-
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Apr 2023For survivors of childhood cancer treated with doxorubicin, dexrazoxane is cardioprotective for at least 5 years. However, longer-term data are lacking.
PURPOSE
For survivors of childhood cancer treated with doxorubicin, dexrazoxane is cardioprotective for at least 5 years. However, longer-term data are lacking.
METHODS
Within the Children's Oncology Group and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute's Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Consortium, we evaluated four randomized trials of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or Hodgkin lymphoma, who received doxorubicin with or without dexrazoxane, and a nonrandomized trial of patients with osteosarcoma who all received doxorubicin with dexrazoxane. Cumulative doxorubicin doses ranged from 100 to 600 mg/m across these five trials, and dexrazoxane was administered uniformly (10:1 mg/m ratio) as an intravenous bolus before doxorubicin. Cardiac function was prospectively assessed in survivors from these trials, plus a matched group of survivors of osteosarcoma treated with doxorubicin without dexrazoxane. Two-dimensional echocardiograms and blood biomarkers were analyzed centrally in blinded fashion. Multivariate analyses adjusted for demographic characteristics, cumulative doxorubicin dose, and chest radiotherapy determined the differences and associations by dexrazoxane status.
RESULTS
From 49 participating institutions, 195 participants were assessed at 18.1 ± 2.7 years since cancer diagnosis (51% dexrazoxane-exposed; cumulative doxorubicin dose 297 ± 91 mg/m). Dexrazoxane administration was associated with superior left ventricular fractional shortening (absolute difference, +1.4% [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5]) and ejection fraction (absolute difference, +1.6% [95% CI, 0.0 to 3.2]), and lower myocardial stress per B-type natriuretic peptide (-6.7 pg/mL [95% CI, -10.6 to -2.8]). Dexrazoxane was associated with a reduced risk of having lower left ventricular function (fractional shortening < 30% or ejection fraction < 50%; odds ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.81]). This protective association was primarily seen in those treated with cumulative doxorubicin doses ≥ 250 mg/m.
CONCLUSION
Among young adult-aged survivors of childhood cancer, dexrazoxane was associated with a cardioprotective effect nearly 20 years after initial anthracycline exposure.
Topics: Young Adult; Child; Humans; Aged; Dexrazoxane; Cancer Survivors; Doxorubicin; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Osteosarcoma; Bone Neoplasms
PubMed: 36669148
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02423 -
The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health Dec 2022Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, which might be prevented by dexrazoxane. However, concerns exist about the safety of... (Review)
Review
Primary cardioprotection with dexrazoxane in patients with childhood cancer who are expected to receive anthracyclines: recommendations from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group.
Survivors of childhood cancer are at risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, which might be prevented by dexrazoxane. However, concerns exist about the safety of dexrazoxane, and little guidance is available on its use in children. To facilitate global consensus, a working group within the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group reviewed the existing literature and used evidence-based methodology to develop a guideline for dexrazoxane administration in children with cancer who are expected to receive anthracyclines. Recommendations were made in consideration of evidence supporting the balance of potential benefits and harms, and clinical judgement by the expert panel. Given the dose-dependent risk of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, we concluded that the benefits of dexrazoxane probably outweigh the risk of subsequent neoplasms when the cumulative doxorubicin or equivalent dose is at least 250 mg/m (moderate recommendation). No recommendation could be formulated for cumulative doxorubicin or equivalent doses of lower than 250 mg/m, due to insufficient evidence to determine whether the risk of cardiotoxicity outweighs the possible risk of subsequent neoplasms. Further research is encouraged to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of dexrazoxane in children with cancer.
