-
Frontiers in Immunology 2022The central nervous system (CNS) is a constitutive structure of various cell types conserved by anatomical barriers. Many of the major CNS cell-type populations... (Review)
Review
The central nervous system (CNS) is a constitutive structure of various cell types conserved by anatomical barriers. Many of the major CNS cell-type populations distributed across the different brain regions are targets for several neurotropic viruses. Numerous studies have demonstrated that viral susceptibility within the CNS is not absolute and initiates a cell-type specific antiviral defence response. Neurons, astrocytes, and microglial cells are among the major resident cell populations within the CNS and are all equipped to sense viral infection and induce a relative antiviral response mostly through type I IFN production, however, not all these cell types adopt a similar antiviral strategy. Rising evidence has suggested a diversity regarding IFN production and responsiveness based on the cell type/sub type, regional distinction and cell`s developmental state which could shape distinct antiviral signatures. Among CNS resident cell types, neurons are of the highest priority to defend against the invading virus due to their poor renewable nature. Therefore, infected and uninfected glial cells tend to play more dominant antiviral roles during a viral infection and have been found to be the major CNS IFN producers. Alternatively, neuronal cells do play an active part during antiviral responses but may adopt differential strategies in addition to induction of a typical type I IFN response, to minimize the chance of cellular damage. Heterogeneity observed in neuronal IFN responsiveness may be partially explained by their altered ISGs and/or lower STATS expression levels, however, further studies are required to fully elucidate the specificity of the acquired antiviral responses by distinct CNS cell types.
Topics: Central Nervous System; Astrocytes; Microglia; Neuroglia; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 36458002
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1044721 -
Current Opinion in Virology Feb 2022To establish successful infection in cells, it is essential for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to overcome intracellular antiviral responses. The host cell mechanism that... (Review)
Review
To establish successful infection in cells, it is essential for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to overcome intracellular antiviral responses. The host cell mechanism that fights against the virus culminates in the production of interferons (IFNs), IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as the induction of autophagy and apoptosis. HCV has developed multiple means to disrupt the host signaling pathways that lead to these antiviral responses. HCV impedes signaling pathways initiated by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), usurps and uses the antiviral autophagic response to enhance its replication, alters mitochondrial dynamics and metabolism to prevent cell death and attenuate IFN response, and dysregulates inflammasomal response to cause IFN resistance and immune tolerance. These effects of HCV allow HCV to successful replicate and persist in its host cells.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Interferons; Virus Replication
PubMed: 34973476
DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.12.010 -
Viruses Apr 2021The emergence or re-emergence of viruses with epidemic and/or pandemic potential, such as Ebola, Zika, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV), Severe Acute... (Review)
Review
The emergence or re-emergence of viruses with epidemic and/or pandemic potential, such as Ebola, Zika, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 1 and 2 (SARS and SARS-CoV-2) viruses, or new strains of influenza represents significant human health threats due to the absence of available treatments. Vaccines represent a key answer to control these viruses. However, in the case of a public health emergency, vaccine development, safety, and partial efficacy concerns may hinder their prompt deployment. Thus, developing broad-spectrum antiviral molecules for a fast response is essential to face an outbreak crisis as well as for bioweapon countermeasures. So far, broad-spectrum antivirals include two main categories: the family of drugs targeting the host-cell machinery essential for virus infection and replication, and the family of drugs directly targeting viruses. Among the molecules directly targeting viruses, nucleoside analogues form an essential class of broad-spectrum antiviral drugs. In this review, we will discuss the interest for broad-spectrum antiviral strategies and their limitations, with an emphasis on virus-targeted, broad-spectrum, antiviral nucleoside analogues and their mechanisms of action.
Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Alanine; Amides; Animals; Antiviral Agents; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola; Humans; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus; Mutagenesis; Nucleosides; Pyrazines; Ribavirin; SARS-CoV-2; Virus Replication; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 33924302
DOI: 10.3390/v13040667 -
Genes Jun 2023Plants evolved several mechanisms to protect themselves against viruses. Besides recessive resistance, where compatible host factors required for viral proliferation are... (Review)
Review
Plants evolved several mechanisms to protect themselves against viruses. Besides recessive resistance, where compatible host factors required for viral proliferation are absent or incompatible, there are (at least) two types of inducible antiviral immunity: RNA silencing (RNAi) and immune responses mounted upon activation of nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptors. RNAi is associated with viral symptom recovery through translational repression and transcript degradation following recognition of viral double-stranded RNA produced during infection. NLR-mediated immunity is induced upon (in)direct recognition of a viral protein by an NLR receptor, triggering either a hypersensitive response (HR) or an extreme resistance response (ER). During ER, host cell death is not apparent, and it has been proposed that this resistance is mediated by a translational arrest (TA) of viral transcripts. Recent research indicates that translational repression plays a crucial role in plant antiviral resistance. This paper reviews current knowledge on viral translational repression during viral recovery and NLR-mediated immunity. Our findings are summarized in a model detailing the pathways and processes leading to translational arrest of plant viruses. This model can serve as a framework to formulate hypotheses on how TA halts viral replication, inspiring new leads for the development of antiviral resistance in crops.
