids inhibit the transcription of a broad spectrum of genes including those encoding monocyte, T cell-derived cytokines and several hemopoietic growth factors, whereas drugs such as cyclosporin A and D-penicillamine interfere with T cell activation more specifically by suppressing interleukin 2 (IL-2) production. The in vivo effects of drug therapy on cytokines in RA patients are less well established. Gold compounds reduce circulating IL-6 levels and the expression of monocyte-derived cytokines, such as IL-1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and IL-6, in the rheumatoid synovium. Decreases in circulating IL-6, soluble IL-2 (sIL-2R), and TNF receptors and in synovial fluid IL-1 levels have been reported with methotrexate. Reductions in circulating IL-6 and sIL-2R concentrations have also been observed with cyclosporin and corticosteroids, whereas azathioprine reduces IL-6 but not sIL-2R. Studies on sulfasalazine are conflicting and the in vivo effects of D-penicillamine and antimalarials have not been studied yet. Interferon gamma therapy is not effective in RA but may prove a useful antifibrotic for systemic sclerosis. Colony stimulating factors improve the granulocytopenia associated with Felty's syndrome or drug toxicities but can induce arthritis flares and should be reserved to treat infectious complications. Promising results are being obtained with selective antagonism of TNF and IL-1 in RA, and combinations of anticytokine strategies with traditional antirheumatic drugs have been already envisaged. These should preferably be based in a broader knowledge of the effects of antirheumatic agents on the cytokine network.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Humans
PubMed: 8834013
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-0172(96)80035-7 -
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Oct 2018Methotrexate (MTX) is used as an anchor disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of its potent efficacy and... (Review)
Review
Methotrexate (MTX) is used as an anchor disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of its potent efficacy and tolerability. MTX benefits a large number of RA patients but partially suffered from side effects. A variety of side effects can be associated with MTX when treating RA patients, from mild to severe or discontinuation of the treatment. In this report, we reviewed the possible side effects that MTX might cause from the most common gastrointestinal toxicity effects to less frequent malignant diseases. In order to achieve regimen with less side effects, the administration of MTX with appropriate dose and a careful pretreatment inspection is necessary. Further investigations are required when combining MTX with other drugs so as to enhance the efficacy and reduce side effects at the same time. The management of MTX treatment is also discussed to provide strategies for occurred side effects. Thus, this review will provide scholars with a comprehensive understanding the side effects of MTX administration by RA patients.
Topics: Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Methotrexate; Neoplasms
PubMed: 30243154
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.027 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2022Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about forty years and to date MTX remains the part of global standard of treatment... (Review)
Review
Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about forty years and to date MTX remains the part of global standard of treatment for RA. The efficacy of MTX in RA is the result of multiple mechanisms of action. In order to summarize the possible pharmacological mechanisms of MTX in the treatment of RA, this review will elaborate on folate antagonism, promotion of adenosine accumulation, regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, bone protection and maintenance of immune system function.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate
PubMed: 35658215
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113074 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Jun 2020The elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population consists of both elderly-onset RA that manifests after the age of 60 and individuals diagnosed with RA early in life who... (Review)
Review
The elderly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population consists of both elderly-onset RA that manifests after the age of 60 and individuals diagnosed with RA early in life who age naturally to become members of this group. The elderly RA population is expanding due to both increased life expectancy and an increased incidence of elderly onset RA. Elderly onset RA seems to have a characteristic clinical pattern and perhaps biological profile different to that of early onset RA. The management of RA in elderly patients can be challenging, as robust treat-to-target approaches must be balanced against the adverse events due to increased comorbidities in old age. This produces a tendency to prefer less aggressive treatment in elderly RA patients in clinical practice. Despite the concerns about adverse events, there is limited evidence on the best way to approach RA in this population, as elderly patients are often not well presented in the clinical trials. Herein, we review the literature to assess the efficacy and safety of RA therapies in this age group. We then suggest a tailored approach that can be adopted in clinical practice, based on the disease severity and risk profiles of elderly RA patients.
Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Comorbidity; Humans
PubMed: 32234572
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102528 -
Drugs 2005Over the last decade, several new drugs have become available for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These agents include the new disease-modifying... (Review)
Review
Over the last decade, several new drugs have become available for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These agents include the new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) leflunomide and the biologic agents, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists and an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist. Methotrexate is commonly used as the first DMARD, has a well documented clinical efficacy and slows radiological deterioration. Sulfasalazine appears to have similar properties, albeit to a lesser extent. Leflunomide has similar efficacy as methotrexate but it is less tolerated than sulfasalazine. The adverse effect profiles of these three drugs makes regular laboratory monitoring mandatory. Several combination therapies with DMARDs were proven to be more effective than mono-DMARD therapy. However, until now these strategies have not been widely adopted. TNF antagonists are potent anti-inflammatory drugs, with a rapid onset of effects compared with traditional DMARDs. The IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, has an intermediate place between methotrexate and the TNF antagonists with respect to efficacy. The adverse effects of TNF antagonists include an increased incidence of common and opportunistic infections. Thus far, anakinra has not been associated with an enhanced rate of opportunistic infections. Some of the biologic agents have been associated with worsening heart failure and demyelinating disease. The limited long-term safety data of the biologic agents are a point of concern because, at present, an enhanced risk for malignancies, particularly lymphoma, can not be excluded. Drug costs of traditional DMARDs are up to US dollars 3000 per year, whereas for the biologics the yearly drug costs range between US dollars 16,000 and > US dollars 20,000. Cost-effectiveness analyses are necessary to determine whether or not these high costs are justified. Unfortunately, adequate, prospective, economic evaluations are not yet available. Until these become available, treatment decisions will be based on the balance of direct costs and indirect costs and expected cost savings in the future.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Immunologic Factors
PubMed: 15748099
DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200565050-00006 -
Annals of the Academy of Medicine,... Aug 2014Up to 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) respond inadequately to conventional non-biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs), and may benefit... (Review)
Review
Singapore Chapter of Rheumatologists Consensus Statement on the Eligibility for Government Subsidy of Biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Agents for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
INTRODUCTION
Up to 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) respond inadequately to conventional non-biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs), and may benefit from therapy with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). However, the high cost of bDMARDs limits their widespread use. The Chapter of Rheumatologists, College of Physicians, Academy of Medicine, Singapore aims to define clinical eligibility for government-assisted funding of bDMARDs for local RA patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Evidence synthesis was performed by reviewing 7 published guidelines on use of biologics for RA. Using the modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM), rheumatologists rated indications for therapies for different clinical scenarios. Points reflecting the output from the formal group consensus were used to formulate the practice recommendations.
RESULTS
Ten recommendations including diagnosis of RA, choice of disease activity measure, initiation and continuation of bDMARD and option of first and second-line therapies were formulated. The panellists agreed that a bDMARD is indicated if a patient has (1) active RA with a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) score of ≥3.2, (2) a minimum of 6 swollen and tender joints, and (3) has failed a minimum of 2 nbDMARD combinations of adequate dose regimen for at least 3 months each. To qualify for continued biologic therapy, a patient must have (1) documentation of DAS28 every 3 months and (2) at least a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) moderate response by 6 months after commencement of therapy.
CONCLUSION
The recommendations developed by a formal group consensus method may be useful for clinical practice and guiding funding decisions by relevant authorities in making bDMARDs usage accessible and equitable to eligible patients in Singapore.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Financing, Government; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Singapore
PubMed: 25244989
DOI: No ID Found -
Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North... May 2017
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Reproductive Health; Rheumatic Diseases; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28390571
DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2017.02.002 -
Current Opinion in Rheumatology May 2009Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about three decades now. MTX is one of the most effective and commonly used medicines... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about three decades now. MTX is one of the most effective and commonly used medicines to treat various forms of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions. MTX was shown to improve signs and symptoms of RA, disease activity and function, to a similar degree as the tumor necrosis factor blockers, and it inhibits radiographic progression to a smaller degree than the antitumor necrosis factor agents. MTX is considered as the anchor drug among the disease-modifying antirheumatic agents, and it is internationally accepted as the first choice in the management of RA. This review was performed on the basis of a PubMed literature search looking at all publications on MTX and arthritis in 2008.
RECENT FINDINGS
MTX seems to even prolong the life span of patients who tolerate the drug and have clinical benefit from this therapy; this may partly be explained by beneficial effects on cardiovascular mortality. The reason for this may well be the suppression of inflammation, but direct atheroprotective effects of MTX may also play a role. MTX is used as monotherapy and in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic agents or biologic agents such as the antitumor necrosis factor agents. The 'early' use of MTX within 5 years after disease onset is clearly associated with improved outcomes. The management of RA should include an early strong suppression of inflammation and continuously a tight control strategy. The pharmacodynamics and kinetics of MTX are still incompletely understood.
SUMMARY
In this review, we especially cover the following themes: new clinical studies on the use of MTX in RA, the use of MTX in other rheumatic conditions, prediction of response to MTX, optimal dosage, MTX use in the elderly, the mechanism of action, the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacogenetics of MTX, the prevention of side effects, and the overall long-term safety.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate; Pharmacogenetics; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 19373092
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328329c79d -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Dec 2016
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Drug Design; Humans; Rheumatic Diseases; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 27924647
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1240784 -
British Journal of Rheumatology Jan 1997
Comparative Study Review
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Penicillamine
PubMed: 9117147
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.1.104