Topics: Humans; Child; Anthracyclines; Dexrazoxane; Neoplasms; Cardiotoxicity; Antineoplastic Agents; Doxorubicin; Polyketides
PubMed: 36174614
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00239-5 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2022This review is the third update of a previously published Cochrane Review. The original review, looking at all possible cardioprotective agents, was split and this part... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This review is the third update of a previously published Cochrane Review. The original review, looking at all possible cardioprotective agents, was split and this part now focuses on dexrazoxane only. Anthracyclines are effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent or reduce this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied, including dexrazoxane.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy of dexrazoxane to prevent or reduce cardiotoxicity and determine possible effects of dexrazoxane on antitumour efficacy, quality of life and toxicities other than cardiac damage in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines when compared to placebo or no additional treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase to May 2021. We also handsearched reference lists, the proceedings of relevant conferences and ongoing trials registers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which dexrazoxane was compared to no additional therapy or placebo in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and GRADE assessment of included studies. We analysed results in adults and children separately. We performed analyses according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
For this update, we identified 548 unique records. We included three additional RCTs: two paediatric and one adult. Therefore, we included a total of 13 eligible RCTs (five paediatric and eight adult). The studies enrolled 1252 children with leukaemia, lymphoma or a solid tumour and 1269 participants, who were mostly diagnosed with breast cancer. In adults, moderate-quality evidence showed that there was less clinical heart failure with the use of dexrazoxane (risk ratio (RR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.43; 7 studies, 1221 adults). In children, we identified no difference in clinical heart failure risk between treatment groups (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.19; 3 studies, 885 children; low-quality evidence). In three paediatric studies assessing cardiomyopathy/heart failure as the primary cause of death, none of the children had this outcome (1008 children, low-quality evidence). In the adult studies, different definitions for subclinical myocardial dysfunction and clinical heart failure combined were used, but pooled analyses were possible: there was a benefit in favour of the use of dexrazoxane (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.56; 3 studies, 417 adults and RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.66; 2 studies, 534 adults, respectively, moderate-quality evidence). In the paediatric studies, definitions of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and clinical heart failure combined were incomparable, making pooling impossible. One paediatric study showed a benefit in favour of dexrazoxane (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.85; 33 children; low-quality evidence), whereas another study showed no difference between treatment groups (Fischer exact P = 0.12; 537 children; very low-quality evidence). Overall survival (OS) was reported in adults and overall mortality in children. The meta-analyses of both outcomes showed no difference between treatment groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% 0.88 to 1.23; 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence; and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 3 studies, 1008 children; low-quality evidence, respectively). Progression-free survival (PFS) was only reported in adults. We subdivided PFS into three analyses based on the comparability of definitions, and identified a longer PFS in favour of dexrazoxane in one study (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.90; 164 adults; low-quality evidence). There was no difference between treatment groups in the other two analyses (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.40; 1 study; low-quality evidence; and HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.43; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence, respectively). In adults, there was no difference in tumour response rate between treatment groups (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.04; 6 studies, 956 adults; moderate-quality evidence). We subdivided tumour response rate in children into two analyses based on the comparability of definitions, and identified no difference between treatment groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07; 1 study, 206 children; very low-quality evidence; and RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.01; 1 study, 200 children; low-quality evidence, respectively). The occurrence of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) was only assessed in children. The available and worst-case analyses were identical and showed a difference in favour of the control group (RR 3.08, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.38; 3 studies, 1015 children; low-quality evidence). In the best-case analysis, the direction of effect was the same, but there was no difference between treatment groups (RR 2.51, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.53; 4 studies, 1220 children; low-quality evidence). For other adverse effects, results also varied. None of the studies evaluated quality of life. If not reported, the number of participants for an analysis was unclear.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analyses showed the efficacy of dexrazoxane in preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults treated with anthracyclines. In children, there was a difference between treatment groups for one cardiac outcome (i.e. for one of the definitions used for clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined) in favour of dexrazoxane. In adults, no evidence of a negative effect on tumour response rate, OS and PFS was identified; and in children, no evidence of a negative effect on tumour response rate and overall mortality was identified. The results for adverse effects varied. In children, dexrazoxane may be associated with a higher risk of SMN; in adults this was not addressed. In adults, the quality of the evidence ranged between moderate and low; in children, it ranged between low and very low. Before definitive conclusions on the use of dexrazoxane can be made, especially in children, more high-quality research is needed. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in children and adults with cancer who are treated with anthracyclines. However, clinicians and patients should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects, including SMN, for each individual. For children, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has developed a clinical practice guideline.
Topics: Adult; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiotoxicity; Child; Dexrazoxane; Heart Failure; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Polyketides; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 36162822
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014638.pub2 -
Cureus Apr 2023Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population with the most common cancer being acute lymphoblastic leukemia. One of the... (Review)
Review
Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population with the most common cancer being acute lymphoblastic leukemia. One of the most common drugs used in the treatment is the anthracycline group of chemotherapeutic agents, and a major side effect is cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane, a member of the cardioprotective agents' group of medications, is the only current FDA-approved medication to tackle cardiotoxicity. The mechanism of action in which dexrazoxane is cardioprotective is by halting necroptosis in cardiomyocytes after anthracycline therapy and concurrently binds with iron and reduces the formation of anthracycline-iron complexes and reactive oxygen species. The efficacy of dexrazoxane has been demonstrated in clinical trials within the pediatric population with roughly 60%-80% reduction in risk of developing cardiotoxicity with a very tolerable and limited side effect profile. Further research is required to not only establish the efficacy of dexrazoxane within the pediatric population but also to explore other medications that may serve alongside the function of dexrazoxane.