Topics: RNA Interference; Plant Viruses; Antiviral Agents; Viral Proteins; RNA, Double-Stranded
PubMed: 37372472
DOI: 10.3390/genes14061293 -
IUBMB Life Apr 2022Targeting intracellular components for lysosomal degradation by autophagy not only maintains cellular homeostasis but also counteracts the effects of external stimuli,... (Review)
Review
Targeting intracellular components for lysosomal degradation by autophagy not only maintains cellular homeostasis but also counteracts the effects of external stimuli, including invading pathogens. Among various kinds of pathogens, viruses have been extensively shown to induce autophagy to benefit viral growth in infected cells and to modulate host defense responses, such as innate antiviral immunity. Recently, numerous lines of evidence have implied that virus-induced autophagy triggers multilayer mechanisms to regulate the innate antiviral response of host cells, thus promoting a balance in virus-host cell interactions. In this review, the detailed mechanisms underlying autophagy and the innate antiviral immune response are first described. Then, I summarize the current information regarding the diverse functional role(s) of autophagy in the control of antiviral defenses against different types of viral infections. Moreover, the physiological significance of autophagy-regulated antiviral responses on the viral life cycle and the potential autophagy alterations induced by virus-associated antiviral signaling is further discussed.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Autophagy; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Virus Diseases; Viruses
PubMed: 34859938
DOI: 10.1002/iub.2582 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Nov 2014Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents an important public health problem worldwide. Reduction of HCV morbidity and mortality is a current challenge owned to... (Review)
Review
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents an important public health problem worldwide. Reduction of HCV morbidity and mortality is a current challenge owned to several viral and host factors. Virus molecular evolution plays an important role in HCV transmission, disease progression and therapy outcome. The high degree of genetic heterogeneity characteristic of HCV is a key element for the rapid adaptation of the intrahost viral population to different selection pressures (e.g., host immune responses and antiviral therapy). HCV molecular evolution is shaped by different mechanisms including a high mutation rate, genetic bottlenecks, genetic drift, recombination, temporal variations and compartmentalization. These evolutionary processes constantly rearrange the composition of the HCV intrahost population in a staging manner. Remarkable advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanism controlling HCV replication have facilitated the development of a plethora of direct-acting antiviral agents against HCV. As a result, superior sustained viral responses have been attained. The rapidly evolving field of anti-HCV therapy is expected to broad its landscape even further with newer, more potent antivirals, bringing us one step closer to the interferon-free era.
Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Disease Progression; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evolution, Molecular; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Host-Pathogen Interactions; Humans; Phenotype; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25473152
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.15992 -
Virulence Dec 2023Influenza viruses, including four major types (A, B, C, and D), can cause mild-to-severe and lethal diseases in humans and animals. Influenza viruses evolve rapidly... (Review)
Review
Influenza viruses, including four major types (A, B, C, and D), can cause mild-to-severe and lethal diseases in humans and animals. Influenza viruses evolve rapidly through antigenic drift (mutation) and shift (reassortment of the segmented viral genome). New variants, strains, and subtypes have emerged frequently, causing epidemic, zoonotic, and pandemic infections, despite currently available vaccines and antiviral drugs. In recent years, avian influenza viruses, such as H5 and H7 subtypes, have caused hundreds to thousands of zoonotic infections in humans with high case fatality rates. The likelihood of these animal influenza viruses acquiring airborne transmission in humans through viral evolution poses great concern for the next pandemic. Severe influenza viral disease is caused by both direct viral cytopathic effects and exacerbated host immune response against high viral loads. Studies have identified various mutations in viral genes that increase viral replication and transmission, alter tissue tropism or species specificity, and evade antivirals or pre-existing immunity. Significant progress has also been made in identifying and characterizing the host components that mediate antiviral responses, pro-viral functions, or immunopathogenesis following influenza viral infections. This review summarizes the current knowledge on viral determinants of influenza virulence and pathogenicity, protective and immunopathogenic aspects of host innate and adaptive immune responses, and antiviral and pro-viral roles of host factors and cellular signalling pathways. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of viral virulence factors and virus-host interactions is critical for the development of preventive and therapeutic measures against influenza diseases.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Influenza, Human; Virulence; Orthomyxoviridae Infections; Influenza A virus; Orthomyxoviridae; Influenza Vaccines; Antiviral Agents; Virus Replication; Influenza in Birds
PubMed: 37339323
DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2023.2223057 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Mar 2021Azithromycin (AZM) is a synthetic macrolide antibiotic effective against a broad range of bacterial and mycobacterial infections. Due to an additional range of... (Review)
