-
JAMA Internal Medicine Jun 2022Daprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being evaluated as an oral alternative to conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Daprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being evaluated as an oral alternative to conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. Few studies of anemia treatment in an incident dialysis (ID) population have been reported.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of chronic kidney disease in ID patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted from May 11, 2017, through September 24, 2020, in 90 centers across 14 countries. Patients with advanced CKD were eligible if they planned to start dialysis within 6 weeks from screening or had started and received hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 90 days before randomization, had a screening hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 8.0 to 10.5 g/dL (to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10) and a randomization Hb of 8.0 to 11.0 g/dL, were ESA-naive or had received limited ESA treatment, and were iron-replete.
INTERVENTIONS
Randomized 1:1 to daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary analysis in the intent-to-treat population evaluated the mean change in Hb concentration from baseline to evaluation period (weeks 28-52) to assess noninferiority of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g/dL). The mean monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose from baseline to week 52 was the principal secondary end point. Rates of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events (AEs) were also compared between treatment groups to assess safety and tolerability.
RESULTS
A total of 312 patients (median [IQR] age, 55 [45-65] years; 194 [62%] male) were randomized to either daprodustat (157 patients; median [IQR] age, 52.0 [45-63] years; 96 [61%] male) or darbepoetin alfa (155 patients; median [IQR] age, 56.0 [45-67] years; 98 [63%] male); 306 patients (98%) completed the trial. The mean (SD) Hb concentration during the evaluation period was 10.5 (1.0) g/dL for the daprodustat and 10.6 (0.9) g/dL for the darbepoetin alfa group, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of -0.10 g/dL (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.14 g/dL), indicating noninferiority. There was a reduction in mean monthly IV iron use from baseline to week 52 in both treatment groups; however, daprodustat was not superior compared with darbepoetin alfa in reducing monthly IV iron use (adjusted mean treatment difference, 19.4 mg [95% CI, -11.0 to 49.9 mg]). Adverse event rates were 76% for daprodustat vs 72% for darbepoetin alfa.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This randomized clinical trial found that daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of CKD and may represent a potential oral alternative to a conventional ESA in the ID population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03029208.
Topics: Anemia; Barbiturates; Darbepoetin alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Glycine; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Iron; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35377393
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0605 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Dec 2006The purpose of this study was to review and analyze current research to evaluate the dose ratio of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to review and analyze current research to evaluate the dose ratio of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and to identify determinants of the variation in epoetin alfa:darbepoetin alfa dose ratios across studies.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature for comparative switch and non-switch studies of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa treatments in CKD for the period 2000-2005 was performed. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the information. Data on the study design and outcomes were collected for each selected study. The dose ratio from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa was calculated for each study, and the results were reported stratified by study characteristics. To control for differences in study design and characteristics that could explain the variability in the relative dosages of the two agents across studies, multivariate regression analysis was conducted. Based on these results, a dose conversion ratio for Canada was estimated.
RESULTS
A total of 21 studies involving 16 378 patients exposed to epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa in CKD were identified. Univariate analysis of the dose ratios indicated a mean dose ratio of 217:1 (IU of epoetin alfa:mug of darbepoetin alfa). Results from the multivariate analysis demonstrated that the study design (i.e., switch study versus straight comparison studies) and geographical coverage (i.e., United States) affected the results. Based on the multivariate analysis, the dose conversion ratio between epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for Canada was 169:1.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite limitations associated with switching studies and the limited total number of studies available, this systematic review based on aggregated results provides further evidence to the clinical community that the dose conversion ratio for epoetin alfa:darbepoetin alfa in CKD patients in Canada is approximately 169:1. At that ratio, treatment with epoetin alfa is 11-18% cheaper than treatment with darbepoetin alfa in Canada.
