-
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in... Aug 2016β-Lactams are the most widely used class of antibiotics. Since the discovery of benzylpenicillin in the 1920s, thousands of new penicillin derivatives and related... (Review)
Review
β-Lactams are the most widely used class of antibiotics. Since the discovery of benzylpenicillin in the 1920s, thousands of new penicillin derivatives and related β-lactam classes of cephalosporins, cephamycins, monobactams, and carbapenems have been discovered. Each new class of β-lactam has been developed either to increase the spectrum of activity to include additional bacterial species or to address specific resistance mechanisms that have arisen in the targeted bacterial population. Resistance to β-lactams is primarily because of bacterially produced β-lactamase enzymes that hydrolyze the β-lactam ring, thereby inactivating the drug. The newest effort to circumvent resistance is the development of novel broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors that work against many problematic β-lactamases, including cephalosporinases and serine-based carbapenemases, which severely limit therapeutic options. This work provides a comprehensive overview of β-lactam antibiotics that are currently in use, as well as a look ahead to several new compounds that are in the development pipeline.
Topics: Carbapenems; Cephalosporins; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Monobactams; Penicillins; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors
PubMed: 27329032
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a025247 -
JAMA Jul 2023Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug...
IMPORTANCE
Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events.
RESULTS
All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Meropenem; Shock, Septic; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Sepsis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Monobactams; Hypersensitivity
PubMed: 37326473
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.10598 -
Advances in Applied Microbiology 1986
Review
Topics: Acetobacter; Aztreonam; Chemical Phenomena; Chemistry; Drug Synergism; Glycopeptides; Monobactams
PubMed: 3521210
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2164(08)70442-8 -
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Nov 1991The monobactam antibiotics are synthetic compounds, although monocyclic beta-lactam compounds have been found in nature in various soil bacteria. Although additional... (Review)
Review
The monobactam antibiotics are synthetic compounds, although monocyclic beta-lactam compounds have been found in nature in various soil bacteria. Although additional orally and parenterally administered monobactams are under investigation, the first marketed monobactam was aztreonam. This agent has an antimicrobial spectrum similar to that of gentamicin and tobramycin, aminoglycoside antibiotics. Aztreonam, however, is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; absorption after oral administration is poor. The primary route of elimination is the urine. The serum half-life of the drug in patients with normal renal function is 1.5 to 2.1 hours; the recommended dosing interval in patients with normal renal function is every 8 hours. Dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal impairment. The strictly gram-negative aerobic spectrum of aztreonam limits its use as a single empiric agent. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism (or organisms) has been determined in patients who are seriously ill and at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infections.
Topics: Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Monobactams; Safety; Tissue Distribution
PubMed: 1943248
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65797-8 -
Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1985A novel procedure designed to detect naturally occurring beta-lactam-containing molecules led to isolation of the monobactams - structurally unique, bacterially... (Review)
Review
A novel procedure designed to detect naturally occurring beta-lactam-containing molecules led to isolation of the monobactams - structurally unique, bacterially produced, monocyclic beta-lactam antibiotics. Although none of these monobactams exhibited impressive antimicrobial activity, side-chain variation - as with the penicillins and cephalosporins - resulted in potently active compounds. Aztreonam was chosen from hundreds of compounds for extended laboratory studies. In addition to a unique chemical structure, aztreonam has biologic properties that are unique in comparison with those of the classical penicillins and cephalosporins. Aztreonam is relatively inactive against gram-positive bacteria and anaerobes but is extremely effective against aerobic gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The drug is highly resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis by beta-lactamases, particularly those known to be mediated by R plasmids, and is a poor inducer of chromosomal beta-lactamases. In the majority of drug combinations tested, aztreonam exhibits additive or synergistic activity. In a series of animal-model infections, the drug showed a high degree of efficacy that was consistent with findings in studies in vitro. In a hamster model for Clostridium difficile-induced pseudomembranous colitis, aztreonam did not induce any significant changes.
