-
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis :... Feb 2020Low-molecular-weight heparin is the guideline-endorsed treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). While apixaban is approved for the treatment of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Low-molecular-weight heparin is the guideline-endorsed treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). While apixaban is approved for the treatment of acute VTE, limited data support its use in cancer patients.
OBJECTIVES
The primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included VTE recurrence and a composite of major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB).
PATIENTS/METHODS
Patients with cancer-associated VTE were randomly assigned to receive either apixaban 10 mg twice daily for seven days followed by 5 mg twice daily for six months or subcutaneous dalteparin (200 IU/kg for one month followed by 150 IU/kg once daily).
RESULTS
Of 300 patients randomized, 287 were included in the primary analysis. Metastatic disease was present in 66% of subjects; 74% were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Major bleeding occurred in 0% of 145 patients receiving apixaban, compared with 1.4% of 142 patients receiving dalteparin [P = .138; hazard ratio (HR) not estimable because of 0 bleeding event in apixaban group]. Recurrent VTE occurred in 0.7% of apixaban, compared to 6.3% of dalteparin patients [HR 0.099, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.013-0.780, P = .0281). Major bleeding or CRNMB rates were 6% for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Oral apixaban was associated with low major bleeding and VTE recurrence rates for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 31630479
DOI: 10.1111/jth.14662 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Aug 2001Dalteparin sodium (Fragmin, Pharmacia Corporation) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of approximately 5000 Da. As with the other... (Review)
Review
Dalteparin sodium (Fragmin, Pharmacia Corporation) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of approximately 5000 Da. As with the other LMWHs, dalteparin sodium has certain advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), most important of which are improved bio-availability by sc. injection, a prolonged antithrombotic activity which is highly correlated with body weight permitting the o.d. administration of the drug. Dalteparin sodium has been subjected to a large number of well-designed randomised clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disorders. Based on data from the randomised clinical trials, dalteparin sodium has been approved internationally for a wide spectrum of clinical indications (e.g., prevention of thromboembolic events after surgery). Dalteparin sodium has also been studied in randomised controlled trials in the maintenance of graft patentcy following peripheral vascular surgery, in place of warfarin for the long-term treatment of patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in the prevention of upper extremity thrombosis in patients with indwelling portacath devices and in pregnant patients with a history of previous venous thromboembolism with or without thrombophilia. Dalteparin sodium has been compared with heparin for the prevention of thrombotic complications during haemodyalisis and haemofiltration. These studies have shown promising results but further work is required before dalteparin sodium can be recommended for these indications.
Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dalteparin; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 11585001
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2.8.1325 -
Thrombosis and Haemostasis May 2022Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may vary in patients with different cancer sites. We evaluated the rates of VTE... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may vary in patients with different cancer sites. We evaluated the rates of VTE recurrence and major bleeding and the relative efficacy and safety of 6-month treatment with oral apixaban or subcutaneous dalteparin in patients with different cancer sites randomized in the Caravaggio study. Primary cancer was located at gastrointestinal sites in 375 patients (32.5%), lung in 200 (17.3%), breast in 155 (13.4%), genitourinary sites in 139 (12%), gynecological sites in 119 (10.3%), and was hematological in 85 patients (7.4%). Rates of VTE recurrence were 10.9% in patients with gynecological, 8.8% with gastrointestinal, 6.5% with genitourinary, and 5.5% with lung cancer with lower rates in the other sites of cancer. Rates of major bleeding were 7.2% in patients with genitourinary and 4.8% with gastrointestinal cancer, with lower rates in patients with other sites of cancer. The observed absolute risk difference in VTE recurrence in favor of apixaban was 11.9% in patients with gynecological, 5.5% with lung, 3.7% with genitourinary cancer, and 0.6% with gastrointestinal cancer. None of the risk differences was statistically significant. The rates of major bleeding in patients treated with apixaban or dalteparin was similar across patients with different cancer sites. In conclusion, recurrences appear to be more common in patients with gastrointestinal and gynecological cancer and major bleedings in patients with genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancer. Oral apixaban is a valid oral alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for the treatment of a large spectrum of patients with cancer-associated VTE.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Humans; Neoplasms; Pyrazoles; Pyridones; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 34530482
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735194 -
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy Feb 1997To discuss the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and to review the comparative clinical trial data... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To discuss the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and to review the comparative clinical trial data evaluating the efficacy and safety of dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UH) for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism.
DATA SOURCES
A MEDLINE search identified pertinent English-language publications on dalteparin and venous thromboembolism. Key search terms were dalteparin, Fragmin, LMWH, and venous thromboembolism. The search was supplemented by review articles, articles obtained from the bibliographies of the review articles, and the dalteparin approval database.
STUDY SELECTION
The most pertinent studies describing the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of dalteparin in humans were selected; all abstracts and clinical evaluating the use of dalteparin for antithrombotic therapy were reviewed. Review articles by authors of international reputation were selected.
