-
Clinical Drug Investigation 2009Armodafinil (R-modafinil) is the R- and longer-lasting isomer of the racemic compound modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting medication. Armodafinil is eliminated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Armodafinil (R-modafinil) is the R- and longer-lasting isomer of the racemic compound modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting medication. Armodafinil is eliminated approximately three times more slowly than the S-isomer of racemic modafinil. Published studies have demonstrated the efficacy of armodafinil for treating excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnoea, shift work disorder and narcolepsy. The objectives of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetic profile, tolerability and safety of armodafinil in healthy subjects.
METHODS
Pooled pharmacokinetic data from three separate randomized studies in 119 healthy subjects who received single or multiple (once daily for up to 14 days) oral doses of armodafinil ranging between 50 and 400 mg were analysed. The impact of food on the single-dose pharmacokinetic profile of armodafinil was also assessed in subjects following an overnight fast and after the consumption of a standard fatty meal.
RESULTS
Armodafinil was readily absorbed and exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the 50-400 mg dose range. Peak plasma concentrations were reached around 2 hours after administration in the fasted state. Food had no effect on the overall bioavailability of armodafinil; however, the peak concentration was delayed by approximately 2-4 hours. In the multiple-dose study, dose proportionality was confirmed by linear regression analyses of the log-transformed area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) values as a function of dose. After reaching the peak, plasma concentrations of armodafinil declined in a monophasic manner, with a mean elimination half-life of approximately 15 hours. Steady state appeared to be reached within 7 days. At steady state, the systemic exposure to armodafinil was 1.8 times that observed after single-dose administration. Armodafinil was generally well tolerated, the most frequent adverse events being headache, dizziness and nausea.
CONCLUSIONS
In the present analysis, armodafinil exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range of 50-400 mg. While food affected the rate but not the extent of absorption, peak plasma concentrations were reached in approximately 2 hours when the drug was taken on an empty stomach. With once-daily dosing, steady state appeared to be reached within 7 days. After reaching peak plasma levels, concentrations of armodafinil declined monophasically, with a mean elimination half-life of around 15 hours. Armodafinil was generally well tolerated.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Area Under Curve; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biological Availability; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Food-Drug Interactions; Half-Life; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 19133704
DOI: 10.2165/0044011-200929020-00003 -
Psychopharmacology Aug 2020Agonist-based pharmacologic intervention is an accepted approach in treatment of opioid and tobacco use disorders. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
RATIONALE
Agonist-based pharmacologic intervention is an accepted approach in treatment of opioid and tobacco use disorders.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate usefulness of an agonist approach as treatment of (psycho)stimulant use disorder (PSUD).
METHODS
We reviewed PubMed/Medline, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases searching for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design studies evaluating outcomes of individuals treated for cocaine- or amphetamine-type substance use disorder. We combined results of all trials that included the following prescription psychostimulants (PPs): modafinil, methylphenidate, or amphetamines (mixed amphetamine salts, lisdexamphetamine, and dextroamphetamine). The combined sample consisted of 2889 patients. Outcomes of interest included the following: drug abstinence (defined as 2-3 weeks of sustained abstinence and the average maximum days of consecutive abstinence), percentage of drug-negative urine tests across trial, and retention in treatment. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and assessed quality of evidence using the GRADE system.
RESULTS
Thirty-eight trials were included. Treatment with PPs increases rates of sustained abstinence [risk ratio (RR) = 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (1.10, 1.92)] and duration of abstinence [mean difference (MD) = 3.34, 95% CI = (1.06, 5.62)] in patients with PSUD, particularly those with cocaine use disorder (very low-quality evidence). Prescription amphetamines were particularly efficacious in promoting sustained abstinence in patients with cocaine use disorder [RR = 2.44, 95% CI = (1.66, 3.58)], and higher doses of PPs were particularly efficacious for treatment of cocaine use disorder [RR = 1.95, 95% CI = (1.38, 2.77)] (moderate-quality evidence). Treatment with prescription amphetamines also yielded more cocaine-negative urines [MD = 8.37%, 95% CI = (3.75, 12.98)]. There was no effect of PPs on the retention in treatment.