Topics: Animals; Aztreonam; Bacterial Infections; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Enterobacteriaceae; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Intestines; Monobactams; Structure-Activity Relationship; Technology, Pharmaceutical; beta-Lactamases
PubMed: 3909315
DOI: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_4.s579 -
Actas Urologicas Espanolas 1988
-
Drug Safety May 1995Monobactams and carbapenems are 2 classes of beta-lactam antibiotics that were introduced in the 1980s. This review considers the monobactam aztreonam and the... (Review)
Review
Monobactams and carbapenems are 2 classes of beta-lactam antibiotics that were introduced in the 1980s. This review considers the monobactam aztreonam and the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem. Imipenem is administered together with cilastatin, which inhibits the enzymatic breakdown of imipenem in the kidney. The antibacterial activities of these drugs are quite different from older beta-lactams. Aztreonam is directed towards aerobic Gram-negative bacteria, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while imipenem and meropenem are active against both aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, these drugs should be reserved for patients who have a special need for them. They are also structurally different from older beta-lactams and possess different adverse drug reaction profiles. It was initially suggested that aztreonam would be less immunogenic than previous beta-lactams because reactive breakdown products acting as haptens are less likely to be formed. Clinical reports now support this assumption, and, in particular, cross hypersensitivity between aztreonam and other beta-lactams seems to be rare which makes the drug a useful therapeutic alternative. However, hypersensitivity to aztreonam does occur. The predominant concern in terms of adverse reactions to imipenem/cilastatin is the increased tendency to cause seizures compared with other beta-lactams. The risk of producing a seizure is highly associated with inadequate dose adjustment in relation to kidney function. If appropriate care is taken, seizures occur in less than 1% of patients treated. However, it is possible that concomitant administration of other drugs with neurotoxic profiles (e.g. theophylline and cyclosporin) given in overdose, may increase the risk of seizures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Topics: Animals; Carbapenems; Humans; Monobactams
PubMed: 7669260
DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199512050-00003 -
JAMA Jul 2023
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Critical Illness; Infusions, Intravenous; Monobactams; Sepsis; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors
PubMed: 37326478
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.6483 -
Mayo Clinic Proceedings Apr 1999Imipenem and meropenem, members of the carbapenem class of beta-lactam antibiotics, are among the most broadly active antibiotics available for systemic use in humans.... (Review)
Review
Imipenem and meropenem, members of the carbapenem class of beta-lactam antibiotics, are among the most broadly active antibiotics available for systemic use in humans. They are active against streptococci, methicillin-sensitive staphylococci, Neisseria, Haemophilus, anaerobes, and the common aerobic gram-negative nosocomial pathogens including Pseudomonas. Resistance to imipenem and meropenem may emerge during treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, as has occurred with other beta-lactam agents; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is typically resistant to both imipenem and meropenem. Like the penicillins, the carbapenems have inhibitory activity against enterococci. In general, the in vitro activity of imipenem against aerobic gram-positive cocci is somewhat greater than that of meropenem, whereas the in vitro activity of meropenem against aerobic gram-negative bacilli is somewhat greater than that of imipenem. Daily dosages may range from 0.5 to 1 g every 6 to 8 hours in patients with normal renal function; the daily dose of meropenem, however, can be safely increased to 6 g. Infusion-related nausea and vomiting, as well as seizures, which have been the main toxic effects of imipenem, occur no more frequently during treatment with meropenem than during treatment with other beta-lactam antibiotics. The carbapenems should be considered for treatment of mixed bacterial infections and aerobic gram-negative bacteria that are not susceptible to other beta-lactam agents. Indiscriminate use of these drugs will promote resistance to them. Aztreonam, the first marketed monobactam, has activity against most aerobic gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa. The drug is not nephrotoxic, is weakly immunogenic, and has not been associated with disorders of coagulation. Aztreonam may be administered intramuscularly or intravenously; the primary route of elimination is urinary excretion. In patients with normal renal function, the recommended dosing interval is every 8 hours. Patients with renal impairment require dosage adjustment. Aztreonam is used primarily as an alternative to aminoglycosides and for the treatment of aerobic gram-negative infections. It is often used in combination therapy for mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Approved indications for its use include infections of the urinary tract or lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections, septicemia, and cutaneous infections caused by susceptible organisms. Concurrent initial therapy with other antimicrobial agents is recommended before the causative organism has been determined in patients who are seriously ill or at risk for gram-positive or anaerobic infection.
Topics: Aztreonam; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Monobactams; Thienamycins
PubMed: 10221472
DOI: 10.4065/74.4.420 -
Infection 1999During the last decade improved clinical and microbiological methods have resulted in the realization that most intraabdominal infections involve both aerobic and... (Review)
Review
During the last decade improved clinical and microbiological methods have resulted in the realization that most intraabdominal infections involve both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Papers on the use of different antimicrobial agents directed against the polymicrobial flora of the infected site have been published. In this paper the use of monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections is reviewed. The review is based on data published since 1990. Three hundred forty-four patients participated in three trials where aztreonam combined with clindamycin was compared with other antimicrobial agents for treatment of intraabdominal infections. Eighty-six percent of the patients receiving aztreonam plus clindamycin were cured/improved, while 83% of the patients receiving the comparative drugs had favorable outcomes. Eleven trials compared imipenem/cilastatin versus other antimicrobial combinations for therapy of intraabdominal infections. One thousand three hundred seventy-five patients were evaluated in the trials. Eighty percent of patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin had favorable outcomes, while 81% of the patients receiving the comparative drugs were cured/improved. Nine studies including 1,205 patients for evaluation of meropenem versus other antimicrobial agents in the treatment of intraabdominal infections have been published. Cure/improvement was seen in 96% of the patients treated with meropenem and in 91% receiving the comparative drugs. One trial has been published comparing biapenem with imipenem/cilastatin for treatment of intraabdominal infections. Eighty-three patients participated, 65% of the patients in the biapenem group were cured/improved and 68% in the imipenem/cilastatin group.
Topics: Abdomen; Aztreonam; Bacterial Infections; Carbapenems; Cilastatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Monobactams; Protease Inhibitors; Thienamycins
PubMed: 10219648
DOI: 10.1007/BF02560517