DATA EXTRACTION
Pertinent information from the review articles on the pharmacology of LMWHs and UH was summarized. Clinical trial data were extracted for study design, patient demographics, therapeutic regimens, methods of evaluation, and outcomes.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Dalteparin is an LMWH indicated for patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are considered to be at risk for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), which may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). In this population, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy between dalteparin and fixed-dose UH for DVT prophylaxis. Dalteparin has a predictable dose response and can be administered as a standard single daily subcutaneous dose for all patients. In therapeutic doses, dalteparin does not alter coagulation tests and therefore does not require routine laboratory monitoring, in contrast with adjusted-dose UH. Bleeding risks with dalteparin are comparable with and possibly less than those associated with UH. Preliminary studies suggest that dalteparin may be effective for other indications, including DVT prophylaxis for hip replacement surgery and the treatment of DVT and PE. Comparative cost-effectiveness data are not yet available.
CONCLUSIONS
Dalteparin is the second LMWH to receive approval by the Food and Drug Administration. Dalteparin is indicated for prophylaxis against DVT in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Clinical studies have shown that single daily doses of dalteparin provide a safe and effective alternative to fixed-dose UH therapy. Additional studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of dalteparin compared with UH and other LMWHs.
Topics: Abdomen; Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Biological Availability; Dalteparin; Drug Costs; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Thrombophlebitis
PubMed: 9034422
DOI: 10.1177/106002809703100212 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Oct 2023: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. Anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. Anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dalteparin and apixaban, have demonstrated efficacy and safety. However, more comparative research of these drugs is still needed. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the efficacy of apixaban compared to dalteparin in reducing recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding associated with cancer. : We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials databases up to 5 January 2023, for randomized controlled trials comparing apixaban versus dalteparin as treatment for cancer-associated VTE. Five studies were included. Effects according to meta-analyses were reported as relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). : It was found that 33 of 734 (4.5%) patients treated with apixaban and 56 of 767 (7.3%) with dalteparin had recurrent VTE as the efficacy outcome (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.15-1.58, I 38%). Major bleeding occurred in 25 of 734 patients treated with apixaban (3.4%) and 27 of 767 with dalteparin (3.5%) (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.31-5.27, I 59%). Likewise, clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 64 of 734 patients treated with apixaban (8.7%) and 46 of 767 (5.9%) with dalteparin (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05-2.19, I 0%). : Apixaban showed a lower risk of recurrent VTE than dalteparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE, albeit with no statistical difference. Statistical significance was observed for no major clinically relevant bleeding but not for major bleeding.
Topics: Humans; Dalteparin; Venous Thromboembolism; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37893585
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101867 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Feb 2018Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is unclear.
METHODS
In this open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with cancer who had acute symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (edoxaban group) or subcutaneous dalteparin at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for 1 month followed by dalteparin at a dose of 150 IU per kilogram once daily (dalteparin group). Treatment was given for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding during the 12 months after randomization, regardless of treatment duration.
RESULTS
Of the 1050 patients who underwent randomization, 1046 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 67 of the 522 patients (12.8%) in the edoxaban group as compared with 71 of the 524 patients (13.5%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.36; P=0.006 for noninferiority; P=0.87 for superiority). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 41 patients (7.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 59 patients (11.3%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, -3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 0.2). Major bleeding occurred in 36 patients (6.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.6).
CONCLUSIONS
Oral edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with dalteparin. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; Hokusai VTE Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073682 .).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pyridines; Recurrence; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 29231094
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711948 -
Drugs Jul 2000Dalteparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of 5000. Compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH), the drug has markedly improved... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Dalteparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of 5000. Compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH), the drug has markedly improved bioavailability and increased plasma elimination half-life, and exerts a greater inhibitory effect on plasma activity of coagulation factor Xa relative to its effects on other coagulation parameters. Dalteparin also has less lipolytic activity than UFH. Dalteparin 2500U once daily subcutaneously is of similar antithrombotic efficacy to UFH 5000IU twice daily, and 2 studies have shown superiority over UFH 2 or 3 times daily of dalteparin 5000U once daily in patients requiring surgical thromboprophylaxis. After total hip arthroplasty, dalteparin was superior to adjusted-dosage warfarin and was of greater thromboprophylactic efficacy when given for 35 than for 7 days. Intravenous or subcutaneous dalteparin is as effective as intravenous UFH when given once or twice daily in the initial management of established deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The drug is also effective in long term home treatment. Dalteparin has been shown to be effective in combination with aspirin in the management of unstable coronary artery disease (CAD), with composite end-point data from 1 study suggesting benefit for up to 3 months. Current data indicate potential of the drug in the management of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Dalteparin is also of similar efficacy to UFH, with a single bolus dose being sufficient in some patients, in the prevention of clotting in haemodialysis and haemofiltration circuits. Pharmacoeconomic data indicate that overall costs relative to UFH from a hospital perspective can be reduced through the use of dalteparin in patients receiving treatment for venous thromboembolism. Dalteparin has also been shown to be cost effective when used for surgical thromboprophylaxis. Overall, rates of haemorrhagic complications in patients receiving dalteparin are low and are similar to those seen with UFH.
