-
The Lancet. Oncology Mar 2019
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Progression-Free Survival; Sunitinib
PubMed: 30799259
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30104-4 -
Urologic Oncology Nov 2023Limited information is currently available on the efficacy and safety of axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with renal impairment. Therefore,...
OBJECTIVES
Limited information is currently available on the efficacy and safety of axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with renal impairment. Therefore, the present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of axitinib in patients with chronic kidney disease.
METHODS
Post-hoc analyses were performed on a Japanese multicenter cohort study of 477 mRCC patients who received axitinib followed by 1 or 2 regimens of systemic antiangiogenic therapy between January 2012 and December 2016. Differences in clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of axitinib were assessed based on pretreatment renal function.
RESULTS
Patients were categorized into the following 5 renal function groups according to baseline renal function: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 ml/min (n = 133), 45 ml/min ≤eGFR <60 ml/min (n = 153), 30 ml/min ≤eGFR< 45 ml/min (n = 130), eGFR <30 ml/min (n = 45), and dialysis (n = 16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the 5 groups was 11 (8-16), 14 (11-19), 14 (10-19), 12 (8-24), and 6 (3-NR) months, respectively (p = 0.781). After adjustments for treatment-related confounders, the renal function group was not a significant prognostic factor for PFS. Objective response rates in the 5 groups were 22%, 23%, 23%, 18%, 20%, and 38%, respectively (p = 0.468). Regarding adverse events of all grades, hypertension (p = 0.0006) and renal and urinary disorders (p < 0.0001) were more frequently observed in the eGFR <30 ml/min group than in the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Since renal function at the initiation of treatment with axitinib does not adversely affect the efficacy of VEGF-TKI therapy, clinicians do not need to avoid its administration to mRCC patients with impaired renal function in consideration of the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease.
Topics: Humans; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Antineoplastic Agents; Cohort Studies; Kidney Neoplasms; Indazoles; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37798145
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.008 -
The Lancet. Oncology Oct 2022Patients with advanced type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma resistant to chemotherapy have few treatment options. We report the efficacy and safety results of the...
BACKGROUND
Patients with advanced type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma resistant to chemotherapy have few treatment options. We report the efficacy and safety results of the combination of the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab with the anti-angiogenesis drug axitinib in patients with advanced type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
METHODS
CAVEATT was a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial, conducted in two Italian centres (the European Instituteof Oncology and the Humanitas Institute, Milan) in patients with histologically confirmed type B3 thymoma or thymic carcinoma, with advanced stage of disease who had progressed after at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Previous treatment with an anti-angiogenesis drug was allowed but not with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Other inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, progressive disease, and presence of measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the centrally assessed overall response rate according to RECIST version 1.1. Patients who received at least one cycle of treatment and had at least one CT scan after treatment start at scheduled time point by protocol were judged assessable for response and were included in efficacy and safety analyses. This study is registered with EUDRACT, 2017-004048-38; enrolment is completed and follow-up is ongoing.
FINDINGS
Between April 22, 2019, and June 30, 2021, 32 patients were enrolled. 27 patients had a thymic carcinoma, three a type B3 thymoma, and two a mixed type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma. 29 (91%) of 32 patients had stage IVB disease and 13 (41%) of 32 had been pretreated with an anti-angiogenesis drug. 11 of 32 patients had an overall response; thus the overall response rate was 34% (90% CI 21-50); no patients had a complete response, 11 (34%) had a partial response, 18 (56%) had stable disease, and in two patients (6%) progressive disease was the best response. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was hypertension (grade 3 in six [19%] of 32 patients). Four (12%) of 32 patients developed serious adverse events that were new-onset immune-related adverse events, including one grade 3 interstitial pneumonitis, one grade 4 polymyositis, and two grade 3 polymyositis. There were no treatment-related deaths.
INTERPRETATION
Avelumab combined with axitinib has promising anti-tumour activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced type B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma progressing after chemotherapy, and could emerge as a new standard treatment option in this setting.
FUNDING
Pfizer.
Topics: Adolescent; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Polymyositis; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 36096156
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00542-3 -
International Journal of Urology :... Jun 2021
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Indazoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33719092
DOI: 10.1111/iju.14529 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Mar 2021Axitinib plus pembrolizumab showed superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) versus sunitinib in a randomised...
