-
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Mar 2023Accessing a joint with a needle (arthrocentesis) to extract synovial fluid is a skill intrinsic to the rheumatologist's praxis. Joint aspirations are essential for... (Review)
Review
Accessing a joint with a needle (arthrocentesis) to extract synovial fluid is a skill intrinsic to the rheumatologist's praxis. Joint aspirations are essential for diagnosing or excluding septic joints, are the gold standard for diagnosing acute crystal arthritis, and can provide valuable information about the nature of other forms of arthritis. In appropriate settings, injecting medications into joints can provide rapid, temporary, or even prolonged relief of pain and swelling and can provide a window of relief until other treatment modalities (anti-inflammatories, immunomodulators, and physical therapy) can enforce durable responses. Soft tissue aspirations (e.g., of bursae) and soft tissue injections (of bursae, tendons, trigger points, and areas of nerve compression) can provide similar relief, earning the practitioner the gratitude of the patient. Here, we provide a primary on joint and soft tissue aspiration and injection, including indications for and against procedures, preparing for procedures, and approaches to specific musculoskeletal structures.
Topics: Humans; Arthrocentesis; Arthritis; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 37507281
DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101853 -
Stomatologija 2021The article presents a systematic overview of single- and double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis methods published in the Scopus database during 2016-2020,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The article presents a systematic overview of single- and double-puncture techniques of arthrocentesis methods published in the Scopus database during 2016-2020, highlighting the advantages and shortcomings of different methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A search was conducted in the Scopus database using the terms "TMJ OR temporomandibular OR mandibular OR jaw AND arthrocentesis". Arthrocentesis techniques were described and categorized mostly as single- or double-needle ones.
RESULTS
The literature reviewed in the article represents studies of arthrocentesis treatment in 2675 patients involving 2740 joints. Arthrocentesis techniques can mainly be divided into single- and double-needle techniques. Single-needle techniques are subcategorized into type 1 and type 2, of which the first is a single-needle cannula technique where inflow and outflow pass through the same lumen, while the second uses a Y-shaped device, which has two ports and two lumens. Double needle techniques use two needles - one for the inflow and the other for the outflow. The literature found in the Scopus database during the period investigated presents 28% of single-puncture (type 1 - 10%, type 2 - 15%, single puncture with distention of the upper joint compartment - 3%), 69% of double-puncture, 1% of ancillary second-puncture methods and 1% employing a CBCT-based tragus-supported guide with 3 needles.
CONCLUSION
All of the arthrocentesis techniques described in the literature are effective as treatment modalities, none appears to be superior to others. The selection of the method to be used depends on the surgeon´s choice and experience.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Needles; Punctures; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 35635520
DOI: No ID Found -
Biomedical Papers of the Medical... Mar 2015Arthrocentesis is a very gentle method for lavage of the joint space. The principle consists in the introduction of a pair of needles into the upper joint space and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arthrocentesis is a very gentle method for lavage of the joint space. The principle consists in the introduction of a pair of needles into the upper joint space and subsequent lavage using physiological saline or Ringer's solution. Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint is used in both cases of acute closed lock and treatment of various temporomandibular disorders.
METHODS
A literature search in Pubmed database, using key words: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ), Arthrocentesis, indications, technique, results.
CONCLUSION
Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint is a minimally invasive treatment method at the boundary between conservative and surgical therapy. It is usually performed on an out-patient basis under local anaesthesia. It is used both in cases of acute block caused by displacement of the articular disc and also to treat degenerative inflammatory diseases of the joints. The main objective of arthrocentesis is to wash out inflammatory mediators, release the disc, break adhesions, eliminate pain and improve joint mobility. It is a method with a minimum number of complications, it is simple and not demanding in terms of instruments, and it can be performed repeatedly. For this reason, it has become widespread and very popular in the treatment of internal disorders of the temporomandibular joint.
Topics: Arthrocentesis; Humans; Isotonic Solutions; Ringer's Solution; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; Therapeutic Irrigation
PubMed: 23579112
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2013.026 -
Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE Feb 2022Arthrocentesis of the knee is a procedure in which a needle is inserted into the knee joint, and synovial fluid is aspirated. An arthrocentesis can be diagnostic or...