CONCLUSION
Prescription psychostimulants, particularly prescription amphetamines given in robust doses, have a clinically significant beneficial effect to promote abstinence in the treatment of individuals with PSUD, specifically the population with cocaine use disorder.
Topics: Amphetamine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cocaine; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Prescription Drugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Substance-Related Disorders; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32601988
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05563-3 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2017Population pharmacokinetic models for armodafinil and its major metabolites, R-modafinil acid and modafinil sulfone, were developed, and selected covariates were...
Population pharmacokinetic models for armodafinil and its major metabolites, R-modafinil acid and modafinil sulfone, were developed, and selected covariates were investigated. Data from 583 healthy subjects and patients with bipolar I disorder in 11 phase 1-3 studies (8027 concentrations) of armodafinil, given as single or multiple once-daily doses (50- to 400-mg tablet or capsule), were pooled. A previously developed 1-compartment model with first-order absorption without covariate effects was initially applied to pooled phase 1 and 2 data. After covariate analysis, the phase 3 data were pooled with the phase 1 and 2 data set and the model was refined again using a second backward elimination step. Population modeling was performed with NONMEM version 7 with the first-order conditional estimation method. Estimated armodafinil apparent oral clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (Vc/F), and absorption t were 2.01 L/h, 45 L, and 0.226 hours, respectively. Armodafinil CL/F and Vc/F increased with weight; predicted steady-state area under the curve was 16.4% higher and 29.1% lower in a patient weighing 50 or 150 kg, respectively, relative to a 70-kg patient. Female participants had 10.2% lower armodafinil Vc/F compared with male participants. Age, race (white vs nonwhite), health status (healthy vs bipolar I disorder), liver function, and renal function were not statistically significant predictors of armodafinil pharmacokinetics. CL/F and Vc/F for R-modafinil acid and modafinil sulfone were 16.7 L/h and 8.95 L and 6.82 L/h and 12.4 L, respectively. Weight did not affect exposure of either metabolite. These population pharmacokinetic models were from the largest population of adults reported to date and provide a robust characterization of the pharmacokinetics of armodafinil, R-modafinil acid, and modafinil sulfone in adults.
Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biotransformation; Bipolar Disorder; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ethnicity; Female; Half-Life; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Models, Statistical; Population; Sex Characteristics
PubMed: 27436172
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.800 -
Clinical Therapeutics May 2006Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSA/HS) experience excessive sleepiness (ES) that might not resolve with nasal continuous positive airway... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of armodafinil in the treatment of residual excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in nCPAP-adherent adults.
BACKGROUND
Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSA/HS) experience excessive sleepiness (ES) that might not resolve with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) treatment.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of armodafinil 150 or 250 mg QD when used as adjunctive treatment for residual ES associated with OSA/HS in patients who are adherent to nCPAP therapy.
METHODS
This 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted at 37 centers in the United States and Canada. Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years with residual ES associated with OSA/HS were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive armodafinil 150 or 250 mg or placebo PO QD for 12 weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and study weeks 4, 8, and 12 and included the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) to determine wakefulness, the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) to determine improvement in clinical condition, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to determine patient-estimated wakefulness, the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) to determine global fatigue, and the Cognitive Drug Research computerized assessment battery. To distinguish between earlier and later effects, sleep latencies, assessed using the MWT, were averaged across the first 4 (9 and 11 AM, and 1 and 3 PM) and last 3 (3, 5, and 7 PM) tests. Tolerability assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory tests, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiography.