BACKGROUND
Axitinib plus pembrolizumab showed superior overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) versus sunitinib in a randomised phase III trial in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). We report long-term efficacy and safety of the axitinib/pembrolizumab from the phase I trial (NCT02133742), after 46-55 months from study initiation (data cut-off date, 23rd July 2019).
METHODS
Fifty-two treatment-naïve patients with advanced RCC were treated with oral axitinib 5 mg twice daily and intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. PFS, duration of response (DoR) and OS were summarised using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
At a median follow-up of 42.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.1-44.1), median OS was not reached; 38 (73.1%) patients were alive. The probability of being alive at 4 years was 66.8% (95% CI: 49.1-79.5). Median PFS in the overall population was 23.5 months (95% CI: 15.4-30.4). ORR was 73.1%; five patients had complete response. Median DoR was 22.1 months (95% CI: 15.1-34.5). Grade III/IV adverse events (AEs) were reported in 38 (73.1%) patients and 20 (38.5%) discontinued treatment because of AEs: 17 (32.7%) discontinued axitinib, 13 (25.0%) discontinued pembrolizumab, and 10 (19.2%) discontinued both drugs. Common AEs included diarrhoea (84.6%), fatigue (80.8%), hypertension (53.8%), cough (48.1%) and dysphonia (48.1%). There were no new AE terms reported and no treatment-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with advanced RCC with ~4 years of follow-up, combination axitinib/pembrolizumab continued to demonstrate clinical benefit, with no new safety signals.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Time Factors; United States
PubMed: 33412465
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.009 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Oct 2022
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35709408
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00712 -
Anti-cancer Drugs Feb 2023Axitinib is emerging as a first-line combination treatment drug for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but the acquired resistance significantly bothers the treatment...
Axitinib is emerging as a first-line combination treatment drug for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but the acquired resistance significantly bothers the treatment efficacy. This article is to investigate the impact of fragile X mental retardation autosomal homolog 1 (FXR1) and its mechanistic involvement with Kelch-like epoxy chloropropan-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)/NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway on cell resistance to axitinib in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Establishment of axitinib resistance cells (786-O, Caki-1, 786-O/axitinib, or Caki-1/axitinib) was made, and the cells were then transfected with sh-FXR1, or co-transfected with sh-FXR1 and sh-KEAP1. The quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blotting assays were employed to measure the expression of FXR1, KEAP1, Nrf2, LC3 II/I, Beclin 1, p62, MDR-1, and MRP-1. In addition, the binding between FXR1 and KEAP1 was verified by RNA-immunoprecipitation and RNA pull-down assays, and FXR1-dependent KEAP1 mRNA degradation was determined. Herein, FXR1 was demonstrated to be overexpressed in ccRCC cells, and showed higher expression in 786-O/axitinib and Caki-1/axitinib cells. Mechanistically, FXR1 enriched KEAP1 mRNA, and pulled downed by biotinylated KEAP1 probes. Results of RNA stability assay reveled that KEAP mRNA stability was suppressed by FXR1. Furthermore, knockdown of FXR1 promoted cell apoptosis and showed a restrained feature on cell resistance to axitinib. Of note, KEAP1 knockdown suppressed cell autophagy, oxidative stress, resistance to axitinib, and promoted apoptosis, despite FXR1 was downregulated in ccRCC cells. In conclusion, FXR1 played an encouraging role in ccRCC cell resistance to axitinib by modulating KEAP/Nrf2 pathway.
