-
European Heart Journal Aug 2023To examine the decongestive effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone in patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
To examine the decongestive effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin compared to the thiazide-like diuretic metolazone in patients hospitalized for heart failure and resistant to treatment with intravenous furosemide.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A multi-centre, open-label, randomized, and active-comparator trial. Patients were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or metolazone 5-10 mg once daily for a 3-day treatment period, with follow-up for primary and secondary endpoints until day 5 (96 h). The primary endpoint was a diuretic effect, assessed by change in weight (kg). Secondary endpoints included a change in pulmonary congestion (lung ultrasound), loop diuretic efficiency (weight change per 40 mg of furosemide), and a volume assessment score. 61 patients were randomized. The mean (±standard deviation) cumulative dose of furosemide at 96 h was 977 (±492) mg in the dapagliflozin group and 704 (±428) mg in patients assigned to metolazone. The mean (±standard deviation) decrease in weight at 96 h was 3.0 (2.5) kg with dapagliflozin compared to 3.6 (2.0) kg with metolazone [mean difference 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12,1.41 kg; P = 0.11]. Loop diuretic efficiency was less with dapagliflozin than with metolazone [mean 0.15 (0.12) vs. 0.25 (0.19); difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.17,0.01 kg; P = 0.10]. Changes in pulmonary congestion and volume assessment score were similar between treatments. Decreases in plasma sodium and potassium and increases in urea and creatinine were smaller with dapagliflozin than with metolazone. Serious adverse events were similar between treatments.
CONCLUSION
In patients with heart failure and loop diuretic resistance, dapagliflozin was not more effective at relieving congestion than metolazone. Patients assigned to dapagliflozin received a larger cumulative dose of furosemide but experienced less biochemical upset than those assigned to metolazone.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04860011.
Topics: Humans; Metolazone; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Diuretics; Sodium
PubMed: 37210742
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad341 -
Congestive Heart Failure (Greenwich,... 2003Metolazone is commonly administered in conjunction with a loop diuretic to manage volume overload in patients otherwise resistant to loop diuretic therapy alone.... (Review)
Review
Metolazone is commonly administered in conjunction with a loop diuretic to manage volume overload in patients otherwise resistant to loop diuretic therapy alone. Metolazone is a thiazide-type diuretic that is characterized by slow and sometimes erratic absorption when administered as the Zaroxylyn product. This absorptive profile together with the large volume of distribution and high degree of renal clearance for metolazone provide the pharmacologic basis for a favorable diuretic combination effect. Zaroxylyn should always be administered cautiously and only with a means of surveillance allowing the patient's weight to be carefully monitored so as to avoid excessive diuresis. If an excessive diuresis occurs with a metolazone and loop diuretic combination both drugs should be stopped temporarily. The temptation should be avoided to simply reduce the doses of either metolazone or the loop diuretic as a means to controlling an active diuresis.
Topics: Diuresis; Diuretics; Edema, Cardiac; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Metolazone
PubMed: 12671341
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2003.01907.x -
Biogerontology Feb 2021Accumulating studies have argued that the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR) is a mitochondrial stress response that promotes longevity in model organisms. In...
Accumulating studies have argued that the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR) is a mitochondrial stress response that promotes longevity in model organisms. In the present study, we screened an off-patent drug library to identify compounds that activate UPR using a mitochondrial chaperone hsp-6::GFP reporter system in Caenorhabditis elegans. Metolazone, a diuretic primarily used to treat congestive heart failure and high blood pressure, was identified as a prominent hit as it upregulated hsp-6::GFP and not the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone hsp-4::GFP. Furthermore, metolazone specifically induced the expression of mitochondrial chaperones in the HeLa cell line. Metolazone also extended the lifespan of worms in a atfs-1 and ubl-5-dependent manner. Notably, metolazone failed to increase lifespan in worms with knocked-down nkcc-1. These results suggested that metolazone activates the UPR across species and prolongs the lifespan of C. elegans.
Topics: Animals; Caenorhabditis elegans; Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins; HeLa Cells; Humans; Longevity; Metolazone; Transcription Factors; Ubiquitins
PubMed: 33216250
DOI: 10.1007/s10522-020-09907-6 -
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin Jun 2023Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Xaqua (metolazone) 5mg tablets: exercise caution when switching patients between metolazone preparations....