RESULTS
A total of 395 patients were enrolled in the study (armodafinil 150 mg/d, 133; armodafinil 250 mg/d, 131; placebo, 131); 392 received >or=1 dose of study drug (armodafinil 150 mg/d, 131; armodafinil 250 mg/d, 131; placebo, 130). The armodafinil and placebo groups were well matched with regard to age (mean [SD], 49.2 [8.9] vs 50.1 [9.4] years), sex (71 vs 69% men), race (84% vs 87% white), and body weight (mean [SD], 110.3 [24.9] vs 111.9 [24.0] kg). At the final visit, the mean (SD) change from baseline in MWT sleep latency across the morning and afternoon was significantly greater in the armodafinil combined group compared with the placebo group (+1.9 [7.3] vs 1.7 [8.6] minutes; P < 0.001). Also at the final visit, the proportions of patients who showed at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C, and the mean (SD) changes from baseline in ESS and BFI scores, were significantly greater in the armodafinil group compared with those in the placebo group (72% vs 37%, -5.5 [5.0] vs -3.3 [4.7], and -1.2 [2.2] vs -0.6 [2.0], respectively; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.01, respectively). No significant effects on nighttime sleep, as assessed using polysomnography, were found with armodafinil. AEs reported in the armodafinil combined and placebo groups were headache, nausea, insomnia, anxiety, and dizziness. Serious AEs (ulcerative colitis, migraine, worsening of Axis II and mood disorder, and duodenal ulcer) were reported in 4 (1.5%) patients receiving armodafinil and were considered by the investigator not or unlikely to be drug related.
CONCLUSIONS
In this selected population of patients with OSA/HS and residual ES despite effective treatment with nCPAP, armodafinil QD used as an adjunct to nCPAP treatment was associated with improved wakefulness and overall clinical condition. Clinical benefit was shown at the first assessment and maintained for the 12-week duration of the study. Armodafinil was also associated with significantly reduced interference of ES with daily activities and global fatigue. Armodafinil was well tolerated, with no adverse effect on nighttime sleep or nCPAP use.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 16861091
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.05.013 -
JAMA Internal Medicine Feb 2021This cohort study uses data from the US Provigil/Nuvigil Pregnancy Registry to assess prevalence of fetal major congenital malformations after exposure to modafinil and...
This cohort study uses data from the US Provigil/Nuvigil Pregnancy Registry to assess prevalence of fetal major congenital malformations after exposure to modafinil and armodafinil during pregnancy.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Pregnancy; Registries; United States; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents
PubMed: 33074297
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4009 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Oct 2013Development of central nervous system-acting drugs would be enhanced by suitable biomarkers that reflect the targeted pathophysiologic brain state. The...
Development of central nervous system-acting drugs would be enhanced by suitable biomarkers that reflect the targeted pathophysiologic brain state. The electroencephalogram (EEG) has several characteristics of an ideal biomarker and can be promptly adapted to pre-clinical and clinical testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate EEG as a measure of the wakefulness-promoting effect of armodafinil in sleep deprived healthy subjects. Armodafinil pharmacodynamics were simultaneously assessed by EEG- and behavioral-based measures including a well-established measure of alertness. Using two quantitative EEG-based measures-power spectral and event-related brain activity analyses-we observed that armodafinil mitigated the slowing of brain activity and the decrease of the event-related brain activity caused by sleep deprivation. Armodafinil-induced changes in EEG are in agreement and explain up to 73.1% of the armodafinil-induced changes in alertness. Our findings suggest that EEG can serve as a marker of the wakefulness-promoting drug effect.
Topics: Adult; Behavior; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Female; Humans; Male; Modafinil; Neuropsychological Tests; Sleep Deprivation; Wakefulness; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents; Young Adult
PubMed: 23913585
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.143 -
Journal of Human Lactation : Official... May 2023
Topics: Female; Humans; Modafinil; Milk, Human; Breast Feeding
PubMed: 37073875
DOI: 10.1177/08903344231156443 -
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Oct 2014To examine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive armodafinil for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive armodafinil in adults with major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive armodafinil for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.
METHOD
Adults meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for bipolar I disorder and currently experiencing a major depressive episode while taking at least 4 weeks of conventional maintenance medication were enrolled in a placebo-controlled evaluation of adjunctive armodafinil 150 or 200 mg (conducted January 2010-March 2012). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to week 8 on the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C30) total score in the 150-mg armodafinil group versus placebo.