Topics: Anemia; Chronic Disease; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Multivariate Analysis; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 17257447
DOI: 10.1185/030079906X154024 -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Aug 2002Anemia in cancer patients is frequent but often under-recognized and under-treated. This may be related to misconceptions about the impact of anemia on cancer patients... (Review)
Review
Anemia in cancer patients is frequent but often under-recognized and under-treated. This may be related to misconceptions about the impact of anemia on cancer patients and ill-defined guidelines for treatment, as well as the inadequacies of current therapy. Darbepoetin alfa, a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein with a longer serum half-life than epoetin (alpha and beta), is approved to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Most recently darbepoetin alfa has received approval by the FDA in USA for the treatment of anemia associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy and approval in the EU is expected soon. Clinical trials in cancer patients indicate that darbepoetin alfa effectively and safely alleviates anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy. A Phase II trial also indicates that darbepoetin alfa is effective in patients who are not receiving chemotherapy. Thus, darbepoetin alfa has the potential to improve supportive care and thereby, cancer patients' quality of life, and might also impact on treatment outcome.
Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Darbepoetin alfa; Drug Interactions; Erythropoietin; Humans; Neoplasms; Quality of Life
PubMed: 12647980
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2.4.377 -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Oct 2004Anemia is a common and potentially debilitating complication of cancer. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp, Amgen) has been in routine clinical use for the treatment of... (Review)
Review
Anemia is a common and potentially debilitating complication of cancer. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp, Amgen) has been in routine clinical use for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia since 2002. The extended half-life of darbepoetin alfa permits less frequent and consequently more flexible dosing than other erythropoietic therapies. Data suggest that hemoglobin levels can be effectively and safely increased with darbepoetin alfa in cancer patients who are receiving chemotherapy (patients with treatment-induced anemia), and in those who are not receiving chemotherapy (patients with tumor-induced anemia). This review provides an overview of clinical trial results, particularly those exploring flexible, extended dosing schedules.
Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Darbepoetin alfa; Delayed-Action Preparations; Erythropoietin; Half-Life; Hemoglobins; Humans; Neoplasms; Quality of Life
PubMed: 15485310
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.4.5.735 -
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Sep 2023In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Higher hemoglobin levels using darbepoetin alfa and kidney outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PREDICT trial.
BACKGROUND
In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower hemoglobin target (9-11 g/dl) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) without diabetes. Prespecified secondary analyses were performed to further study the effects of targeting higher hemoglobin levels on renal outcomes.
METHODS
Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 8-20 ml/min/1.73 m without diabetes were randomly assigned 1:1 to the high- and low-hemoglobin groups. The differences between the groups were evaluated for the following endpoints and cohort sets: eGFR and proteinuria slopes, assessed using a mixed-effects model in the full analysis set and the per-protocol set that excluded patients with off-target hemoglobin levels; the primary endpoint of composite renal outcome, evaluated in the per-protocol set using the Cox model.
RESULTS
In the full analysis set (high hemoglobin, n = 239; low hemoglobin, n = 240), eGFR and proteinuria slopes were not significantly different between the groups. In the per-protocol set (high hemoglobin, n = 136; low hemoglobin, n = 171), the high-hemoglobin group was associated with reduced composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96) and an improved eGFR slope (coefficient: + 1.00 ml/min/1.73 m/year; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.63), while the proteinuria slope did not differ between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In the per-protocol set, the high-hemoglobin group demonstrated better kidney outcomes than the low-hemoglobin group, suggesting a potential benefit of maintaining higher hemoglobin levels in patients with advanced CKD without diabetes.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT01581073).