Arthrocentesis of the knee is a procedure in which a needle is inserted into the knee joint, and synovial fluid is aspirated. An arthrocentesis can be diagnostic or therapeutic. Synovial fluid may be removed for testing to determine the nature of the knee effusion. If septic arthritis is suspected, urgent arthrocentesis before initiation of antibiotic treatment is indicated. Moreover, arthrocentesis can also aid in diagnosing crystal-induced arthritis such as gout or pseudogout, or non-inflammatory arthritis such as osteoarthritis. Identifying the cause of the knee effusion can guide treatment. Furthermore, removing fluid from a knee can reduce intraarticular pressure to decrease pain and improve range of motion. There is no absolute contraindication to performing this procedure, but in selecting the needle entry site, an area of skin that is infected should be avoided. Therefore, caution should be exercised when a patient presents with suspected cellulitis over the knee joint to avoid the potential risk of causing iatrogenic septic arthritis. A knee that has undergone arthroplasty should be assessed for arthrocentesis by an orthopedic surgeon. Arthrocentesis of the knee is typically performed with the patient supine. The site for needle insertion is marked, and then the skin is disinfected. After a local anesthetic is administered, a needle is inserted along the pathway that was anesthetized. Synovial fluid is aspirated, and then the needle is withdrawn. Pressure is applied until any bleeding stops. The synovial fluid can be analyzed for infection and inflammation but cannot directly confirm a diagnosis of internal derangement or autoimmune causes of arthritis. In addition to the history and physical examination, laboratory findings and imaging can clarify the etiology of a knee effusion.
Topics: Adult; Arthrocentesis; Humans; Inflammation; Knee Joint; Osteoarthritis; Synovial Fluid
PubMed: 35285829
DOI: 10.3791/63135 -
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2019The temporomandibular joint forms one of the most fascinating and complex synovial joints in the body. Movements of the temporomandibular joint are regulated by an... (Review)
Review
The temporomandibular joint forms one of the most fascinating and complex synovial joints in the body. Movements of the temporomandibular joint are regulated by an intricate neurological controlling mechanism, which is essential for the system to function normally and efficiently. Lack of such harmony may cause disruptive muscle behavior or structural damage to any of the components. The management of refractory pain and dysfunctions in the temporomandibular joint poses challenge both to the oral physician and maxillofacial surgeon. Arthrocentesis is a simple, minimally invasive technique that can be used instead of more invasive procedures in patients with pain that fails to respond to conventional conservative measures. This review provides a full comprehensive overview of the literature about the various technical and prognostic aspects in relation to arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint, and every clinician must take into account this consideration when performing this procedure in treating patients with temporomandibular disorders.
PubMed: 31293946
DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_160_17 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2022The aim of this study was to investigate the most effective lavage volume of arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular disorders. A comprehensive electronic... (Review)
Review
The aim of this study was to investigate the most effective lavage volume of arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular disorders. A comprehensive electronic search, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was performed, which included a computer search with specific keywords, a reference list search and a manual search. The inclusion criteria were the following: a randomized controlled trial, at least 20 subjects who underwent arthrocentesis, mention of the irrigation materials used for the arthrocentesis, mention of the irrigation volumes used for the arthrocentesis, MMO and pain measured as VAS or NRS, were reported as outcome figures, mention of a specific diagnosis or signs and symptoms, and inclusion of the data on the MMO or VAS/NRS at 6-month follow-up. Sixteen publications were enrolled in the meta-analysis, comparing arthrocentesis with a lavage volume <150 mL and arthrocentesis with a lavage volume ≥150 mL, in the efficacy of the improvement in the mouth opening and pain reduction. The results revealed the group with a lavage volume <150 mL had a greater improvement in the mouth opening and pain reduction. However, results are to be interpreted with caution, due to the paucity of the randomized controlled literature and other confounding factors. Further high-quality studies are required to provide a better conclusion to the treatment outcomes of the different lavage volumes.
PubMed: 36359466
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112622