RESULTS
Of 786 patients screened, 433 were randomized (placebo, n = 199; armodafinil 150 mg, n = 201; armodafinil 200 mg, n = 33). The 200-mg armodafinil group was discontinued by protocol amendment due to lower than expected patient enrollment. For the 150-mg armodafinil group versus placebo, there was a significantly greater decrease in least squares mean (standard error of mean [SEM]) IDS-C30 total score at week 8 (-21.7 [1.1] vs -17.9 [1.1]; P = .0097; Cohen d therapeutic effect size = 0.28). The proportion of IDS-C30 responders (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) was significantly higher for the 150-mg armodafinil group versus placebo at final visit (46% [91/197] vs 34% [67/196]; P = .0147). The proportion of IDS-C30 remitters (total score ≤ 11) was 21% (42/197) for armodafinil 150 mg versus 17% (34/196) for placebo (P = .3343) at final visit. Adverse events (AEs) observed in > 5% of either the armodafinil 150 mg or placebo groups and more frequently with 150 mg armodafinil were diarrhea (9% [17/198] vs 7% [13/199]), and nausea (6% [11/198] vs 5% [9/199]), respectively. In the 200-mg armodafinil group, there were 2 serious AEs (n = 1, hepatic failure leading to death; n = 1, acute hepatitis). The death was not considered related to study treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Adjunctive armodafinil 150 mg significantly improved symptoms of major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I disorder versus placebo and was generally well tolerated.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01072929.
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Bipolar Disorder; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Placebos; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness-Promoting Agents
PubMed: 25099397
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13m08951 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Apr 2006This study assessed the efficacy and safety of armodafinil, the longer half-life enantiomer of modafinil, for the treatment of excessive sleepiness in patients with... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of armodafinil, the longer half-life enantiomer of modafinil, for the treatment of excessive sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
This was a multicenter double-blind study with 196 patients (aged 18-65 years) randomized to receive armodafinil 150 mg (n = 65), armodafinil 250 mg (n = 67), or placebo (n = 64) once daily for 12 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Efficacy was assessed using the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) (six 20-min subtests across the day), the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), subjective measures of sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), patient diaries, and evaluations of cognitive performance (Cognitive Drug Research) and fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory).
RESULTS
Armodafinil significantly increased MWT mean sleep latency (at 0900-1500) compared with placebo. The mean change from baseline at final visit for armodafinil was an increase of 1.3, 2.6, and 1.9 min in the 150-mg, 250-mg, and combined groups, respectively, compared with a decrease of 1.9 min for placebo (p < 0.01 for all three comparisons). Mean late-day MWT latency (1500-1900) was also significantly improved (difference of armodafinil combined group relative to placebo at final visit: 2.8 min, p = 0.0358). The proportions of patients who showed at least minimal improvement in the CGIC rating from baseline to final visit in the armodafinil 150-mg, 250-mg, and combined groups were 69%, 73%, and 71%, respectively, compared with 33% for placebo (p < 0.0001). Both doses were associated with statistically significant improvements in memory, attention, and fatigue (p < 0.05). The most common adverse events in patients receiving armodafinil were headache, nausea, and dizziness.
CONCLUSIONS
Armodafinil significantly improved ability to sustain wakefulness throughout the day in patients with narcolepsy. Armodafinil also significantly improved overall clinical condition, memory, attention, and fatigue when compared with placebo.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Middle Aged; Modafinil; Narcolepsy; Sleep Stages; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness
PubMed: 16684437
DOI: 10.1185/030079906X100050 -
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und... Feb 2018The enhancement of physical and cognitive abilities (i. e. concentration, vigilance, memory) has always been desirable for humans. The term pharmacological... (Review)
Review
The enhancement of physical and cognitive abilities (i. e. concentration, vigilance, memory) has always been desirable for humans. The term pharmacological neuroenhancement refers to the use of legal or nonprescription psychoactive substances by healthy subjects with the intention of cognitive enhancement. To give the most prominent example, caffeine serves worldwide as a natural stimulant. Brain doping, however, specifies the use of illegal substances or prescription drugs beyond approval with the purpose of cognitive enhancement. Only amphetamines, methylphenidate and modafinil have significant effects on attentiveness, concentration and alertness, whereas other substances, such as anti-dementia drugs or anti-depressants failed to demonstrate cognitive enhancement in healthy subjects.
Topics: Aged; Amphetamines; Brain; Cognitive Aging; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Illicit Drugs; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Nootropic Agents; Plant Preparations; Prescription Drugs; Psychotropic Drugs; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 29209802
DOI: 10.1007/s00391-017-1351-y