CONCLUSIONS
Dalteparin is effective and well tolerated when given subcutaneously once daily in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease. The simplicity of the administration regimens used and the lack of necessity for laboratory monitoring facilitate home or outpatient treatment and appear to translate into cost advantages from a hospital perspective over UFH or warfarin. Dalteparin also maintains the patency of haemodialysis and haemofiltration circuits, with beneficial effects on blood lipid profiles and the potential for prophylaxis with a single bolus injection in some patients. Data are also accumulating to show dalteparin to be an effective and easily administered alternative to UFH in patients with CAD.
Topics: Blood Coagulation; Coronary Disease; Dalteparin; Drug Costs; Drug Interactions; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Female; Humans; Male; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Thromboembolism
PubMed: 10929935
DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200060010-00010 -
Drugs Aug 1996The low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin sodium is notable for its improved pharmacokinetic characteristics (chiefly increased bioavailability and plasma... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
The low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin sodium is notable for its improved pharmacokinetic characteristics (chiefly increased bioavailability and plasma elimination half-life) compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). These properties enable the drug to be given subcutaneously as a single daily dose, compared with the 8- to 12-hourly regimens necessary with UFH. Dalteparin sodium also appears to exert a greater inhibitory effect than UFH on plasma activity of coagulation factor Xa relative to its effects on clotting times [usually expressed as activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)] and activity of factor IIa. It is not associated with any clinically significant effects on the fibrinolytic system and may have less lipolytic activity than UFH. Extensive clinical studies have been conducted to compare the antithrombotic efficacy of dalteparin sodium with that of UFH in surgical thromboprophylaxis, treatment of established deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the anticoagulation of patients undergoing haemodialysis and haemofiltration. The majority of trails of patients receiving thromboprophylactic heparin perioperatively have shown similar efficacy of dalteparin sodium and UFH in the prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE), although 2 groups of investigators reported superior antithrombotic potency for dalteparin sodium. The two types of heparin appear similarly effective in the management of established DVT and the maintenance of the extracorporeal circulation in haemodialysis circuits. Dalteparin sodium has also shown clinical benefit in the management of patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The overall incidence of haemorrhagic complications observed with daltparin sodium therapy is no greater than that associated with UFH, and data suggest that perioperative transfusion requirements and frequency of bleeding are lower after dalteparin sodium. The antithrombotic efficacy of dalteparin sodium is at least equivalent to that of UFH, although further clinical comparisons with other LMWHs are required. Further studies are also needed to clearly define any advantages of dalteparin sodium over UFH (and other antithrombotics) with regard to the incidence of haemorrhagic complications. The drug has also shown clinical efficacy in the prevention of myocardial infarction and death in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. In addition, there may be cost advantages attached to the once-daily subcutaneous regimen of dalteparin sodium, but this requires further examination. Thus, dalteparin sodium is an effective antithrombotic agent for perioperative thromboprophylaxis, the management of established DVT, and the anticoagulation of patients undergoing haemodialysis.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Dalteparin; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Thromboembolism
PubMed: 8841743
DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199652020-00011 -
European Journal of Medical Research Apr 2004Dalteparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of approximately 5,000. As with the other low molecular weight heparins, dalteparin has... (Review)
Review
Dalteparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of approximately 5,000. As with the other low molecular weight heparins, dalteparin has certain advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH) most important of which are improved bio-availability by subcutaneous injection, a prolonged antithrombotic activity which is highly correlated with body weight permitting the once daily administration of the drug. Other possible advantages of LMWH including dalteparin include a lower incidence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis and decreased tendency to produce osteopenia on prolonged administration. Dalteparin has been subjected to a large number of well designed randomised clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Based on data from the randomised clinical trials, dalteparin has been approved internationally for a wide spectrum of clinical indications.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Coronary Disease; Dalteparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Molecular Weight; Neoplasms; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Thromboembolism
PubMed: 15210402
DOI: No ID Found -
Neonatology 2021Neonatal thrombosis is a frequently encountered complication in a neonatal intensive care unit. Dalteparin can be used to treat thrombosis in newborn infants.
BACKGROUND
Neonatal thrombosis is a frequently encountered complication in a neonatal intensive care unit. Dalteparin can be used to treat thrombosis in newborn infants.
OBJECTIVES
In this study, we evaluate the current recommended starting dose of 129 ± 43 U/kg/24 h, hypothesizing that this dose is too low to reach therapeutic anti-Xa levels.
METHODS
From 2008 until 2017, all infants treated with dalteparin in the University Medical Centre Utrecht were included in this study. In this retrospective cohort study, the correlation between dose and anti-Xa level was observed.
RESULTS
Sixty-six infants were included. The most common thrombus types were catheter-related (29 patients, 44%) and venous sinus thrombosis (28 patients, 43%). The mean dalteparin dose needed for the first adequate anti-Xa level (0.5-1.0 IU/mL) was 297.6 U/kg/12 h. Two infants developed a first bleeding episode under dalteparin therapy; they both had anti-Xa levels in the therapeutic range.
CONCLUSION
The increase of the starting dose of dalteparin will lead to earlier therapeutic levels of anti-Xa in the studied population and appears to be safe. However, this needs to be evaluated in further study.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Retrospective Studies; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33735895
DOI: 10.1159/000513784