-
Biochemical and Biophysical Research... Sep 2022Marimastat is one of the potent inhibitors of MMP (MMPIs) with few side effects. The impact of marimastat on cellular senescence remains unexplored. Our study evaluated...
Marimastat is one of the potent inhibitors of MMP (MMPIs) with few side effects. The impact of marimastat on cellular senescence remains unexplored. Our study evaluated the marimastate effect on oxidative stress-induced cell senescence using NIH3T3 cells. Marimastate administration was found to suppress senescence-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity and development linked with aging. Furthermore, we observed that this effect of marimastat was closely linked with the recovery of autophagy dysfunction and mTOR suppression in HO-treated cells. Notably, this study demonstrated the marimastat effect on senescence inhibition for the first time.
Topics: Animals; Autophagy; Cellular Senescence; Hydrogen Peroxide; Hydroxamic Acids; Mice; NIH 3T3 Cells; Oxidative Stress
PubMed: 35780580
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.06.075 -
Drugs in R&D 2003Marimastat [BB 2516, TA 2516] is a second-generation anticancer drug originally developed with British Biotech in Europe and North America. It is an orally active... (Review)
Review
Marimastat [BB 2516, TA 2516] is a second-generation anticancer drug originally developed with British Biotech in Europe and North America. It is an orally active metalloprotease inhibitor of the same class as batimastat, and is the first compound in this class to have completed a pivotal clinical trial. Marimastat also has collagenase- and angiogenesis-inhibiting properties. British Biotech and Schering-Plough have signed an agreement enabling the latter to develop and market marimastat in North America and Europe. Under the terms of the agreement, British Biotech will receive an up-front license fee of 4 million US dollars and a 4 million US dollars equity investment in British Biotech by Schering-Plough. Schering-Plough holds rights to marimastat in all countries other than the Far East and Japan. The two companies are considering asking the FDA for accelerated approval in gastric cancer based on the secondary endpoint of progression-free survival. Marimastat is licensed to Tanabe Seiyaku in Japan, where phase II clinical trials are underway for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer and lung cancer. Further phase II trials in other tumour types are planned. The commencement of phase II trials in Japan resulted in a milestone payment of 5 million US dollars to British Biotech from Tanabe Seiyaku. Tanabe Seiyaku also holds rights to marimastat in the Far East. Marimastat has been in pivotal phase III trials in glioblastoma, breast, ovarian and small and non-small cell lung cancer, but these trials have all been discontinued because marimastat failed to show superior efficacy over either standard chemotherapy or placebo. Results from the marimastat 131 trial in patients with glioblastoma, for example, indicated that marimastat was no better than placebo at prolonging survival in these cancer patients. In June 2000, when the results of this study were released, shares in British Biotech fell 21.6% to just 19 pence per share. The phase III trial in small cell lung cancer was discontinued when the results of study 140 were released in February 2001 showing that marimastat was not significantly more effective than placebo in prolonging the survival of small cell lung cancer patients. The results of this study were consistent with those reported in study 117. British Biotech has also conducted a phase III placebo-controlled study of marimastat as monotherapy in patients with inoperable gastric cancer at 37 centres throughout Europe. Results from this trial indicated that it did not achieve its primary endpoint of a statistically significant survival benefit over placebo. However, data collected during the follow-up period have shown increases in survival benefit in the treatment group in addition to a significant improvement in disease-free progression, the secondary endpoint of the trial. Development of marimastat for this indication is ongoing. In May 2001, British Biotech reported data from an interim analysis of results from the remaining phase III study in pancreatic cancer (study 183) that showed no patient benefit for marimastat recipients compared with gemcitabine. However, these results did not meet stopping criteria and the study continues under the guidance of Schering-Plough. The multicentre trials are being conducted in the US, Canada and the European Union. The phase III trial of marimastat in combination with carboplatin that was being conducted in patients with ovarian cancer was discontinued because British Biotech realised that the design of the trial was insufficient for registration in the US or Europe. Altogether, seven phase III studies have failed to meet their primary end-points, but the company has stated that the effectiveness of marimastat is more likely to be seen in patients with less advanced disease. Phase II trials in prostate and head and neck cancer are still underway in the US.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drugs, Investigational; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids
PubMed: 12757409
DOI: 10.2165/00126839-200304030-00011 -
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1999Marimastat (BB-2516) is the first matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor to have entered clinical trials in the field of oncology. It has excellent bioavailability and has... (Review)
Review
