-
Journal of the College of Physicians... Mar 2021To determine the effect and safety of sequential treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin and the direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban in patients... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect and safety of sequential treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin and the direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban in patients with cancer- associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).
STUDY DESIGN
Observational study.
PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY
Department of Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, between January 2017 and September 2019.
METHODOLOGY
Patients with active cancer, diagnosed with VTE and who received sequential treatment with dalteparin and rivaroxaban, were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with VTE recurrence.
RESULTS
Ninety-nine patients with active cancer were enrolled in the study. The median delteparin treatment time was nine days (5-20 days), and 2.8 months (1-6 months) for rivaroxaban. Sixty (60.6%) patients had eliminated VTE, and 39 (39.4%) had persistent VTE, but with relieved symptoms. No major bleeding was observed. Eleven (11.1%) patients had minor bleeding, including melena (5.1%), hematuria (3.0%), vaginal bleeding (1.0%), gingival bleeding (1.0%), and subcutaneous hemorrhage (1.0%). During the 6 months follow-up period, one (1.0%) developed pulmonary embolism, and seven (7.1%) experienced recurrent VTE. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that bleeding occurrence and anticoagulant treatment duration were the two significant factors affecting VTE recurrence (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Maintenance of rivaroxaban after initial dalteparin treatment could effectively reduce the risk of VTE recurrence and was well tolerated by patients with cancer-associated VTE. However, in the clinical practice, the treatment duration is often insufficient, so it is essential to follow-up these patients to ensure sufficient treatment time. Key Words: Venous thromboembolism, Low-molecular-weight heparins, Directly oral anticoagulants, Cancer.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Female; Humans; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Rivaroxaban; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 33775018
DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.03.294 -
Connecticut Medicine Jan 2009
Review
Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Fibrinolytic Agents; Formularies, Hospital as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 19248570
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis :... Oct 2010
Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Calibration; Creatinine; Dalteparin; Drug Overdose; Female; Heparin; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prothrombin Time; Risk; Suicide, Attempted; Thromboembolism; Time Factors
PubMed: 20629941
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03984.x -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... Dec 1995
Topics: Anticoagulants; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Dalteparin; Drug Costs; Heparin; Humans; Molecular Weight; Thrombophlebitis
PubMed: 7500910
DOI: No ID Found -
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Feb 2022To maintain living, interactive evidence (LIvE) on the benefits and harms of different treatment options in adults with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To maintain living, interactive evidence (LIvE) on the benefits and harms of different treatment options in adults with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT).
METHODS
We have used a novel LIvE synthesis framework to maintain this living, interactive systematic review since September 19, 2018. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for CAT are included in this analysis. Details of LIvE synthesis framework are available at the website https://cat.network-meta-analysis.com.
RESULTS
The results are constantly updated as new information becomes available (https://cat.network-meta-analysis.com/CAT.html). The living, interactive systematic review currently includes 4 randomized controlled trials (N=2894). Direct comparisons show that DOACs significantly decrease recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) events compared with dalteparin (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.86; I, 25%) without significantly increasing major bleeding (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.83 to 2.18; I, 28%). Mixed treatment comparisons show that apixaban (OR, 0.41; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.16 to 0.95) and rivaroxaban (OR, 0.58; 95% CrI, 0.37 to 0.90) significantly decrease VTE recurrent events compared with dalteparin. Edoxaban significantly increases major bleeding compared with dalteparin (OR, 1.73; 95% CrI, 1.04 to 3.16), and rivaroxaban significantly increases clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding compared with dalteparin and other DOACs. There are no significant differences between DOACs in terms of VTE recurrences and major bleeding.
CONCLUSION
DOACs should be considered a standard of care for the treatment of CAT except in patients with a high risk of bleeding. Current evidence favors the use of apixaban for the treatment of CAT among other DOACs.
REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dth86).
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Dalteparin; Hemorrhage; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Humans; Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 34172290
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.041 -
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia =... Jun 2023Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of critical illness. Sex- or gender-based analyses are rarely conducted and their effect on outcomes is unknown. We... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of critical illness. Sex- or gender-based analyses are rarely conducted and their effect on outcomes is unknown. We assessed for an effect modification of thromboprophylaxis (dalteparin or unfractionated heparin [UFH]) by sex on thrombotic (deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], VTE) and mortality outcomes in a secondary analysis of the Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT).
METHODS
We conducted unadjusted analyses using Cox proportional hazards analysis, stratified by centre and admission diagnostic category, including sex, treatment, and an interaction term. Additionally, we performed adjusted analyses and assessed the credibility of our findings.
RESULTS
Critically ill female (n = 1,614) and male (n = 2,113) participants experienced similar rates of DVT, proximal DVT, PE, any VTE, ICU death, and hospital death. In unadjusted analyses, we did not find significant differences in treatment effect favouring males (vs females) treated with dalteparin (vs UFH) for proximal leg DVT, any DVT, or any PE, but found a statistically significant effect (moderate certainty) favouring dalteparin in males for any VTE (males: hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.96 vs females: HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.68; P = 0.04). This effect remained after adjustment for baseline characteristics (males: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.96 vs females: HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.68; P = 0.04) and weight (males: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.96 vs females: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.73; P = 0.03). We did not identify a significant effect modification by sex on mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
We found an effect modification by sex of thromboprophylaxis on VTE in critically ill patients that requires confirmation. Our findings highlight the need for sex- and gender-based analyses in acute care research.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Anticoagulants; Heparin; Dalteparin; Venous Thromboembolism; Critical Illness; Sex Characteristics; Pulmonary Embolism
PubMed: 37310606
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02457-8 -
Thrombosis Research Nov 2015This study focused on the clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who received low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin)...