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Xaqua (metolazone) 5mg tablets: exercise caution when switching patients between metolazone preparations. 2023;16:1.
Topics: Humans; Metolazone; Diuretics; Tablets; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 36813274
DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2023.000010 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... May 2020
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension
PubMed: 32555118
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Cardiac Failure Aug 2022Metolazone and intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide are commonly used diuretics for sequential nephron blockade (SNB) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure...
BACKGROUND
Metolazone and intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide are commonly used diuretics for sequential nephron blockade (SNB) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Previous studies suggest metolazone may be comparable with chlorothiazide in terms of efficacy and safety. The objective of this study was to determine whether IV chlorothiazide is superior to metolazone in increasing net urine output (UOP) of hospitalized patients with ADHF.
METHODS AND RESULTS
This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients with ADHF and evidence of loop diuretic resistance in a tertiary academic medical center. The primary end point was the change in net 24-hour UOP in patients treated with IV chlorothiazide compared with metolazone. The relative cost of chlorothiazide doses and metolazone doses administered during SNB was a notable secondary end point. The median change in net 24-hour UOP in the IV chlorothiazide group was -1481.9 mL (interquartile range -2696.0 to -641.0 mL) and -1780.0 mL (interquartile range -3084.5 to -853.5 mL) in the metolazone group (P = .05) across 220 hospital encounters. The median cost of chlorothiazide and metolazone doses used during SNB was $360 and $4, respectively (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS
Chlorothiazide was not superior to metolazone in changing the net 24-hour UOP of patients with ADHF and loop resistance. Preferential metolazone use in SNB is a potential cost-saving measure.
Topics: Chlorothiazide; Diuretics; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Metolazone; Nephrons; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35688407
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.05.011 -
Nephrology Nursing Journal : Journal of... 2006
Review
Topics: Diuretics; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Edema; Evidence-Based Medicine; Furosemide; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Metolazone; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 16538931
DOI: No ID Found -
JACC. Heart Failure Mar 2020This study compared combination diuretic strategies in acute heart failure (AHF) complicated by diuretic resistance (DR). (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
This study compared combination diuretic strategies in acute heart failure (AHF) complicated by diuretic resistance (DR).
BACKGROUND
Combination diuretic regimens to overcome loop DR are commonly used but with limited evidence.
METHODS
This study was a randomized, double-blinded trial in 60 patients hospitalized with AHF and intravenous (IV) loop DR. Patients were randomized to oral metolazone, IV chlorothiazide, or tolvaptan therapy. All patients received concomitant high-dose IV infusions of furosemide. The primary outcome was 48-h weight loss.
RESULTS
The cohort exhibited DR prior to enrollment, producing 1,188 ± 476 ml of urine in 12 h during high-dose loop diuretic therapy (IV furosemide: 612 ± 439 mg/day). All 3 interventions significantly improved diuretic efficacy (p < 0.001). Compared to metolazone (4.6 ± 2.7 kg), neither IV chlorothiazide (5.8 ± 2.7 kg; 1.2 kg [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -2.9 to 0.6; p = 0.292) nor tolvaptan (4.1 ± 3.3 kg; 0.5 kg [95% CI: -1.5 to 2.4; p = 0.456) resulted in more weight loss at 48 h. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) cumulative urine output increased significantly and did not differ among those receiving metolazone (7.78 [IQR: 6.59 to 10.10] l) and chlorothiazide (8.77 [IQR: 7.37 to 10.86] l; p = 0.245) or tolvaptan (9.70 [IQR: 6.36 to 13.81] l; p = 0.160). Serum sodium decreased less with tolvaptan than with metolazone (+4 ± 5 vs. -1 ± 3 mEq/l; p = 0.001), but 48-h spot urine sodium was lower with tolvaptan (58 ± 25 mmol/l) than with metolazone (104 ± 16 mmol/l; p = 0.002) and with chlorothiazide (117 ± 14 mmol/l; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
In this moderately sized DR trial, weight loss was excellent with the addition of metolazone, IV chlorothiazide, or tolvaptan to loop diuretics, without a detectable between-group difference. (Comparison of Oral or Intravenous Thiazides vs. tolvaptan in Diuretic Resistant Decompensated Heart Failure [3T]; NCT02606253).
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Chlorothiazide; Diuretics; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Metolazone; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Tolvaptan; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31838029
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.012