Marimastat (BB-2516) is the first matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor to have entered clinical trials in the field of oncology. It has excellent bioavailability and has completed phase I and II trials. Phase I studies involved healthy volunteers who received short courses of marimastat; these were well tolerated. Symptoms experienced by many patients with various malignancies included severe joint and muscle pain which were debilitating in >60% of patients at doses >50 mg bid. These symptoms were reversible on discontinuation of the drug, and their incidence has been decreased by using marimastat 10 mg bid, the dose used in current studies. Phase II studies involved the use of serum tumor markers as surrogate indicators of antitumor activity. Six studies in colorectal, ovarian, and prostate cancer have been completed and pooled analysis has demonstrated a dose-dependent biological effect (as defined by the authors); 58% of patients respond at doses >50 mg bid. Effects on tumor markers were associated with increased survival. Small phase II studies have suggested potential activity in pancreatic and gastric cancer and have demonstrated the safety of combining cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents with marimastat. Ongoing phase III studies are investigating the effects of marimastat in addition to chemotherapy in the treatment of small cell lung cancer and pancreatic and gastric carcinoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Metalloendopeptidases; Neoplasms
PubMed: 10357560
DOI: 10.1007/s002800051099 -
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Dec 2000Marimastat (BB-2516) is the first orally bioavailable matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor to have entered clinical trials in the field of oncology. It has excellent... (Review)
Review
Marimastat (BB-2516) is the first orally bioavailable matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor to have entered clinical trials in the field of oncology. It has excellent bioavailability and has completed Phase I, II and some Phase III trials. In Phase I studies, which recruited patients with various malignancies, the main toxicity observed was mild to severe joint and muscle pain seen in > 60% of patients receiving a dose of marimastat > 50 mg b.i.d. The symptoms were reversible on discontinuation of the drug and their incidence has been reduced by using marimastat 10 mg b.i.d. In a number of Phase II studies in a variety of tumours, serum tumour markers were used as surrogate determinants of efficacy. Results were interpreted as indicating activity, but this has not yet translated into improved survival in the Phase III studies, which have been completed in pancreatic or gastric carcinoma and glioma. It is likely that these drugs will be most effective in the setting of minimal tumour volume such as in adjuvant treatment or maintenance therapy following response to standard cytotoxics. Therefore, the analysis of Phase III studies in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) where this hypothesis has been tested is awaited with interest. Marimastat can be safely co-administered with conventional cytotoxics and radiotherapy and Phase III studies using these approaches are currently ongoing.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Neoplasms
PubMed: 11093361
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.9.12.2913 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Aug 2001The prognosis for unresectable pancreatic cancer remains dismal (1-year survival rate, < 10%; 5-year survival rate, < 5%). Recent advances in conventional chemotherapy... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
The prognosis for unresectable pancreatic cancer remains dismal (1-year survival rate, < 10%; 5-year survival rate, < 5%). Recent advances in conventional chemotherapy and novel molecular treatment strategies warrant investigation. This, the largest randomized study in pancreatic cancer performed to date, compares marimastat, the first of a new class of agents, with gemcitabine.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Four hundred fourteen patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were randomized to receive marimastat 5, 10, or 25 mg bid or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The primary end point was survival. Progression-free survival, patient benefit, and safety were also assessed.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in survival between 5, 10, or 25 mg of marimastat and gemcitabine (P =.19). Median survival times were 111, 105, 125, and 167 days, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 14%, 14%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival rates between patients treated with gemcitabine and marimastat 5 and 10 mg (P <.003). Both agents were well tolerated, although grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reported in 22% and 12% of the gemcitabine- and marimastat-treated patients, respectively. The major toxicity of marimastat was musculoskeletal (44% of marimastat patients, compared with 12% of gemcitabine patients; musculoskeletal toxicity was severe in only 8% of marimastat patients).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study provide evidence of a dose response for marimastat in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The 1-year survival rate for patients receiving marimastat 25 mg was similar to that of patients receiving gemcitabine. In view of the manageable tolerability of marimastat and its ease of administration, further studies are warranted.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Deoxycytidine; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 11481349
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3447 -
Scientific Reports Dec 2020An intra-hippocampus injection of kainic acid serves as a model of status epilepticus and the subsequent development of temporal lobe epilepsy. Matrix...