This study focused on the clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) who received low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) therapy. Changes in D-dimer levels before and after VTE were also evaluated. Among 549 patients treated with various chemotherapeutic agents, a total of 52 (9.47%) patients including 32 newly diagnosed with MM and 16 with relapsed/refractory MM developed VTE, 48 of whom received dalteparin. Among the 48 treated patients, 37 (77%) had proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), four had (8%) pulmonary embolism (PE), and seven (15%) had both DVT and PE. In 32 patients with available paired samples (at baseline and VTE occurrence), significant conversion of D-dimer levels from 2.2 ± 0.4 mg/L to 11.8 ± 1.6 mg/L (P < 0.001) was observed, which decreased from 10.9 ± 0.4 mg/L to 1.9 ± 0.6 mg/L one month after initiating dalteparin therapy. A total of 44 patients received dalteparin with a median duration of 4.2 months (range, 2.7-9.4), and four patients were discontinued early due to death (n = 3) and major bleeding (n = 1). After a median follow-up of 9.0 months (range, 0.7-35.8) since the first VTE episode, five patients showed recurrence of VTE with a cumulative incidence of 17.5 ± 7.9%. Major bleeding occurred in three patients. In summary, dalteparin seems to be a promising drug for the treatment of VTE in MM. In addition, the significant difference in D-dimer levels observed before occurrence of VTE and after dalteparin treatment may suggest the usefulness of D-dimer testing as a surrogate marker for VTE in MM patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Dalteparin; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 26432650
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.021 -
BMC Medicine Apr 2024Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Impact of perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on clinical events of elderly patients with prior coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This randomized trial was designed to compare the clinical benefits and risks of antiplatelet drug discontinuation via LMWH bridging therapy.
METHODS
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either dalteparin sodium or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac or cerebrovascular events. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding.
RESULTS
Among 2476 randomized patients, the variables (sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and procedural characteristics) and percutaneous coronary intervention information were not significantly different between the bridging and non-bridging groups. During the follow-up period, the rate of the combined endpoint in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (5.79% vs. 8.42%, p = 0.012). The incidence of myocardial injury in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (3.14% vs. 5.19%, p = 0.011). Deep vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the non-bridging group (1.21% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.024), and there was a trend toward a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (0.32% vs. 0.08%, p = 0.177). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of acute myocardial infarction (0.81% vs. 1.38%), cardiac death (0.24% vs. 0.41%), stroke (0.16% vs. 0.24%), or major bleeding (1.22% vs. 1.45%). Multivariable analysis showed that LMWH bridging, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, preoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of ischemic events. LMWH bridging and a preoperative platelet count of < 70 × 10/L were independent predictors of minor bleeding events.
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed the safety and efficacy of perioperative LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. An alternative approach might be the use of bridging therapy with half-dose LMWH.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ISRCTN65203415.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Aged; Stents; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Dalteparin; Treatment Outcome; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Hemorrhage; Placebos; Perioperative Care
PubMed: 38649992
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03391-2 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... 2010
Topics: Anticoagulants; Bariatric Surgery; Dalteparin; Enoxaparin; Humans; Obesity; Postoperative Complications; Practice Guidelines as Topic; United Kingdom; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 20655034
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.05.007 -
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis : An... Apr 2024Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients world-wide. In Australia, the low-molecular weight... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients world-wide. In Australia, the low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) enoxaparin or dalteparin are usually used as first-line prophylaxis for VTE, though there is uncertainty whether dalteparin has the same effectiveness as enoxaparin in real-world settings. This is relevant because dalteparin is less renally cleared and may be more cost effective than enoxaparin. The aim of this study was to explore VTE event incidence in a general cohort of hospitalized adult inpatients who were prescribed enoxaparin or dalteparin for VTE prophylaxis. A retrospective observational study was conducted at a quaternary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, of patients who had experienced a hospital-acquired VTE from 1 September 2021 to 1 March 2023. Patients were identified from routinely collected data following an in-hospital VTE event, and further data was retrieved retrospectively from the integrated electronic Medical Record (ieMR). Incidence and type of VTE events, LMWH-prescribing patterns, and risk factors were assessed. The incidence of VTE events were similar across the dalteparin and enoxaparin cohorts (42.1 events/10 000 patients vs. 34.4 events/10 000 patients, respectively), although patients prescribed enoxaparin had a higher number of risk factors, particularly obesity and active cancer. Our research indicates comparable incidence of VTE in patients prescribed dalteparin compared with enoxaparin in an Australian hospital general cohort of adult inpatients. Dalteparin may be as effective as enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in a real-world cohort of patients, and as such dalteparin may be considered a suitable alternative to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis. Further research including large randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Dalteparin; Enoxaparin; Venous Thromboembolism; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Retrospective Studies; Australia; Anticoagulants
PubMed: 38358899
DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001281