Topics: Humans; Darbepoetin alfa; Anemia; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Kidney; Hemoglobins; Proteinuria; Neoplasms; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37289335
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-023-02362-w -
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) Oct 2002Studies on human erythropoietin (EPO) demonstrated that there is a direct relationship between the sialic acid-containing carbohydrate content of the molecule and its... (Review)
Review
Studies on human erythropoietin (EPO) demonstrated that there is a direct relationship between the sialic acid-containing carbohydrate content of the molecule and its serum half-life and in vivo biological activity, but an inverse relationship with its receptor-binding affinity. These observations led to the hypothesis that increasing the carbohydrate content, beyond that found naturally, would lead to a molecule with enhanced biological activity. Hyperglycosylated recombinant human EPO (rHuEPO) analogs were developed to test this hypothesis. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp), which was engineered to contain five N-linked carbohydrate chains (two more than rHuEPO), has been evaluated in preclinical animal studies. Due to its increased sialic acid-containing carbohydrate content, darbepoetin alfa is biochemically distinct from rHuEPO, having an increased molecular weight and greater negative charge. Compared with rHuEPO, it has an approximate threefold longer serum half-life, greater in vivo potency, and can be administered less frequently to obtain the same biological response. Darbepoetin alfa is currently being evaluated in human clinical trials for treatment of anemia and reduction in its incidence.
Topics: Animals; Darbepoetin alfa; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Design; Erythropoietin; Humans; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 12435169
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Jan 2019To provide an understanding of darbepoetin alfa dose patterns in cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy starting from 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To provide an understanding of darbepoetin alfa dose patterns in cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy starting from 2011.
STUDY DESIGN
This is a retrospective cohort study using a proprietary outpatient oncology database.
METHODS
Metastatic, solid tumor cancer patients receiving concomitant myelosuppressive chemotherapy and darbepoetin alfa with an associated hemoglobin <10 g/dL during 2011-2015 were identified. The analysis was restricted to the first continuous exposure to chemotherapy agents (maximum allowable gap of 90 days between consecutive exposures) with darbepoetin alfa for each eligible patient. Initial, maintenance, weekly, and cumulative doses of darbepoetin alfa were examined across all darbepoetin alfa users. Subgroup analyses were conducted by chemotherapy type, baseline hemoglobin level, year of chemotherapy, solid tumor type, and initial dosing schedule. Differences in weekly doses across subgroups were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
RESULTS
Among 835 eligible patients, over 90% were 50 years or older. Mean chemotherapy course duration was 248 days, and mean duration of darbepoetin alfa treatment was 106 days. The mean weekly darbepoetin alfa dose was 110 µg. Patients received a mean of 4.3 darbepoetin alfa injections in the first chemotherapy course. There were no statistically significant differences (all P values > .05) in weekly dose by chemotherapy type, baseline hemoglobin level, year of chemotherapy, or solid tumor type.
CONCLUSION
The average weekly darbepoetin alfa dose among metastatic cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia from this study was 110 µg, which was lower than the labeled dosage for most adults. This estimate did not differ over time, across chemotherapy regimens, baseline hemoglobin levels, or solid tumor types.
Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Darbepoetin alfa; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Erythropoiesis; Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; United States
PubMed: 28814194
DOI: 10.1177/1078155217725571 -
Clinical Therapeutics Jan 2016Limited data are available to describe the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa (DA) in terms of hemoglobin (Hb) and transfusion outcomes when initiated at Hb ≤10 g/dL... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Limited data are available to describe the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa (DA) in terms of hemoglobin (Hb) and transfusion outcomes when initiated at Hb ≤10 g/dL (the threshold specified in the summary of prescribing characteristics). We assessed DA, initiated according to current labeling (Hb ≤10 g/dL), in chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA).
METHODS
Data for patients with cancer and CIA who initiated DA at Hb ≤10 g/dL were extracted from a database of Amgen-sponsored trials. A comparative analysis was limited to randomized, controlled trials in patients treated with DA or control (placebo/best supportive care). Data for the DA arm(s) of randomized, multiple-arm, or prospective, single-arm trials were also extracted (DA-only analysis; non-front-loaded studies only). Outcomes included Hb increase ≥1 g/dL or ≥2 g/dL during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Crude and Kaplan-Meier proportions of patients who experienced each outcome and time (days) to each outcome were summarized by treatment arm. Meta-analysis (fixed-effects inverse-variance method) was performed to compare outcomes for DA with control.