An intra-hippocampus injection of kainic acid serves as a model of status epilepticus and the subsequent development of temporal lobe epilepsy. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is an enzyme that controls remodeling of the extracellular milieu under physiological and pathological conditions. In response to brain insult, MMP-9 contributes to pathological synaptic plasticity that may play a role in the progression of an epileptic condition. Marimastat is a metalloproteinase inhibitor that was tested in clinical trials of cancer. The present study assessed whether marimastat can impair the development of epilepsy. The inhibitory efficacy of marimastat was initially tested in neuronal cultures in vitro. As a marker substrate, we used nectin-3. Next, we investigated the blood-brain barrier penetration of marimastat using mass spectrometry and evaluated the therapeutic potential of marimastat against seizure outcomes. We found that marimastat inhibited the cleavage of nectin-3 in hippocampal neuronal cell cultures. Marimastat penetrated the blood-brain barrier and exerted an inhibitory effect on metalloproteinase activity in the brain. Finally, marimastat decreased some seizure parameters, such as seizure score and number, but did not directly affect status epilepticus. The long-term effects of marimastat were evident up to 6 weeks after kainic acid administration, in which marimastat still inhibited seizure duration.
Topics: Animals; Blood-Brain Barrier; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Hydroxamic Acids; Kainic Acid; Male; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Nectins; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 33277582
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78341-y -
British Journal of Cancer Jun 2002This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the ability of the orally administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat,... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the ability of the orally administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, to prolong survival in patients with non-resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Three hundred and sixty-nine patients with histological proof of adenocarcinoma, who had received no more than a single regimen of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, were randomised to receive either marimastat (10 mg b.d.) or placebo. Patients were treated for as long as was tolerable. The primary endpoint was overall survival with secondary endpoints of time to disease progression and quality of life. At the point of protocol-defined study completion (85% mortality in the placebo arm) there was a modest difference in survival in the intention-to-treat population in favour of marimastat (P=0.07 log-rank test, hazard ratio=1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.55)). This survival benefit was maintained over a further 2 years of follow-up (P=0.024, hazard ratio=1.27 (1.03-1.57)). The median survival was 138 days for placebo and 160 days for marimastat, with 2-year survival of 3% and 9% respectively. A significant survival benefit was identified at study completion in the pre-defined sub-group of 123 patients who had received prior chemotherapy (P=0.045, hazard ratio=1.53 (1.00-2.34)). This benefit increased with 2 years additional follow-up (P=0.006, hazard ratio=1.68 (1.16-2.44)), with 2-year survival of 5% and 18% respectively. Progression-free survival was also significantly longer for patients receiving marimastat compared to placebo (P=0.009, hazard ratio=1.32 (1.07-1.63)). Marimastat treatment was associated with the development of musculoskeletal pain and inflammation. Events of anaemia, abdominal pain, jaundice and weight loss were more common in the placebo arm. This is one of the first demonstrations of a therapeutic benefit for a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in cancer patients. The greatest benefit was observed in patients who had previously received chemotherapy. A further randomised study of marimastat in these patients is warranted.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male; Metalloendopeptidases; Middle Aged; Safety; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Tissue Distribution; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 12085177
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600310 -
Computers in Biology and Medicine May 2023The purpose of this study was using bioinformatics tools to identify biomarkers and molecular factors involved in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, which are effective...
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was using bioinformatics tools to identify biomarkers and molecular factors involved in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, which are effective for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.
METHODS
We determined differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to colorectal cancer (CRC) using the data series retrieved from GEO database. Then the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to explore co-expression modules related to CRC diagnosis. Next, the relationship between the integrated modules with clinical features such as the stage of CRC was evaluated. Other downstream analyses were performed on selected module genes.
RESULTS
In this study, after performing the WGCNA method, a module named blue module which was more significantly associated with the CRC stage was selected for further evaluation. Afterward, the Protein-protein interaction network through sting software for 154 genes of the blue module was constructed and eight hub genes were identified through the evaluation of constructed network with Cytoscape. Among these eight hub genes, upregulation of MMP9, SERPINH1, COL1A2, COL5A2, COL1A1, SPARC, and COL5A1 in CRC was validated in other microarray and TCGA data. Based on the results of the mRNA-miRNA interaction network, SERPINH1 was found as a target gene of miR-940. Finally, results of the DGIDB database indicated that Andecaliximab, Carboxylated glucosamine, Marimastat, Tozuleristide, S-3304, Incyclinide, Curcumin, Prinomastat, Demethylwedelolactone, and Bevacizumab, could be used as a therapeutic agent for targeting the MMP9. Furthermore, Ocriplasmin and Collagenase clostridium histolyticum could target COL1A1, COL1A2, COL5A1, and COL5A2.