PubMed: 37182052
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37308 -
General Pharmacology Jan 19991. Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) is the only clinically approved drug for use in cancer patients to prevent anthracycline mediated cardiotoxicity. 2. The mode of action appears... (Review)
Review
1. Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) is the only clinically approved drug for use in cancer patients to prevent anthracycline mediated cardiotoxicity. 2. The mode of action appears to be mainly due to the potential of the drug to remove iron from iron/anthracycline complexes and thus reduce free radical formation by these complexes. 3. Dexrazoxane also influences cell biology by its ability to inhibit topoisomerase II and its effects on the regulation of cellular iron homeostasis. 4. Although the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with anthracyclines is well documented, the potential of this drug to modulate topoisomerase II activity and cellular iron metabolism may hold the key for future applications of dexrazoxane in cancer therapy, immunology, or infectious diseases.
Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Heart; Humans; Iron; Razoxane; Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
PubMed: 9888268
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-3623(98)00100-1 -
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing :... 2015Anthracyclines are a fundamental part of many childhood cancer therapy regimens; however, the discovery of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity has raised concern and... (Review)
Review
Anthracyclines are a fundamental part of many childhood cancer therapy regimens; however, the discovery of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity has raised concern and led to dose limitation. The cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines has resulted in an increased demand for cardioprotectants. Dexrazoxane is the only cardioprotectant that has proven efficacy in reducing cardiotoxic effects when given prior to the administration of anthracyclines. Currently, it is still considered an "off-label" use due to a paucity of data in the literature on dexrazoxane administration in children. Nevertheless, through evaluation of the available data, dexrazoxane is observed to be safe, tolerable, and efficacious in mitigating the cardiotoxic effects of anthracycline in children, without jeopardizing its antineoplastic activity or increasing the risk of developing secondary malignant neoplasms.
Topics: Adolescent; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiotoxicity; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexrazoxane; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Neoplasms; Protective Agents
PubMed: 25366577
DOI: 10.1177/1043454214554008 -
Pharmacology 2022Doxorubicin (DOX), an anthracycline antitumor agent, has been widely used against various solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, the clinical application...
INTRODUCTION
Doxorubicin (DOX), an anthracycline antitumor agent, has been widely used against various solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, the clinical application of DOX is restricted by its multiple organ toxicity including nephrotoxicity. This study investigated the protective effects and mechanisms of dexrazoxane (DZR) against DOX-induced nephropathy in rats.
METHODS
Male Sprague Dawley rats received 2.5 mg/kg DOX once a week for 5 consecutive weeks. 24-h urinary protein and renal function injury biomarkers were determined to evaluate the renal function. Histopathological changes and glomerulosclerosis were examined by hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff staining. The change of renal ultrastructure in the DOX-induced rats was observed by the electron microscopy. The renal apoptosis was detected by TUNEL staining and measured the protein expression of Caspase-3, Bcl-2, and Bax. Renal interstitial fibrosis was determined by Masson staining and immunohistochemistry examination. The levels of vimentin, alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) in kidney tissue were detected by Western blot.
RESULTS
DZR pretreatment markedly raised the survival rate and improved the renal dysfunction in DOX-treated rats. DZR ameliorated DOX-induced histopathological lesion of glomerular and tubular and apoptosis. DZR restored the oxidant/antioxidant balance via regulating the levels of MDA, SOD, and TAC. DZR reduced DOX-induced collagen IV deposition and renal interstitial fibrosis and downregulated the fibrosis-related protein expressions of vimentin, α-SMA, and TGF-β1.
CONCLUSION
Our results suggest DZR exerted its protective effects against DOX-induced nephropathy through inhibition of lipid peroxidation, apoptosis, and fibrosis.
Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Dexrazoxane; Doxorubicin; Fibrosis; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Transforming Growth Factor beta1
PubMed: 35021174
DOI: 10.1159/000521220 -
Cancer Management and Research 2014For more than half a century, the different properties of dexrazoxane have captured the attention of scientists and clinicians. Presently, dexrazoxane is licensed in... (Review)
Review
For more than half a century, the different properties of dexrazoxane have captured the attention of scientists and clinicians. Presently, dexrazoxane is licensed in many parts of the world for two different indications: prevention of cardiotoxicity from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and prevention of tissue injuries after extravasation of anthracyclines. This article reviews the historical, preclinical, and clinical background for the use of dexrazoxane for these indications.
PubMed: 25246808
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S47238