FINDINGS
The comparative analysis included 4 studies (2 in lung cancer, 1 in lymphoproliferative disease, and 1 in non-myeloid malignancy: DA, n = 261; control, n = 273). The DA-only analysis included 15 studies (n = 3768). In comparative analyses, more patients who received DA than placebo achieved Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL (fixed-effects hazard ratio [HR] = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.62-2.63) or ≥2 g/dL (HR = 2.91; 95% CI, 2.09-4.06). Median times to ≥1 g/dL or ≥2 g/dL increase were 43 or 78 days for DA (not evaluable for placebo). Transfusions were less common in patients who received DA (HR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77). Addition of 2 dose-finding studies did not change the findings of the main comparative analysis. Results were similar in the DA-only analyses.
IMPLICATIONS
This is the first patient-level meta-analysis, to our knowledge, to evaluate the efficacy in terms of Hb response of DA treatment when initiated according to current product labeling in patients with CIA. Limitations include the small number of studies and patients eligible for inclusion in the comparative analyses and the absence of non-Amgen trials of DA. The results of the comparative analysis confirm that DA is more effective than placebo at increasing serum Hb levels and at reducing the need for transfusion in patients with CIA when treatment is initiated at Hb ≤10 g/dL, as per current product labeling.
Topics: Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Transfusion; Darbepoetin alfa; Databases, Factual; Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors
PubMed: 26730453
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.11.012 -
The New England Journal of Medicine Dec 2021Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels.
METHODS
In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25.
RESULTS
A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).
Topics: Aged; Anemia; Barbiturates; Cardiovascular Diseases; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Glycine; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline Dioxygenases; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke
PubMed: 34739194
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113379 -
Pharmacological Research Sep 2020Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a new class of oral medicines being developed for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety of HIF prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor vs epoetin and darbepoetin for anemia in chronic kidney disease patients not undergoing dialysis: A network meta-analysis.
Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a new class of oral medicines being developed for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHI vs epoetin and darbepoetin in CKD patients with anemia not undergoing dialysis. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched from inception to October 2019 for randomized controlled trials investigating different agents (six HIF-PHIs, epoetin, darbepoetin, and placebo) for treating CKD patients with anemia that did not undergo dialysis. The outcomes included a change in hemoglobin (Hb) levels and all-cause mortality. A total of 19 studies were included. Compared with the placebo, except for vadadustat (mean differences: 1.12, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: ‒0.11-2.35), the other drugs significantly increased Hb levels, with mean differences of 2.46 (95 % CI: 0.93-3.99) for desidustat, 1.81 (0.87-2.75) for enarodustat, 1.68 (0.64-2.72) for molidustat, 1.66 (0.89-2.44) for epoetin, 1.63 (0.69-2.56) for darbepoetin, 1.61 (0.99-2.22) for roxadustat, and 1.55 (0.74-2.36) for daprodustat. No differences were found in the Hb level elevations among these eight drugs. Compared with the placebo, there also was no significant association between the drugs and all-cause mortality (molidustat of RR, 0.39 [95 % CI, 0.06-2.59]; roxadustat, 0.40 (0.06-2.84); enarodustat, 0.33 (0.01-16.25); desidustat, 0.34 (0.01-17.00); epoetin, 0.50 (0.18-1.42); daprodustat, 0.54 (0.09-3.31); darbepoetin, 1.03 (0.65-1.65); and vadadustat, 1.43 (0.15-13.27)). No differences were observed in the all-cause mortality among the drugs. In conclusion, these HIF-PHIs are effective and relatively tolerant for treating anemia patients with CKD not undergoing dialysis. Further research should consider the limitations of our study to evaluate the value of these HIF-PHIs in clinical settings.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Biomarkers; Darbepoetin alfa; Enzyme Inhibitors; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline Dioxygenases; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32561478
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105020