CONCLUSION
Taken together, the results of the current study indicated that seven hub genes including COL1A2, COL5A1, COL5A2, SERPINH1, MMP9, SPARC, and COL1A1 which were upregulated in CRC could be used as a diagnostic and progression biomarker of CRC. On the other hand, miR-940 which targets SERPINH1 could be used as a potential biomarker of CRC. More ever, Andecaliximab, Carboxylated glucosamine, Marimastat, Tozuleristide, S-3304, Incyclinide, Curcumin, Prinomastat, Demethylwedelolactone, Bevacizumab, Ocriplasmin , and Collagenase clostridium histolyticum were introduced as therapeutic agents for CRC which their therapeutic potential should be evaluated experimentally.
Topics: Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9; Bevacizumab; Curcumin; Microbial Collagenase; MicroRNAs; Biomarkers; Colorectal Neoplasms; Gene Regulatory Networks
PubMed: 36931200
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106779 -
Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1997Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a homologous family of enzymes that are involved in tissue remodeling and morphogenesis. Collectively, these enzymes are capable of... (Review)
Review
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a homologous family of enzymes that are involved in tissue remodeling and morphogenesis. Collectively, these enzymes are capable of degrading all components of the extracellular matrix, and they play an important role in normal physiologic conditions, such as wound healing and other processes involving tissue remodeling. However, increased activity of these enzymes now has been observed in a number of different pathological conditions, and it has been hypothesized that such increased activity of MMPs might play a role in the pathogenesis of these conditions. Cancer is one such condition; extracellular matrices constitute the principal barrier to tumor growth and spread, and there is growing experimental evidence that malignant tumors utilize MMPs to overcome these barriers. Consequently, inhibitors of MMPs represent an attractive target for a new class of anticancer agents. Marimastat and batimastat are potent broad-spectrum inhibitors of all major MMPs and have been shown to prevent or reduce spread and growth of a number of different malignant tumors in numerous animal models. Both agents are now in advanced clinical testing in a number of different solid tumors in North America and Europe. The purpose of this paper is to review available preclinical and emerging clinical data, using batimastat and marimastat as prototype MMP inhibitors in the cancer area.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Hemangioma; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Melanoma; Metalloendopeptidases; Mice; Ovarian Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Phenylalanine; Protease Inhibitors; Skin Neoplasms; Thiophenes
PubMed: 9364582
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-7258(97)00023-5 -
British Journal of Cancer Feb 1999Marimastat is a specific inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases that has been shown to be effective in cancer models. A pilot, escalating-dose study of oral marimastat... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Marimastat is a specific inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases that has been shown to be effective in cancer models. A pilot, escalating-dose study of oral marimastat was performed in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer, in whom evaluation of serological response was made by measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. The study assessed the safety and tolerability of 4 weeks administration of marimastat, and determined a dose range producing detectable serological effects. Patients were recruited with a serum CEA level greater than 5 ng ml(-1), and rising by more than 25% over a 4-week screening period. Patients were treated for 28 days and entered into a continuation protocol if a serological response or clinical benefit was observed. Pharmacokinetic and safety data determined that groups of patients were recruited sequentially at 25 mg and 50 mg twice daily, and, thereafter, 10 mg twice daily, 10 mg once daily, 5 mg once daily and 20 mg once daily. A biological effect (BE) was defined as a CEA value on day 28 no greater than on day 0; a partial biological effect (PBE) was defined as a rise in CEA over the 28-day treatment period of less than 25%. Of 70 patients recruited, 63 completed the 28-day treatment period, and 55 were eligible for cancer antigen analysis. Examination of the dose-effect relationships provides evidence for a causal relationship between marimastat and biological effects: the proportion of patients with BE or PBE was higher with twice daily dosing (16 out of 25, 64%) than with once daily dosing (11 out of 30, 37%) (P = 0.043, chi2 test). Furthermore, the median rates of rise of CEA fell markedly during treatment compared with the screening period for patients receiving twice daily marimastat (P<0.0001), but not for patients receiving marimastat once daily (P = 0.25). Musculoskeletal adverse events emerged as the principal drug-related toxicity of marimastat, occurring in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. It was concluded that marimastat was associated with dose-dependent biological effects in cancer patients. The occurrence of musculoskeletal side-effects define 25 mg twice daily as the upper limit of the dose range for continuous use in further studies. Therefore, a dose range of 20 mg once daily to 25 mg twice daily seems appropriate for further studies, which should aim to demonstrate the efficacy of the drug in terms of conventional clinical end points and describe the long-term tolerability of this novel agent.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoembryonic Antigen; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Hydroxamic Acids; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Pilot Projects; Recurrence
PubMed: 10027321
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690079