Topics: Humans; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1; Kidney Neoplasms; NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Oxidative Stress; RNA; RNA-Binding Proteins; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 36730618
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001416 -
Anti-cancer Drugs Apr 2019Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most frequent malignancies of the adults. Its incidence has been increasing steadily by 2-4% each year. Up to 30% of patients... (Review)
Review
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most frequent malignancies of the adults. Its incidence has been increasing steadily by 2-4% each year. Up to 30% of patients present with metastases at diagnosis. It is a highly vascularized cancer because of the hypoxia-induced factor stabilization as a consequence of von Hippel-Lindau inactivation. Hypoxia-induced factor accumulation leads to transactivation of molecules involved in angiogenesis including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor. Sunitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that interacts with several angiogenesis receptors including platelet-derived growth factor receptors and VEGF receptors, and is approved for the first-line treatment in metastatic RCC. In terms of tolerability, patients treated with sunitinib showed a higher incidence of diarrhea, vomiting, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and neutropenia, a safety profile consistent with what had been observed in earlier phase studies. Axitnib is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1, 2, and 3, and is approved in the second-line setting for patients with metastatic RCC. The tolerability profile of axitinib is favorable. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events are diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue, nausea, and dysphonia. Bowel toxicity, especially pneumatosis intestinalis and bowel perforation, is very uncommon. In particular, the incidence of intestinal perforation or fistulae is not well known for sunitinib or axitinib. Here, for the first time, we report the incidence of rectovaginal fistula in a 57-year-old White woman, with RCC, following treatment with sunitinib and axitinib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Rectovaginal Fistula
PubMed: 30640790
DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000742 -
ESMO Open Apr 2022In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial, first-line avelumab plus axitinib demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial, first-line avelumab plus axitinib demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). However, efficacy in elderly patients remains unclear. We report efficacy and safety by age group from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
PFS and ORR as per blinded independent central review (RECIST 1.1), OS, and safety were assessed in patient groups aged <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years.
RESULTS
In the avelumab plus axitinib and sunitinib arms, 271/138/33 and 275/128/41 patients aged <65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years, respectively, were randomized. At data cut-off (January 2019), median PFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] with avelumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib in these respective age groups was 11.6 (8.4-19.4) versus 6.9 (5.6-8.4) months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% CI 0.501-0.786], 13.8 (11.1-18.0) versus 11.0 (7.8-16.6) months (HR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.627-1.231), and 13.8 [7.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 9.8 (4.3-NE) months (HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.378-1.511). Median OS (95% CI) in the respective age groups was not reached (NR) (NE-NE) versus 28.6 (25.5-NE) months (HR, 0.74; 95% CI 0.541-1.022), 30.0 (30.0-NE) versus NR (NE-NE) months (HR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.546-1.467), and 25.3 (19.9-NE) versus NR (19.4-NE) months (HR, 0.87; 95% CI 0.359-2.106). ORR (95% CI) in the respective age groups was 49.4% (43.3% to 55.6%) versus 27.3% (22.1% to 32.9%), 60.9% (52.2% to 69.1%) versus 28.9% (21.2% to 37.6%), and 42.4% (25.5% to 60.8%) versus 22.0% (10.6% to 37.6%). In the avelumab plus axitinib arm, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs occurred in 76.9%/81.2%/72.7% and 45.5%/48.1%/36.4% in the respective age groups.
CONCLUSIONS
First-line avelumab plus axitinib demonstrated favorable efficacy across age groups, including patients aged ≥75 years. OS data were still immature; follow-up is ongoing. The safety profile was generally consistent across age groups.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Male; Sunitinib
PubMed: 35397432
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100450 -
Investigational New Drugs Dec 2019Introduction New therapeutic strategies combining axitinib and immune checkpoint blockers are ongoing in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). These strategies do not...
Introduction New therapeutic strategies combining axitinib and immune checkpoint blockers are ongoing in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). These strategies do not consider the pharmacokinetic variability of axitinib. We aimed to describe the risk of axitinib under-exposure using routine pharmacologic therapeutic monitoring (PTM). Methods We analyzed axitinib dosage in nine patients with mRCC. Routine axitinib concentration measurements were centralized at Henri Mondor University Hospital (Créteil, France) using a validated method. The primary objective was to describe the evolution of Cmax dosages (1 to 6 h after oral intake) during routine axitinib titration. Results Nine patients with available Cmax axitinib dosages were included. Four out of the nine patients had axitinib titration and Cmax dosages were performed before and after titration. All but one corrected their plasma axitinib exposure after titration, suggesting of a titration success. The last patient was monitored in the Henri Mondor Hospital routine PTM program and a pharmacokinetic profiling was performed after controlled oral intake. Results suggested a poor axitinib absorption. This patient experienced early tumor progression as best response. Conclusion We report a patient with significant axitinib under-exposure, possibly due to a poor absorption. PTM should be evaluated and considered in drug developments evaluating combination therapies based on axitinib.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Kidney Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30806848
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00743-1