Review
Azithromycin (AZM) is a synthetic macrolide antibiotic effective against a broad range of bacterial and mycobacterial infections. Due to an additional range of anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties, it has been given to patients with the coronaviruses SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV. It is now being investigated as a potential candidate treatment for SARS-CoV-2 having been identified as a candidate therapeutic for this virus by both in vitro and in silico drug screens. To date there are no randomised trial data on its use in any novel coronavirus infection, although a large number of trials are currently in progress. In this review, we summarise data from in vitro, murine and human clinical studies on the anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties of macrolides, particularly AZM. AZM reduces in vitro replication of several classes of viruses including rhinovirus, influenza A, Zika virus, Ebola, enteroviruses and coronaviruses, via several mechanisms. AZM enhances expression of anti-viral pattern recognition receptors and induction of anti-viral type I and III interferon responses. Of relevance to severe coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19), which is characterised by an over-exuberant innate inflammatory response, AZM also has anti-inflammatory properties including suppression of IL-1beta, IL-2, TNF and GM-CSF. AZM inhibits T cells by inhibiting calcineurin signalling, mammalian target of rapamycin activity and NFκB activation. AZM particularly targets granulocytes where it concentrates markedly in lysosomes, particularly affecting accumulation, adhesion, degranulation and apoptosis of neutrophils. Given its proven safety, affordability and global availability, tempered by significant concerns about antimicrobial stewardship, there is an urgent mandate to perform well-designed and conducted randomised clinical trials.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antiviral Agents; Azithromycin; Humans; Virus Diseases
PubMed: 32969125
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2163 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2019Epstein⁻Barr virus (EBV) is a human γ-herpesvirus that infects up to 95% of the adult population. Primary EBV infection usually occurs during childhood and is... (Review)
Review
Epstein⁻Barr virus (EBV) is a human γ-herpesvirus that infects up to 95% of the adult population. Primary EBV infection usually occurs during childhood and is generally asymptomatic, though the virus can cause infectious mononucleosis in 35⁻50% of the cases when infection occurs later in life. EBV infects mainly B-cells and epithelial cells, establishing latency in resting memory B-cells and possibly also in epithelial cells. EBV is recognized as an oncogenic virus but in immunocompetent hosts, EBV reactivation is controlled by the immune response preventing transformation in vivo. Under immunosuppression, regardless of the cause, the immune system can lose control of EBV replication, which may result in the appearance of neoplasms. The primary malignancies related to EBV are B-cell lymphomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which reflects the primary cell targets of viral infection in vivo. Although a number of antivirals were proven to inhibit EBV replication in vitro, they had limited success in the clinic and to date no antiviral drug has been approved for the treatment of EBV infections. We review here the antiviral drugs that have been evaluated in the clinic to treat EBV infections and discuss novel molecules with anti-EBV activity under investigation as well as new strategies to treat EBV-related diseases.
Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Virus Replication
PubMed: 30871092
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24050997 -
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Jul 2022Chronic HBV infection is a global public health burden estimated to impact nearly 300 million persons worldwide. Despite the advent of potent antiviral agents that... (Review)
Review
Chronic HBV infection is a global public health burden estimated to impact nearly 300 million persons worldwide. Despite the advent of potent antiviral agents that effectively suppress viral replication, HBV cure remains difficult to achieve because of the persistence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), HBV-DNA integration into the host genome, and impaired immune response. Indefinite treatment is necessary for most patients to maintain level of viral suppression. The success of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C treatment has rejuvenated the search for a cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), though an HBV cure likely requires an additional layer: immunomodulators for restoration of robust immune responses. DAAs such as entry inhibitors, capsid assembly modulators, inhibitors of subviral particle release, cccDNA silencers, and RNA interference molecules have reached clinical development. Immunomodulators, namely innate immunomodulators (Toll-like receptor agonists), therapeutic vaccines, checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies, are also progressing toward clinical development. The future of the HBV cure possibly lies in triple combination therapies with concerted action on replication inhibition, antigen reduction, and immune stimulation. Many obstacles remain, such as overcoming translational failures, choosing the right endpoint using the right biomarkers, and leveraging current treatments in combination regimens to enhance response rates. This review gives an overview of the current therapies for CHB, HBV biomarkers used to evaluate treatment response, and development of DAAs and immune-targeting drugs and discusses the limitations and unanswered questions on the journey to an HBV cure.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Biomarkers; DNA, Circular; DNA, Viral; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Virus Replication
PubMed: 34990029
DOI: 10.1002/hep.32314